Tuesday, February 23rd 2010

ATI Radeon HD 5830 Specifications Surface

AMD's new performance graphics card that targets an upper-mainstream price-point, the Radeon HD 5830, is slated for February 25. A set of company slides sourced by IT168.com shows the GPU's specifications are in tune with what we expected. The HD 5830 is based on AMD's Cypress 40 nm GPU. It has 1120 stream processors, a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, 16 ROPs, 56 TMUs, and clock speeds of 800 MHz (core) and 1000 MHz (memory). The memory bandwidth on the card is 128 GB/s, on par with that of the Radeon HD 5850. The core clock speed is slightly higher, too.

With a GPU of these specifications, AMD targets the market price-range of $200-$250, where there's room for a DirectX 11 generation graphics card to be positioned between the Radeon HD 5770 and Radeon HD 5850. The maximum board power of the card is slightly higher than that of the HD 5850, but we think that's because reference designs - if there are - might not use high-grade digital PWM circuitry. That typically shouldn't affect overclocking headroom a big deal.
The Radeon HD 5830 further has 1 GB of memory, and supports ATI Eyefinity technology. With the same display controllers as on the Radeon HD 5870, the card can support up to six physical displays. AMD's add-in board partners should be able to release non-reference design graphics cards right away, so you wouldn't have to wait any further for a PCS+, the VaporX, or the IceQ+.
Source: IT168
Add your own comment

72 Comments on ATI Radeon HD 5830 Specifications Surface

#51
TheGuruStud
DonInKansasYou know, where the 5850 was when it originally launched. :laugh:
Haha, yeah, but the exorbitant prices confirm that the 5850 kicks ass :rockout:

Maybe ATI figured Nvidia would snap into gear and release fermi :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#52
Nick89
TheGuruStudSuch nice coolers on a sub par card makes baby jeebus cry.
You know what else makes baby jeebus cry? Gimmicks.
Posted on Reply
#53
TheGuruStud
Nick89You know what else makes baby jeebus cry? Gimmicks.
It's just :banghead: You can buy the good card and not receive such a cooler, but the redheaded step child does. :mad:
Posted on Reply
#54
theorw
ZubasaThe problem is the 5850 is now the 4770 of the HD5k series.
It is simply too fast if you look at that compare to the 5870.


The 5830 still out perform any 5700 at stock clocks ;)
What makes you think that a 5830 will not overclock just as well (if not better) than the 5850? :p
i was proved RIGHT wasnt i?
Only 5% difference on STOCK speeds from 5770 means 2 5770s WILL pawn 5830 for 50EUR more and the satisfaction of XFIRE:nutkick:
Posted on Reply
#55
pantherx12
Hell get a 5770 with a decent cooler and they do 1ghz core speed anyways ( taking them up to very similar performance levels)

5830s are like the lottery I guess lol you could get an epic one but you could get an awful one.

( In the UK 5830s could be worth it as if you buy online you can rma the item within 14 days just because you don't like it, then just buy from another shop, repeat until you get an epic one!)
Posted on Reply
#56
theorw
pantherx12Hell get a 5770 with a decent cooler and they do 1ghz core speed anyways ( taking them up to very similar performance levels)

5830s are like the lottery I guess lol you could get an epic one but you could get an awful one.

( In the UK 5830s could be worth it as if you buy online you can rma the item within 14 days just because you don't like it, then just buy from another shop, repeat until you get an epic one!)
U can do the same here except u cant buy from another shop...
But what i do is OC a card then if it wont OC nice i RMA it (bios flash...ahem) to a maximum of 3 times and if i am lucky i find one that OC well;)
Posted on Reply
#57
DonInKansas
theorwi was proved RIGHT wasnt i?
Only 5% difference on STOCK speeds from 5770 means 2 5770s WILL pawn 5830 for 50EUR more and the satisfaction of XFIRE:nutkick:
If you look at any review, CF 5770s will run with a 5870. 5830 never stood a chance.
Posted on Reply
#58
Athlonite
almost makes me want to buy one just get the cooler for my 5770 LOL
Posted on Reply
#59
Nick89
theorwi was proved RIGHT wasnt i?
Only 5% difference on STOCK speeds from 5770 means 2 5770s WILL pawn 5830 for 50EUR more and the satisfaction of XFIRE:nutkick:
There is no satisfaction from Xfire, I know cause I use it. And 2 5770's will get their ass's kicked most of the time because the performance increase with Xfire is non existent in most games except those that support crossfire properly.

A lot of PC games don't support crossfire properly because a lot of them are console ports these days.
Posted on Reply
#60
TheGuruStud
Nick89There is no satisfaction from Xfire, I know cause I use it. And 2 5770's will get their ass's kicked most of the time because the performance increase with Xfire is non existent in most games except those that support crossfire properly.

A lot of PC games don't support crossfire properly because a lot of them are console ports these days.
But on the other hand...the console ports are POS and the graphics suck, so you don't need a fast card :D
Posted on Reply
#61
Nick89
TheGuruStudBut on the other hand...the console ports are POS and the graphics suck, so you don't need a fast card :D
You ever play GTA 4 PC?
Posted on Reply
#62
TheGuruStud
Nick89You ever play GTA 4 PC?
Yeah, it looked...okay. I know it was limited b/c of hardware, but that's probably the only game that doesn't fall in line with console ports being easy to render. Bioshock 2 was a massive let down in texture resolution. It was almost depressing. Pretty water effects and blurry walls. Screw consoles.
Posted on Reply
#63
zithe
TheGuruStudBut on the other hand...the console ports are POS and the graphics suck, so you need a fast card :D
Fixed.
Posted on Reply
#64
Nick89
zitheFixed.
And you only need a fast card because they aren't optimized.
Posted on Reply
#65
Meizuman
There is no way I would consider buying one to replace my 4850... I checked for prices in Germany , and 5830 was only about 15-30€ cheaper. This is madness.

Also the prices of 5830 are 235-249€ whereas 5850 goes for 265-300€

5770 is also faster un OC'd in some few titles. 4890 is faster by a margin. U can still get 4890 for about 200€ or lower (used) so I really can't justice buying one.
Posted on Reply
#66
[I.R.A]_FBi
5850 prices went UP on the egg, bumboclaat man
Posted on Reply
#67
zithe
[I.R.A]_FBi5850 prices went UP on the egg, bumboclaat man
Cheaper ones are out of stock. :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#68
[I.R.A]_FBi
zitheCheaper ones are out of stock. :laugh:
I wonder why ...
Posted on Reply
#69
MKmods
Case Mod Guru
[I.R.A]_FBi5850 prices went UP on the egg, bumboclaat man
it looks like Nvidia cards may be so expensive ATI felt the need to raise the prices on all their cards...

The ATI stuff seems a lot more $ than they were a few mos ago:rolleyes:
www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102879
FTL!

(I thought there was an article a while back that mentioned ATI and Nvidia working together to keep prices up)
Posted on Reply
#70
TheGuruStud
MKmodsit looks like Nvidia cards may be so expensive ATI felt the need to raise the prices on all their cards...

The ATI stuff seems a lot more $$ than they were a few mos ago
Retailers jackin prices more than anything, IMO. The prices jump as soon as the demand does.
Posted on Reply
#72
MKmods
Case Mod Guru
LOL, I would like it even better if it was $199.

also are those cards the same length as a 5870? (I thought I read in one of the things that the 5830 was built using messed up 5870s)
If so that would make it too long to be useful to me.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 18th, 2024 22:26 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts