Sunday, September 4th 2022

The EU Proposes New Mobile Device Regulation to Extend Product Life Time

Around 20 years ago, most people replaced their phones on a yearly basis in some countries, largely due to the fact that if you signed the right mobile service contract, you got a free phone. These days, it's not nearly as common to get a free device with your service, but then again, mobile service contracts also tend to cost much less these days in many countries. As such, people retain their devices longer, which has put the device upgrade cycle somewhere around the two or three year mark. Now the EU is proposing new regulations that will force the mobile device makers to re-think the current status quo, as the European Commission regulators are considering asking mobile device makers to offer not just better battery life, but also spare part availability for as long as five years after a device was launched.

When it comes to battery life, the EU Commission is intending to offer the device manufacturers two options. The first is that they'll have to offer batteries that can deliver 83 percent of their rated capacity after 500 charging cycles, followed by 80 percent capacity after 1000 charging cycles. Alternatively, they can offer replacement batteries and phone back covers to its end-user customers, so they can replace their batteries once the batteries no longer hold charge that meets the owners expectations.
The spare parts program is tied to "professional repairers" which suggests that third party repair shops will be on the table. The manufacturers will have to provide key parts, such as batteries, displays, cameras, charging ports, mechanical buttons, microphones, speakers and hinge assemblies for a period of at least five years. End consumers should also be given access to replacement displays, as well as SIM and memory card trays, microphones, charging ports and hinge mechanisms, for a time period of at least seven years from the last marketing day of the device. This suggests that phone parts could be available for some eight to nine years after a new model has been introduced.

Furthermore, the EU Commission is proposing at least five years of security updates and three years of "functionality updates". However, these updates should be seen as an extension to the current OS updates and security patches, which should see most phone makers having to offer updates well beyond the two or three years we're seeing from most Android device makers today. The EU is currently collecting feedback on its proposal and anyone can submit comments until the 28th of September. If the EU Commission decides to go ahead with the proposal, it's not expected to be approved until sometime in the fourth quarter of this year and it's unlikely to be written into law until the end of 2023.
Sources: the EU Commission, via Arstechnica
Add your own comment

82 Comments on The EU Proposes New Mobile Device Regulation to Extend Product Life Time

#76
1d10t
Phone are just lifestyles nowadays, not just necessity but personality as well.
Posted on Reply
#77
hat
Enthusiast
Making more reliable batteries is a good step, but what about the phone itself? What about all the phones out there that seem to go to shit and slow to a crawl after a year or two? I know it's not simply a case of user error when I've personally factory reset a few phones, only to have them exhibit the same behavior afterwards with a clean slate. Planned obsolescence is a real thing, hell it was even in my history books back when I was in high school over 10 years ago... Until manufacturers start building to last rather than building to fail, this issue will always exist.
Posted on Reply
#78
big_glasses
zlobby3G service uses a precious RF spectrum. Operators need it for the much faster 4G/5G and stuff. However, they can't just switch 3G off because many phones still use it.
Thats' wrong. Lotsa operators have turned off 3G already, and are keeping 2G for legacy (one of the main reasons is not phones, but MCM like payment terminals)

Couldn't this somewhat be circumvented by providing worse usable battery capacity through firmware?
as in the phone can't be charged over actuall 80% and less than 20% (or other numbers)? more actual capacity than the phone says.
Posted on Reply
#79
zlobby
big_glassesThats' wrong. Lotsa operators have turned off 3G already, and are keeping 2G for legacy (one of the main reasons is not phones, but MCM like payment terminals)
And lotsa operators, like 90% (mostly in developing countries) still can't afford to do that simply because they will leave ~70% of their subscribers without service. Numbers from recent Broadcomm, Eriscsson and Huawei reports. Gotta find those .pdfs...
Their network or subscriber phones don't support IMS (still CSFB to 2G/3G even if phone is LTE-capable), so switching off 3G will dump the entire traffic in 2G, which in turn will congest badly. It also has to do with VoLTE roaming.
Posted on Reply
#80
lexluthermiester
hatMaking more reliable batteries is a good step, but what about the phone itself? What about all the phones out there that seem to go to shit and slow to a crawl after a year or two? I know it's not simply a case of user error when I've personally factory reset a few phones, only to have them exhibit the same behavior afterwards with a clean slate. Planned obsolescence is a real thing, hell it was even in my history books back when I was in high school over 10 years ago... Until manufacturers start building to last rather than building to fail, this issue will always exist.
This. And the big brands like Apple and Samsung are VERY guilty of it. Google is one of the bad brands that actually invests in their phones long term.
Posted on Reply
#81
TechLurker
While I support being able to replace the battery, I'd also just make do with strapping a slim external battery bank (such as those 5000mah ones with the thickness of 2 stacked credit cards and only slightly larger L/W than a credit card) onto the back of the phone case, perma-plugged to the phone (since I can just recharge the battery bank at the same time it recharges the phone).

If anything, I'd like a return to the short period when replacement phone cases had a larger integrated battery and replaced both the back of the phone and added a protective edge around the back and sides of the phone.
Posted on Reply
#82
lexluthermiester
zlobbyAnd lotsa operators, like 90% (mostly in developing countries) still can't afford to do that simply because they will leave ~70% of their subscribers without service. Numbers from recent Broadcomm, Eriscsson and Huawei reports. Gotta find those .pdfs...
Their network or subscriber phones don't support IMS (still CSFB to 2G/3G even if phone is LTE-capable), so switching off 3G will dump the entire traffic in 2G, which in turn will congest badly. It also has to do with VoLTE roaming.
That situation does NOT apply to most of the EU and all but the southern most reaches of North America, and as this is an article about the EU...
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 3rd, 2024 06:30 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts