Friday, October 21st 2022

Monolith by Monoprice Announces MTM 100 Watt Bluetooth aptX HD Powered Desktop Speakers

The Monolith MTM Desktop Speakers deliver stunning audiophile performance for your desktop! These speakers feature an accurate frequency response, exceptional sonic clarity, punchy, powerful bass, and present a spacious, and musical soundstage. Set up is a breeze: Connect easily through analog RCA and 3.5 mm inputs or through the optical or USB digital inputs. Pair your device wirelessly using the Bluetooth with Qualcomm aptX HD Audio for high quality, CD audio level Bluetooth performance. A headphone jack adorns the front, allowing you to easily switch between the speakers and headphones. The Monolith MTM powered speakers are a perfect, great sounding addition to a home office, gaming, or bedroom system.

Engineered to deliver spacious, punchy, and accurate sound, the Monolith MTM features a powerful 100 watts per speaker amplifier, a 1" silk dome tweeter and dual 4" woofers, and a 5.25" passive radiator to enhance bass performance. Fantastic dynamics, smooth midrange, punchy bass combined with holistic imaging usually only found in audiophile grade speakers at a much higher price. The Qualcomm aptX HD audio codec ensures your Bluetooth wireless enabled device can deliver high definition audio. It preserves sound data through the audio transmission, resulting in a "better than CD" listening experience. With aptX HD, you can enjoy
listening to your music at the highest audio quality when using an aptX HD enabled device.
You can easily connect these speakers to your laptop, tablet or any other gear you may have. Featuring a pair of RCA inputs and a 3.5 mm auxiliary input for wired use, or connect through a Bluetooth enabled device for wireless connectivity. This Bluetooth features a Qualcomm chipset and aptx HD decoding, for superior Bluetooth performance and sound. An optical and USB connection allow you to connect digitally and utilize the onboard high performance DAC. Add a little kick to your music or games by utilizing the subwoofer output jack and connecting a powered subwoofer.

A convenient front headphone jack graces the front of the speaker allowing you to easily choose to utilize your speakers for playback, or monitor the sound with your favorite headphones. Adjust volume, select the input and source, pair Bluetooth, and increase treble or bass to your preference through the supplied remote control. The Monolith MTM comes with a 3-year warranty, will be available from Oct 28, and costs $499.99.
Add your own comment

63 Comments on Monolith by Monoprice Announces MTM 100 Watt Bluetooth aptX HD Powered Desktop Speakers

#26
Operandi
zlobbyHa-ha! I beg to differ:
I'm sorry I thought we were talking about audio?

Language concepts 101 is best left for separate conversation.
zlobbyFor a $5 earphones, yes.
You don't know what you are talking about. For most music content an F3 of 50-55Hz is pretty good and covers most of it. Klipsch Heresy IVs are full size speakers that have an F3 of 48Hz retail for $3,000 and while they aren't full range you certainly are not expected to add a subwoofer right out of the gate. Headphone frequency response specs are so inaccurate they pretty much meaningless so don't compare them to speakers.

Like everything in life quality over quantity, a bookshelf that that can produce quality bass into the mid to lower 50s will sound far better than a entry level subwoofer that play into 40s.
SOAREVERSORSo you know how there are donkeys and horses and both are equidea? They are alike, and share many things in common, but are not the same. Same concept. But if horse fucks a donkey you get mule? This is kind like a mule.
Not really. Its just a full range active desktop speaker, plenty of them around, nothing weird about it.
AsRockThese look more like a gimmick than any thing else.


$500 LMFAO.
For quality drivers, quality amp, and a quality DAC in well built enclosure, $500 is about right.
Posted on Reply
#27
Kaleid
It's a serious brand, seen them tested by for instance Erin's audio corner... who also measures when he reviews so it's not just subjective viewpoints
Posted on Reply
#28
bogami
It does not belong to the $500 class. Maybe if the had active woofer little bigger instead of the passive parts. It looks cheap in the $70 to $100 desktop class .
Posted on Reply
#29
ymdhis
bogamiIt does not belong to the $500 class. Maybe if the had active woofer little bigger instead of the passive parts. It looks cheap in the $70 to $100 desktop class .
Yeah, for $500 you can get hifi class passive speakers.
Posted on Reply
#30
zlobby
FreedomEclipseI wouldnt mind seeing a review on TPU for this set of speakers.
It would require acoustic room that I think TPU does not have.
Posted on Reply
#31
Chrispy_
I was going to comment on what a great idea these were. Relatively full sound with a few compromises in order to get extremely simple, flexible desktop audio that could reasonably be considered "jack of all trades" audio for a PC.

Given the limitations of so much going on in a couple of cabinets, these are never going to sound amazing but I figured for a couple of hundred bucks they are going to make a lot of people suitably impressed.

...and then I reached the end of the news article and saw the price.

Just no.

You can do sooooo much better than this for a lot less money. Thinking about all the parts in my desktop setup here, I basically have the same input functionality at the same price, but using actual, pro-grade 8" studio monitors.
Posted on Reply
#32
SOAREVERSOR
cvaldesNo, PC equipment has been around a lot longer than Michael Bay's Transformer movies. And they still looked like sh!t when they were beige boxes.

Hell, the old mainframes weren't supermodels either.

The local computer museum is full of ugly cabinets and boxes. The replica Babbage difference engine that was temporarily there was neat. And unlike most of the other computers on display, it actually worked. The docents operated it a few times a day.

Most stereo equipment is ugly. I've owned decades of them. Maybe the only non-ugly stereo gear I ever bought were some KEF speakers. Of course, KEF promptly discontinued that design.
PC equipment did have an era of good looking aluminum cases, like Windy Soldam and old Lian Li. Streacom still makes good cases.

Stereo equipment stops getting ugly in the 5-6 figure range but that's insane.
Posted on Reply
#33
VSG
Editor, Reviews & News
zlobbyIt would require acoustic room that I think TPU does not have.
I actually do but I don't have means of measuring speaker frequency responses well unlike headphones and earphones.
Posted on Reply
#34
zlobby
VSGI actually do but I don't have means of measuring speaker frequency responses well unlike headphones and earphones.
You mean room that meets or exceeds IEC (and other) standards? Because back in my days of crayon eating, I and some friends foamed a room and we were so proud of its 'acoustics'! :D We though we achieved the peak!

You already have the capture and analysis gear, get some proper mics and you're good to go if the room is also done right.
Posted on Reply
#35
VSG
Editor, Reviews & News
zlobbyYou mean room that meets or exceeds IEC (and other) standards? Because back in my days of crayon eating, I and some friends foamed a room and we were so proud of its 'acoustics'! :D We though we achieved the peak!

You already have the capture and analysis gear, get some proper mics and you're good to go if the room is also done right.
The anechoic chamber hits 19 dB or lower and I've used it for a while to test fans in particular. Like I said it's the microphones part that's the issue and I can't afford to get them myself.
Posted on Reply
#36
zlobby
VSGThe anechoic chamber hits 19 dB or lower and I've used it for a while to test fans in particular. Like I said it's the microphones part that's the issue and I can't afford to get them myself.
Hmm, doesn't sound (pun not intended) like a proper anaechotic room to me. I think your mics are the least of your worries in this case. ;)
Posted on Reply
#37
VSG
Editor, Reviews & News
zlobbyHmm, doesn't sound (pun not intended) like a proper anaechotic room to me. I think your mics are the least of your worries in this case. ;)
More like that's just the lowest the current mics pick up haha.
Posted on Reply
#38
zlobby
VSGMore like that's just the lowest the current mics pick up haha.
Well, as you know apart from the attenuation you'd need panels that don't reflect sound waves in the audible spectrum. Then comes the sizing of the room and that's also tricky for some speaker power ratings and port placements. And that's just a scratch on the surface. Real math for this is gnarly.

Bottom line - too expensive for what you'd get out of it.
Posted on Reply
#39
VSG
Editor, Reviews & News
zlobbyWell, as you know apart from the attenuation you'd need panels that don't reflect sound waves in the audible spectrum. Then comes the sizing of the room and that's also tricky for some speaker power ratings and port placements. And that's just a scratch on the surface. Real math for this is gnarly.

Bottom line - too expensive for what you'd get out of it.
Yup, totally a budget issue. Let me see if we can still get some subjective testing done for this thing though.
Posted on Reply
#40
SOAREVERSOR
zlobbyWell, as you know apart from the attenuation you'd need panels that don't reflect sound waves in the audible spectrum. Then comes the sizing of the room and that's also tricky for some speaker power ratings and port placements. And that's just a scratch on the surface. Real math for this is gnarly.

Bottom line - too expensive for what you'd get out of it.
Nobody buying 500 buck speakers/monitors has a room that would matter. It's why I gave up the speaker game when I got engaged. In my old 2BR one of them was my "office" and it was pretty well foamed. Not pro level but good enough for what I had. Got engaged moved to another apartment and the second bedroom became our office and there was no way I was going to be allowed to pull that stunt. So I sold it all off and blamo headphone stuff. Still do the studio monitors on both desks though with foam isolation.
Posted on Reply
#41
thewan
I do not understand why when manufacturers list USB as an input option for speakers, they do not list some specifications for the USB input. Especially if you are going to advertise something that "sounds good", your speaker should support usb playback that actually enables it to sound good.
Posted on Reply
#42
zlobby
thewanI do not understand why when manufacturers list USB as an input option for speakers, they do not list some specifications for the USB input. Especially if you are going to advertise something that "sounds good", your speaker should support usb playback that actually enables it to sound good.
Because id they did nobody would buy their speakers. ;) Tou see, only tell parts of the truth. This way you never lie (well, there are other terms for that in law) directly.
Posted on Reply
#43
SOAREVERSOR
thewanI do not understand why when manufacturers list USB as an input option for speakers, they do not list some specifications for the USB input. Especially if you are going to advertise something that "sounds good", your speaker should support usb playback that actually enables it to sound good.
They also don't really release their bluetooth specs either.
zlobbyBecause id they did nobody would buy their speakers. ;) Tou see, only tell parts of the truth. This way you never lie (well, there are other terms for that in law) directly.
ROFL.

Ultimately the people that really care about this stuff for powered monitors or powered speakers or whatever the hell this is aren't going to use that. I have powered monitors on both my desktops and they are both fed by a DAC and have both RCA and 1/4 TRS inputs.
Posted on Reply
#44
zlobby
SOAREVERSORThey also don't really release their bluetooth specs either.

ROFL.

Ultimately the people that really care about this stuff for powered monitors or powered speakers or whatever the hell this is aren't going to use that. I have powered monitors on both my desktops and they are both fed by a DAC and have both RCA and 1/4 TRS inputs.
Nevermind the typos in my previous post. I must have been PUI...
Posted on Reply
#45
Operandi
bogamiIt does not belong to the $500 class. Maybe if the had active woofer little bigger instead of the passive parts. It looks cheap in the $70 to $100 desktop class .
Then they'd need to be significantly bigger than what they are. The passive radiators are there in place of ports. They could use a larger woofer making it a 3-way in a sealed enclosure and use DSP to extend the response but that would make it significantly more expensive and it already gets down to 55Hz which is pretty decent (I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt by assuming that "55Hz" is F3 cause they don't explicitly say it is).
Chrispy_I was going to comment on what a great idea these were. Relatively full sound with a few compromises in order to get extremely simple, flexible desktop audio that could reasonably be considered "jack of all trades" audio for a PC.

Given the limitations of so much going on in a couple of cabinets, these are never going to sound amazing but I figured for a couple of hundred bucks they are going to make a lot of people suitably impressed.

...and then I reached the end of the news article and saw the price.

Just no.

You can do sooooo much better than this for a lot less money. Thinking about all the parts in my desktop setup here, I basically have the same input functionality at the same price, but using actual, pro-grade 8" studio monitors.
It is pretty expensive so they had better be pretty good but you can't say they are over priced based on the size of the drivers they use. My KRK V4 S4s on my desk are $400 each and they use a 4" woofer, and thats nothing compared to what a similarly sized Genlec would go for.

If they can get 55Hz and reasonable output with multiple 4" woofers and passives that allows them to keep a small desktop foot print at the expensive of more parts vs. the much bigger cabinet requirments a a speaker with larger woofer and port would require. I think thats a fair compromise to make considering the target market.
SOAREVERSORNobody buying 500 buck speakers/monitors has a room that would matter. It's why I gave up the speaker game when I got engaged. In my old 2BR one of them was my "office" and it was pretty well foamed. Not pro level but good enough for what I had. Got engaged moved to another apartment and the second bedroom became our office and there was no way I was going to be allowed to pull that stunt. So I sold it all off and blamo headphone stuff. Still do the studio monitors on both desks though with foam isolation.
Unless the speakers are broken the room still matters. There are plenty of people with $1,000+ speakers setup poorly in bad sounding rooms and there are plenty of people with $300 speakers that have them setup properly and are getting the most of them. Also you don't need extensive room treatments to get things to sound decent, most of it comes down to placement of the speakers in the room (which is speaker dependent), and you can get good results with normal room furnishings to keep reflections under control.
Posted on Reply
#46
Kaleid
It's possible to achieve low bas with one single driver. Guru Audio Junior digs down to 34hz (but it has to be placed correctly or the bas won't be there)
I know this because I own these speakers, and even the Denon AVR recognizes the small speakers as BIG.
But, it comes at a higher cost of course.
Posted on Reply
#47
Operandi
KaleidIt's possible to achieve low bas with one single driver. Guru Audio Junior digs down to 34hz (but it has to be placed correctly or the bas won't be there)
I know this because I own these speakers, and even the Denon AVR recognizes the small speakers as BIG.
But, it comes at a higher cost of course.
Yeah, it can be done, just requires clever design. 4" full range Ti driver in a TL that has an F3 of 49Hz for example.

You get the extension but it comes at the cost of size and of course limited output so nothing is free.
Posted on Reply
#48
zlobby
OperandiYeah, it can be done, just requires clever design. 4" full range Ti driver in a TL that has an F3 of 49Hz for example.

You get the extension but it comes at the cost of size and of course limited output so nothing is free.
It seems to me thar you're hell-bent of proving these Monolith speakers are the best thing in the $500 price range. Emphasis on 'seems'.
Posted on Reply
#49
Kaleid
zlobbyIt seems to me thar you're hell-bent of proving these Monolith speakers are the best thing in the $500 price range. Emphasis on 'seems'.
I don't expect them to be better than some normal 2 channel speakers, but I'll say again that it's not a Logitech plastic speakers company.
Posted on Reply
#50
SOAREVERSOR
OperandiYeah, it can be done, just requires clever design. 4" full range Ti driver in a TL that has an F3 of 49Hz for example.

You get the extension but it comes at the cost of size and of course limited output so nothing is free.
Nobody who can build their own speakers is buying monoprice. They are buying say hivi speakers and doing it in their garage. Now let me show you my early 2000s altoids amp.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 23rd, 2024 09:36 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts