Monday, August 6th 2018

AMD Announces 2nd Generation Ryzen Threadripper 2000, up to 32 Cores/64 Threads!

AMD announced its second-generation Ryzen Threadripper high-end desktop (HEDT) processor series, succeeding its lean and successful first-generation that disrupted much of Intel's Core X HEDT series, forcing Intel to open up new high-core-count (HCC) market segments beyond its traditional $1000 price-point. AMD's 16-core $999 1950X proved competitive with even Intel's 12-core and 14-core SKUs priced well above the $1200-mark; and now AMD looks to beat Intel at its game, with the introduction of new 24-core and 32-core SKUs at prices that are sure to spell trouble for Intel's Core X HCC lineup. The lineup is partially open to pre-orders, with two SKUs launching within August (including the 32-core one), and two others in October.

At the heart of AMD's second-generation Ryzen Threadripper is the new 12 nm "Pinnacle Ridge" die, which made its debut with the 2nd Generation Ryzen AM4 family. This die proved to introduce 3-5 percent IPC improvements in single-threaded tasks, and multi-threaded improvements with an improved Precision Boost II algorithm, which boosted frequencies of each of 8 cores on-die. The Threadripper is still a multi-chip module, with 2 to 4 of these dies, depending on the SKU. There are four of these - the 12-core/24-thread Threadripper 2920X, the 16-core/32-thread Threadripper 2950X; the 24-core/48-thread Threadripper 2970WX, and the flagship 32-core/64-thread Threadripper 2990WX.
The pricing of these chips is sure to shock you. The 12-core/24-thread 2920X is priced at just $649.99, or $150 cheaper than its predecessor, the 1920X, which already proved faster than the 10-core/20-thread Core i9-7900X in multi-threaded tasks. This SKU should disrupt Intel's pitifully configured 8-core/16-thread Core i7-7820X and 6-core/12-thread i7-7800X; and its pricing could be strategic in taking some of the attention away from Intel's upcoming Core i9-9900K.

Next up, is the 16-core/32-thread TR-2950X. This chip can be yours for $899.99, which again, is $100 cheaper than its predecessor.

At this point, you'll notice why the higher core-count SKUs have a "WX" extension, while the 12-core and 16-core parts have just "X." This is because AMD is targeting the 24-core and 32-core parts at pro-sumers, while the 12-core and 16-core ones are targeted at high-end gaming PC builds.

The 24-core TR-2970WX is priced at $1,299.99, bang on par with Intel's 14-core i9-7940X (you get 10 fewer cores with Intel). The flagship TR-2990WX is priced at $1,799, or about $100 cheaper than Intel's flagship, the 18-core/36-thread Core i9-7980XE. You get a whopping 14 more cores.

All four SKUs are drop-in compatible with existing socket TR4 motherboards based on AMD X399 chipset, requiring a BIOS update. All X399 motherboards on the market support USB flashback, so a previous-generation CPU is not required to flash to the latest BIOS.

The 4-die 2970WX and 2990WX should logically have 8 memory channels and up to 128 PCIe lanes, because you are adding up the connectivity of all four dies on the MCM; however, there are no socket TR4 motherboards in the market or on the horizon, which have 8-channel memory slots, or PCIe slots that utilize all those PCIe lanes. "Drop-in compatibility" with existing X399 motherboards could hint at the likelihood of the 4-die, 24-core and 32-core SKUs probably only having quad-channel DDR4 memory interface, and just 64 PCIe lanes.

How AMD is wiring the dies out on the 24-core and 32-core MCMs remains a mystery. We know from how EPYC is wired out, that the SP3r2/TR4 socket has four distinct "zones," each corresponding to a die. Wiring out 1 memory channel per die may neither be possible nor desirable. It may not be possible because current socket TR4 motherboards are built for MCMs with just two active dies, the diagonally-opposite ones, and as such the memory wiring of the four channels terminate at the pins of those two active dies; it may not be desirable either, because one memory channel per die would severely cripple memory bandwidth for single-threaded or less-parallelized tasks that AMD likes to localize to one die with dual-channel memory access.

The same logic could apply to PCIe. PCI-Express 3.0 x16 slots and M.2-NVMe slots on existing boards are wired to terminate at the two diagonally-opposite "active" dies of the first-generation Threadrippers. This could mean that the two additional active dies on the 24-core and 32-core SKUs rely on the Infinity Fabric interconnects to access memory and PCIe devices. On the 4-die EPYC MCMs, each die is connected to the three other dies using an Infinity Fabric link. Each link has a 25.6 GB/s (per-direction) bandwidth.

It's probably for this reason, that the 2970WX and 2990WX are targeted more at pro-sumers who actually use software that can utilize those many cores; while the 2920X and 2950X are targeted at high-end gaming builds, in which you're gaming, streaming, and doing a whole bunch of other things in tandem.

Taking advantage of the 12 nm "Pinnacle Ridge" die, AMD increased clock-speeds across the board. The 2920X is clocked at 3.50 GHz, with 4.30 GHz boost, compared to the 3.50/4.00 GHz clocks of its predecessor. The 2950X is clocked at 3.50 GHz with 4.50 GHz boost, a 500 MHz increase in boost frequencies from its predecessor. The TDP of both SKUs is unchanged, at 180W. The doubling in core-count for the two WX SKUs doesn't linearly increase TDP, despite impressive clocks. The 24-core 2970WX is clocked at 3.00 GHz with 4.20 GHz boost (higher than the max boost of the 1950X). The 32-core 2990WX has identical clock speeds as the 2970WX. Both the 24-core and 32-core chips have 250W TDP.

AMD began taking in pre-orders for the 32-core flagship Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which is priced at $1,799.99, which will be generally available from August 13, 2018. The 16-core 2950X will be available from August 31st. The 24-core and 12-core SKUs will be available in October.
AMD's press-deck for today is posted verbatim below.
Add your own comment

70 Comments on AMD Announces 2nd Generation Ryzen Threadripper 2000, up to 32 Cores/64 Threads!

#51
bug
NkdI am not sure what you are talking about. World doesn't revolve around gaming only. There are plenty of people who can utilize 32 cores. Its not designed for gaming alone in mind. By software being far behind core count you must mean gaming. Because plenty of other software supports multicore processors beyond eight.
Please list some of the things that are not about rendering, video or photo editing that need that many cores. Because there aren't.
But that's ok, Threadripper is not supposed to be a mass-market part anymore than Intel's HEDT was.

PS If plenty of people could use 32 cores, how come so many people are happily ditching desktops for laptops and even tablets?
Posted on Reply
#54
efikkan
ssdproAMD says the same, DDR4-2933 max. It's still good speed. I have no idea why this site faked that chart and even kept it fake once it was pointed out as wrong yesterday.

www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990wx
I'm not going to speculate in where this information came from, but TPU does unfortunately rarely correct articles, even when the error is pointed out almost immediately in the forum thread.

DDR4-2933 is certainly a decent speed, and I think almost no one will be bottlenecked by that. But those wanting ECC might have to wait a bit for DDR4-2933 ECC.
Posted on Reply
#55
londiste
Cool to see that DDR4-2933 is officially supported yet all their own benchmarks are run with DDR4-3200 14-14-14-28-1T :)
-6% in gaming is rather awful, considering this is where i9 7900x also sucks.
Posted on Reply
#56
efikkan
londisteCool to see that DDR4-2933 is officially supported yet all their own benchmarks are run with DDR4-3200 14-14-14-28-1T :)

-6% in gaming is rather awful, considering this is where i9 7900x also sucks.
Yeah, a subtle hint about what you should be running.
I wonder if all samples of these are able to handle DDR4-3200 14-14-14-28-1T (at what voltage?) over time? I've seen samples of Kaby Lake not able to run it at all. And don't forget that memory controllers do also degrade over time…
Posted on Reply
#57
londiste
Probably. IF links are still tied to RAM clocks, so that is a nice sneaky nudge to performance as well while claiming they run at the same RAM speeds as Intel system :D
Given memory capable of doing that (which I must admit is not very cheap) any Xen+ based (2000 series) Ryzen/TR should be able to run that. Good RAM kits should do that at 1.35V I believe.
Posted on Reply
#58
Slizzo
FrickI'm slightly worried over this prevalent attitude. It sets the stage for dissapointment as it's incredibly vague. It's like the people saying No Mans Sky will be incredible with the new dlc.
OT, but after this "NEXT" update, No Man's Sky is truly incredible.
Posted on Reply
#59
JRid
Nice i start love AMD
Posted on Reply
#60
Captain_Tom
Prima.VeraI know you are bullshitting since currently there are no CL14 RAM sticks at 3600MHz , and not even in 2016 you couldn't buy that cheap, common!
Try again.
Have you heard of overclocking? And yes I did. What, do I need to post my purchase history?

Everyone building PC's right now is getting robbed.
Posted on Reply
#61
John Naylor
Im not seeing the big impact from the original TR ... 0.9% overall perf increase for 67% more cost and 100% more cores over the 7820x.

Posted on Reply
#62
Xaled
John NaylorIm not seeing the big impact from the original TR ... 0.9% overall perf increase for 67% more cost and 100% more cores over the 7820x.

Same goes for i7 7900x and 7920x.
~4.2% overall perf. increase for %25 more cores and %67 more cost in the case of 7900x.
and ~2% increase for %50 more cores and %100 more cost in the case of 7920x.

So it looks that Adobe premiere just doesnt benefit from more than 8c/16th effeciently
Posted on Reply
#63
Captain_Tom
John NaylorIm not seeing the big impact from the original TR ... 0.9% overall perf increase for 67% more cost and 100% more cores over the 7820x.

LOL everyone take notice that he left off the 2700X...
Posted on Reply
#64
bug
John NaylorIm not seeing the big impact from the original TR ... 0.9% overall perf increase for 67% more cost and 100% more cores over the 7820x.

Even at 0 performance difference, these new chips are still cheaper ;)
Posted on Reply
#65
Durvelle27
Man did you guys see the deal on the 1920X 12 core

Was going for $249 on Amazon
Posted on Reply
#66
R0H1T
Durvelle27Man did you guys see the deal on the 1920X 12 core

Was going for $249 on Amazon
What, when, where? Ah the US, probably not anymore though ;)
Posted on Reply
#67
Durvelle27
R0H1TWhat, when, where? Ah the US, probably not anymore though ;)
It lasted only a few hours and then Amazon ran out of stock
Posted on Reply
#68
R0H1T
Durvelle27It lasted only a few hours and then Amazon ran out of stock
I think the 19xx will be the last of their kind, I wonder how the current HEDT lineup (29xx) will look a year from now, including the competition from Intel.
Posted on Reply
#69
Durvelle27
R0H1TI think the 19xx will be the last of their kind, I wonder how the current HEDT lineup (29xx) will look a year from now, including the competition from Intel.
I wish I would have gotten the 1920X would have been a great upgrade
Posted on Reply
#70
Solaris17
Super Dainty Moderator
Seriously awesome stuff coming out of AMDs camp! that come back wow!
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 23rd, 2024 17:41 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts