Monday, June 15th 2020

Intel CET Answers Call to Protect Against Common Malware Threats

The security of our customers' data is a top priority at Intel. As part of Intel's Security First Pledge, our engineers continue to deliver advancements to help safeguard our technology from evolving cyber-threats. It begins with designing and engineering security features into our products and continues in our work with the industry to move security innovation forward.

Today, we are announcing a new security capability. Intel Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (Intel CET) will be first available on Intel's upcoming mobile processor code-named "Tiger Lake." Intel CET delivers CPU-level security capabilities to help protect against common malware attack methods that have been a challenge to mitigate with software alone.
Intel CET is designed to protect against the misuse of legitimate code through control-flow hijacking attacks - widely used techniques in large classes of malware. Intel CET offers software developers two key capabilities to help defend against control-flow hijacking malware: indirect branch tracking and shadow stack. Indirect branch tracking delivers indirect branch protection to defend against jump/call-oriented programming (JOP/COP) attack methods. Shadow stack delivers return address protection to help defend against return-oriented programming (ROP) attack methods. These types of attack methods are part of a class of malware referred to as memory safety issues and include tactics such as the corruption of stack buffer overflow and use-after-free.

According to TrendMicro's Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), 63.2% of the 1,097 vulnerabilities disclosed by ZDI from 2019 to today were memory safety related. These malware types target operating systems (OS), browsers, readers and many other applications. It takes deep hardware integration at the foundation to deliver effective security features with minimal performance impact.

Intel was the first to tackle these complex security challenges, and we remain committed to working with the industry to drive security innovation. We recognized that scaling OS and application adoption to truly solve the problem would require industrywide collaboration. To accelerate adoption, we published the Intel CET specifications in 2016. Additionally, Intel and Microsoft have been working closely to prepare Windows 10 and developer tools so applications and the industry at large can offer better protection against control-flow hijacking threats.

Microsoft's upcoming support for Intel CET in Windows 10 is called Hardware-enforced Stack Protection, and a preview of it is available today in Windows 10 Insider Previews. This new Hardware-enforced Stack Protection feature only works on chipsets with Intel CET instructions. It relies on a new CPU architecture that is compliant with Intel CET specifications. For applications running on an OS that supports Intel CET, users can expect detailed guidance from our partners on how applications "opt-in" for protection.

The significance of Intel CET is that it is built into the microarchitecture and available across the family of products with that core. While Intel vPro platforms with Intel Hardware Shield already meet and exceed the security requirements for Secured-core PCs, Intel CET further extends advanced threat protection capabilities. Intel CET is also expected to be available in future desktop and server platforms.

As our work here shows, hardware is the bedrock of any security solution. Security solutions rooted in hardware provide the greatest opportunity to provide security assurance against current and future threats. Intel hardware, and the added assurance and security innovation it brings, help to harden the layers of the stack that depend on it.

The security of our products is an ongoing priority, not a one-time event. Together with our partners and customers, we continue to build a more trusted foundation for all computing systems.

The following is an opinion editorial by Tom Garrison of Intel Corporation. Tom Garrison is vice president of the Client Computing Group and general manager of Security Strategies and Initiatives (SSI).
Add your own comment

10 Comments on Intel CET Answers Call to Protect Against Common Malware Threats

#1
Caring1
It appears Intel's "security first" is an after thought. ;)
The horse has bolted guys.
Posted on Reply
#2
zlobby
Forward to the chorus... :roll:

Posted on Reply
#3
Pinktulips7
intel has hardware base Security Protection built in where AMD got None...............
Caring1It appears Intel's "security first" is an after thought. ;)
The horse has bolted guys.
Hugh............
Posted on Reply
#4
SL2
Is there an equivalent initiative to protect us from 14^+ nm products, or Skylake?


[/s]
Posted on Reply
#5
watzupken
I think Intel need to protect against uncommon threats first before looking into the common threats. Don't get me wrong, it is a good initiative, but with them hitting headlines with new security threat every other month, it is a clear they need to focus on security. After all, they have the biggest market share and thus, all the more reasons for hackers and such too focus on digging out more vulnerabilities with their aged chips.
Posted on Reply
#6
Bruno Vieira
And AMD doesnt support arbitrary addresses at all. Nice thing to create an ad solving a problem that you created to yourself.
Posted on Reply
#7
Steevo
Pinktulips7intel has hardware base Security Protection built in where AMD got None...............


Hugh............
Ummm, Intel has more built in hardware security issues than AMD and Ryzen has a lot of security built in. Intel is just touting this since they screwed up so much and need some PR to spin.
Posted on Reply
#8
zlobby
Pinktulips7intel has hardware base Security Protection built in where AMD got None...............


Hugh............
:kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#9
tehehe
They (AMD as well) should open source all their firmware that sits on CPU - including ME/PSP. Security should be in service of the user to safeguard his safety/privacy. At the moment we have neither. Also why AMD (yes AMD does this too and this is appaling) and Intel think only business class cpu deserve security features? It's false market segmentation - security should be a standard feature.
Posted on Reply
#10
JB_Gamer
We've found that the best security protection against vulnerabilities, that is to avoid intel - for now. Ok, they struggle - at least they say they do - to secure their new models, but leaving older models completely without mitigations! Quite often is a new UEFI/BIOS needed, but motherboard makers stops producing updates much sooner than EOL:(
Posted on Reply
Nov 23rd, 2024 05:10 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts