HellasVagabond
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Messages
- 3,376 (0.52/day)
- Location
- Athens , GREECE
System Name | SECONDARY RIG / PRIMARY RIG / THIRD RIG |
---|---|
Processor | i920@3.6GHz / i920@4GHz / AMD Phenom II 955 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte EX58-UD4P / Gigabyte EX58-UD7 / ASRock 890GX3 |
Cooling | CoolIT Domino ALC / Thermalright Silver Arrow / Thermalright VenomousX |
Memory | 12GB DDR3 @ 1800MHZ / 6GB DDR3 @ 2250MHZ / 4GB DDR3 @ 1600MHZ |
Video Card(s) | XFX ATI RADEON 5970 / GAINWARD NVIDIA GTX 580 / 2xGEFORCE GTX295 |
Storage | 1550GB / 6TB SAS - SSD / 160GB SSD |
Display(s) | NEC 26WUXi2 / NEC 3090WQXi / SONY 55A2000 (1080P 55inch) |
Case | COOLER MASTER HAF 932 / COOLER MASTER ATCS 840 / ANTEC DARKFLEET DF85 |
Audio Device(s) | Soundblaster X-Fi Xtreme Music / SoundBlaster X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro / Realtek Onboard |
Power Supply | CWT 1200W / Enermax Revolution 85+ 1250W / Ikonik Vulcan 1200W |
Software | Windows 7 x64 / Windows 7 x64 / Windows 7 x64 |
Cowie is saying the same thing i am. Last time we saw "large" performance gains from new AMD drivers they had changed the entire IQ (Image Quality) structure of the drives so they favored speed by reducing IQ with the default settings. Later on they did admit doing so (after word got spread) and not a word about that since.
So once again something like that might have happened, it has nothing to do with Wizz and any other reviewer. However there are those who will sniff out any "tweaks" made by AMD that May sacrifice quality so we will have to wait and see.
So once again something like that might have happened, it has nothing to do with Wizz and any other reviewer. However there are those who will sniff out any "tweaks" made by AMD that May sacrifice quality so we will have to wait and see.