- Joined
- Mar 8, 2009
- Messages
- 1,077 (0.19/day)
System Name | Primary Rig |
---|---|
Processor | e8500 Q822A549 4.5ghz AIR |
Motherboard | Foxconn Mars P35 |
Cooling | TRUE |
Memory | 2 x2GB Patriot Viper 1066 5-5-5-12 @ 1.8v |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire 5870 Unlocked |
Storage | 300gb Velociraptor |
Display(s) | Dell 24" Ultrasharp |
Case | Coolermaster CM690 |
Power Supply | PC Power & Cooling 750w Quad Silencer |
Software | Windows 7 Ultimate x86 |
4.6ghz i5-3570k ~ 4.9ghz 2500k Cinebench CPU Rendering
I pulled out the retail OEM E1 3570k and put in my 2500k at 4.9ghz same system.
As far as Cinebench CPU rendering, it does appear a 4.6ghz 3570k @ 1.3v is roughly equivalent to a 4.9ghz 2500k @ 1.376v but runs at higher temps - see below:
It is then reasonable to infer that as far as Cinebench CPU rendering a 4.5ghz 3570k is comparable to a 4.8ghz 2500k.
The temperature profile is much more reasonable and achievable by all with a 4.5ghz 3570k also:
I pulled out the retail OEM E1 3570k and put in my 2500k at 4.9ghz same system.
As far as Cinebench CPU rendering, it does appear a 4.6ghz 3570k @ 1.3v is roughly equivalent to a 4.9ghz 2500k @ 1.376v but runs at higher temps - see below:
![](/forums/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi246.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fgg84%2Fjhchang69%2FCinebenchComparison.png&hash=af3dc9589608d2ceee8c8e2c6db0d70a)
![](/forums/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi246.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fgg84%2Fjhchang69%2FBetterPrime60min.png&hash=15bbb70b22a39347a458260b52fc4450)
![](/forums/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi246.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fgg84%2Fjhchang69%2F2500k49ghz.png&hash=a509616b463782e8ffcf6f475b5a4358)
It is then reasonable to infer that as far as Cinebench CPU rendering a 4.5ghz 3570k is comparable to a 4.8ghz 2500k.
The temperature profile is much more reasonable and achievable by all with a 4.5ghz 3570k also:
![](/forums/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi246.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fgg84%2Fjhchang69%2F3570k45ghz124v.png&hash=a04333b6b626f2ff96fb21050639bbbf)
Last edited: