Monday, December 7th 2015

ASRock Intros Cost-Effective Z170X1-3.1 Motherboard with USB 3.1

by
btarunr
 Discuss (20 Comments)
ASRock unveiled one of the first sub-$100 socket LGA1151 motherboards with USB 3.1 ports, the Z170A-X1/3.1. This narrow ATX board can seat 6th generation Core "Skylake" processors, with support for up to 64 GB of dual-channel DDR4 memory, at speeds of up to DDR4-3400 MHz via overclocking. The board draws power from a combination of 24-pin ATX and 8-pin EPS power connectors, and uses a simple 5-phase VRM to condition it for the CPU.

Expansion slots on the Z170A-X1/3.1 include one PCI-Express 3.0 x16 wired to the CPU, a PCIe 3.0 x16 (electrical x4), wired to the Z170 PCH, and three other PCIe 3.0 x1 ports. Storage connectivity includes six SATA 6 Gb/s ports. The centerpiece of this board's feature-set is its pair of 10 Gb/s USB 3.1 ports, including a type-A, and a type-C. There are eight other USB 3.0 ports, six on the rear panel, two by headers. Gigabit Ethernet, driven by an Intel-made controller, and 6-channel HD audio with ground layer isolation, make for the rest of it. ASRock is eyeing a sub-$100 price point.

Related News

Add your own comment

20 Comments on ASRock Intros Cost-Effective Z170X1-3.1 Motherboard with USB 3.1

#1
micropage7
looks like over sharpening btw why they put wheels on that, to make it running faster?
Posted on Reply
#2
hojnikb
Whats the point of 8pin cpu power connector, if VRMs are not powerful enough to take advantage of that ?

Other than that, seems like a nice board. Hopefully they make a cheap h110 board with decent functionally (like their previous HDS series).
Posted on Reply
#3
Ferrum Master
hojnikbWhats the point of 8pin cpu power connector, if VRMs are not powerful enough to take advantage of that ?

Other than that, seems like a nice board. Hopefully they make a cheap h110 board with decent functionally (like their previous HDS series).
Less voltage drop, lower resistance. More secure and mechanically safe. A wise engineering choice IMHO.
Posted on Reply
#4
AsRock
TPU addict
micropage7looks like over sharpening btw why they put wheels on that, to make it running faster?
Yeah strips are not as fast as wheels.

Don't like the SATA connectors so i would not be buying it if i was in the market, although nice to see a <$100 from them.
Posted on Reply
#5
Ferrum Master
AsRockYeah strips are not as fast as wheels.

Don't like the SATA connectors so i would not be buying it if i was in the market, although nice to see a <$100 from them.
There is no front USB3 header too... gosh...
Posted on Reply
#6
GhostRyder
Ferrum MasterThere is no front USB3 header too... gosh...
There is a USB 3.0 front header on the board, look between the top PCIE 16x and memory slots.

Eh, nice to see a budget board on the platform that still supports overclocking. Though I am not a big fan of the copper look on the board but that's just my opinion.
Posted on Reply
#7
Ferrum Master
GhostRyderThere is a USB 3.0 front header on the board, look between the top PCIE 16x and memory slots.

Eh, nice to see a budget board on the platform that still supports overclocking. Though I am not a big fan of the copper look on the board but that's just my opinion.
It just can't be more retarded placed.
Posted on Reply
#8
n-ster
Lack of M.2 forcing you to use a PCIe card for NVMe is a bit of a bummer, as I like to relegate my old SSDs to laptops usually, but otherwise looks like a solid choice in the Z170 series. 1 x16 PCIe for GPU, 1 for NVMe SSD, x1 for Wi-Fi if needed. Looks well built, but as said, with these SATA ports and USB3 header, this isn't meant for Windowed case as much it seems
Posted on Reply
#9
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
I like seeing 4 DIMM slots on a budget board. Too often cutting two of the DIMM slots is the first thing they do to save money.
n-sterLack of M.2 forcing you to use a PCIe card for NVMe is a bit of a bummer, as I like to relegate my old SSDs to laptops usually,
I don't really see a lot of people buying expensive PCIe based NVMe SSDs to put in a sub-$100 motherboard. If you are going to do that, spend a little bit more on a better board.
Posted on Reply
#10
Ferrum Master
And I only see 3 FAN headers... really? Only one around CPU, none for exhaust fan, and two for the front intakes?
Posted on Reply
#11
n-ster
newtekie1I don't really see a lot of people buying expensive PCIe based NVMe SSDs to put in a sub-$100 motherboard. If you are going to do that, spend a little bit more on a better board.
Even so, I like using the M.2 SATA for budget boards, a M.2 850 EVO would be perfect for a build with this Mobo and could be easily relegated to laptop duties in the future
Ferrum MasterAnd I only see 3 FAN headers... really? Only one around CPU, none for exhaust fan, and two for the front intakes?
That is a bummer indeed, I think it's 1 exhaust 1 intake and 1 CPU in their minds perhaps? Placement for the exhaust fan isn't great but still doable I guess.
Posted on Reply
#12
natr0n
I kinda like it minimal.
Posted on Reply
#13
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
n-sterEven so, I like using the M.2 SATA for budget boards, a M.2 850 EVO would be perfect for a build with this Mobo and could be easily relegated to laptop duties in the future
Yeah, but the 2.5" version pretty much fits the same idea. Unless you are using it to upgrade an ultra-slim, but those are moving towards permanant soldered drives on the system board.
Posted on Reply
#14
[502]
Can't complain anything for that price and features, though I'd prefer those heatsinks be painted black instead of copper.
Posted on Reply
#15
GhostRyder
I agree with @newtekie1 , its a budget board so expecting someone to fork over for an NVMe SSD. Regular SSD's are cheaper which would fit the criteria for someone looking at this board.

Its a great budget board, I just think the copper stands out more than I would prefer on the board but other than that its a great value.
Posted on Reply
#16
SimpleTECH
If Intel wasn't charging so much for their chipset design, this board would easily sell for under $70 considering how minimal stuff is on there.
Posted on Reply
#17
ironwolf
Ferrum MasterIt just can't be more retarded placed.
Sure it could have: between the two PCIe x16 slots just next to the chipset/heatsink. :roll:
Posted on Reply
#18
The Von Matrices
newtekie1I like seeing 4 DIMM slots on a budget board. Too often cutting two of the DIMM slots is the first thing they do to save money.
That's due to Intel, not the motherboard manufacturers. H81 and H110 are limited to one DIMM per channel, so you will never see more than two DIMM slots on a cheap Intel board.
Posted on Reply
#19
GC_PaNzerFIN
SimpleTECHIf Intel wasn't charging so much for their chipset design, this board would easily sell for under $70 considering how minimal stuff is on there.
Would you prefer motherboard being cramped full of ICs and chipset being cheap? I mean, surely you do not expect to get all the IP licenses/patents/design work/etc. that goes to making that highly integrated chipset for free. :)
Posted on Reply
#20
hojnikb
The Von MatricesThat's due to Intel, not the motherboard manufacturers. H81 and H110 are limited to one DIMM per channel, so you will never see more than two DIMM slots on a cheap Intel board.
*khm* Asus H81-Gamer *khm*

Although its still limited to 16GB of overall ram.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 17th, 2024 21:12 EST change timezone

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts