Tuesday, March 7th 2023
NVIDIA to Clear Out GA104 Inventory by Carving GeForce RTX 3060 Out of Them
NVIDIA is preparing yet another variant of the GeForce RTX 3060 "Ampere" graphics card, by carving it out of the much larger "GA104" silicon. This SKU will feature 12 GB of faster 19 Gbps GDDR6X memory. Across a 192-bit memory bus, this yields an impressive 456 GB/s of memory bandwidth that's higher than the bandwidth of the original RTX 3070 with 14 Gbps GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit memory bus (448 GB/s). From what we can tell, the core-configuration of the card remains the same, with 3,584 CUDA cores, 112 Tensor cores, 28 RT cores, 112 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. This SKU is carved out of the GA104 silicon by enabling 28 out of 48 SM (that's 58% of the available number-crunching machinery); and slashing down the memory interface by 25%.
34 Comments on NVIDIA to Clear Out GA104 Inventory by Carving GeForce RTX 3060 Out of Them
I'm not For fifty different versions of 3060 being sold as same Same But.
Using dies that were defective in some areas on lower end/spec cards is the way to go( just with decent differentiation in name's), saves e waste and due to that should save consumer's money, SHOULD.
They are not neutering GPU to make 3060 or if they are double down on your statement and I am with you, but I don't think they are.
Also, how same-named cards were often completely different silicon depending on what section of nVidia''s Curie era you look at.
www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv40.g6
www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv41.g162
www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv42.g44
edit: I forgot 1!
www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv45.g163
edit 2: HOLY CRAP there's even more than I remember:
www.techpowerup.com/gpu-specs/nvidia-nv48.g374
For gaming, it doesn't make much sense though. A placeholder until 4060/4050 arrive.
What boils my blood is purposefully misleading customers into a lesser price/perf purchase, because you change BOM components and purposfully made no attempt to denote it to the prospective customer. (SSD manufacturers do this commonly now,) I squarely put the blame on Apple for this. Apple didn't just change things mid-run. No, they made their naming purposefully misleading on their newest hottest product, so even the secondary market encouraged scamming and kept perception and price inflated.
I used the 6800s as an example, specifically because you could buy a 6800 XT, and have it be on one of about 5+ different performance levels, which could not be compensated for in OCing. One or 2 of which were slower than the 6600s, IIRC.
It's 50% faster at 1440p in Cyberpunk 2077, and to reiterate, it's priced almost the same as the 3060.