Wednesday, February 21st 2024

NVIDIA Announces Q4 and Fiscal 2024 Results, Clocks 126% YoY Revenue Growth, Gaming Just 1/6th of Data Center Revenues

NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) today reported revenue for the fourth quarter ended January 28, 2024, of $22.1 billion, up 22% from the previous quarter and up 265% from a year ago. For the quarter, GAAP earnings per diluted share was $4.93, up 33% from the previous quarter and up 765% from a year ago. Non-GAAP earnings per diluted share was $5.16, up 28% from the previous quarter and up 486% from a year ago.

For fiscal 2024, revenue was up 126% to $60.9 billion. GAAP earnings per diluted share was $11.93, up 586% from a year ago. Non-GAAP earnings per diluted share was $12.96, up 288% from a year ago. "Accelerated computing and generative AI have hit the tipping point. Demand is surging worldwide across companies, industries and nations," said Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of NVIDIA.
"Our Data Center platform is powered by increasingly diverse drivers—demand for data processing, training and inference from large cloud-service providers and GPU-specialized ones, as well as from enterprise software and consumer internet companies. Vertical industries—led by auto, financial services and healthcare—are now at a multibillion-dollar level.

"NVIDIA RTX, introduced less than six years ago, is now a massive PC platform for generative AI, enjoyed by 100 million gamers and creators. The year ahead will bring major new product cycles with exceptional innovations to help propel our industry forward. Come join us at next month's GTC, where we and our rich ecosystem will reveal the exciting future ahead," he said.

NVIDIA will pay its next quarterly cash dividend of $0.04 per share on March 27, 2024, to all shareholders of record on March 6, 2024.

Outlook
NVIDIA's outlook for the first quarter of fiscal 2025 is as follows:
  • Revenue is expected to be $24.0 billion, plus or minus 2%.
  • GAAP and non-GAAP gross margins are expected to be 76.3% and 77.0%, respectively, plus or minus 50 basis points.
  • GAAP and non-GAAP operating expenses are expected to be approximately $3.5 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively.
  • GAAP and non-GAAP other income and expense are expected to be an income of approximately $250 million, excluding gains and losses from non-affiliated investments.
  • GAAP and non-GAAP tax rates are expected to be 17.0%, plus or minus 1%, excluding any discrete items.
Highlights
NVIDIA achieved progress since its previous earnings announcement in these areas:

Data Center
  • Fourth-quarter revenue was a record $18.4 billion, up 27% from the previous quarter and up 409% from a year ago. Full-year revenue rose 217% to a record $47.5 billion.
  • Launched, in collaboration with Google, optimizations across NVIDIA's data center and PC AI platforms for Gemma, Google's groundbreaking open language models.
  • Expanded its strategic collaboration with Amazon Web Services to host NVIDIA DGX Cloud on AWS.
  • Announced that Amgen will use the NVIDIA DGX SuperPOD to power insights into drug discovery, diagnostics and precision medicine.
  • Announced NVIDIA NeMo Retriever, a generative AI microservice that lets enterprises connect custom large language models with enterprise data to deliver highly accurate responses for AI applications.
  • Introduced NVIDIA MONAI cloud APIs to help developers and platform providers integrate AI into their medical-imaging offerings.
  • Announced that Singtel will bring generative AI services to Singapore through energy-efficient data centers that the telco is building with NVIDIA Hopper architecture GPUs.
  • Introduced plans with Cisco to help enterprises quickly and easily deploy and manage secure AI infrastructure.
  • Supported the National Artificial Intelligence Research Resource pilot program, a major step by the U.S. government toward a shared national research infrastructure.
Gaming
  • Fourth-quarter revenue was $2.9 billion, flat from the previous quarter and up 56% from a year ago. Full-year revenue rose 15% to $10.4 billion.
  • Launched GeForce RTX 40 SUPER Series GPUs, starting at $599, which support the latest NVIDIA RTX technologies, including DLSS 3.5 Ray Reconstruction and NVIDIA Reflex.
  • Announced generative AI capabilities for its installed base of over 100 million RTX AI PCs, including Tensor-RT LLM to accelerate inference on large language models, and Chat with RTX, a tech demo that lets users personalize a chatbot with their own content.
  • Introduced microservices for the NVIDIA Avatar Cloud Engine, allowing game and application developers to integrate state-of-the-art generative AI models into non-playable characters.
  • Reached the milestone of 500 AI-powered RTX games and applications utilizing NVIDIA DLSS, ray tracing and other NVIDIA RTX technologies.
Professional Visualization
  • Fourth-quarter revenue was $463 million, up 11% from the previous quarter and up 105% from a year ago. Full-year revenue rose 1% to $1.6 billion.
  • Announced adoption of NVIDIA Omniverse by the global automotive-configurator ecosystem.
  • Announced the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation GPU, bringing the latest AI, graphics and compute technology to compact workstations.
Automotive
  • Fourth-quarter revenue was $281 million, up 8% from the previous quarter and down 4% from a year ago. Full-year revenue rose 21% to $1.1 billion.
  • Announced further adoption of its NVIDIA DRIVE platform, with Great Wall Motors, ZEEKR and Xiaomi using DRIVE Orin to power intelligent automated-driving systems and Li Auto selecting DRIVE Thor as its centralized car computer.
CFO Commentary
Commentary on the quarter by Colette Kress, NVIDIA's executive vice president and chief financial officer, is available at this page.
Add your own comment

40 Comments on NVIDIA Announces Q4 and Fiscal 2024 Results, Clocks 126% YoY Revenue Growth, Gaming Just 1/6th of Data Center Revenues

#26
kaktus1907
As Raja Koduri Says. "Developers on PC GPUs are the key enablers to DC GPU success. So all the dev tools need to work flawlessly on PC GPUs. Currently this is largely true with Geforce. I still get dirty looks from my engineers when I ask them to swap away their Geforce card. Engineers cost way more than any GPU pricing delta, so not worth messing with their productivity.

Gaming GPUs are so accessible globally. Just to give an example, engineers in smaller cities in places like India that don't have a path to access DC GPUs, can walk to their local PC reseller and buy a Geforce card and start coding!

Consistent architecture and driver stack across PC and DC GPUs will be a huge advantage. This is much overlooked disadvantage of dedicated AI accelerator eco-system.
"

Gaming market is the hook for younger talent and marketing for your hardware to any pc on earth. Nvidia knows the importance of both seeding academia/institutes & making it as widely accessible as possible via unified code/software with gaming GPUs & datacenter accelerators. And they don't do this for charity, still earning steady and sizeable revenue of income.
Posted on Reply
#27
A&P211
Nvidia's stock price 15% today. This is thing is insane.
Posted on Reply
#29
Random_User
Don't be that happy about gaming branch being stable. That's all due they had the stocks of cards made pre-AI-fever. Giving the trend, the next generation of GPUs will be even more enterprise oriented, so will be the margins. The avarege gamer Joe and Janes might not be able to buy even xx60.

Now, is there any doubt's literal gouging? The sad thing AMD continues this trend, and keeps their consumer prices to be as high as possible as well. If there's no collusion, then what is this?
PapusanThey prefer maximizing profits from old silicon/Gpu's

China’s special graphics card RX 6750 GRE is too cheap! AMD takes action: fines, suspension of goods

At the end of January, AMD issued an internal notice to AIB brand manufacturers and dealers, requiring that the prices of RX 6750 GRE 10/12GB must be strictly controlled, with the lowest prices being 2,149 yuan and 2,379 yuan respectively.
That's interesting, how lightningly fast AMD reacted to the "cheaper" prices, while there are hundreds of thousands cards in the world, being sold with 200-300% margins above MSRP, on daily basis, for years. Since the first major mining boom in 2017-18. And they did not make a single move. Disgusting.
Posted on Reply
#30
Bwaze
Random_UserDon't be that happy about gaming branch being stable. That's all due they had the stocks of cards made pre-AI-fever. Giving the trend, the next generation of GPUs will be even more enterprise oriented, so will be the margins. The avarege gamer Joe and Janes might not be able to buy even xx60.
We don't even know if "Gaming" even means selling gaming cards - let alone selling gaming cards to gamers.

Nvidia was caught redhanded when they transferred revenue during cryptocraze so that it showed growth in all sectors, even Automotive, but then it all plummeted when the cryptoreality struck. But when the shareholders tried to sue Nvidia judges were quick to tell them it's not illegal.
Posted on Reply
#31
pk67
BwazeDon't believe me? Just take a simple approx. 50% performance, 50% price increase from now on, the same we have this generation:

2020, RTX 3080 - $700
2022, RTX 4080 - $1200
2024, RTX 5080 - $2040
2026, RTX 6080 - $3468
2028, RTX 7080 - $5896
2030, RTX 8080 - $10022
2032, RTX 9080 - $17038
2034, RTX 1080 - $28965

At what point will you stop?
OK. Lets try some thought experiment. Let assume Huang is right, More Law is dead for good and whole industry almost reached the "wall" and any progress is really slow.
Let assume hipotetical price scenario without AI rush.
2020, RTX 3080 - $700
2022, RTX 4080 - $1200
2024, RTX 5080 - $2040
2030, RTX 6080 - $2468
2038, RTX 7080 - $2896
2050, RTX 8080 - $4022

Again lets compare it to yours scenario.
2020, RTX 3080 - $700
2022, RTX 4080 - $1200
2024, RTX 5080 - $2040 ================= --- 4080 Super - $1000
================= 2026, RTX 6080 - $3468 --- 4080 Super - $800 --- 5080 Super - $1740
================= 2028, RTX 7080 - $5896 --- 4080 Super - $700 --- 5080 Super - $1540 --- 2028, 6080 Super - $2918
2030, RTX 6080 - $2468 --- 2030, RTX 8080 - $10022 - - End of life 4080 - --- 5080 Super - $1340 --- 2030, 6080 Super - $2518 --- 7080 Super - $5196
================= 2032, RTX 9080 - $17038 --- 8080 Super - $8422 - - End of life 5080 - --- 2032, 6080 Super - $2218 --- 7080 Super - $4696
================================= --- 8080 Super - $7022 --- 9080 Super - $14438 --- 2034, - End of life 6080 - --- 7080 Super - $4296 ================================= --- 8080 Super - $5922 --- 9080 Super - $12038 --- ============== 2036, - End of life 7080
2038, RTX 7080 - $2896 =================== - - - End of life 8080 --- 9080 Super - $10040 --- 2038
2050, RTX 8080 - $4022
2065, RTX 9080 - $5538

My simple question is which one scenario is better for gamers ?

In slow progress scenario first availability of RTX 8080 is year 2050 at moderate price level $ 4022 but in AI rush scenario it is available 20 years earlier !! - the price is really high at the moment of premiere but 6 years later it dropped to $5922 for Super incarnation.

IMHO slow progress scenario is much worse for gamers than fast pace scenario even at exploding prices as in your example.
Posted on Reply
#32
cvaldes
The best scenario for gamers is to buy some NVDA shares and sell one or two when you need to buy a new graphics card.
Posted on Reply
#33
pk67
cvaldesThe best scenario for gamers is to buy some NVDA shares and sell one or two when you need to buy a new graphics card.
I'm not sure if they are considerably more safe than BTC now. Renting some computing power is even better and safer option for gamers to get their money back.
Posted on Reply
#34
cvaldes
pk67I'm not sure if they are considerably more safe than BTC now. Renting some computing power is even better and safer option for gamers to get their money back.
There's no infrastructure or system for that type of activity. You can't just post to Craigslist saying "RTX 4090 for rent: AI workloads welcomed when I'm not playing CoD".

It's far more primitive than cryptomining which was essentially for peasants.

And some of these AI training models can be massive. There's a lot of other resources that need to be set up to provide AI workload services.

And remember, most of the world's fortunes came from investments. Buying NVDA is a better investment than buying Nvidia hardware and trying to pawn off some GPU/Tensor core cycles. You don't get rich driving a delivery van for Amazon, you get rich trading AMZN shares.
Posted on Reply
#35
pk67
cvaldesThere's no infrastructure or system for that type of activity. You can't just post to Craigslist saying "RTX 4090 for rent: AI workloads welcomed when I'm not playing CoD".

It's far more primitive than cryptomining which was essentially for peasants.

And some of these AI training models can be massive. There's a lot of other resources that need to be set up to provide AI workload services.

And remember, most of the world's fortunes came from investments. Buying NVDA is a better investment than buying Nvidia hardware and trying to pawn off some GPU/Tensor core cycles. You don't get rich driving a delivery van for Amazon, you get rich trading AMZN shares.
You can rent your rig but in 24/7 regime. After year or two you can use your rig for gaming. It is not secretive knowledge.
Posted on Reply
#36
cvaldes
pk67You can rent your rig but in 24/7 regime. After year or two you can use your rig for gaming. It is not secretive knowledge.
You're still footing the bill for retail electricity rates which takes a major bite of profitability. Consumers don't have access to the commercial electricity rates that the pros get.

That was one of the biggest reasons why cryptomining ended up being for peasants. It wasn't the cost of the hardware, it was the cost of the electricity.

Even today, if you look at the Distributed Computing section of the TPU forums, you'll see that participants are struggling with electricity costs. I mentioned that donating money to the charity is a more effective use of cash than burning up CPU/GPU cycles folding proteins, whatever. Because again, a large organization can buy electricity at favorable rates.

By renting out your rig for AI work, you are essentially destroying margin by shelling out for consumer electricity rates.

What you are talking about is for peasants. Yes, it can be done but there are better things to do with money that'll generate more return than renting out your rig.
Posted on Reply
#37
pk67
cvaldesYou're still footing the bill for retail electricity rates which takes a major bite of profitability. Consumers don't have access to the commercial electricity rates that the pros get.

That was one of the biggest reasons why cryptomining ended up being for peasants. It wasn't the cost of the hardware, it was the cost of the electricity.

Even today, if you look at the Distributed Computing section of the TPU forums, you'll see that participants are struggling with electricity costs. I mentioned that donating money to the charity is a more effective use of cash than burning up CPU/GPU cycles folding proteins, whatever. Because again, a large organization can buy electricity at favorable rates.

By renting out your rig for AI work, you are essentially destroying margin by shelling out for consumer electricity rates.

What you are talking about is for peasants. Yes, it can be done but there are better things to do with money that'll generate more return than renting out your rig.
It depend if you are lanlord with your own electricity generation or just tenant. Sure you can selling drugs if you need more money faster. But renting your rig is very good option if you have access to affordable electricity to get your money back. If you are rich enough to buy dedicated rig for gaming but still crying gpu is too expensive - i'm showing you it is not the case. Maybe electricity at your location is too expensive but not GPU - cos other guys are ready for that price.
Posted on Reply
#38
cvaldes
Well if it works for you, you are definitely part of a minority. Most people who can afford high-end consumer graphics cards live in major metropolitan areas where the electricity isn't particularly cheap. This is even more the case for Europeans with the energy crisis resulting from the invasion of Ukraine.

Expensive electricity will just destroy gross margin on your GPU rental activities. Again, this is all peasant stuff.

This is like saying that farming corn is good because diesel for the tractor is cheap where you live. It's still better to trade corn futures than drive a tractor.

And Nvidia stock is pretty volatile with a beta of 1.68 according to Yahoo Finance. So opportunities to buy low and sell high happen very frequently. If you bought NVDA on Tuesday and sold yesterday (Thursday), you could have walked away with +15% easily. Ten grand in investment capital would have grossed $1500, and even after taxes, you would have enough for a 4080 SUPER. In less than 48 hours.
Posted on Reply
#39
pk67
cvaldesWell if it works for you, you are definitely part of a minority. Most people who can afford high-end consumer graphics cards live in major metropolitan areas where the electricity isn't particularly cheap.
If you are REAL gamer just change your location into more friendly place like Argentina or Brazil. In Brazil you will have a lot of cheap solar energy and hydro as well. No problems with freezing in winter season.:laugh:
Metropolitan areas are fine for busy people who dont have a lot of time for gaming or for awfully rich ones who dont care electricity bills or pennies they have to spend for latest most powerfull GPU available for sale.
Posted on Reply
#40
A&P211
cvaldesThe best scenario for gamers is to buy some NVDA shares and sell one or two when you need to buy a new graphics card.
Each share will cost around a 4080. It sits at $788 atm.
cvaldesWell if it works for you, you are definitely part of a minority. Most people who can afford high-end consumer graphics cards live in major metropolitan areas where the electricity isn't particularly cheap. This is even more the case for Europeans with the energy crisis resulting from the invasion of Ukraine.

Expensive electricity will just destroy gross margin on your GPU rental activities. Again, this is all peasant stuff.

This is like saying that farming corn is good because diesel for the tractor is cheap where you live. It's still better to trade corn futures than drive a tractor.

And Nvidia stock is pretty volatile with a beta of 1.68 according to Yahoo Finance. So opportunities to buy low and sell high happen very frequently. If you bought NVDA on Tuesday and sold yesterday (Thursday), you could have walked away with +15% easily. Ten grand in investment capital would have grossed $1500, and even after taxes, you would have enough for a 4080 SUPER. In less than 48 hours.
I started buying nvda some time ago in the $250 range, my last buy in was at $493 in December. I just sold everything on Thursday after their earnings call. NVDA has gotten too rich for me. As of right now, NVDA cut 2.5yrs off from early retirement. Before earning, it was 2yrs early, now its 2.5yrs. Thanks Nvidia, its been fun but time to put the gun back into its holster and safer stocks like index funds.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 3rd, 2024 13:25 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts