Alcpone's Official 3DMark '06 Compilation

[aCid888*]

Username|Card|Clocks|Score|Cpu
aCid888*|eVGA 9800GTX+| 1155/1690/2920|14147 |E8400 @ 3000Mhz - 333.4FSB

Thanks for adding me to the list.

Side note: My 9800GTX+ clocks high, but not this high! lol (I wish it could!)

 

[aCid888*]

ADD THIS

ORB link

Here is some old school to add.
Core clock 695 MHz Memory clock 1071 MHz
Score 11797
User ID:1493316
Video Card: ATI Radeon™ X1950 XTX Master / Radeon™ X1950 XTX in Crossfire

for some reason, that score impressed the hell out of me

I have to agree, that is a pretty impressive score with the X1950.

 

[JrRacinFan]

Busted 13k with the new 9.1's. Trying for a lil higher in a moment

EDIT:

This run is false and was at 1280x768 due to a driver issue.

 

[Cold Storm]

Woot! I knew you could do it man! I knew it!!!!

 

[ZenZimZaliben]

@ jbunch07

THANKS FOR YOUR EFFORT!


@ Zim, See you have rocked that Q9650 tooo!

Yeah its coming along nicely. There is more FSB for me to play with as well as memory timings. The Ole P35 is doing okay, but she is very close to maxed out. Good for another 6 months at least.

JrRacingFan - Nice OC on the e5200!!

 

[JrRacinFan]

Yah know what, I take that back, my drivers didnt fully initialize or initialize properly. That run was at 1280x768. So yes it was flawed so I will be running it again at the same settings.

EDIT:

My 24/7 settings

 

[DRDNA]

I haven't reinstalled word on my computer yet, but i have done that in the past.


Updated to page 30 Going to bed, been up since 6AM, will finish in the morning. good night TPU.

What does this mean page 30 ???? I only have a total of 18 pages for this thread and 882 replies

 

[JrRacinFan]

What does this mean page 30 ???? I only have a total of 18 pages for this thread and 882 replies

Odds are you have your settings to 50 replies per page. Whereas he has it set for 25.

 

[DRDNA]

Odds are you have your settings to 50 replies per page. Whereas he has it set for 25.

Ahhh okay ...then that would expain my results not being posted.....lol I have been using a huge monitor for so long I forgot about the how many post to display thing.

 

[JrRacinFan]

Ahhh okay ...then that would expain my results not being posted.....lol I have been using a huge monitor for so long I forgot about the how many post to display thing.

So, I think he would be about page 14 or 15 by your reply/page settings.

@ Z3

So far I have had her up to 4.2Ghz 1.6v, didn't leave her there for too long and the benefits of running it that high are slim.

 

[ZenZimZaliben]

So far I have had her up to 4.2Ghz 1.6v, didn't leave her there for too long and the benefits of running it that high are slim.

Still thats pretty freaking sweet for a $80 chip. I wonder how much value you added to that chip by hitting 4.2Ghz. Gotta be close to a E8600 at stock, 3.33Ghz with 6mbs cache has to be close with 4.2Ghz and 3mbs cache....So you just saved yourself $200.00.

Whats your RAM running at?

 

[groothof22]

Busted 13k with the new 9.1's. Trying for a lil higher in a moment

EDIT:

This run is false and was at 1280x768 due to a driver issue.

try to beat me m8 lol just kidding it,s good looking for a E5200 its nice to see that

cheers

 

[JrRacinFan]

Still thats pretty freaking sweet for a $80 chip. I wonder how much value you added to that chip by hitting 4.2Ghz. Gotta be close to a E8600 at stock, 3.33Ghz with 6mbs cache has to be close with 4.2Ghz and 3mbs cache....So you just saved yourself $200.00.

Whats your RAM running at?

Well i have figured out that with this chip @ 10.5*333fsb= 3.5Ghz 24/7 = e8400 stock 24/7. So saved myself about $100.

As far as ram goes, I am going in between 1Ghz CL5 @ 2.1v and 800 CL4 @ 2.07v. Can't decide.

try to beat me m8 lol just kidding it,s good looking for a E5200 its nice to see that

cheers

Yah know darn well I am coming after you! (as soon as I get a 3870x2 LOL)

 

[Fitseries3]

 

[Tatty_Two]

Well i have figured out that with this chip @ 10.5*333fsb= 3.5Ghz 24/7 = e8400 stock 24/7. So saved myself about $100.

As far as ram goes, I am going in between 1Ghz CL5 @ 2.1v and 800 CL4 @ 2.07v. Can't decide.

1ghz @ cl5 in everything apart from SM2 In my findings you need around 125 - 150mhz to justify the higher bandwidth to lower latency.

 

[Wile E]

1ghz @ cl5 in everything apart from SM2 In my findings you need around 125 - 150mhz to justify the higher bandwidth to lower latency.

Actually, 800 cas4 and 1000 cas5 are about equal. The only time 1000 cas5 would show improvement is in bandwidth starved apps that aren't sensitive to latency. Whereas apps that don't need the bandwidth, but are sensitive to latency would prefer 800 cas4.

Personally, I would clock them as high as I could on CAS4. I've found my system performs the best at 960 cas4 vs 1200 cas5.

 

[Tatty_Two]

Actually, 800 cas4 and 1000 cas5 are about equal. The only time 1000 cas5 would show improvement is in bandwidth starved apps that aren't sensitive to latency. Whereas apps that don't need the bandwidth, but are sensitive to latency would prefer 800 cas4.

Personally, I would clock them as high as I could on CAS4. I've found my system performs the best at 960 cas4 vs 1200 cas5.

I agree, but where we differ and only just slightly is in your first words, all the stuff i have read and what i have found with my systems is that they are equal ar around 950mhz with CL5 but yes, of course there are lots of apps out there that crave latency over bandwidth my comment was a generalisation across the board so to speak, you were just more specific!

 

[JrRacinFan]

@ Wile E & Tatty

So should I up my multiplier a little bit lower my FSB and raise my ram divider to allow higher clock on CL4?

That's my current settings.

EDIT:

Didn't do much but ....

I got that on a lower dimm voltage.

 

[Tatty_Two]

What divider options do you have? i take it you have upto an 11x divider, so what ram spped options would you have at say 11x 319?

 

[JrRacinFan]

Well the board splits them according to bootstrap:

200/667 "??"
200/800 1:2

266/667 4:5
266/800 2:3
266/1066 5:8

333/667 1:1
333/800 5:6
333/1066 3:4

I think that's how it falls.

I will admit though, I get my best performance on the proc @ 333/800 or 266/800 (1Ghz ram)

EDIT:

@11x319fsb

200/667=1063
200/800=1276

266/667=799
266/800=959
266/1066=1278

333/667=638
333/800=766
333/1066=1021

Just as info, 266/800 if I take my fsb up to 350(which my cpu doesn't mind) gives me 1067mhz CL5 2.2v ram. I can do that but not for 24/7 stable usage.

 

[dark2099]

Has anyone using Win 7 and Vista noticed 7 benches this a bit better? I just switched back to Vista and FPS are down a bit.

 

[SystemViper]

damn i better get to 7, is the beta still the load of choice

 

[dark2099]

Yes it is, I think I might dual boot Vista 64 and XP 64 and do my 06 runs in XP since I had some driver issues with Win 7.

 

[SystemViper]

Add This

Add This

This should be in ATI Single Card...

Link to ORB for screen resi..

Thanks for your effort!

 

[Tatty_Two]

Well the board splits them according to bootstrap:

200/667 "??"
200/800 1:2

266/667 4:5
266/800 2:3
266/1066 5:8

333/667 1:1
333/800 5:6
333/1066 3:4

I think that's how it falls.

I will admit though, I get my best performance on the proc @ 333/800 or 266/800 (1Ghz ram)

EDIT:

@11x319fsb

200/667=1063
200/800=1276

266/667=799
266/800=959
266/1066=1278

333/667=638
333/800=766
333/1066=1021

Just as info, 266/800 if I take my fsb up to 350(which my cpu doesn't mind) gives me 1067mhz CL5 2.2v ram. I can do that but not for 24/7 stable usage.

So could you get the 959mhz at say 5-4-4-12?? If not then as tight as you can on the 799mhz., unless of course you can do 1278mhz at 5-5-5-18 @ 2.3v??