All measurements were performed using two Chroma 6314A mainframes equipped with the following electronic loads: six 63123A [350 W each], one 63102A [100 W x2], and one 63101A [200 W]. The aforementioned equipment is able to deliver 2500 W of load, and all loads are controlled by a custom-made software. We also used a Picoscope 3424 oscilloscope, a Picotech TC-08 thermocouple data logger, a Fluke 175 multimeter, and a Yokogawa WT210 power meter. We also included a wooden box, which, along with some heating elements, was used as a hot box. Finally, we had at our disposal four more oscilloscopes (Rigol 1052E and VS5042, Stingray DS1M12, and a second Picoscope 3424), and a CEM DT-8852 sound level meter. You will find more details about our equipment and the review methodology we follow in this article. Finally, we conduct all of our tests at 40°C-45°C ambient in order to simulate with higher accuracy the environment seen inside a typical system, with 40°C-45°C being derived from a standard ambient assumption of 23°C and 17°C-22°C being added for the typical temperature rise within a system.
Primary Rails Voltage Regulation
The following charts show the voltage values of the main rails, recorded over a range of 60 W to the maximum specified load, and the deviation (in percent) for the same load range.
5VSB Regulation
The following chart shows how the 5VSB rail deals with the load we throw at it.
Hold-up Time
Hold-up time is a very important PSU characteristic and represents the amount of time, usually measured in milliseconds, a PSU can maintain output regulations as defined by the ATX spec without input power. In other words, it is the amount of time the system can continue to run without shutting down or rebooting during a power interruption. The ATX spec sets the minimum hold-up time to 16 ms with the maximum continuous output load. In the following screenshot, the blue line is the mains signal and the yellow line is the "Power Good" signal. The latter is de-asserted to a low state when any of the +12V, 5V, or 3.3V output voltages fall below the undervoltage threshold, or after the mains power has been removed for a sufficiently long time to guarantee that the PSU cannot operate anymore.
The hold-up time was much smaller than the minimum ATX-specified 16 ms, so the unit failed this test. A larger bulk cap would obviously prolong its hold-up time, but Enermax didn't use one because it would increase cost, which is a shame.
Inrush Current
Inrush current or switch-on surge refers to the maximum, instantaneous input-current drawn by an electrical device when first turned on. Because of the charging current of the APFC capacitor(s), PSUs produce large inrush-current right as they are turned on. Large inrush current can cause the tripping of circuit breakers and fuses and may also damage switches, relays, and bridge rectifiers; as a result, the lower the inrush current of a PSU right as it is turned on, the better.
Inrush current was low, which is the only benefit of the small bulk cap Enermax used.
Voltage Regulation and Efficiency Measurements
The first set of tests revealed the stability of the voltage rails and the efficiency of the ERX630AWT. The applied load was equal to (approximately) 20%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 80%, 100%, and 110% of the maximum load the PSU can handle. We conducted two additional tests. In the first test, we stressed the two minor rails (5V and 3.3V) with a high load while the load at +12V was only 0.10 A. This test reveals whether the PSU is Haswell ready or not. In the second test, we dialed the maximum load the +12V rail could handle while the load on the minor rails was minimal.
Voltage Regulation & Efficiency Testing Data Enermax ERX630AWT
Test
12 V
5 V
3.3 V
5VSB
Power (DC/AC)
Efficiency
Fan Speed
Fan Noise
Temp (In/Out)
PF/AC Volts
20% Load
8.557A
1.955A
1.945A
0.980A
125.70W
90.22%
610 RPM
31.7 dBA
38.82°C
0.893
12.172V
5.103V
3.388V
5.081V
139.32W
42.07°C
230.1V
40% Load
17.509A
3.939A
3.913A
1.185A
251.72W
92.01%
973 RPM
38.2 dBA
39.51°C
0.953
12.141V
5.071V
3.369V
5.054V
273.58W
43.24°C
230.1V
50% Load
21.875A
4.944A
4.910A
1.588A
314.74W
91.80%
1135 RPM
43.3 dBA
40.51°C
0.965
12.126V
5.057V
3.359V
5.031V
342.87W
44.83°C
230.2V
60% Load
26.246A
5.946A
5.912A
1.994A
377.66W
91.53%
1255 RPM
44.1 dBA
41.57°C
0.973
12.113V
5.040V
3.348V
5.007V
412.61W
46.34°C
230.2V
80% Load
35.200A
7.980A
7.932A
2.410A
503.60W
90.80%
1380 RPM
46.5 dBA
43.57°C
0.980
12.081V
5.009V
3.327V
4.972V
554.65W
50.21°C
230.1V
100% Load
44.804A
9.033A
8.972A
3.036A
629.57W
89.75%
1380 RPM
46.5 dBA
45.28°C
0.985
12.050V
4.983V
3.309V
4.935V
701.45W
52.45°C
230.0V
110% Load
50.089A
9.048A
8.996A
3.040A
692.51W
89.33%
1380 RPM
46.5 dBA
45.62°C
0.987
12.035V
4.974V
3.302V
4.927V
775.25W
53.42°C
230.0V
Crossload 1
0.097A
15.009A
15.005A
0.000A
126.28W
83.05%
1210 RPM
43.6 dBA
43.06°C
0.907
12.163V
4.993V
3.343V
5.044V
152.05W
48.33°C
230.2V
Crossload 2
50.968A
1.001A
1.003A
1.001A
628.19W
90.77%
1380 RPM
46.5 dBA
44.80°C
0.984
12.061V
5.060V
3.344V
5.039V
692.10W
52.67°C
230.0V
Voltage regulation on the +12V rail was pretty good and good enough on the minor rails, and within 3%. The unit had absolutely no problem operating at very high ambient temperatures and with heavy loads. Its components are then up to the task and resilient to high temperatures, which is of great importance when it comes to PSUs. Also, efficiency was at good levels overall and only dropped slightly below 90% in our full load test (and beyond).
The fan only spun at low speeds during the first two tests, but noise and speed significantly increased afterward. We can't call the ERX630AWT quiet, that's for sure, but nor is it annoyingly noisy during the above tests.