Friday, March 5th 2010
Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 Pictured
At the ongoing CeBIT event, Gigabyte showed off its latest offer of motherboards including an interesting one based on AMD's upcoming 890FX chipset. Made for socket AM3 processors from AMD, the GA-890FXA-UD5 is based on the AMD 890FX chipset with SB850 southbridge. It expands a little on the chipset's features. The CPU is powered by a 10-phase VRM. It is wired to four DDR3 memory slots that are powered by a 2-phase VRM. The AMD 890FX drives four PCI-Express 2.0 x16 slots (electrical x8 when all are populated, x16 on alternate slots otherwise). There are two PCI-E x1 and one PCI. All six of the SATA 6 Gb/s ports from the southbridge are internal, while an additional GSATA2 controller gives out two SATA 3 Gb/s ports, and drives the IDE connector. Connectivity options include 8+2 channel audio with Dolby Home Theater, two gigabit Ethernet interfaces, FireWire, and two USB 3.0 ports, apart from a number of USB 2.0 ports. The board is expected to release later next month.
Source:
PC Watch
32 Comments on Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 Pictured
why? who would like 8x SATA 6Gbps ports instead of 6x SATA 6Gbps + 2x SATA 3Gbps :p
Still makes me laugh though. :laugh:
EDIT: 500th post woohoo!!
Not really a big deal yet, but why not do it anyways Gigabyte :shadedshu
still looking for a 10-12 port board from gigabyte.
Top one blocked by heatsink, lower one blocked by dual-slot GPU.
:(
PS Floppy Drive FTW! I still have one!
It was logical that this board was coming. What surprised me was when they released the GA-790FXTA-UD5, which has the same feature set. I sure hope some reviewer compares the two. (I know that the 890's will be the best going forward, I was just surprised that Gigabyte took the 790FX and made a "890FX version" with SATA6 and USB3.)
Damn it, that temporary storage area on my brain is erased, can't remember what it is :D
Oh yeah, the whole wasted PCI-e x1 slot is retarded too. Asus has started moving away from it and Gigabyte seems to be the only major mobo maker who is sticking with it. It is just dumb to arranged the heatsink and that PCI-e x1 slot that way.