- Joined
- Sep 26, 2006
- Messages
- 464 (0.07/day)
At what point does the cost and yeild benefit disappear with all this complex alignment and 'gluing' of chipsets tiles?
System Name | 4K-gaming |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X |
Motherboard | Gigabyte B550M Aorus Elite |
Cooling | Custom loop, Corsair ML/LL fans |
Memory | 48GB Kingston Fury DDR4-3200 |
Video Card(s) | Asus GeForce RTX 3080 TUF 10GB @ +150/700 |
Storage | ~4TB SSD + 6TB HDD |
Display(s) | Acer XV273K 4K120 + Lenovo L32p-30 4K60 |
Case | Corsair 4000D Airflow White |
Audio Device(s) | Asus TUF H3 Wireless |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova G2 750W |
Mouse | Logitech MX518 + Asus TUF P1 mousepad |
Keyboard | Roccat Vulcan 121 AIMO |
VR HMD | Oculus Rift CV1 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | It runs Crysis remastered at 4K |
Yeah the Pentium D 900 series had multiple dies, D 800 had one big die (put basicly a dual Pentium 4 500 series)EDIT: Apparently the old Core 2 Quads had multiple dies.
Picture from @Ruslan
I knew that the older Pentium D chips also had multiple dies.
Both dies were processor dies. This was back in the days of having the northbridge on the motherboard.
Processor | i5-6600K |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus Z170A |
Cooling | some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar |
Memory | 16GB DDR4-2400 |
Video Card(s) | IGP |
Storage | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB |
Display(s) | 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200 |
Case | Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh |
Audio Device(s) | E-mu 1212m PCI |
Power Supply | Seasonic G-360 |
Mouse | Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse |
Keyboard | Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994 |
Software | Oldwin |
So Intel had the great idea of chiplets/tiles as early as clarkdale in 2010, did they go back to a single die after this? If so I wonder why. As long as the interconnect between them is fast enough it's a great setup as seen by Ryzen.
What is the interface between the tiles on these?
It's not some fixed point. Chip manufacturing is advancing, albeit slowly, price per transistor is heading upwards instead of downwards, and there's a size limit of 26x33 mm. Meanwhile, packaging tech is advancing at an amazing rate - see Intel, TSMC, Cerebras - but in my opinion, exotic tech comes at an exotic price. So it's all dictated by economics... like ever before.At what point does the cost and yeild benefit disappear with all this complex alignment and 'gluing' ofchipsetstiles?
Processor | I7-6900K @ 4.2ghz 8c/4.3ghz 2c |
---|---|
Motherboard | GA-X99-Ultra Gaming |
Cooling | Liquid Freezer II 240 |
Memory | 32GB G.Skill @ 3200 15-17-17-34 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 3080 12GB FTW3 Ultra Hybrid |
Storage | 1TB P31 NVMe and 2x 1TB S31 SATA |
Display(s) | CU34G2X and Ea244wmi |
Case | 5000D Airflow |
Audio Device(s) | Sound Blaster X4 |
Power Supply | SuperNOVA 850 G+ |
Mouse | G502 HERO/G700s |
Keyboard | Ducky Shine |
That would be either an Itanium 733 or 800 with 4 MB L3 cache. I believe the first generation were the only ones to feature the separated cache....
Edit: Hey, can anyone identify this price-no-object processor called Itanium? It has four dies on a single substrate. They can't be anything else but cache - it's from a period when cache was separate from the CPU, like in Pentium II and III. Source: https://chipscapes.com/products/intel-generations
View attachment 237317
Processor | i5-6600K |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus Z170A |
Cooling | some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar |
Memory | 16GB DDR4-2400 |
Video Card(s) | IGP |
Storage | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB |
Display(s) | 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200 |
Case | Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh |
Audio Device(s) | E-mu 1212m PCI |
Power Supply | Seasonic G-360 |
Mouse | Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse |
Keyboard | Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994 |
Software | Oldwin |
You're right. So Intel (and HP) did glue several chips on a common substrate as early as 2001. IBM and others did it before (early examples I found on a Russian site). Maybe IBM had EMIB but didn't tell anyone, and those who cut IBM modules apart didn't notice anything because it was too advanced.That would be either an Itanium 733 or 800 with 4 MB L3 cache. I believe the first generation were the only ones to feature the separated cache.
In 2026, thanks to Itanium E-cores, notebooks would finally become as thin as they used to be in 2000.I've often wondered what the landscape would look like if Intel had been able to shift to IA-64 and leave x86 behind. AMD was smart to design the extension to x86 with AMD64, because of the state of the software market, but a clean break could have changed everything.
Processor | I7-6900K @ 4.2ghz 8c/4.3ghz 2c |
---|---|
Motherboard | GA-X99-Ultra Gaming |
Cooling | Liquid Freezer II 240 |
Memory | 32GB G.Skill @ 3200 15-17-17-34 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 3080 12GB FTW3 Ultra Hybrid |
Storage | 1TB P31 NVMe and 2x 1TB S31 SATA |
Display(s) | CU34G2X and Ea244wmi |
Case | 5000D Airflow |
Audio Device(s) | Sound Blaster X4 |
Power Supply | SuperNOVA 850 G+ |
Mouse | G502 HERO/G700s |
Keyboard | Ducky Shine |
During that era everything would have been connected by a bus (most likely dedicated between cache and core) as the process node technology wasn't good enough to even imagine something like EMIB.You're right. So Intel (and HP) did glue several chips on a common substrate as early as 2001. IBM and others did it before (early examples I found on a Russian site). Maybe IBM had EMIB but didn't tell anyone, and those who cut IBM modules apart didn't notice anything because it was too advanced.
You're not wrong with how terribly they started out.In 2026, thanks to Itanium E-cores, notebooks would finally become as thin as they used to be in 2000.
Ugh.My 90nm identifies as 1nm and failure to respect that is hate crime.
Integrated performance demands are much higher now than in 2010, and with big appetites for many cores it makes sense to move the the large GPU die off of the CPU die.I can't believe they're spinning this as new , I mean a reasonably useful GPU in an Intel CPU would be new, but Intel doing an McM with a CPU and GPU is so last decade.
And a few weeks ago they were buying their competitors GPU to place on their McM.(sarcasm )
In fact the only new bit is Intel has decided to nick AMD'S McM IO die concept, no?!.
System Name | RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II |
---|---|
Processor | Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H |
Motherboard | Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus |
Cooling | 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK |
Memory | Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB |
Video Card(s) | Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060 |
Storage | Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme |
Display(s) | Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter |
Case | Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2 |
Audio Device(s) | Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset |
Power Supply | corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock |
Mouse | Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless |
Keyboard | Roccat Aimo 120 |
VR HMD | Oculus rift |
Software | Win 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506 |
I wasn't against it ?Integrated performance demands are much higher now than in 2010, and with big appetites for many cores it makes sense to move the the large GPU die off of the CPU die.
Processor | i5-6600K |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus Z170A |
Cooling | some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar |
Memory | 16GB DDR4-2400 |
Video Card(s) | IGP |
Storage | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB |
Display(s) | 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200 |
Case | Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh |
Audio Device(s) | E-mu 1212m PCI |
Power Supply | Seasonic G-360 |
Mouse | Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse |
Keyboard | Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994 |
Software | Oldwin |
With MCM, Intel can also fracture the supply chain in ways unimaginable in 2010, and have parts of a single product partly made in India, Germany, China, Ireland, Mexico, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, US, South Korea, Israel, Taiwan and Jamaica. It's cheaper this way.Integrated performance demands are much higher now than in 2010, and with big appetites for many cores it makes sense to move the the large GPU die off of the CPU die.
System Name | RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II |
---|---|
Processor | Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H |
Motherboard | Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus |
Cooling | 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK |
Memory | Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB |
Video Card(s) | Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060 |
Storage | Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme |
Display(s) | Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter |
Case | Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2 |
Audio Device(s) | Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset |
Power Supply | corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock |
Mouse | Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless |
Keyboard | Roccat Aimo 120 |
VR HMD | Oculus rift |
Software | Win 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506 |
Say what now?!.This is like alien technology from intel