• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti Benchmarked Some More

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,164 (7.57/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
In the run up to its rumored February 18th launch, GeForce GTX 750 Ti, the first retail GPU based on NVIDIA's next-generation "Maxwell" GPU architecture, the card is finding itself in the hands of more leaky PC enthusiasts, this time, members of Chinese PC enthusiast community site PCOnline. The site used an early driver to test the GTX 750 Ti, which it put through 3DMark 11 (performance preset) and 3DMark Fire Strike. In the former, the card scored P4188 points, and 3170 points in the latter. The test-bed details are not mentioned, but one can make out a stock Core i7-4770K from one of the screenshots. Also accompanying the two is an alleged GPU-Z 0.7.5 screenshot of the GTX 750 Ti, which reads out its CUDA core count as 960. Version 0.7.5 doesn't support GTX 750 Ti, but it has fall-backs that help it detect unknown GPUs, particularly from NVIDIA. Its successor, GPU-Z 0.7.6, which we're releasing later today, comes with support for the chip.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
734 (0.17/day)
Location
Malaysia
System Name Cypher-C4
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk Max
Cooling Deepcool AK620
Memory 32GB Crucial Ballistix Elite 3200MHz
Video Card(s) Palit RTX 3060 Ti Dual
Storage 250GB Crucial MX500 + 2TB Crucial MX500 + 2TB WD Black + 4TB Toshiba + 1TB Samsung F3
Display(s) Acer XV272UP
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D
Audio Device(s) Behringher UMC202HD Audio Interface + Mackie HM-4 + Sennheiser HD 280 Pro + Shure SM58
Power Supply Corsair HX750i
Mouse Steelseries Rival 310
Keyboard Keychron K8 + Kailh BOX Crystal Jade switches + Ducky Good in Blue keycaps
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
The 3DMark 11 performance score is only slightly higher than a GTX 460. If this holds true after official launch (plus better driver), then this card seems a bit too weak.
 

infernox

New Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
The 3DMark 11 performance score is only slightly higher than a GTX 460. If this holds true after official launch (plus better driver), then this card seems a bit too weak.

Yeah it really does if that is true. The GTX 650ti was around GTX560 levels and the GTX650ti boost was a great value card close to the GTX570/480. I was expecting the 750ti to be around at least GTX660 levels since the 650ti boost can get very close to 660levels with an OC.
 
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
307 (0.06/day)
Processor Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard Asrock X470 Master sli/ac
Cooling Raijintek Themis Evo
Memory Team Dark Pro 3200 cl14
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Gold Plus 850W
Yeah it really does if that is true. The GTX 650ti was around GTX560 levels and the GTX650ti boost was a great value card close to the GTX570/480. I was expecting the 750ti to be around at least GTX660 levels since the 650ti boost can get very close to 660levels with an OC.
450 and 550ti all over again, back to the era of midrange of suck.
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
734 (0.17/day)
Location
Malaysia
System Name Cypher-C4
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk Max
Cooling Deepcool AK620
Memory 32GB Crucial Ballistix Elite 3200MHz
Video Card(s) Palit RTX 3060 Ti Dual
Storage 250GB Crucial MX500 + 2TB Crucial MX500 + 2TB WD Black + 4TB Toshiba + 1TB Samsung F3
Display(s) Acer XV272UP
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D
Audio Device(s) Behringher UMC202HD Audio Interface + Mackie HM-4 + Sennheiser HD 280 Pro + Shure SM58
Power Supply Corsair HX750i
Mouse Steelseries Rival 310
Keyboard Keychron K8 + Kailh BOX Crystal Jade switches + Ducky Good in Blue keycaps
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,768 (0.30/day)
System Name Lailalo
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X Boosts to 4.95Ghz
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus (WIFI
Cooling Noctua
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) XFX 7900XT 20GB
Storage Samsung 970 Pro Plus 1TB, Crucial 1TB MX500 SSD, Segate 3TB
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper
Power Supply XPG 1000W
Mouse G602
Keyboard G510s
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
450 and 550ti all over again, back to the era of midrange of suck.

Yet the best high midrangers they ever put out were in that Fermi era. Fermi era was at least setup well. You knew what you were paying for and got some of the best SLI performers out of it.

The 600 series was actually more of a mess with midrangers becoming the high ends and low/mid chips filling in the midrange block. We didn't get the 110s till late. 700 series is finally started getting things back on track but now the results are skewed thanks to NV's bumblings in the 600s. Course, AMD wasn't really mounting any competition so they didn't help much.
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
580 (0.14/day)
Not sure why anyone expects a 660 Ti for a 750 Ti product.

The 700 series in general isn't that much higher in performance than the 600 series, so the new 700 series product seems appropriately named for the performance offered.

This is not a high end product. This is not intended to be pushing the boundaries of performance. This is a test bed for the new architecture on a well-known fab process. This is to help them work out any deficiencies in the new design ahead of the new fab processes finally being ready and readily available.

They've done this before. I suppose that's why I'm not surprised. The mid-range part that gets the new design (or the new fab process) has unrealistic expectations heaped upon it and then when it comes out at more or less the performance level assigned it by the very branding it was given (in this case the 750 series), people are disappointed by the new architecture.

The real disappointment is you're unrealistic expectations for a lower than mid-range product.

I'll be curious to see what improvements are present in the product's architecture (ie., mostly the reviews) and I'm still looking forward to the "bigger" versions of Maxwell on the smaller die process, but this card was never going to be worlds better than the existing products given what current fabs are capable of.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
6,758 (1.39/day)
Processor 7800x3d
Motherboard Gigabyte B650 Auros Elite AX
Cooling Custom Water
Memory GSKILL 2x16gb 6000mhz Cas 30 with custom timings
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6750 XT MECH 2X 12G OC
Storage Adata SX8200 1tb with Windows, Samsung 990 Pro 2tb with games
Display(s) HP Omen 27q QHD 165hz
Case ThermalTake P3
Power Supply SuperFlower Leadex Titanium
Software Windows 11 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores CB23: 1811 / 19424 CB24: 1136 / 7687
The performance is fine if the power consumption is great.
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
944 (0.20/day)
Location
Slovenia
System Name PC.
Processor i7 2600K 5.0Gh,i7 3770K 5.00Gh. EK, Liqed Coooleng
Motherboard P67A-UD7-B3 Gigabyte T.,ASUS,P8Z77-V PREMIUM,MAXIMUS V EXTRIME..
Cooling Liqed Cooleng ,EK Suprime LTX Nickel,EK for Motherboard,Aqua computer (WGA), Thermaltake .... 0i,
Memory G.SKILL F3-17600CL7-2GBPISG. 16GBSkill Sniper F3-17000CL94GBSR on 2400Hz 10-12-11-29 1
Video Card(s) GTX590 ,SLI ,POV TGT best 691Hz ,LiqedCoold,GTX480.....GTX1080MSI SeaHawkEK SLI
Storage OCZ-REVODRIVE 3-240GB,2xCrucialMX100.512.R-0,1x LMT-32L3m,3x 1TB-WD,1x;1x2TbSEAGATE1x2Tb Seagate
Display(s) DELL-U2412Mb,Samsung Synkmaster245B,HP ENVY 34c
Case Thermaltake, NZXT SWITCH 810SE
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE BLASTER X-Fi Titanium HD , AUNE T1MK2 TUBE USB
Power Supply ENERMAX Platimax 1500W,Thermaltake 1500W
Mouse VIPER V560,FUNC MS-3, Prestigio, R.A.T.E.7 and 5,LogitechG502,RAZER,Inperator.,dead...a.s.o.
Keyboard Trust ....LogotechG410
Software Windows7 64....
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Fire Strike 21.385 (37.234,11.828,7.176)
Core efficiency is low. it reaches 0.4 Fremi architecture. Pixs fillrate and Texture fillrate is very consistent with GTX480 - GTX570 operating frequency much higher which again shows the ineffectiveness of the core.
Customizing the upcoming 4K resolution monitors! seem a big problem. And next gen Open GL to .Or is it as usual resisting direct X. Difficult to say that they are not prepared Driver for new architecture.
definitely a disappointment ! 1-8 nop !
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2013
Messages
30 (0.01/day)
System Name Gaming rig
Processor AMD ryzen 7 2700x
Motherboard gigabyte b450 aorus pro
Cooling AMD wraith prism
Memory Asgard 2x16gb ddr4 3200mhz cl16
Video Card(s) Asus tuf 1660 3X fan
Storage 2TB HDDs + samsung 850 evo 128gb sata SSD + silicon power A80 1TB nvme SSD
Display(s) Viewsonic xg2405 24" 144hz
Case Cooler master H500p
Audio Device(s) on-board
Power Supply Corsair RM1000i
Mouse Razer viper
Keyboard Cooler master devastator 3
Software windows 11 x64 pro
this looks weak
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,306 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
If you take the graphics score from a 650Ti and then calculate what that score would be if 650Ti was running at 750Ti's gpu speed and had 960 cores instead of 768, you come up with a score close to that 5600.
Now at Wccftech they where saying that we will also see a 750 not Ti with a rumored 75W power consumption. If 750 non ti follows the same logic as 650, with 650 having half the cores compared to 650Ti, then there isn't really any difference in power consumption compared to Kepler. From 64W and 384 cores on 650 non ti you go to 75W and 480 cores on 750 non ti. No big deal I think.

Looking at these facts/rumors, and also considering that both cards are part of 700 series, I still have huge doubts that these cards are Maxwell. I think they are Kepler rebrands.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
540 (0.08/day)
System Name Ed-PC
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus TUF Z690 PLUS Wifi D4
Cooling Noctua NH-14S
Memory Crucial Ballistix DDR4 C16@3600 16GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia MSI 970
Storage Samsung 980, 860evo
Case Lian Li Lancool II mesh Perf
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
Software Win10 Pro 64bit
Since there still on 28nm why would power go down by much for same core count , efficiency improvements would only be small IMO , few % and that would probably need solid drivers .
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
984 (0.18/day)
Location
Michigan
System Name Daves
Processor AMD Ryzen 3900x
Motherboard AsRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Enermax LIQMAX III 360
Memory 32 GiG Team Group B Die 3600
Video Card(s) Powercolor 5700 xt Red Devil
Storage Crucial MX 500 SSD and Intel P660 NVME 2TB for games
Display(s) Acer 144htz 27in. 2560x1440
Case Phanteks P600S
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Corsair RM 750
Mouse EVGA
Keyboard Corsair Strafe
Software Windows 10 Pro
Yep not much to see here!
 
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
1,972 (0.35/day)
Location
Bulgaria
System Name penguin
Processor R7 5700G
Motherboard Asrock B450M Pro4
Cooling Some CM tower cooler that will fit my case
Memory 4 x 8GB Kingston HyperX Fury 2666MHz
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) 27' LG
Case Zalman
Audio Device(s) stock
Power Supply Seasonic SS-620GM
Software win10
It seems to be a tad memory starved. Compared to a 660 which also comes with 960 shaders, not only does it have 1 less memory bus, but the mem speed is lower too. That seems to be the culprit and explains the low performance.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
2,174 (0.34/day)
Location
Darkness
System Name Unreal Machine IV
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard Asrock 570X Taichi
Cooling Noctua U9S
Memory Team UD4-4000 @4000 CL18 1:1
Video Card(s) 5600XT Red Devil
Storage Kingston SSD 240GB + WD RED 4TB + WD Blue SN 550 Nvme 1TB X3
Display(s) DELL U2417H
Case Old school Termalthake xaser III black with lots of noctua 80mm fans
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Champion + Creative Inspire t7900 7.1 + Sony MDR-1A + AKG K-240
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech G502 hero SE
Keyboard Logitech
Software 10 pro
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 Multi ~15k 4.4Ghz all core Cinebench R23 single 1.5k 4.65Ghz
Performance lower than my Hd6950 running on a 3.4Ghz i3 and probably will cost around 150-200€...
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,306 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
Performance lower than my Hd6950 running on a 3.4Ghz i3 and probably will cost around 150-200€...

I would expect a price between 650Ti and 650Ti Boost. I think it is meant to replace both cards(in a way).
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,352 (0.51/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
Strangled by 86.4GB/s bandwidth, same as 650Ti. 750Ti will respond supremely to memory overclocking.
 
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
762 (0.13/day)
System Name HTPC whhaaaat?
Processor 2600k @ 4500mhz
Motherboard Asus Maximus IV gene-z gen3
Cooling Noctua NH-C14
Memory Gskill Ripjaw 2x4gb
Video Card(s) EVGA 1080 FTW @ 2037/11016
Storage 2x512GB MX100/1x Agility 3 128gb ssds, Seagate 3TB HDD
Display(s) Vizio P 65'' 4k tv
Case Lian Li pc-c50b
Audio Device(s) Denon 3311
Power Supply Corsair 620HX
It seems to be a tad memory starved. Compared to a 660 which also comes with 960 shaders, not only does it have 1 less memory bus, but the mem speed is lower too. That seems to be the culprit and explains the low performance.

Bingo.

If it is 960 unified shaders (meaning a smx is comprised of 240sp instead of 192+32 special function units) is will require exactly 25% more bandwidth, even though the actual usefulness versus 896 (768+128) is only a couple to a few percent in games beyond increased compute performance, which granted is important for additional effects/physics/etc. Unified is the best way forward considering gpus are for more than rasterization, but it is not always the most efficient purely for graphics performance. I assume sfus are quite a bit smaller than full shaders, use less power, and were tied to the internal cache (hence not needing extra bw), but granted 240 unified is a good number.

The thing about kepler is while nvidia nailed the ratio needed for special function (which amd does in shaders, perhaps nvidia will now too) the best ratio of total units is around 234-235sp for 4 rops. Nvidia had 224 (192+32) while amd has 256 in most scenarios. This is why often kepler was more efficient, but gcn stronger per clock (when both similarly satiated but not accounting for excessive bandwidth per design). 240 is obviously very close to the ideal mark per 4 rops per one 'core', and realistically the closest an arch can get based on large, compact engines with units based on granularity of multiples of 4/8/16 etc.

That said, I truly expected something clever like 1037-1100/7000, or the outlier chance of something phenomenal, like say 192-bit, up to 1200mhz boost, and 5500mhz-rated (7000mhz 1.5v binned to 1.35v) ram...those would have made sense or been exciting....perhaps in six-or-seven months when we get 20nm parts.

This...this is shit. It basically screams 'wait for the 770-style rebrand we try to sell you in six months with a better bandwidth config that we will hail as a huge efficiency improvement' once gk106 chips exit the channel and no longer competes with it. AMD isn't much better with the 5ghz-> 6ghz ram on 7870->270(x), but at least in that case the they were probably waiting for that specific ram to get cheaper, as well as the fact the initial design wasn't supremely bottle-necked by 5ghz (or most 5ghz overclockable speeds). I suppose there is a chance nvidia could rig future (20nm) maxwell designs up with a larger cache so it is less dependent on external bw and this design got the shaft because of 28nm, but I'm not holding my breath.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2012
Messages
1,400 (0.31/day)
Location
78°55' N, 11°56' E
System Name -aLiEn beaTs-
Processor Intel i7 11700kf @ 5.055Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z490 Unify
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro RGB
Memory G.skill Royal Silver 4400 cl17 @ 4403mhz
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 980TI AMP!Omega Factory OC 1418MHz
Storage Intel SSD 330, Crucial SSD MX300 & MX500
Display(s) Samsung C24FG73 144HZ
Case CoolerMaster HAF 932 USB3.0
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD @ 2.1 Bose acoustimass 5
Power Supply CoolerMaster 850W v2 gold atx 2.52
Mouse Razer viper 8k
Keyboard Logitech G19s
Software Windows 11 Pro 21h2 64Bit
Benchmark Scores ► ♪♫♪♩♬♫♪♭
Looks ok for a physx card..
 
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
222 (0.05/day)
System Name Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Processor Ryzen 5 5600 @4.65 GHz
Motherboard Asus ROG X570-E
Cooling Thermalright
Memory 32 GB 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) Asus RX 6700XT 12 GB Dual
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus
Display(s) SS QHD 144Hz + LG 55 Inch 4K
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply Superflower 850
Really high core clock .
 
Joined
Feb 14, 2012
Messages
2,352 (0.51/day)
System Name msdos
Processor 8086
Motherboard mainboard
Cooling passive
Memory 640KB + 384KB extended
Video Card(s) EGA
Storage 5.25"
Display(s) 80x25
Case plastic
Audio Device(s) modchip
Power Supply 45 watts
Mouse serial
Keyboard yes
Software disk commander
Benchmark Scores still running
Really high core clock .

I hate it when they jack the clock on a low core count, inefficient. 660 Ti was nice, higher core count lower clock. Of course that's the one they axed, and the 650 Ti Boost.
 
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
118 (0.03/day)
This doesn't look good. It brings back my memories to the 550 Ti. It is not even faster than the 2 year old 7850.
 
Top