• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

SATA 3.0 (6Gbps) Cables - What's the Deal?

Joined
Oct 6, 2005
Messages
10,242 (1.46/day)
Location
Granite Bay, CA
System Name Big Devil
Processor Intel Core i5-2500K
Motherboard ECS P67H2-A2
Cooling XSPC Rasa | Black Ice GT Stealth 240 | XSPC X2O 750 | 2x ACF12PWM | PrimoChill White 7/16"
Memory 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance LP Arctic White 1600MHz CL9
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 ACX SC
Storage Intel 520 Series 180GB + WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) HP ZR30W 30" 2650x1600 IPS
Case Corsair 600T SE
Audio Device(s) Xonar Essence STX | Sennheisser PC350 "Hero" Modded | Corsair SP2500
Power Supply ABS SL 1050W (Enermax Revolution Rebadge)
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro w/ Media Center
Benchmark Scores Ducky Year of the Snake w/ Cherry MX Browns & Year of the Tiger PBT Keycaps | Razer Deathadder Black
I've heard many reviewers state that there is no difference between a SATA 2.0 cable and a SATA 3.0 cable other than the marking on them. I have heard others say that there are differences. I'd definitely like a definitive answer on this.

Found this from SATA-Io_Org:

SATA 6Gb/s Cabling
The same cables and connectors used for current SATA implementations can be
used to connect SATA 6Gb/s devices. SATA-IO recommends utilizing quality
components to ensure data integrity and robust operation at the fast 6Gb/s transfer rate.
Cables already at the threshold of 3Gb/s operating margins may experience lower
performance than expected at 6Gb/s due to an increased number of resends.
The SATA Revision 3.0 spec addresses this issue by defining the Compliance
Interconnect Channel (CIC). The CIC is outlined as a mathematical model of a
compliant channel as well as an insertion/return loss plot defining the most extreme
losses the system can sustain and still be compliant. Note that the CIC does not specify
the components to be used in a system but rather the overall performance and quality
the system must exhibit.
Cable vendors will want to consider removing any question of quality by marking
their packaging to explicitly state a product's 6Gb/s CIC compliance. Vendors can also
have their cables added to the Integrators List on the SATA-IO web site. End-users, for
their part, will want to consult the Integrators List – this list is available to the public –
before buying new cabling.

They definitely mention that SATA 2.0 cables may not live up to SATA 3.0 drives, but there doesn't seem to be a set standard for the cabling, at least in that document. Is there any other information out there?
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.53/day)
Shielding and how it's shielded and actual wire construction is the big issue.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,609 (6.50/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e-Plus Wifi
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD/Samsung m.2's
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Amp, Adam Audio T5V's, Hifiman Sundara's.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Epomaker 84 key
Software Windows 11 Pro
Shielding and how it's shielded and actual wire construction is the big issue.

Indeed, if you put the two cables side by side there is a difference. It seems with a Sata 6gbps cable that it is split in two lengthwise. What it actually means in terms of how it works I have no idea.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.53/day)
Yeah, I'm not sure, exactly why, but 6 Gb/s cabling is a bit thicker than SATA2.


That said, most users do not even ahve devices that should notice any real differences, unless teh cables are real garbage, but I thikn this may actualyl end up playing a role specifically with SSD speed, as SSD's reach over 500 Mb/s.
 
Top