• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Eliyan Closes $40M Series A Funding Round and Unveils Industry's Highest Performance Chiplet Interconnect Technologies

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
16,348 (2.29/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
Eliyan Corporation, credited for the invention of the semiconductor industry's highest-performance and most efficient chiplet interconnect, today announced two major milestones in the commercialization of its technology for multi-die chiplet integration: the close of its Series A $40M funding round, and the successful tapeout of its technology on an industry standard 5-nanometer (nm) process.

Eliyan's NuLink PHY and NuGear technologies address the critical need for a commercially viable approach to enabling high performance and cost-effectiveness in the connection of homogeneous and heterogenous architectures on a standard, organic chip substrate. It has proven to achieve similar bandwidth, power efficiency, and latency as die-to-die implementations using advanced packaging technologies, but without the other drawbacks of specialized approaches.




Eliyan's chiplet packaging method is key to realizing the scale of performance and integration required in a broad range of compute intensive applications for data centers, cloud computing, AI and graphics.

The company's founding CEO Ramin Farjadrad is the inventor of the innovative and proven Bunch of Wires (BoW) scheme, which has been adopted by the Open Compute Project (OCP). NuLink technology is backward compatible with Universal Chiplet Interconnect Express (UCIe), a standard developed by Intel and donated to the UCIe Consortium, which includes 80+ leaders in semiconductor, packaging, foundries, cloud services and IP suppliers. Farjadrad's experience includes pioneering work in creating connectivity technologies such as PAM4 SerDes, Multi-Gbps Enterprise Ethernet, and Multi-Gbps Automotive Ethernet that were eventually adopted as IEEE Standards.

Eliyan's Series A round was led by Tracker Capital Management ("Tracker Capital"), which was founded by Stephen A. Feinberg, Co-Founder and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. Celesta Capital and other strategic investors including Intel Capital and Micron also participated. As part of the investment from Tracker Capital, made in February 2022, Dr. Shaygan Kheradpir of Cerberus, former Group CIO and a founding member of the Executive Leadership Committee at Verizon, will join the Board of Directors of Eliyan.

Funding supports accelerated validation and commercial readiness
Funding and support from leading industry players enable fast-track design, testing, and implementation ramp-up, culminating with the demonstration of the commercial readiness of Eliyan's best-in-class chiplet interconnect technology in a recent, successful tapeout using TSMC's 5 nm process. The design confirms Eliyan's ability to achieve twice the bandwidth at less than half the power consumption of current interconnect methods and does so using a standard system-in-package (SIP) manufacturing and packaging process. The ability to implement chiplet-based systems in organic packages enables the creation of larger and higher performance solutions at considerably lower power and cost of materials. These factors provide major gains in sustainability.

The company's first silicon is expected in the first quarter of 2023.
"Technology scaling using conventional system on chip (SoC) architectures is hitting the wall, requiring a new approach in how we integrate and manufacture silicon. Our extensive background in developing bleeding-edge technologies in this space led us to focus on a key challenge: interconnect improvements for system-in-package and chip-to-memory architectures as the path to deliver performance scaling," said Eliyan CEO and co-founder, Ramin Farjadrad. "Our approach supports and is compliant with the overall industry move toward chiplet-optimized interconnect protocols, including the UCIe standard as well as High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) protocols. This financial investment by industry leaders and the successful implementation of our design in 5 nm validates our strategy and prepares us for broader commercialization efforts."

Dr. Shaygan Kheradpir of Cerberus commented: "Traditional methods of integrating multi-chip architectures impose challenges that result in high costs, low yield, manufacturing complexity, and size limitations. Eliyan has drawn upon its years of experience to develop a practical scheme that is also backward compatible with existing standards to chiplet interconnect and is optimized for delivering the necessary high bandwidth, low latency, and low power capabilities. We are confident its NuLink technology holds the key to a broader proliferation of chiplets in key market sectors such as hyperscalers, AI processor development, high-performance memory, and advanced graphics chips."

Advanced chiplet interconnect is key to extending Moore's Law
Ulitlizing the manufacturing and cost advantages of chiplets, product developers can continue to scale the performance, power efficiency and size required by high performance computing applications. Industry forecasters estimate the chiplet sector of the semiconductor market will be $50B, with high-bandwidth memory (HBM) applications representing an additional $8B market growing at 50% CAGR.

Eliyan's innovative approach to connecting multi-die chip architectures is achieved without the need for complex and advanced packaging solutions such as silicon interposers. This is essential to cost-effectively leveraging the potential of the fast-growing chiplet-based architectures that experts agree are the pathway to extend Moore's Law.

A track record of interconnect innovation to enable the chiplet ecosystem
Eliyan's BoW approach was specifically developed to address the need for highly efficient die-to-die (D2D) PHYs to connect different functions in one package.

Its NuLink technology, which is a superset of BoW and UCIe, is an innovative PHY technology that uses patented implementation techniques to provide major power-performance differentiation for die-to-die (D2D) connectivity over any packaging substrate, reducing complexity and lowering overall development time and costs. It eliminates the need for advanced packaging solutions, such as silicon interposers that limit overall system-in-package size that ultimately limits performance, results in low wafer test coverage that ultimately impacts yield, increases total cost of ownership, and extends overall manufacturing cycle time.

The company's patented NuGear is an optimized technology for 2.5/3D implementations that enables practical mix and match of chiplets with different die-to-die interfaces in in different processes (DRAM, SOI, etc.).

The technology has been under development by Farjadrad and his team since 2017. In 2018, Farjadrad proposed BoW as a superior chiplet interconnect architecture to OCP. Given the significantly improved performance and features that BoW offered over existing methods, it received strong support and later was adopted as the chiplet interconnect scheme of OCP. Farjadrad's work not only led to the adoption of BoW at OCP, but also helped influence UCIe, which is based on the same signaling/clocking schemes and architecture basics and is widely supported in the industry.

An earlier incarnation of the NuLink technology has been mass-produced on a 14 nm process, validating its commercial viability and performance advantages. The most recent version that was taped out at 5 nm delivers a minimum of 2000 Gbps/mm of edge bandwidth on a standard organic package.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (3.00/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
It sounds like AMD should be very interested in this. Die-to-die-like IF without the cost of LSI or CoWoS? Yes, please!
 
Joined
Feb 6, 2015
Messages
13 (0.00/day)
It sounds like AMD should be very interested in this. Die-to-die-like IF without the cost of LSI or CoWoS? Yes, please!
So how does this compare to AMD's current technology in speed and power usage.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8,140 (2.25/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF gaming B650
Cooling Artic Liquid Freezer 2 - 420mm
Memory G.Skill Sniper 32gb DDR5 6000
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 4070 ti super 16gb
Storage Samsung EVO 500gb & 1Tb, 2tb HDD, 500gb WD Black
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) - SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Steeseries Esports Wireless
Keyboard Corsair K100
Software windows 10 H
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
It sounds like AMD should be very interested in this. Die-to-die-like IF without the cost of LSI or CoWoS? Yes, please!
It should prove interesting to see a direct performance comparison between IF and this. Another thought is how much of IF contributes to this tech.
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
16,348 (2.29/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
It sounds like AMD should be very interested in this. Die-to-die-like IF without the cost of LSI or CoWoS? Yes, please!
"investors including Intel Capital and Micron"
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2019
Messages
2,155 (1.15/day)
Location
Olympia, WA
System Name Sleepy Painter
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus TuF Gaming X570-PLUS/WIFI
Cooling FSP Windale 6 - Passive
Memory 2x16GB F4-3600C16-16GVKC @ 16-19-21-36-58-1T
Video Card(s) MSI RX580 8GB
Storage 2x Samsung PM963 960GB nVME RAID0, Crucial BX500 1TB SATA, WD Blue 3D 2TB SATA
Display(s) Microboard 32" Curved 1080P 144hz VA w/ Freesync
Case NZXT Gamma Classic Black
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D1
Power Supply Rosewill 1KW on 240V@60hz
Mouse Logitech MX518 Legend
Keyboard Red Dragon K552
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 2019 LTSC 1809 17763.1757
"investors including Intel Capital and Micron"
Last time I recall Micron and Intel working together, it didn't turn out too well...
*Cough*Optane*Cough*

At least, when they end up abandoning Eliyan, someone like AMD (or maybe Sun Microsystems?) will be interested in their IP(s).
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (3.00/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
"investors including Intel Capital and Micron"
Micron? That's odd, wonder what they would want this for. Intel I can Definitely see - if nothing else then to keep this tech out of AMD's hands, but also as a potential half-way fall-back if they keep hitting delays for Meteor Lake and other MCM designs.

So how does this compare to AMD's current technology in speed and power usage.
I don't have any numbers, but from memory I seem to recall something like an order of magnitude less power per bit transferred for things like EMIB vs through package signalling? @TheLostSwede can probably enlighten us on this though?

Given that IF on current AMD CPUs sits in the 10+W range (for both 5000 and 7000 series) - nobody outside of AMD has precise numbers, but it's the majority of the uncore power of these chips, which varies from ~10-20W. An order of magnitude less would then be ~1W, which would be a massive, massive difference - and could render MCM APUs for mobile viable, for example.
 
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
2,823 (2.26/day)
Location
Slovenia
Processor i5-6600K
Motherboard Asus Z170A
Cooling some cheap Cooler Master Hyper 103 or similar
Memory 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
Display(s) 2x Oldell 24" 1920x1200
Case Bitfenix Nova white windowless non-mesh
Audio Device(s) E-mu 1212m PCI
Power Supply Seasonic G-360
Mouse Logitech Marble trackball, never had a mouse
Keyboard Key Tronic KT2000, no Win key because 1994
Software Oldwin
I don't have any numbers, but from memory I seem to recall something like an order of magnitude less power per bit transferred for things like EMIB vs through package signalling? @TheLostSwede can probably enlighten us on this though?
AMD is not entirely without bridges, they have some in Instinct ("AMD is relying on a technology called Elevated Fanout Bridge 2.5D, which takes fanout packaging to the next level by incorporating a small silicon bridge above the substrate itself to connect two dies") and RDNA3 ("AMD is using an unspecified fanout bridge technology").
Given that IF on current AMD CPUs sits in the 10+W range (for both 5000 and 7000 series) - nobody outside of AMD has precise numbers, but it's the majority of the uncore power of these chips, which varies from ~10-20W. An order of magnitude less would then be ~1W, which would be a massive, massive difference - and could render MCM APUs for mobile viable, for example.
10+ W is the consumption of an idle Ryzen CPU with chiplets, is that what you mean? I don't know what parts of the package contribute to that but there should be very little data transfer between chiplets, so a better bridge technology couln't reduce consumption by a lot in an idle CPU (or at low load).

And I've just noticed that monolithic parts aren't any better in this regard. At least TPU measured 50 W for the 5600X and 52 W for the 5700G system consumption on idle.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (3.00/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
I know, I wasn't very clear about it but I was specifically talking about their CPUs, as I've been in several discussions touching on IF power here previously and how that harms AMD's efficiency at lower power levels compared to Intel's monolithic chips.
10+ W is the consumption of an idle Ryzen CPU with chiplets, is that what you mean? I don't know what parts of the package contribute to that but there should be very little data transfer between chiplets, so a better bridge technology couln't reduce consumption by a lot in an idle CPU (or at low load).

And I've just noticed that monolithic parts aren't any better in this regard. At least TPU measured 50 W for the 5600X and 52 W for the 5700G system consumption on idle.
Idle power is one thing - at idle IF can implement power saving measures, but it's still notably higher compared to a monolithic or die-to-die bridge solution. It's more interesting under load. Remember, the RAM controllers are on the IOD, so the CCDs will constantly be sending significant amounts of data across that bus even if there is minimal inter-CCD communication.

Uncore power is the sum of whatever is on the IOD, plus IF link power, so it's a bit of a mixed bag, but the majority of the IOD sits idle most of the time, and an idle PCIe or sata controller consumes minimal power. PCIe generally consumes very little power. Leaving memory and IF, of which once again IF is by far the biggest power draw (especially as memory power is mostly the DIMMs, not the controllers, and DIMMs are powered separately).

Full system power draw numbers are fundamentally unreliable for showing anything other than full system power, there's far too much variability and room for error to use that as a measurement of something like CPU idle power. Thankfully tpu has finally moved on to direct eps cable measurements in their most recent reviews.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (3.00/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
Oh, I forgot to mention above, but EPYC and TR Pro might be the best AMD application for something like this. Anandtech's EPYC Milan review (or more specifically their later re-testing with a more up-to-date motherboard) casts some light on this: Uncore power on EPYC Milan can reach well above 100W, of which IF power is the vast majority. They even see variations in uncore power draw specifically related to how memory-bound the workloads are (down to ~50W uncore power in less memory bound workloads on the new, better tuned motherboard), a clear indication that increased memory traffic increases IF power draw. It's also worth noting that while the original test platform had an old, updated but unoptimized 1st gen EPYC motherboard that had excessive IO power at times, peak uncore power isn't drastically different between the two - it's slightly lower, but mainly lower in scenarios where IF is less utilized for memory access. In other words: through-package IF is a power hog, and is a significant hindrance to further performance scaling in server/HPC, and a significant hindrance to efficiency in MSDT and mobile applications.

Now, we know AMD is working closely with TSMC on developing exotic packaging tech - RDNA3 likely uses CoWoS, though it might be LSI - but getting similar performance without relying on interposers, whether full-sized or smaller, substrate-embedded ones like LSI and EMIB would be a major benefit to the cost and complexity of these CPUs and APUs going forward.

Which, I guess, partly explains why Intel, who already has EMIB, which is well proven at this point, would want in on this. Not only for their burgeoning fab business, but also to keep it out of AMD's hands.
 
Top