Wednesday, October 19th 2022
Intel Claims 11 Percent Gaming Performance Advantage of the Core i9-13900K Over AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X
Intel has been busy briefing its customers about its 13th gen Core processors and courtesy of a reader over at Videocardz, we now know a little bit more about Intel's positioning of its Core i9-13900K processor. In the slides, Intel is pitching its upcoming flagship CPU against AMD's current flagship, the Ryzen 9 7950X, which is hardly surprising, since it'll be its main competitor. Intel put the two CPUs through 12 game benchmarks using an unknown graphics card and on average, the Core i9-13900K leads by around 11 percent. As always, take the numbers with a sprinkle of salt, especially as we don't know the system configuration, or even what resolution was used, but we'd hazard a guess that it's 1080p or lower. Intel only allowed for one game win for AMD, with Intel being as much as 22 percent ahead in The Riftbreaker.
Intel also claims to lead in content creation, but this doesn't appear to be quite true, as AMD either comes out on top or ties with Intel in all of the Pugetbench tests. Intel is somewhat ahead in AutoCAD Catalyst and a healthy 16 percent ahead in Autodesk Revit, but as we know, the type of scene being rendered can have a huge impact in these types of tests, as we've seen from both camps. On the plus side, here it appears that content creators shouldn't have to worry too much about which CPU is in their system, as both should be performing exceptionally well. Intel is set to launch its 13th gen Core processors tomorrow, so it won't be long until we'll have some third party benchmarks comparing the two CPUs.
Source:
Videocardz
Intel also claims to lead in content creation, but this doesn't appear to be quite true, as AMD either comes out on top or ties with Intel in all of the Pugetbench tests. Intel is somewhat ahead in AutoCAD Catalyst and a healthy 16 percent ahead in Autodesk Revit, but as we know, the type of scene being rendered can have a huge impact in these types of tests, as we've seen from both camps. On the plus side, here it appears that content creators shouldn't have to worry too much about which CPU is in their system, as both should be performing exceptionally well. Intel is set to launch its 13th gen Core processors tomorrow, so it won't be long until we'll have some third party benchmarks comparing the two CPUs.
69 Comments on Intel Claims 11 Percent Gaming Performance Advantage of the Core i9-13900K Over AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X
Windows 11 stuttering issues confirmed by AMD, but a fix is far off
By Sean Endicott
published March 08, 2022
Windows 11 2H22 was supposed to fix that but ...
But you can always disable SMT :
[URL='https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/look-amd-microsoft-tanking-cpu-102139975.html'][SIZE=4][U]Look out, AMD – Microsoft is tanking your CPU performance again with Windows 11[/U][/SIZE][/URL]
Christian GuytonTue, October 18, 2022 at 5:21 AM
AMD users waiting for the stuttering fix :
It isn't flawless, but way better than bug11
Typically, the 3950x, 5950x, and 7950x win a lot of gaming benchmarks over their lower core counterparts, not because of the core counts, but because they're the highest-clocked SKU sold within the lineup.
Agreed it's silly to buy a 16C/32T for gaming only, but to say it's not a gaming CPU isn't really accurate.
www.techpowerup.com/299959/amd-ryzen-9-7950x-posts-significantly-higher-gaming-performance-with-a-ccd-disabled
The stutter fix was a TPM issue that was exclusive to a specific AGESA update...
This is a scheduling issue from the 7000 series CPU's being treated like they're intel CPUs - either MS fixes it, or AMD fixes it with a chipset driver Win11 is good overall, but it is ironic that what it's meant to be best at (CPU scheduling) it fails the most often at
My guess is that overall the 13900k will be the top dog until the 7000 series X3D is released. The 5800X3D has Raptor Lake beat already in a two or three games as posted by Intel (WoW being one of them).
This is October. Get with the times man.
The intel part will hardly OC, and the AMD part has headroom once you get good cooling. I have no doubt that the AMD part will offer better performance once OC'd.
I'm curious about the content creation aspect of the CPU since these CPUs are for those workloads. Gaming is a bonus to be fair. Maybe I will be changing my TRs at some point and I would like to know what this one can do against my TRx and newest 7950x AMD and maybe then I will make a decision.
Their performance will go up - zero denying that it's a rocky launch. How the hell they cant test this stuff with microsoft and get it sorted in advance is beyond me, surely they could at least just hire a known CPU reviewer and test this stuff a few months before launch and send microsoft the problems, or make a chipset driver in that time
My next upgrade will be "Zen 5" 8 cores CPU with V-Cache, something like "9800X3D", tuned "Zen 4" CPU. So they have only 2 years to do something with prices. ;) We also have one computer with 5600G. I prefer 5800X3D, because it is perf I need and sufficient for what I do with this computer and with normal power consumption.