Monday, December 26th 2022

Intel "Raptor Lake Refresh" Meant to Fill in for Scrapped "Meteor Lake" Desktop?

Intel's 2023 roadmap for the desktop processor segment sees the company flesh out its 13th Gen Core "Raptor Lake" desktop family with 65 W (locked) SKUs, and the new i9-13900KS flagship; followed by a new lineup of processors under the "Raptor Lake Refresh" family, due for Q3-2023, with no mentions of a desktop "Meteor Lake" processor in the year. It turns out that "Raptor Lake Refresh" is being designed to fill in for these (i.e. there won't be any "Meteor Lake" desktop chips). This, according to OneRaichu, a reliable source with Intel leaks.

"Meteor Lake" is Intel's first client processor to fully incorporate the company's IDM 2.0 product development strategy of disintegrating the processor into multiple chiplets built on various foundry nodes based on design needs; and combining them onto a single package with a high-performance interconnect. "Meteor Lake" has just one problem and that is CPU core-counts, with rumors pointing to 6P+16E (6 performance cores + 16 efficiency cores) being the maximum core-count possible, something Intel probably feels won't be competitive in the desktop segment against AMD, which will probably have a lineup of "Zen 4" X3D processors out by Q3-2023, with up to 16 P-cores. The company will, however, give "Meteor Lake" a sizable launch in the various mobile segments.
"Raptor Lake Refresh" remains shrouded in mystery, particularly what Intel does with packaging it—whether it retains LGA1700 or uses the next LGA1851 package; or whether it is a speed-bump, or like "Coffee Lake Refresh," Intel could even increases the core-counts. Assuming Intel doesn't change the silicon from the present 8P+16E, the "Refresh" series could see incremental core-count uplifts among each Core brand extension (eg: Core i5 going from 6P+8E to 6P+16E); besides clock speed increases. Should Intel take the path of changing the socket to LGA1851, the company might change the branding to 14th Gen Core, release a new chipset, with the socket probably offering improved I/O, such as CPU-attached PCIe Gen 5 NVMe (currently Gen 4). These LGA1851 motherboards will come with preparation for next-generation "Arrow Lake" processors due in 2024.
Sources: OneRaichu (Twitter), HotHardware
Add your own comment

61 Comments on Intel "Raptor Lake Refresh" Meant to Fill in for Scrapped "Meteor Lake" Desktop?

#51
Dirt Chip
watzupkenI actually find it pointless to upgrade if the improvement is just on the E-cores. But that is subjected to individuals' use case. If I were still into doing video encoding/ decoding related work, then I guess the faster E-cores will be useful. However for people using their system for games which uses P-cores almost exclusively, then I don't believe it will benefit FPS at all. You may see better benchmark results, but that's just benchmarks and generally don't translate to real life experience.
It`s not just the e-cores, it`s in addition to P-cores enhancement.
As of now, those e+P CPU`s are doing fine in real life gaming experience.
No reason for it will go backwards and if so, they will simply won`s sell :)
Posted on Reply
#52
john_
Dirt ChipNo reason for it will go backwards and if so, they will simply won`s sell :)
Backwards, no. Just slow down performance advancements. It would have a negative impact in their core count, but until AMD comes out with their own hybrid configuration, Intel will maintain core count advantage. Even at 22 cores. They will only lose thread count parity, dropping to 28 threads.
Posted on Reply
#55
SL2
Luke357That's partly because the AMD hype was at it's peak.
So when AMD is more popular its a hype.. as opposed to when Intel is more popular? :confused:

Yeah.. no. Your "why" doesn't makes sense.
Why_MeAdd to that fact that over half the heterosexuals on here would sacrifice their first born to AMD if Lisa Su asked them ...
I've used both, does that make me a bisexual?
TheinsanegamerNI have no faith in AMD now. They sat on vega 7 for years and only begrudgingly moved to rDNA2 with zen3+. By all accounts the peonix point APUs (not the zen 2 or zen 3 models tho) will have the same core count as zen3+ for the GPU, just moving them to rDNA3. I doubt performance will be more then 5-10% faster. And given AMD's naming melarky it wouldnt surprise me if actual laptops sporting a zen4+rDNA3 APU are relatively rare.
That's a lot of FUD to digest. ;) You left out the part about Intel having competitive IGP's only the last few years, something that didn't exist during the Vega years AFAIK. I'm pretty sure it will affect AMD at some point.
Lets not forget how much IGP performance increase Zen 3+ actually brought. I doubt Raptor runs faster than that.

It's not like what you're saying is impossible tho.
TheinsanegamerNIntel stands a good chance of being faster then the majority of ryzen 7000 laptops, depending on how bad AMD's 7000 series pans out.
It's not like fastest IGP evar is the most sought after feature in a laptop anyway. Intel will probably sell more laptop CPU's, but for other reasons.
Posted on Reply
#56
hs4
ThrashZoneHi,
Yep poll was taken not to long ago there are some puddles 9th-10th-11th :laugh:
www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/what-cpu-architecture-do-you-use.301580/
Geekbench Browser #samples (Dec 27)
Raptor:21.94k = 13900K/F:13.66k + 13700K/F:4.84k + 13600K/F:3.44k
Raphael:12.97k = 7950X:5.47k + 7900X:4.72k + 7700X:2.02k + 7600X:0.76k

Passmark #samples (Dec 27)
Raptor:2077 = 13900K/F:958 + 13700K/F:606 + 13600K/F:513
Raphael:1447 = 7950X:671 + 7900X:293 + 7700X:328 + 7600X:155

Considering the difference in sales period, it is estimated that Raptor is selling at a pace two to three times that of Raphael. Perhaps, but Q4 2022 global retail sales numbers would be in the 50-120% range for Intel (ADL+RPL) sales relative to AMD (AM5+AM4) in DIY market.

This method successfully predicted the large drop in AMD sales in Q3 2022 but is not suitable for vertical comparisons, since the 7700X actually sells about twice as much as the 7950X.
Posted on Reply
#57
SL2
hs4Considering the difference in sales period, it is estimated that Raptor is selling at a pace two to three times that of Raphael.
You're right. Raptor oustsells Raphael, and Vermeer outsells Raptor. I think it's possible that Intel sells more than three times of Raptor compared to Raphael.

https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/5800x3d-slashed-£329-329.300357/#post-4871779

www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Computer-CPU-Processors/zgbs/pc/229189

AMD_Stock/comments/zg21j0
Posted on Reply
#58
hs4
MatsYou're right. Raptor oustsells Raphael, and Vermeer outsells Raptor. I think it's possible that Intel sells more than three times of Raptor compared to Raphael.

https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/5800x3d-slashed-£329-329.300357/#post-4871779

www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Computer-CPU-Processors/zgbs/pc/229189

AMD_Stock/comments/zg21j0
Mindfactory can be considered as the bottom line since its customers favor AMD. So, if ADL+RPL is actually 50% of AM4+AM5 in number of units sold, then my guess would be reasonable.

In the Japanese data, Intel overtook AMD in number of units sold in Feb 2022, and AMD is currently overtaking them, mainly with the Ryzen5000 series. Intel is now 75% of AMD in terms of units sold and about the same in terms of revenue.
Posted on Reply
#59
DarthJedi
It's not that Zen 4 failed, it is a lot faster.
The problem is Zen 4 reached Intel's 12th gen single core performance and failed to matching 13th gen at it.
It didn't help that Intel has really nice performance using E-cores when it matters.
Posted on Reply
#60
SL2
hs4Mindfactory can be considered as the bottom line since its customers favor AMD.
What makes you say that?

Besides, Amazon.com (see above) tells the same story, without numbers, obviously.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 3rd, 2024 07:24 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts