Friday, September 30th 2016
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 3DMark Performance Leaked
In the run-up to its mid-October launch, samples of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti are falling into leaky taps. One such card made it to ChipHell, which posted its 3DMark 11 performance. Running on a machine with Core i7-6700K, the GTX 1050 Ti sample scored P10054 in the performance preset, and X3860 points in the extreme preset. A GeForce GTX 960 on the same machine scored around P10000 and X3300 points, respectively. This makes the card faster than the GTX 960, at a price-point of $149.
Based on the 16 nm "GP107" silicon, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti features 768 CUDA cores, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and a 128-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 4 GB of memory. The chip almost makes do with slot power, with its TDP being rated at 75W. The company is preparing an even cheaper SKU based on this chip, the GTX 1050, with 640 CUDA cores, 40 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, priced at $119.
Source:
ChipHell
Based on the 16 nm "GP107" silicon, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti features 768 CUDA cores, 48 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and a 128-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 4 GB of memory. The chip almost makes do with slot power, with its TDP being rated at 75W. The company is preparing an even cheaper SKU based on this chip, the GTX 1050, with 640 CUDA cores, 40 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 2 GB of GDDR5 memory, priced at $119.
45 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 3DMark Performance Leaked
When someone says the GTX 1060 is available at MSRP, they're obviously talking about US.
In local store cheapest RX 460 2GB version costs 132.9€, if we exclude VAT from it it costs 107.18€ exl. VAT which is ~$120. And that's the actual price of the card in newegg in states.
I was giving newegg prices as an example of MSRP-promised MSRP-delivered.
Relative to RX 480, the GTX 1060 6GB is actually cheaper in many places, just to show how pricing works relatively.
2. i was talking about Europe in general, not only Denmark.
3. as for the population thing, thats utter horse manure. Intel can manage it for their CPUs but Nvidia and AMD cant for GPUs?! yeah, sure.. its "the EU regulation and shit.."
also, this^. relatively to relativity since the MSRP is so relative why bother with it in the first place? and for a second time, i'm talking about both companies.
Middlemen will want their share which increases the final prices you pay. I mean someone has to get the stuff to where you are and they gotta get paid.
In EU's case, there is more than one middleman. They all want their shares.
#3 Not being a big enough market doesn't mean no one will care about you. It just means you shouldn't be surprise when they don't.
#4 If anyone's jealous about the "free healthcare" in Europe, this is a prime example of how we get it. We pay taxes till we bleed.
If supply & demand are in check and the ratio is adequate, the price becomes stable and close to MSRP.
If supply is low and demand is high, the gap from MSRP becomes higher as middlemen will want to use the situation to his advantage.
When Intel had CPU shortage last year on Skylake CPU, an i7 6700k in Canada went up as high as 600CAD.
We are just seeing the trickle down affect like it always has been? GTX 960 performance at GTX xx50 range GPU... nothing new.
I agree that a LP version would be like butter on the toast.
Additionally, there is "marketing strategy" which I did mention. When Nvidia gets a new GPU out, its yield is low which automatically creates low supply problem. It's exactly what Nvidia wants. Low supply generally creates heated competition among buyers who couldn't care less how much it costs as long as he can get it for his epeen.
Intel is different. They are through and through chip makers and are the best in fab tech and people are generally less enthusiastic about upcoming CPUs that haven't really moved on in mainstream desktop since 2010.
Trolls should go to wccf and other sites.
Basically in the world, only U.S. and China have this preferential treatment. I wonder why that is...