Tuesday, March 20th 2012
AMD Readies Two More FX Series Processors
AMD launched as many as five new FX Series processor models over the course of Q1, 2012. We're hearing from DonanimHaber that two more budget models are en route for Q2, 2012, likely April. These include the quad-core FX-4130, and six-core FX-6130. The FX-4130 features a nominal clock speed of 3.80 GHz, with a tiny Turbo Core boost, that takes it to 3.90 GHz. Interestingly, while the total L2 cache of this chip is 4 MB (2 MB per module), its L3 cache is halved to 4 MB, even as other SKUs such as the FX-4100 have full 8 MB L3 cache. The FX-6130, on the other hand, has a nominal clock speed of 3.60 GHz, with 3.90 GHz Turbo Core speed. Thankfully, AMD didn't tinker with the L3 cache, and users get all 8 MB of it. Both chips have rated TDP of 125W. Pricing is not revealed.
Source:
DonanimHaber
153 Comments on AMD Readies Two More FX Series Processors
I have not tried to install physically an fx processor on my board since i don't have one.
But the question is what pin count does the fx processors have?
And why asus haves this fx processors as compatible with my board with beta bios?
And its not only my board.many others as well am3 boards support fx processors with beta bios.
But not all of them.
And from other vendor boards as well,not only asus.
then its a mistake from asus to have that there.
References (CPU)*
*from CPU World
AMD Phenom II
www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K10/AMD-Phenom%20II%20X4%20955%20-%20HDX955FBK4DGI.html
AMD FX
www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Bulldozer/AMD-FX-Series%20FX-8150.html
Additional references (Socket compatibility)
whatswithjeff.com/amd-black-am3b-socket/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socket_AM3
they would be crazy to have bios for my board in the official website of asus and not to support the fx processors.
I have tried those beta bios, and what they have done they have disabled some minor things in the bios,but still will run an fx processor.
That is why i said for a moded bios.
Making the piledriver incompatible with am3 boards but compatible with am3+
And its still is not sure,it all comes down to bios.
I think you have issues, you got this all mixed up.
You are confused.
What norton said is correct.
Don't make me search for photos on the net so i can show you the difference of the sockets.
AM3+ is still the best way to go for proper FX support
i have several links for info, and from sounds of it, AvonX is goin intel anyway...:shadedshu
www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?276169-AMD-FX-8120-not-working-with-Asus-M4A89GTD-Pro-USB3-and-3017-OrochiPi-bios
www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?276063-Asus-BD-FX-Support-for-Crosshair-IV-890-boards&p=4989828&viewfull=1#post4989828
www.overclock.net/t/1171580/asus-m4a89gtd-pro-for-bulldozer-does-it-work-alright
www.overclock.net/t/1188660/does-my-motherboard-support-fx-8120
www.tomshardware.com/forum/304013-30-updating-bios-asus-m4a89gtd-usb3-4100
answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120210192918AAd6hhx
forums.techarena.in/motherboard-processor-ram/1455417.htm
I am probably older than you.
So show some respect.
Has anyone done any benchmark comparisons of the B2 stepping vs B3 stepping clock-for-clock at all?
The new fx processors?
And you expect these ones to be better clock for clock?
I don't want to be rude but that was a funny question.