• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Early 470 & 480 benches

jaredpace

jaredpace

Joined
Sep 16, 2009
Messages
166 (0.03/day)
Spoiler Alert: Early 470 & 480 benches

Collection of Fermi Benchmarks: courtesy phk, asuka, obr, kakkoii, kravis, donanim haber, heise.de, computerbase, expreview, & pctuning.cz




20pxc38.jpg


PCB lengths:
HD5870 280mm 28.0cm, 11.02 inches (including backplate & enclosure, 267mm without)
GTX480 267mm 26.7cm, 10.51 inches
GTX470 243mm 24.3cm, 9.56 inches

General performance:
gtx285 75%
hd5850 80%
gtx470 90-95%
hd5870 100%
gtx480 110-115%
hd5970 140%

---------GTX470----------------GTX480----------------GTX470------

---------GTX470----------------GTX480----------------GTX470------


GTX470 Cooler:


20100319090940_WTM_geforcegtx480_atihd5870_resdok_1aa_dh_fx57.jpg


bh8r9.jpg


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ GTX 470 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Specifications rumor: 625mhz core, 1250mhz hot, 1000mhz memory (4000mhz DDR) 320bit Samsung 0.5ns GDDR5 1280mb, 215W, 448sp, 56 tmu, 40 rop, €349.00, $369.00


1.jpg

nv1b.jpg

fullscreencapture316201.jpg

1(9).jpg

2(5).jpg

drivers.png


74b9debabf411a.jpg


exx.jpg

12SY5FFF3053.jpg

GTX470 Device ID = NVIDIA_DEV.06C0.01 = "NVIDIA GF100", this part has been in testing since Forceware v185.20 first spotting:
DriverVer = 12/26/2008, 7.15.11.8520 (15 months of testing ~ same timeframe as cypress coming out of TSMC Jan. 09)
Click to expand...
core @ 625, shader @ 1255 MHz
RAM @ 1600 MHz, 2000 Mhz
800mhz (phk's sample) / 1000mhz (obr's sample and the final clocks) GDDR5 Samsung modules (possibly 5gbps)
All the 470 benches done at 800mhz memory, final is supposed to be 1000mhz
GF100 main advantage is high-res, high-tessellation, minimum fps

GTX470 VS HD5870 in various games @ high-res, high-aa:
GTX 470 625|1255|800 ------ HD 5870 850|850|1200

a46f0aba-0458-4abe-9ce6-f1c14b4d5cbd.jpg


Crysis Warhead:

1003072041dc4a662c1b865.jpg

gtx470benchs.jpg


Tom Clancy's HAWX:

HAWX_25_8aa.jpg


Devil May Cry 4:

????????? Havent seen screens for this game yet

World in Conflict:
2560 x 1600 Ultra 4xAA Max
5870(orange) vs. gtx470(light green)
(Ignore the color of "5870" and "GTX4x0" in the top right, colors were inverted for the overlapping image)

2a99p5j.png

21jnerb.jpg


Farcry2:
2560 x 1600 Ultra 8xAA Max DX10 min/avg/max
5870: 17/32/55
GTX470: 30/40/67

1670490.jpg

nwxawl.jpg

j9c4d4.jpg


Stalker Call of Pripryat:
2560 x 1600 Ultra 4xAA Max DX11

100309233396b4d2bbbc455.jpg

1003092334a71c73ae6759eec6.jpg


Dirt 2 w/ DX11:

vdiv50.jpg


3dmark Vantage:

Performance Vantage- P17156 (GTX470)
(compare HD5850/HD5870: 14300/17303) - GTX480 est.: 17156 x 1.2 = P20,500
Extreme Vantage - X7511 (GTX470)
(compare GTX285/HD5850/HD5870: 6002/6430/8730) - GTX480 est.: 7511 x 1.2 = X9013
GTX470 will have a score of 167xx and 73xx, under Performance preset (1280x1048, 1x AA) and Extreme preset (1900x1200, 4xAA) respectively. Which are 13% and 20% faster than GTX285 and is quite competitive when compared to the results of 5870 under Performance preset. GTX470 will have a wide lead in the benchmarks of the DX10 game, Far Cry 2, with 80fps under the following settings: 1920x1200, 4xAA, 16xAF. However, as there are different benchmarks of Far Cry 2, the data is not ideal for making comparisons with other video cards. GTX470 can achieve a frame rate of around 30fps during the DX11 Uniengine Benchmark under 1920x1200, with 4xAA and 16xAF, which is apparently better than the 5870.
Click to expand...
or8552.jpg


Unigine Heaven:

1920x1200 16xaf benchmark
4xAA [fps]: 29/22/27 (GTX470/HD5850/HD5870)
8xAA [fps]: 20/19/23 (GTX470/HD5850/HD5870)

2a8ncsz.jpg


100303185528f25153d5d8526e.jpg


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ GTX 480 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Specifications rumor: 600-650mhz core, 1250-1350mhz hot, 1000mhz memory (4000mhz DDR) 384bit Samsung 0.4ns GDDR5 1536mb, 280W, 512sp, 60 tmu, 48 rop, €469.00, $489.00

03270128.jpg

25s3d4i.jpg

26392qr.jpg

6t09wg.jpg

rssltd.jpg

1267547764.jpeg

1267547765.jpeg

be6fn.jpg

74b9df7febce49.jpg

1zgalie.jpg


3dMark 2006:

gtx480 (model with 512 shaders)
9u9h83.jpg

hd5870
xasbhe.jpg

14sf9eu.jpg


GTX480 vs. HD5970 Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark:
1920 x 1080 0xAA 1xAF

Geforce GTX 480 stock / Core i7 960 @ 3.33ghz / Heaven v. 1.1 ---------------------------
5pla2v.jpg

video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpdPSZB8A8E&feature=related

Radeon HD 5970 stock / Core i7 920 @ 3.78ghz / Heaven v. 1.0 ---------------------------
2ura4oj.jpg

video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvvQAQU7Sjg

Heavy Tessellation:
GTX 480: 43 fps / HD 5970: 29 fps
fullscreencapture310201.jpg
fullscreencapture310201.jpg

GTX 480: 45 fps / HD 5970: 36 fps
fullscreencapture310201.jpg
fullscreencapture310201.jpg


Medium Tessellation:
GTX 480: 44 fps / HD 5970: 57 fps
fullscreencapture310201.jpg
fullscreencapture310201.jpg

GTX 480: 50 fps / HD 5970: 60 fps
fullscreencapture310201.jpg
fullscreencapture310201.jpg


Very Little Tessellation:
GTX 480: 44 fps / HD 5970: 69 fps
fullscreencapture310201.jpg
fullscreencapture310201.jpg

GTX 480: 71 fps / HD 5970: 112 fps
fullscreencapture310201.jpg
fullscreencapture310201.jpg


Using Illuminated Logo:
GTX 480: 9001 fps / HD 5970: 0 fps
fermi6.jpg
hd597005.jpg


Here's a Full run to reference the time/framerate on the graph below: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F6zSgtRnkE). The toughest scene for the Ati cards is around the 2 minute mark in the benchmark. The camera does a 360 around the heavily tessellated dragon in the early morning sun light, at which point the GTX480 has a higher average framerate than even the OC'ed HD 5970 at the 120 second mark. GF100 is whooping ATI's ass in tessellation. :respect: Must be the 4 triangles per clock? I dunno.
23vf2vb.jpg


Dark Void – 1920x1200 – AA4x – PhysX
GTX 285: 38.3
GTX 480: 77.6

FarCry 2 – 1920x1200 – AA4x – No physX
GTX 285: 51 FPS
GTX 480: 84 FPS

2zyaddv.jpg


Ati's response to GTX 480 is the 2GB 5870 "Eyefinity6" that has been sitting on a shelf collecting dust since last summer:
powercolor_hd5870eyefinity_1.jpg
1z52447.jpg
 
Last edited:
great find... thanks
 
The 5970 & 4xx look like very similar performing cards. It'll all come down to $/performance & "features" specific to the card / brand. If NVIDIA smart, they won't put these cards at steep prices, but they have to recoup their development costs. And the costs for this card are probably very high.
 
AMD will bring out the HD5890 2GB to counter attack the GTX 480, then lower prices at the same time:D:D:D

I hope Nvidia bring out the GTX 480 in 3GB versions, I wanna get 2 and SLI them both, I want 3D Bitches :D:D:D
 
hell and you know damn well with nvidia there will be a GTX485,475,and495(<<dual gpu) this dual gpu will most likely end up longer than the 5970 imo
 
I see the angle here. Show benchmarks that are vram dependant more so then GPU dependant. For example showing results at 2560, one example that shows mins (which really isn't playable), etc.
 
Hmmm, 10-15% increase against 5870. Not too shabby, but can be better. Winner provides the better price, and I would like to see Nvidia's cards below the $400 mark, but that is highly unlikely.
 
Fourstaff said:
Hmmm, 10-15% increase against 5870. Not too shabby, but can be better. Winner provides the better price, and I would like to see Nvidia's cards below the $400 mark, but that is highly unlikely.
Click to expand...

The problem is that the 5XXX series overclock very well and we know nothing about the GTX4XX overclocking results. If they match ATI's prices then they will have done something worthy of note. Otherwise they're really just catering to the GPGPU community.
 
BAM! I win a prize for being right on the money with my performance predictions.

Give it a few months and the gap will change to around 30% I'd wager : ]

But ofcourse the NV card will cost more.

Its the last few generations all over again!
 
I'm digging the heatsink, that's about it. :D
 
If I could get a HD5870 that oc's to 1200mhz I would completely forget about fermi
 
Fermi 32 AA

Whats going on with 32 AA single Fermi 470 and single Fermi 480 ;)
 
Why is the 3Dmark06 score so low?I get in the 14,000s with my 260.:wtf:

And thats with my old cpu.:cool:

3dmark06best.jpg
 
Last edited:
thats a really bad score with a GTX260 and that setup, do you have the + version also is it ruinning with AA being forced.
 
Bad score?I thought that was pretty normal for a 260.:wtf:
 
no, its not a really bad score my bad but it is a tad low for a GTX260 with a quad core, I know last time I used one it got a bit higher than 16k stock with a O9550 but that was a good while ago.

maybe its the difference between a Q9550 and a Phenom 9950
 
Yeah It was only overclocked to 3.1 too.
 
Did I just see 1.8A @+12V for a blower?
If this is real we can feel the fermi "take off". :respect:
Hope this is just an engineering sample :shadedshu
DSC_3684.jpg
 
Last edited:
HA HA awesome, I'm sure it can run fairly slowly too, but would love to hear that at 100% must be insane :D
 
a 12v @1Ablower fan at 100% = tragedy I remember the one on my XFX8800GS, it was louder than every fan in my pc combined, took it off in a day

still it seems Galaxy put out pics of its GTX470 when nvidia ordered all their partners to show nothing, lol
 
Last edited:
IM still waiting for w1z to get it and give us officials
 
pantherx12 said:
HA HA awesome, I'm sure it can run fairly slowly too, but would love to hear that at 100% must be insane :D
Click to expand...
I know, but even that legendary ATi Dust Buster is only a 0.8A fan. :respect:
I am just wonder who is the smartass that thinks it is a good idea to slap on that monster.
fan_650.jpg
 
maybe those holes in the pcb lessen the noise(looking for something good to say)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top