- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 37 (0.01/day)
- Location
- Lithuania
System Name | The little engine that could |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 |
Motherboard | MSI MAG B550 Tomahawk |
Cooling | Deepcool Gammaxx 400 Blue Basic |
Memory | G.Skil Aegis DDR4 16GB 3200 MHz |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte RX 6600 XT Eagle 8G |
Storage | Adata XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB NVMe + Toshiba MQ01ABD 1TB HDD |
Display(s) | Dell U2520d 1440p |
Case | CM 690 II Advanced |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard Realtek ALC1200 |
Power Supply | Corsair CX400 with Arctic P12 fan |
Mouse | Logitech G305 Lightspeed |
Keyboard | Dell basic |
Software | Win10 x64 LTSC |
The majority of Russia is in Asia.
The case isn't clear enough to provide "real proof." We would first have to establish who set up this agreement--was it "manufacturer C" or Intel? We would then have to look at the sales figures to see if AMD really lost out because of this agreement. At least in the USA, anti-competitive behavior in "refusal to deal" cases is determined by the damage done to the competition. Here's an example...
It could be determined that "manufacture C" arranged the agreement, or Intel, or both. All of which is irrelevant unless AMD was threatened by the deal.
Intel set the agreements up: they profited from these agreements, the could sell more chips, but most importantly cap AMD's market share establishing a quasi monopoly.
The thing is, it's a case of EU vs. Intel. Hence the fine isn't a compensation of AMD's lost profits but a penalty for breaking the law and hurting consumers. So AMD's lost profit are irrelevant in this case, and so is the US competition law.
Where's your real proof?
This whole issue is "he said, she said". Very little proof from either side.
So you're saying the whole case is based on hearsay? Don't you think that would be Intel's first line of defense then?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/923f5/923f59e11614b0ead2f6a89f91cb139224b805f8" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Btw, I thought you didn't wanna post until some new facts come up?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/109fe/109fea70aad631006a09785318f18d3aea5657a8" alt="Smile :) :)"
Intel offered those rebates which were illegal under competition law of the EU. They were charged and found guilty.
Just because some people don't agree with the law itself they start to come up with conspiracy theories.