T4C Fantasythis is a hd7890 just so you all know, its Tahiti le and a stock clock for 7870 is 1ghz so just look at the facts a 7890 with a different name

btarunrThere is no "HD 7890". It's going to be called "HD 7870" officially, and "HD 7870-1536SP" in bargainese (universal buyer language).

T4C Fantasythis is a hd7890 just so you all know, its Tahiti le and a stock clock for 7870 is 1ghz so just look at the facts a 7890 with a different name

T4C Fantasysuch bad marketing look at this
www.club-3d.com/index.php/products/reader.en/product/radeon-hd-7870-jokercard.html
same name

CasecutterWell, btarunr you post it then figure it out, don't you proof read your own stuff?

And WOW Club is stupid not to differentiate this from a 7870, I mean why wouldn’t you want to make it appear to make a clear distinction. It’s got Boost, more Shaders, but then just the 2Gb on 256-Bit dang-it. I’d rather had the 384-Bit with 2Gb the extra Shaders and no Boost, as I would want to OC anyway...
I hope other AIB’s do it different, but I don’t think so.


Thats saying... CGAX-7876DS - PCI Express 3.0 - 2048MB - GDDR5 - 256 BIT, 1000 MHz GPU clock speed - 1280 Stream processors - 4800 MHz Memory clock speed - Dual CrossFire - CoolStream high performance cooling

While btarunr like has it a as... CGAX-7876XT - PCI Express 3.0 - 2048MB - GDDR5 - 256 BIT 925 MHz GPU clock speed - 975 MHz GPU Boost clock speed - Stream processors - 6000 MHz Memory clock speed - Dual CrossFire - CoolStream high performance cooling - Overclock


Maybe they intend two Joker's for us?

VinskaThat joker on the box... looks tasty. I mean, hawt. :p

p.s. Do I see "16 Year warranty" in the upper left corner of the box? :wtf:

RCoonanybody who uses that in 16 years time and THEN has a failure, and proceeds to claim for a replacement... is my hero

RCoonanybody who uses that in 16 years time and THEN has a failure, and proceeds to claim for a replacement... is my hero

DSthis card is a "Joke" :roll:

alwayssts210w powertune? So we can infer 175w TDP stock...exact same as 660ti (after tdp boost or whatever it's called)...ick for stock efficiency if that's true. That said, stock voltage is prolly through the damn roof like 7950 BE so they can use as many chips as possible.

Probably performs close to a stock 660ti at stock 670 power for 660 price, if you want a flat comparison. Shows that amd could sure use a chip 75% the size of tahiti, that's for sure.

With 210w though (7870 is 170w max...7950 200w...7950 BE 225w) it should overclock pretty darn well given the lower utilization of shaders, less ram, and disabled mem controllers versus even 7950 Original Gangsta edition.

At the end of the day, sounds like what we thought it would be...A cheaper alternative to the 660ti that probably performs similar stock/overclocked but uses more power.

The most interesting stand out from this evaluation has been the NVIDIA GTX 660 Ti, which is priced significantly higher than the Radeon HD 7870 while turning in similar performance numbers. The GTX 660 Ti has lost its value at this point in time, lending way to the Radeon HD 7950 which has benefited from falling prices and new drivers.

cdawallWhich part is the joke? It is faster than a 7870 and slower than a 7950?