Monday, March 9th 2009

Sapphire Readying HD 4870 With 2 GB Memory

ATI Radeon specialist Sapphire is preparing a new SKU based on its recently unveiled cooler design based on its Vapor-Chamber technology. In an attempt to step up performance and spicing up specifications sheets, the company plans to load 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on an HD 4870 accelerator. To hold that much memory, GDDR5 chips are populated on both sides of the PCB. The chips on the back of the card are cooled by a heatsink, while the ones in the front are subjected to the fan's air-flow. The card uses reference AMD clock speeds of 750/900 MHz (core/memory). DVI, D-Sub and DisplayPort make for the card's connectivity. It is expected to be priced at 258 EUR.
Source: TechConnect Magazine
Add your own comment

30 Comments on Sapphire Readying HD 4870 With 2 GB Memory

#1
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Dats tight!

I shall get one.:)
Posted on Reply
#2
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
Bit of a gimmick but, yeah two (or even four of these) would set you up for life eh?
Posted on Reply
#3
Darknova
Interesting. I'm certainly interested in the cooler. I must say I'm impressed by my current Sapphire 4870 (after a dreadful 3870). However 2GB, I don't know, seems a bit much IMO.
Posted on Reply
#4
Fleck
CDdude55Dats tight!

I shall get one.:)
Fuckin richies :(
Posted on Reply
#5
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
:D

Hopefully it'll drive the prices down even further on the 1GB 4870.
Posted on Reply
#6
Unregistered
would look better on a black or red pcb IMO. Still, sounds like it could be quite the beast.
#7
TreadR
It's a shame that most of Sapphire's cards are plagued by incompatibilities.
And yeah... on a red PCB + red DVI connectors (like XFX) would've looked much better.
Posted on Reply
#8
GSG-9
TreadRIt's a shame that most of Sapphire's cards are plagued by incompatibilities.
And yeah... on a red PCB + red DVI connectors (like XFX) would've looked much better.
Most is a bit harsh
Posted on Reply
#9
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
FleckFuckin richies :(
If i was, i wouldnt have the video card i have in my system right now. Also i got the QX6700 for free. I havne't had a job for a while now.:(
Posted on Reply
#10
technicks
Well i find €250+ to expensive for that card.
After AMD just announced to drop prices on the HD4850/4870 series paying €100 extra for 1Gb memory doesn't sound that cheap to me.
They already lowered prices at some web shops so expect a nice price drop for the HD4870 512/1Gb soon.
Posted on Reply
#11
Methious
I don't see much advantage unless your gaming uber resolutions.
Posted on Reply
#12
GSG-9
MethiousI don't see much advantage unless your gaming uber resolutions.
Would it even matter then? Im @ 2048x1152 and I doubt it would give me an advantage. But now that CS4 can use videocards... I can see that being a valuable asset.
Posted on Reply
#13
3870x2
GSG-9Would it even matter then? Im @ 2048x1152 and I doubt it would give me an advantage. But now that CS4 can use videocards... I can see that being a valuable asset.
Very much so. But in that case, My AMD 3400+ with 1g ram doesn't have a problem running CS3 with 5-6 10.1mp images open, and several windows running in the background, so would it really help?
On the flip side, I would love to see 3 of these crossfired on 1920x1200.
Posted on Reply
#14
IcrushitI
For us older guys and gals we all know about the numbers game, but the new people on the block don't, so entry level people will go GA GA over the numbers and buy.
Posted on Reply
#15
GSG-9
3870x2Very much so. But in that case, My AMD 3400+ with 1g ram doesn't have a problem running CS3 with 5-6 10.1mp images open, and several windows running in the background, so would it really help?
On the flip side, I would love to see 3 of these crossfired on 1920x1200.
How about compositions for print that are over 32in by 24in @ 600+ Dpi? Filters get angry for me at that point. I am a design tech major though, most people have no need for print quality work at that scale. I think there will be no difference between the 2gb and 1gb versions. But thats just going from the initial release of every card before that has been strapped with more memory.
IcrushitIFor us older guys and gals we all know about the numbers game, but the new people on the block don't, so entry level people will go GA GA over the numbers and buy.
I agree
Posted on Reply
#17
nafets
I can't see anyone buying this with the HD4890 coming out soon.

Put 2GB GDDR5 on a HD4890 with this updated "Vapor Chamber" cooler, and you'd have a decent seller, that sticks out from the crowd.

As it is, this souped up HD4870 is just too late to the GPU party. :/
Posted on Reply
#18
theorw
I like the VR heatsink.No doupt it will clock well with extra volts and that think cooling the mosfets and vr s...
Its really huge!!!
Posted on Reply
#19
IcrushitI
nafetsI can't see anyone buying this with the HD4890 coming out soon.
As it is, this souped up HD4870 is just too late to the GPU party. :/
Not every brick and morter carry every brand and sku. The 4870 are becoming the midrange and they will sell.
Posted on Reply
#20
spearman914
Is there any point of this? I mean with the performance of the 4870, 2GB will bottleneck it?
Posted on Reply
#21
W1zzard
that pictured board is not the 2 gb 4870. its just a random 4870 sapphire had at their cebit booth.

2 gb doesn't make any sense and sapphire knows this, they will have small quantities to sell them to the e-penis people
Posted on Reply
#22
GSG-9
W1zzardthat pictured board is not the 2 gb 4870. its just a random 4870 sapphire had at their cebit booth.

2 gb doesn't make any sense and sapphire knows this, they will have small quantities to sell them to the e-penis people
e-penis! Thats the best way to describe it! :toast:
Posted on Reply
#23
DeathTyrant
W1zzard2 gb doesn't make any sense and sapphire knows this...
Is this the case for any single GPU out right now (4870 and 285) W1zzard? Or does this also apply to the X2 cards or to SLI/Xfire (two or three 4870s or 285s) - at high resolutions and AA of course - ?
If these 2GB cards could make a difference, it would perhaps push me to dust off my TripleHead2Go setup (almost as many megapixels as 2560x1600).

It's kind of disappointing to hear that they might be pointless. :(
Posted on Reply
#24
W1zzard
DeathTyrantIs this the case for any single GPU out right now (4870 and 285) W1zzard? Or does this also apply to the X2 cards or to SLI/Xfire (two or three 4870s or 285s) - at high resolutions and AA of course - ?
If these 2GB cards could make a difference, it would perhaps push me to dust off my TripleHead2Go setup (almost as many megapixels as 2560x1600).

It's kind of disappointing to hear that they might be pointless. :(
maybe crysis 2560x1600 with all the eye candy .. then you have 20 fps instead of 16 fps.

i put in a request to nvidia to check if there are any [actual existing] cuda apps out there that benefit from 2 gb over 1 gb.
Posted on Reply
#25
niko084
W1zzardthat pictured board is not the 2 gb 4870. its just a random 4870 sapphire had at their cebit booth.

2 gb doesn't make any sense and sapphire knows this, they will have small quantities to sell them to the e-penis people
Agreed... Even the 1gb cards over 512mb cards of the 4870 the performance differences except in high resolution situations isn't a whole lot. Going to 2gb is only going to lessen that difference and probably with a nasty price increase also. Seriously by the time that amount of ram is going to do you much good, the card simply wont have the punch.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 23rd, 2024 10:48 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts