Tuesday, February 2nd 2016

AMD Zen Architecture Supports Up to 32 Cores per Socket: Leaked Linux Patch

AMD's next-generation "Zen" x86-64 CPU micro-architecture will support up to 32 cores per socket, according to leaked Linux kernel patch on LKML. We know from older reports, that AMD clumps groups of four cores in subunits it calls "Zen quad-core units." Not to be confused with its current "module" design, a quad-core unit is a group of four completely independent cores, which share nothing other than an L3 cache. TechFrag used this bit to deduce that the "Zen" architecture is scalable up to eight quad-core units per socket, or 32 cores per socket.
Source: TechFrag
Add your own comment

46 Comments on AMD Zen Architecture Supports Up to 32 Cores per Socket: Leaked Linux Patch

#26
bubbleawsome
alucasaPersonally, I can use up to only 8 threads. So, if Zen's 8 core CPU beats Skylake by a good margin, I'd switch. Of course, the TDP needs to stay below 95w. I don't want 220w TDP CPU.
I mean, an Intel 8 core is 140w right? I don't know how you expect to get 95w with any sort of speed on 8 cores.
Posted on Reply
#27
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
Just remember these are server chips that are 32 cores. They will likely be the same setup as the current AMD server chips where 2 full CPU's share a socket across the HT link. Likely the best you will see in a non-server class is a 16 core chip for HEDT. It will also probably cost a metric shit ton.
Posted on Reply
#28
alucasa
bubbleawsomeI mean, an Intel 8 core is 140w right? I don't know how you expect to get 95w with any sort of speed on 8 cores.
HT works okay for me, so 4 core + 4 HT is good and affordable enough for me. At the moment AMD can't beat them with 8 true cores, so that's that.

I did say 8 "threads". :p
Posted on Reply
#31
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
bubbleawsomeRight, but Zen is releasing soon. We can't expect a miracle.
I am hoping the 16c stuff to be 140w chips, but at release it wouldn't surprise me if they were closer to 220w. The 8c stuff had better be around 95w and scale to 140w for quite high clocked units.

Now the other side to this is AMD sucks at first gen parts as of late. Phenom I horribly low clocks, not to mention the TLB bug, then the first gen FX chips performed horribly, I really hope zen doesn't follow this.
Posted on Reply
#32
geon2k2
TheGuruStudFine. They should be using Linux, anyway.
Yeah like linux is entirely multicore/multithread friendly for enterprises. There are some 3rd party tools which are licensed per core and it doesn't matter if it is real or HT core. Due to this it happens in many cases to run the system with HT disabled as it is cheaper that way.
Posted on Reply
#33
TheoneandonlyMrK
alucasaPersonally, I can use up to only 8 threads. So, if Zen's 8 core CPU beats Skylake by a good margin, I'd switch. Of course, the TDP needs to stay below 95w. I don't want 220w TDP CPU.
95watts for 32 cores ,even at14nm that's optimistic check the Tdp on Intel's largest new Xeon would you.
Posted on Reply
#34
alucasa
theoneandonlymrk95watts for 32 cores ,even at14nm that's optimistic check the Tdp on Intel's largest new Xeon would you.
Huh? I said I can use only up to 8 threads. That means either 8 cores or 4 cores with HT. I never said I wanted 32 core cpu for 95w TDP.
Posted on Reply
#35
TRWOV
My crunching bug is dancing
Posted on Reply
#36
Patriot
cdawallJust remember these are server chips that are 32 cores. They will likely be the same setup as the current AMD server chips where 2 full CPU's share a socket across the HT link. Likely the best you will see in a non-server class is a 16 core chip for HEDT. It will also probably cost a metric shit ton.
No.... These are in 4c modules connected by their internal fabric.
They will include up to 8 of those modules on a chip.

The 32c count is based on combination of knowledge.
Posted on Reply
#37
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
PatriotNo.... These are in 4c modules connected by their internal fabric.
They will include up to 8 of those modules on a chip.

The 32c count is based on combination of knowledge.
We will see which it ends up being. I am still betting its two MCM's
Posted on Reply
#38
Patriot
cdawallWe will see which it ends up being. I am still betting its two MCM's
Lol ok... It is not like AMD published the info on the quad core units months ago.
Posted on Reply
#40
xfia
so its kinda like this?
Posted on Reply
#41
Yorgos
"Leaked Linux Patch"


Every Linux kernel patch gets leaked and every Linux kernel version gets leaks.
It is called Open-source Software... ohhh and nothing gets leaked, everything is published on public repositories or in public mailing lists.
Posted on Reply
#42
TheoneandonlyMrK
cdawallWe will see which it ends up being. I am still betting its two MCM's
I'm expecting an mcm but with different asics types
Posted on Reply
#43
xvi
YorgosEvery Linux kernel patch gets leaked and every Linux kernel version gets leaks.
It is called Open-source Software... ohhh and nothing gets leaked, everything is published on public repositories or in public mailing lists.
"Leaked" makes people click on news articles.
Posted on Reply
#44
medi01
Lisa Lu announced that we'll see Zen in high perf desktops this year (Q4).
And that there will be many cores.
Which, HOPEFULLY, doesn't hint at single thread performance being too bad, again... =/
TheGuruStudFine. They should be using Linux, anyway.
Enterprise don't run just some random Linux, they run, say, Red Hat or Suse which costs money (although prices are rather modest).

But then there comes stuff such as VMWare, Oracle DB, or WebLogic/WebSphere and those guys charge per core.
Slower cores => money wasted on licenses.
Sadly.

Although it still has its uses.
Posted on Reply
#45
ypsylon
I'm more that eager to pick Zen up if it is worth on performance grounds. In particular that 32 core monster is drooling object of mine. With Windows limit on accessible cores (72 IIRC) you don't even need dual CPU motherboards anymore.

I only hope that name Zeppelin won't turn into Hindenburg disaster...

Go AMD, at this moment in time I 'm pretty sick and tired of Intel monopoly and doing things how they please.
Posted on Reply
#46
hat
Enthusiast
I could use a core count like that, but if I could afford it, I wouldn't need it. :banghead:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 7th, 2024 20:27 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts