Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[mapesdhs]

Fresh install of windows, drivers and updates ...

I'm curious, what GPU clocks are you using there? GPU-Z looks a bit weird, as if you have the core clock running slower
than normal (default = 1481??).

Ian.

 

[jordan1794]

I'm curious, what GPU clocks are you using there? GPU-Z looks a bit weird, as if you have the core clock running slower
than normal (default = 1481??).

Ian.

Well it looks like, for some reason, his default BIOS had boost de-activated(or he is running a custom BIOS)
This makes his default clock the same as his boost clock.

Or perhaps GPU-Z is just incorrectly reporting his default clock?
Would be interesting to hear back from him though, if nothing else to just help our curiosity.

 

[Mydog]

First time I test this one in a very long time
5960X and 2x TitanX with custom bios

 

[CrisInuyasha]

I'm curious, what GPU clocks are you using there? GPU-Z looks a bit weird, as if you have the core clock running slower
than normal (default = 1481??).

Ian.

Well it looks like, for some reason, his default BIOS had boost de-activated(or he is running a custom BIOS)
This makes his default clock the same as his boost clock.

Or perhaps GPU-Z is just incorrectly reporting his default clock?
Would be interesting to hear back from him though, if nothing else to just help our curiosity.

Yeah, I'm running a custom bios that disables boost (so 3d clock is the same as my max stable boost clock). The lower gpu clock is the current base clock, and the default higher clock is the default 3d clock.

P02 is the cuda / opencl profile and P05 is the video profile as far as I'm aware.

 

[Mydog]

A little improvement

 

[xorbe]

We need a 2560x1440 thread. I got 61.0 at max settings, but I have no idea how that stacks up against other typical 2560x1440 systems. Why are we running Titan X at 1080p?

 

[xorbe]

Okay here's my 1920x1080 results, taking top single-gpu spot @ score 2564!

4790K @ 4858MHz + Titan X @ 1390/1851 (stock bios)

 

[Mydog]

Single TitanX 1920x1080, score 2873
5960X @ 5.0 GHz on phase cooling(-45 C Load) + Titan X @ 1528/2055 MHz Custom bios and water cooled

 

[xorbe]

47 minutes lol. My Titan X is tapped out, she's not a good overclocker. Our min fps so close 40.6 and 40.7

 

[Mydog]

47 minutes lol

Do you have water cooling on you TitanX?

 

[xorbe]

Do you have water cooling on you TitanX?

Nope, was running max fan on the GPU for the Heaven run. +210 passes, +220 hangs the system.

 

[Mydog]

Nope, was running max fan on the GPU for the Heaven run. +210 passes, +220 hangs the system.

Your score is the best I've seen on air

 

[xorbe]

Your score is the best I've seen on air

lol, if so I'm sure it won't last long, nothing too special about my PC, and not a silicon winner GPU. I don't use those settings for daily usage, a much more boring 4.5 GHz cpu and +100 gpu, I need stability and longevity.

 

[T1GERTEA]

my 970 strix seems to be volt locked because changing voltages on afterburner or gpu tweak doesn't change it according gpuz or any of the monitoring tools. Just wondering, if i flash my bios, will it unlock the voltage?

 

[xorbe]

Heaven seems to top out at 4096 ... can't run as 5K benchmark!

 

[C3sp3nar]

Single GTX 660 Ti score: 774
1215/1701
Cpu: Intel i5 3350P @ 3.1 Ghz

 

[sirpig05]

R9 290x 1160mhz core clock/1475mhz memory clock
FX-8320 3.5ghz
Frame seems to be quite low for a 290x

 

[Syrocc]

So here's my first submission:

Intel i5 4590 @ 3.3 Ghz, AsRock H87 Pro 4 Mobo, Palit GTX 970 Jetstream, 8 GB Corsair 1600 mhz, Samsung Evo 840 120 GB.

GPU Base Clock - 1352
GPU Boost Clock - 1504
RAM Clock - 2060

Given how crap my CPU is, I was amazed how well the GPU performed. Must have gotten quite lucky with my Palit card, takes punishment like a champ. The results are with the default Bios and with +30 mV voltage, at 111% Max Power. Could probably tweak some more out of it, but I found this to be extremely stable.

 

[Syrocc]

R9 290x 1160mhz core clock/1475mhz memory clock
FX-8320 3.5ghz
Frame seems to be quite low for a 290x

Well, not that I'm against AMD GPUs, but the 290x is still relatively pricey for what it offers. Combine that with high power usage, and I wouldn't really recommend it over a 970, unless you get an insane deal on it. For me, the 290x and 970 were priced identically, so it was a no-brainer. Hope you can get some more out of yours though.

 

[Chatelike]

Stock cooler and stock bios..... will be installing accelero iv air cooler and some heatsinks to take the single performance crown again

 

[xorbe]

Stock cooler and stock bios..... will be installing accelero iv air cooler and some heatsinks to take the single performance crown again

Look up a few posts -- Mydog hit 2800+ score on sub-zero cooling ... good luck taking the top spot!!!

 

[Chatelike]

Look up a few posts -- Mydog hit 2800+ score on sub-zero cooling ... good luck taking the top spot!!!

He's phasing cooling his cpu, his videocard is on a waterblock with decent clocks. He should be able to hit 1550+ , or at least I will

 

[The_Intruder]

Here's my latest score: 1618
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4460 CPU @ 3.20GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 9.18.13.4788 (4095MB) x1
GPU Clock: 1514
Memory Clock: 1980

 

[Mydog]

He's phasing cooling his cpu, his videocard is on a waterblock with decent clocks. He should be able to hit 1550+ , or at least I will

So you'll hit 1550+ with accelero iv easy?
I can't do it with none of my two titans with full cover block and 4C water

 

[Tommy_Here]

I'll quite happily take 10th place thank you!