Hydraulics Pump
Testing
The most scientific way to determine a pumps performance is to plot the
entire pump pressure vs flow rate curve. This can be done by measuring
pressure at the outlet of the pump with a digital manometer and using a
gate valve immediately after this pressure measurement point.
Then utilizing this gate valve, adjusting the amount of
restriction will net different flow rates and coinciding
pressures the pump is producing over its curve.
All of this is preferably done at a very precise 12.00V or
the
tested voltage as needed. While testing for pressure and flow
rates, data was also collected using multi-meters to capture voltage
and
current in amps for power consumption data.
I've also since
learned and
adjusted my method of pressure testing to capture "Totat Dynamic Head"
in pressure (PSI) format. Previously my testing only
captured
"Dynamic Discharge Head" which is pressure on the outlet line only.
The inlet line is the suction line and some suction occurs as
flow rates increase due to pressure drop in the suction line feeding
the pump. This new method is consistent with the
recommendations
by gouldspumps.com pump field testing technical
article
for field testing and I believe more accurately captures the entire
power provided by a pump and will provide more accurate curves for
estimating flow rates.
You'll see the pressure axis for this new testing method is
labeled as "Total Dynamic Head Pressure which is equal to the
"Discharge Pressure" - "Suction Pressure". You can think of
this
as the reverse of pressure drop, it is "Pressure Gain" from the pump.
I believe most manufacturer pump curves follow this same
testing method for developing pressure. It's actually more
common
to refer to "Head" rather than pressure, but in water cooling we're
always dealing with water, so I've had the habit of just reading in PSI
and leaving it at that, so it's consistent in units with pressure drop
in PSI.
I'll be working my way back through my previous pump testing to update
the curves so the flow rate estimator is more accurate.
Equipment:
- Dwyer
Digital Manometer 477 Mark V - Accuracy .5% of Full
Scale. Range 0-20.00 PSI range, Resolution .01 PSI
- King
Instruments 7520 Series 0-5GPM, 250mm scale - Accuracy 2% of
Full Scale. Range 0-5GPM, Resolution .1 GPM (can be
interpolated to .02GPM)
- Water Source - Household water pressure - 50PSI at
>5GPM - Because flow rate readings are instantaneous, household
tap water and water pressure are a good and powerful source for
pressure drop testing.
- Samlex PSA-305 Variable DC Power Supply - Adjusted
voltage to be at 12.00V +-.03V.
- Calterm 66430 Multi-meter - Measured Voltage (DC
Volts
to .01V resolution)
- Cen-Tech Digital Multi-meter - Measure Current (Amps
to .01 Amps Resolution)
- Mastech MS8209 Auto Ranging Multi-meter - Used for
sound level decibel measurements. (.1db resolution)
And my results are as follows:
First up 12.0Volts performs just under what a DDC 3.2 with top will do,
still admirably well. I actually found I could start the pump
with as little as 6.7V, so it's very capable of under-volting.
Pressure at 1.5GPM is now running at about 4 PSI, this is
slightly lower than a single DDC 3.2 at 12V. The efficiency
curve
peaks around 2.1 GPM and power consumption is a low 12 watts at 1.5
GPM, nice!.
Next up is 15.0V, this performs better than any of the DDC 3.2 with top
combinations. Pressure at 1.5GPM is now running at about 6 PSI
(great!), also more powerful than a DDC 3.2 at 12V. Efficiency now
peaks
around 2.6 GPM, and power consumption is still a respectable 20 watts
or so at 1.5 GPM. This would probably be a good setting for
average systems that are not extremely restrictive.
Next is 18.0V, about
the most
common place these things are run. Pressure at 1.5GPM now
running
at about 8 PSI, which is great where you need some
extra power for a more restrictive system. Efficiency now peaks at
around 3.0 GPM and power consumption is climbing to about 29 watts at
1.5GPM which is starting to add up in heat.
Next is the 21.0V.
Pressure
at 1.5GPM now running at about 10 PSI, which is getting way up there
and similar to dual DDCs in series. Efficiency now peaks
around
3.25 GPM, which is a bit higher that you'll see in water cooling for
most cases. This means the pump just isn't operating at it's
most
efficient point. As a result of slipping down the efficiency
curve power consumption climbs to 40 watts at 1.5GPM. This
setting may still prove to me a good spot for extremely restrictive
highly nozzled blocks on systems with large radiators. I also
happened to already peg my 5 GPM flow meter in this test...whoohoo!
And last but not
least the rated
24V point. Almost 14 PSI at 1.5GPM!!...wow. This
even puts
dual DDC's in series looking in envy. Unfortunately
efficiency is
now peaking clear over at 3.5GPM and power consumption has begin to
really climb at nearly 51 watts for a 1.5GPM range. But at
these
powerful pressures it's likely you'd see 2.0GPM or better which is 54+
watts of power consumption. I would only reserve this setting
as
experimental; it's really a lot more power than you could use.
That's alot of power, but also a considerable amount of heat
dump. On a tripler radiator it can mean as much as a 2C water
temperature rise. You'd have to be running multiple radiators and
highly restrictive blocks to really take advantage of this.
Sound Level
With about a 44db ambient noise level and placing my decibel meter about 6" away, the
RD-30 rose the sound level as follows:
- 12V - 50.9 db = 6.9db Gain
- 15V - 51.7 db = 7.7db Gain
- 18V - 53.4 db = 9.4db Gain
- 21V - 54.4 db = 10.4db Gain
- 24V - 55.8 db = 11.8db Gain
And for some general comparisons, I found this chart that relates decibel gain to perceived sound gain:
Perceptions of Increases in Decibel
Level |
Imperceptible Change |
1dB |
Barely Perceptible Change |
3dB |
Clearly Noticeable Change |
5dB |
About Twice as Loud |
10dB |
About Four Times as Loud |
20dB |
And this environment general level condition:
Environmental Noise
|
Weakest sound heard |
0dB |
Whisper Quiet Library |
30dB |
Normal conversation (3-5') |
60-70dB |
Telephone dial tone |
80dB |
City Traffic (inside car) |
85dB |
Train whistle at 500', Truck Traffic |
90dB |
Subway train at 200' |
95dB |
Level at which sustained
exposure may result in hearing loss |
90 -
95dB |
Power mower at 3' |
107dB |
Snowmobile, Motorcycle |
100dB |
Power saw at 3' |
110dB |
Sandblasting, Loud Rock Concert |
115dB |
And the following is a simple recording of that test. Late at
night when the house is very quiet, I recorded the sound with my JVC
GZ-MC500U mini video camera which has stereo recording capability.
Then converted in windows movie maker to VHS quality and uploaded
to YouTube. It's still kind of hard to get a sense of loudness
from the recording, but it does present you with a good indication of
the type and tone of sound.
Subjectively, the pump is much quieter than I expected, just a slight
medium pitched whine that doesn't really become apparent until 21v and
above. It is a big pump though so I can only expect vibrations would
quickly be the primary culprit as with any pump in noise related
issues. As with any pump I would suggest a very isolated on a
soft pad like Petra's Gel Stuff to isolate pump vibrations.
NaeKu
mentioned the pump likes to walk around with vibrations so you'll
probably have to strap it down loosely somehow. I didn't
notice
that on my test bench, but it is a big solid pump so any vibration will
have some energy behind it.
Overall I was pleasantly surprised by the smooth operation and sound
level. I expected the size and power of the pump would relate
to
much more noise. I really don't consider the pump that much
louder than a lot of pump I've tested and probably more quiet than the
Alphacool AP1510.
Construction
While the pump internals are without concern, I must note that the
aluminum feet that are cast into the bottom of the pump housing are
extremely fragile and easily broken. During shipment of this
pump
to my house for testing even when wrapped in a dozen or more layers of
bubble wrap, one of the aluminum feet broke. I could not see
any
apparent abuse on the box package and the bubble wrapping almost
seemed excessive as I could tell NaeKu really cares about this pump.
The exterior of the pump is cast aluminum, and like any cast
metal, casting generally lowers the tensile strength and increases how
brittle metal is. The footing bolt flanges don't have any
sort of
webbing support to provide rigidity, so the can and have now shown that
failure of the cast aluminum metal is possible. I would be
extremely cautious of the metal footings and ship the pump only on it's
side in solid pieces of foam or other to protect the feet from damage.
Watch out for those aluminum mounts, they break easily!!
Conclusion
Wow, that's a lot of pump and it's also very flexible in the amount of
voltage it can operate on. It is however a very large pump
making
the large Laing D5 feel tiny in comparison. This would be a
great
pump for a highly restrictive loop that needs a more powerful pump as
it can handle anything you want to throw at it. I would
recommend
over-sizing your radiator capacity if you intend to run higher voltage
settings as upwards of 50watts of pump heat can really make diminishing
returns on flow apparent sooner than you'd think