-
Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
Intel e6550 2.33 GHZ or AMD 4800+ 2.5 GHZ? Which is faster?
- Thread starter drew24
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2005
- Messages
- 3,624 (0.50/day)
| System Name | TheReactor / HTPC |
|---|---|
| Processor | AMD 7800x3d 5050Mhz / Intel 10700kf (5.1ghz All Core) |
| Motherboard | ASrock x670e Taichi / ROG Strix z490-e gaming |
| Cooling | HeatKiller VI CPU/GPU Block -2xBlackIce GTX 360 Radiators - Swiftech MCP655 Pump |
| Memory | 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz DDR5 / 32GB G.Skill 3400Mhz DDR4 |
| Video Card(s) | Nvidia 3090ti / Nvidia 2080ti |
| Storage | Crucial T700 2TB Gen 5 / Samsung Evo 2Tb |
| Display(s) | Acer Predator xb271hu - 2560x1440 @144hz |
| Case | Corsiar 550 |
| Audio Device(s) | on board |
| Power Supply | Antec Quattro 1000W |
| Mouse | Logitech G502 |
| Keyboard | Corsair Gaming k70 |
| Software | Windows 10 Pro 64bit |
Easy question with a less then obvious answer.
While the AMD chip is operating at a Higher Frequency it is still the slower chip. The e6550 is capable of performing more instructions per cycle. So while it is slower frequency wise, the amount of work it can do in 1 cycle is much greater then the AMD chip.
So the e6550 while slower in frequency is a much more powerful chip then the AMD CHip.
While the AMD chip is operating at a Higher Frequency it is still the slower chip. The e6550 is capable of performing more instructions per cycle. So while it is slower frequency wise, the amount of work it can do in 1 cycle is much greater then the AMD chip.
So the e6550 while slower in frequency is a much more powerful chip then the AMD CHip.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2005
- Messages
- 3,624 (0.50/day)
| System Name | TheReactor / HTPC |
|---|---|
| Processor | AMD 7800x3d 5050Mhz / Intel 10700kf (5.1ghz All Core) |
| Motherboard | ASrock x670e Taichi / ROG Strix z490-e gaming |
| Cooling | HeatKiller VI CPU/GPU Block -2xBlackIce GTX 360 Radiators - Swiftech MCP655 Pump |
| Memory | 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz DDR5 / 32GB G.Skill 3400Mhz DDR4 |
| Video Card(s) | Nvidia 3090ti / Nvidia 2080ti |
| Storage | Crucial T700 2TB Gen 5 / Samsung Evo 2Tb |
| Display(s) | Acer Predator xb271hu - 2560x1440 @144hz |
| Case | Corsiar 550 |
| Audio Device(s) | on board |
| Power Supply | Antec Quattro 1000W |
| Mouse | Logitech G502 |
| Keyboard | Corsair Gaming k70 |
| Software | Windows 10 Pro 64bit |
Since you're new here. You should post your system specs under your name.
If you are looking to upgrade Intel is the leader right now.
If you are looking to upgrade Intel is the leader right now.
Darren
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2005
- Messages
- 1,936 (0.27/day)
| System Name | Cheap yet powerful gaming and entertainment rig! |
|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Athlon 3800+ X2 Windsor, 1 MB L2 Cache (512k L2 Per Core), 65W Energy efficient, 2GHz @ 2.78 Ghz |
| Motherboard | Asrock ALiveNF7G-HD720p Rev v5.0 |
| Cooling | Freezer 64, 2x120mm, 1x92mm |
| Memory | 8 GB DDRII PC6400 @ 929 MHz OCZ (2GBx4) timing: 5-5-5-5-16-2T |
| Video Card(s) | XFX ATI4830 |
| Storage | Seagate 320 GB SATA (16 MB Cache) |
| Display(s) | 19' HannsG (1440x900 @ 75hz) |
| Case | Coolermaster Elite 330 Black Case |
| Audio Device(s) | Auzentech X-Meridian, Pioneer VSX-516 Receiver 7.1 with DD/DD EX/Prologic II/DTS/DTS-ES//DTS: Neo |
| Power Supply | Cool Master eXtreme Power 460W PSU |
| Software | Vista Ultimate X64 Corporate Edition |
Actually the 3800+ is comparable to those two processors, in a lot of benchmarks the 3800+ is faster.
Frequency has very little to do with it, it's to do with the architecture of the chip. Obviously higher freqencies increase performance but know two processors of different architecture and manufacture has can be compared by frequency alone. E.g. a Pentium D 940 overclocked to 3.5 GHz is slower than an Athlon 3800+ X2 overclocked to 2.5 GHz.
ChromeDome
New Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2008
- Messages
- 670 (0.11/day)
| System Name | Super Budget Gamer Thing lol |
|---|---|
| Processor | AMD 5600+ Windsor @3.0ghz |
| Motherboard | ASUS M3N78-VM AM2/AM2+ Micro ATX |
| Cooling | Thermaltake TR2-R1 Ultra Silence CPU heatsink+fan / 3 exhaust case fans |
| Memory | 3 Gigs Kingston DDR2@800mhz |
| Video Card(s) | PNY 8800GT 512mb OC'd 710/1740/950 - 178.24 |
| Storage | 2X 320 gig Seagate Barracuda's @7200rpm - SATA |
| Display(s) | 22in Dell LCD 1680X1050 / 21.6in AOC LCD / Hauppauge TV Tuner |
| Case | Antec Three Hundred |
| Audio Device(s) | Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio |
| Power Supply | Antec Earthwatts EA500D 500w |
| Software | Vista, bby <3 |
| Benchmark Scores | yay it works! =] |
intel E6550 is roughly on par with an AMD 5600+ Windsor performance wise. of course the E6550 overclocks better if thats what you'll be doing
the intel E4600 is similar, but with less cache and a smaller FSB then the E6550
having less cache (2mb) on the AMD then the E6550 doesn't mean much because the 5600+ has an integrated memory controller which helps its performance
when it comes to raw performance they're all similar with an edge going to the E6550 and AMD 5600+
depends on what you're doing with them sometimes, too
i like the AMD out of all of them. its a fine workhorse
little green AMD guy =]
the intel E4600 is similar, but with less cache and a smaller FSB then the E6550
having less cache (2mb) on the AMD then the E6550 doesn't mean much because the 5600+ has an integrated memory controller which helps its performance
when it comes to raw performance they're all similar with an edge going to the E6550 and AMD 5600+
depends on what you're doing with them sometimes, too
i like the AMD out of all of them. its a fine workhorse
little green AMD guy =]
Last edited: