NVIDIA Pitches GeForce GTX 300 Series to Clinch Performance Crown

[Amok]

And here is the original thread,

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/page-276100_15_0.html

Posted by a user named "Succesfull troll"

Come on, obvious fakes, so many people took the bite...

 

[csendesmark]

And here is the original thread,

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/page-276100_15_0.html

Posted by a user named "Succesfull troll"

Come on, obvious fakes, so many people took the bite...

LOL
NAME FAIL

 

[buggalugs]

Nvidia can kiss my ass.

 

[laszlo]

the slides taken from guru maybe fakes but the numbers used in it for the existing cards are real and confirmed by existing reviews;all we don't know is if fermi numbers are invented or not

i expect fermi to be better than cypress but i don't know the% so we must wait....

 

[Amok]

It's not hard to collect numbers from existing reviews, make up some other numbers and make a powerpoint slide to resemble an nvidia official slide.


But, important point is that i never saw an official Nvidia or Ati slide to contain actual numbers, they only contain percentages.

Again, examples of official PR slides.

They never include actual performance numbers, just percentages.

 

[Imsochobo]

Ha again?! Lol ATI also showed similar slides and they were not very correct (in the slides 5870 outperforms GTX295).

And it does.

In fact, by a large margin in diffrent games, i would say 5870 is about on PAR with 295 with the latest driver.

I don't recall any of those games being more ati friendly than nvidia friendly.

 

[the54thvoid]

I'm new here but have been an avid techpowerup watcher. These slides are not the real deal. I recall a great many bench reviews where Stalker has ATI cards outperfomring NV quite competently. A number of sites reviewed show the 5870 beat the 295. Toms Hardware is one of the exceptions.
You still get biased hardware sites that favour one camp. I had a 295 and ditched it for 2 5850's. I can speak for both camps. Based on the reviews i read before purchasing my 5850's (i read practically every english review on the web - i'm that careful) these benchies are fabricated. Stalker is the key here - NV performs poorly in clear sky - it's an ATI game. Here are some reviews that contain a 5870 beating a 295 in other games than stalker.
http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-5870-review-test/18
http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-5870-review-test/16
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...phire-radeon-hd-5870-1gb-gddr5-review-16.html
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/1080/6/
and the most amusing from this very website you amnesic puppies
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/Radeon_HD_5870/20.html (for Stalker SOC)
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ATI/Radeon_HD_5870/21.html (for stalker clear skies)

So, before the camps go to war, do your research... and beware false prophets.

 

[Csokis]

Hmm... DX11 bench?

 

[InnocentCriminal]

It's marketing guff - end of. It's when the card gets reviewed that I'll be interested.

Oh and welcome to the forums the54thvoid, don't forget to fill in your System Specification.

 

[Animalpak]

It seems to me a joke the single GTX 380 is faster than the long and weighing 5970? If it is true I have to laugh ahaha.. Owned

 

[Lionheart]

ZOMG, I just realized the Z in ZOMG doesnt mean anything lol, oh yeah about these benchmarks reviews, complete BS

 

[z1tu]

what a pathetic attempt, they mean to tell me that the 5970 is just barely better than the 360 will be and in some cases even worse? Who the hell falls for crap like this?:shadedshu

 

[crow1001]

I like to see sites like tech get a fair share of traffic but this is not the way to do it, guru know they are fake but they know it will attract loads of hits, tech does not have to go down this root when its so obvious they are fake.

 

[HammerON]

Nay sayers ~ let us wait and see

 

[blibba]

225W TDP... gief GTX395 nao.

 

[qubit]

FAKE!!

Take em down, you all look like suckers.

They might be, but I wouldn't be surprised if the real figures are in this ballpark.

A GTX 300 seems to have about double the performance of a GTX 285, which is not unreasonable.

 

[crow1001]

WTF you talking about " seems " keep guessing away, most NV fanboys do anyway. I'll wait for legit reviews.

 

[gigabit942007]

from what i see this are only DX10 tests no real DX11 tests with tesselation and other dx11 stuff so from what i see they might be better in DX10 but they might suck in DX11 and these tests are not real !

 

[t77snapshot]

FAKE!!

Take em down, you all look like suckers.

hey show some respect to our news Editors ok.:shadedshu

from what i see this are only DX10 tests no real DX11 tests with tesselation and other dx11 stuff so from what i see they might be better in DX10 but they might suck in DX11 and these tests are not real !

Well there are very little games right now that even utilize DX11.

 

[qubit]

WTF you talking about " seems " keep guessing away, most NV fanboys do anyway. I'll wait for legit reviews.

Just because I have an nvidia card does not make me a "fanboy". Thanks. The tests may well not be real and I said that, too.

And you gotta admit my point is reasonable. After all, the 5870 roughly doubled the performance of the 4890, didn't it?

 

[Flyordie]

You guys do realize ATI isn't just gonna stand around and watch this unfold...

There will be an HD5980 or equivalent. ;-p

Probably a 512bit GDDR5 HD5890... As we all know the HD58xx series is very bandwidth starved... giving it that extra bandwidth should pull it ahead of almost everything Nvidia can throw out...

 

[Amok]

Fakes.
Look at the closeup, someone pasted in the numbers in photoshop, it's really obvious.

You can notice the heavy pixelation around the numbers. Cheap stuff

Let me show you what i crafted in 5 minutes... Jen Hsuang gave me this bench himself. Do you believe me?

And i can make as many versions, with whatever scores you want.

 

[stasdm]

Whichever the numbers are, they show that GTX3XX is a bad scaler.
380 looses more than 50% cores number gain when compared to 360.

That means there would not be any sence in dual GTX3XX configuration (the productivity gain will hardly be about 5%). So, in high-end gaming it's a looser.

 

[laszlo]

Fakes.
Look at the closeup, someone pasted in the numbers in photoshop, it's really obvious.

You can notice the heavy pixelation around the numbers. Cheap stuff

http://i50.tinypic.com/34nhz6e.jpg

.

i don't see any pixel distortions in the posted ones by bta

 

[Amok]

you can't see it because i zoomed in on the picture in photoshop and screenshoted it. At the normal low resolution it's not noticeable, but once you zoom in it's really obvious.

I made another zoom in, even further in...
See what i mean. Do it yourself, you will see it as well. Really shabby work from the guy who faked it.