Friday, September 6th 2019
Intel Sourgrapes AMD's Creator Performance Leadership with Laughably Dubious Data
Intel as part of its IFA Berlin client-segment presentation resorted to some very juvenile marketing tactics, inviting criticism from noted PC enthusiast Der8auer. Intel scampered to reclaim its market position in the PC gaming space with the announcement of the Core i9-9900KS 8-core processor, which armed with a 5.00 GHz all-core Turbo Boost frequency, is expected to cement the company's gaming performance leadership. The company didn't leave it at that, and went on to attack AMD's creator performance leadership.
Der8auer observed something curious about a few slides in particular that Intel used to discredit AMD's high-end desktop processors, relating to its Creator performance as tested in Maxon Cinema 4D's benchmark program, Cinebench. Intel claimed that AMD cannot use Cinebench data to represent "real-world" performance as "only 0.22 percent" of users polled by Intel's "Software Improvement Program" respondents use Maxon Cinema 4D. And who are these respondents? Close to 11 million of them, _all_ of whom are notebook and tablet users, and a majority of whom have Software Improvement Program part of OEM bloatware. This, according to Der8auer, is fundamentally dishonest on Intel's part as Maxon Cinema 4D is less likely to be used on portable computers, and more likely on premium desktops or HEDTs. You can watch Der8auer's vlog here (English) or here (German).The complete slide-deck follows.
Der8auer observed something curious about a few slides in particular that Intel used to discredit AMD's high-end desktop processors, relating to its Creator performance as tested in Maxon Cinema 4D's benchmark program, Cinebench. Intel claimed that AMD cannot use Cinebench data to represent "real-world" performance as "only 0.22 percent" of users polled by Intel's "Software Improvement Program" respondents use Maxon Cinema 4D. And who are these respondents? Close to 11 million of them, _all_ of whom are notebook and tablet users, and a majority of whom have Software Improvement Program part of OEM bloatware. This, according to Der8auer, is fundamentally dishonest on Intel's part as Maxon Cinema 4D is less likely to be used on portable computers, and more likely on premium desktops or HEDTs. You can watch Der8auer's vlog here (English) or here (German).The complete slide-deck follows.
90 Comments on Intel Sourgrapes AMD's Creator Performance Leadership with Laughably Dubious Data
It's an absolute front page news show stopper, yet I've never heard of this bug?
I must say, the hump is past and the true value of AMD is being shown(4.75)FAILURE! I love that this has garnered 4 pages of venting but it is really only restating what Dino said originally........
Intel update the Benchmark disclosures again. Last time they updated was Computex 2018. Looks more organized now.
On a "Windows without compromise data" slide
Intel compared HP Folio 2-in-1 notebook with Intel Core i7-8500Y CPU vs.
unspecified OEM system with Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 SoC
and
On a "Windows without compromise data part 2" slide
Intel compared unspecified Preproduction Intel system with Intel Core i7-10510Y CPU vs.
unspecified OEM system with Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 SoC
Intel did not provide any details on an OEM system with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC at all!
Please take a look at:
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8xx series SoCs vs. Intel CPUs ( VTR-014 )
Published on 10.09.2019