Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[mapesdhs]

There was a time when 1920x1200 was a lot more common, while the preference at 2560 width
was leaning more towards 1600 height than 1440 (check reviews from a few years ago, lots of
sites were testing at 2560x1600 before the advent of 4K), but then the classic market shift occured
with a combination of swinging consumer demand and manufacturer cost preference shoving out
1440 as the next preferred height, while 1080 rapidly gained ground below it.

There's a definite feedback effect between what companies make, how they price them, how sites
use them, what consumers decide to buy, etc. I remember when 1600x1200 was still popular.

What shocked me when finally choosing a 2560-width monitor a couple of years ago was how the
pricing had totally changed. Used to be there wasn't much difference between a 1440 and 1600
height model, but by 2013 the 1600 models were massively more expensive, as in 2X to 4X more.
So I became another jolt in the pressure wave by choosing a 1440 model (Dell 27" IPS).

Ian.

PS. Apologies for using the 4K name when I know it's not, but hey that's the way the PR nonsense
has evolved.

 

[Tommy_Here]

Intel core i5-4690k 4.6GHz
Nvidia geforce gtx 980 core clock 1575mhz Boost
Memory clock 7.8ghz effective

 

[Gremalot]

*edit 29apr2015
i7-2600k @ 3.4GHz
gtx 680 @ 1175/1827 ... -(evga 680 sc sig2) . at nice 58°c

 

[The N]

Core i5 2500K @4.0GHz
2x AMD R9 280X (Gigabyte/Sapphire VX)

 

[Bimmiman]

[/IMG] I Had issues with low frames rates. I went from a Gtx 560 to a GTX 960 finally went with the GTX 970 EVGA.......I still noticed low frame rates so the issue for me ended up being that even though I thought I uninstalled all of the previous drivers I in all actuality did not. So I downloaded DISPLAY DRIVER UNINSTALLER. If you do this make sure you watch a youtube video. I overclocked Using MSI afterburner. Increased core clock +50 and Memory Clock +390 My cpu is not overclocked and I am running 3 24 inch displays like a champ for the 1st time ever. I couldn't be more Pleased with this card.YOUTUBE vid of 3 monitors.

Driver Uninstaller YOUTUBE VIDEO.

Hope this helps someone.

 

[Cortana]

View attachment 64503

[/IMG] I Had issues with low frames rates. I went from a Gtx 560 to a GTX 960 finally went with the GTX 970 EVGA.......I still noticed low frame rates so the issue for me ended up being that even though I thought I uninstalled all of the previous drivers I in all actuality did not. So I downloaded DISPLAY DRIVER UNINSTALLER. If you do this make sure you watch a youtube video. I overclocked Using MSI afterburner. Increased core clock +50 and Memory Clock +390 My cpu is not overclocked and I am running 3 24 inch displays like a champ for the 1st time ever. I couldn't be more Pleased with this card.YOUTUBE vid of 3 monitors.

Driver Uninstaller YOUTUBE VIDEO.

Hope this helps someone.

You need to turn on 8x antialiasing and post a screenshot from the benchmark for it to be uploaded to the chart.

 

[EricG]

Intel Core i7-4790k @4.8ghz
2x EVGA GTX 980 @1241/1342

Not too bad i suppose

 

[Suferbus]

[/IMG] Here is my submission. Just finished my 5930k, 3x gtx 980 sli build, but one of my 980's is not operating in sli, so even though Heaven reads 3 gtx 980s, I only have 2 running during this benchmark due to bad sli fingers on my 3rd gpu, so until my rma comes in, it is just sitting in the 3rd pcie slot looking pretty, doing nothing. Specs:
Intel Core I7 5930k @ 4.6Ghz
2x GTX 980 @ 1350Mhz
8gb GSkill DDR4 @ 2400 Mhz

[/IMG]

 

[Suferbus]

Also, sorry my above entry is not the perfect screenshot, i could not get my print screen feature to work, so i had to save my benchmark run in Heaven, and put it in a folder on my desktop, then use Screen Hunter to get the screen shot.

 

[sirpig05]

Well, not that I'm against AMD GPUs, but the 290x is still relatively pricey for what it offers. Combine that with high power usage, and I wouldn't really recommend it over a 970, unless you get an insane deal on it. For me, the 290x and 970 were priced identically, so it was a no-brainer. Hope you can get some more out of yours though.

I did get A pretty good deal shipped for $400 AUD. I think it might be my CPU that is bringing me down however I do regret getting my 290x and would prefer a 970

 

[sirpig05]

This is my R9 290x Score with an fx 8320 at 3.5GHz and the GPU at 1175/1500. The CPU brings my score down a bit though.

 

[romancef]

Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.2 GHz
MSI 970 GTX Gaming @ 1410/2000

 

[FX-GMC]

Updated those with correct screenshot and clocks listed.

Also, sorry my above entry is not the perfect screenshot, i could not get my print screen feature to work, so i had to save my benchmark run in Heaven, and put it in a folder on my desktop, then use Screen Hunter to get the screen shot.

Press F12 after the benchmark then look for a Heaven subfolder in the documents folder. That is where it will save the screenshot

 

[holyfield]

It's an old comp with Radeon R9 280X. I share the result just for case, if someone considers to replace an old graphic card with Radeon R9 280X, as I did.

OS: Mac OSX Yosemite 10.10.3
CPU: Intel Q9550
CPU Frequency: 2,83 GHz
Score: 733

 

[Ghostfriendship]

Alienware 18 (LAPTOP):
18.4" Truelife 1920x1080p HD LED 60Hz 2ms screen
i7 Quad-Core 4900QM 2.8-4.0GHz (o/c)
Duel GTX 880m 8gb cards (total 16gb)
16gb DDR3 duel channel 1600MHz RAM
256gb SSD/1TB HDD (5400 RPM w/80gb cache)
Blueray/DVDRW/CDRW

*FULL STAT LOAD* SCORE: (8x, Extreme, Ultra, Etc.)

Hey Drawboy, can you tell me how you got that awesome score. I have the same lappy as you. I get on average 62. Any advise?

 

[NecrosNightfall]

Intel core i5 3570k @ 3.4 ghz 3.8 boost (stock) Titan X @ 1460 core 2000 Memory

 

[ezequiel dj]

saludos desde Argentina

 

[Tuco]

CPU : I7 3770 3.4
GPU : MSI GTX 970 GAMING 4G
GPU Boost Clock : 1508
MEMORYClock : 2003

 

[xorbe]

I want to clarify my #2 score labeled "1390(non-boost?)/1851" ... 1390 was the speed during the run as reported by MSI AB, so that was the boost speed. 1400 is pretty much the limit of my Titan X.

 

[PartyPrash]

My first post on the site Hello all

TITAN X
GPU Clock @ 1400MHz
Memory Clock @ 4000Mhz
CPU @ 4.7 @ 1.25v

 

[MrGenius]

It's an old comp with Radeon R9 280X. I share the result just for case, if someone considers to replace an old graphic card with Radeon R9 280X, as I did.

OS: Mac OSX Yosemite 10.10.3
CPU: Intel Q9550
CPU Frequency: 2,83 GHz
Score: 733

View attachment 64712

WOW!!!

Worst 280X score ever!

And by a long shot to boot. How is that even possible?

EDIT: It's not valid. Doesn't show the clocks. How'd you manage that? What did you do...underclock it?

 

[Vidane]

i did get 2017 on it after but forgot to screen cap :/
oc was 1551core/2013mem
air cooled

 

[Scarecrow3245]

Anybody done this bench on a laptop before ? Sadly I can't seem to find any scores for m versions of cards...
And comparing it to desktops ones.... well it isn't fair although the gtx 970m is holding on pretty well !
Maybe i'll post some screenshots later on (~1045 with i7 4710HQ stock clock and OC GTX 970m 1170Mhz/3201Mhz)

edit: just saw the guy and his gtx 870m post... wow that is a long shot between his and my 970m

 

[HammerON]

Anybody done this bench on a laptop before ? Sadly I can't seem to find any scores for m versions of cards...
And comparing it to desktops ones.... well it isn't fair although the gtx 970m is holding on pretty well !
Maybe i'll post some screenshots later on (~1045 with i7 4710HQ stock clock and OC GTX 970m 1170Mhz/3201Mhz)

edit: just saw the guy and his gtx 870m post... wow that is a long shot between his and my 970m

Did you see this run?
http://www.techpowerup.com/forums/t...-benchmark-scores.198888/page-33#post-3261538

 

[FX-GMC]

WOW!!!

Worst 280X score ever!

And by a long shot to boot. How is that even possible?

EDIT: It's not valid. Doesn't show the clocks. How'd you manage that? What did you do...underclock it?

It's on a MAC and using OpenGL.



Updated the results that are in compliance with the rules.