Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[Brandon K Hankins]

 

[stealth83]

4770k @3.5
GTX 980ti sc @1102/1190

 

[silkstone]

My score seems a little low, though here it is.
7870 Myst + 280x - 1030/1500
i5 2500k @4.4Ghz

 

[Jetster]

My score seems a little low, though here it is.
7870 Myst + 280x - 1030/1500
i5 2500k @4.4Ghz

Its not low you don't have AA turned on
It should be about 1400

 

[silkstone]

My apologies. I missed that setting.
Scores are extremely low now

 

[GreiverBlade]

View attachment 65732

as said many times in the thread and also stated in the rules in the original post: if it's not a screenshot from within the benchmark : not valide (reason behind, it's awfully easy to modify a HTML file, ofc not saying that you do it, but it's a rule.)

7.) Must Be a Screenshot from within Heaven to be valid (See bottom of post) Here's why.

 

[stealth83]

Sorry about that, ^^^ its fixed now.

 

[cookiemonster]

enter me

 

[GreiverBlade]

enter me

Read my post above... pretty please...

 

[cookiemonster]

Soz how do I do that.

 

[GreiverBlade]

Soz how do I do that.

F12 at the result in the bench then C:user/your name/Heaven/Screenshot convert the TGA to a JPG and upload

 

[cookiemonster]

enter me hope it's right this time.

 

[jdawg12]

Eh I can do better....

 

[Marcelo Couto]

My Score!

 

[RejZoR]

Ok, this is weird...

Isn't the score a bit low? I mean, the card is clocked at 1200/6800 ! Verified artifact free and with each iteration of VRAM clock increase, I've verified scores in Sisoft Sandra and 3DMark and scores were always increasing, meaning I haven't really hit the ECC wall of my RAM (which is when you don't have artifacts, but the score stays the same or even goes down. Seems a bit low to me for some reason looking at how much some score with R9-280's...

 

[crispe]

I can't printscreen a full scree application without my whole screen going black, but I'm running EVGA GTX 760 SSCs in SLI, CPU is at 4.2Ghz

GPUs are 1,241Mhz (Core) / 3005Mhz (Memory)

 

[QuestForQueso]

I finally went out and bought a good graphics card and dayum is it fast.

Specs:
CPU: intel i7-4770k @ 3.5 GHz (I'd overclock it but I got the (un)luck of the draw and it's a shitty overclocker)
GPU: EVGA Geforce GTX 980ti SC (core clock: 1458, memory clock: 2065)

 

[Jetster]

I can't printscreen a full scree application without my whole screen going black, but I'm running EVGA GTX 760 SSCs in SLI, CPU is at 4.2Ghz

GPUs are 1,241Mhz (Core) / 3005Mhz (Memory)

Use TPUs own screen capture program........http://www.techpowerup.com/tpucapture/

 

[neo1738]

Brand new build, been 5 years on the same laptop which just wasn't cutting it. Note the CPU is OC the GPU is out of the bock clock speeds.
I7-5820k OC to 4.1 Ghz
16gb G.Skill Ripjaws DDR 4 PC 3000
Asus X99 Deluxe MB
2x EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC in SLI
2x Samsung EVO 250gb SSD in Raid 0.
Note: Heaven only recognizes 4gb of the 6gb memory available on each card. Not sure if it's reading wrong or not optimized.

 

[jordan1794]

Brand new build, been 5 years on the same laptop which just wasn't cutting it. Note the CPU is OC the GPU is out of the bock clock speeds.
I7-5820k OC to 4.1 Ghz
16gb G.Skill Ripjaws DDR 4 PC 3000
Asus X99 Deluxe MB
2x EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC in SLI
2x Samsung EVO 250gb SSD in Raid 0.
Note: Heaven only recognizes 4gb of the 6gb memory available on each card. Not sure if it's reading wrong or not optimized.

View attachment 65962 View attachment 65963 View attachment 65964

I'd set a custom fan curve if I were you, 80 C is a bit warm.
You are probably being thermal throttled by the cards BIOS (Doesn't really matter, you are so freaking overkill anyways lol)
I think you could probably hit 3500-3750 with the right overclock.
Amazing score btw, and awesome build

 

[neo1738]

Yeah my understanding is the max optimal temp is about 83 degrees, once it hits that the fans really kick up and never had it over 84. Thank you!

 

[jordan1794]

Do you have ACX 2.0 cooling? If so you can really crank the cool haha.
I have one 980 overclocked to 1569 core & 8384 effective memory.
My fan curve keeps my card under 65 C, and fan speeds rarely exceed 60 percent.
Inaudible with headphones on, although with them off it is a little noisy.

GPU-Z will tell you what is holding the card(s) back, look at the PerfCap section during the bench (or if you have 1 monitor hover over the graph to a point where it was benching)
These are the codes:

vRel = Reliability. Indicating perf is limited by reliability voltage.
VOp = Operating. Indicating perf is limited by max operating voltage.
Pwr = Power. Indicating perf is limited by total power limit.
Thrm = Thermal. Indicating perf is limited by temperature limit.
Util = Utilization. Indicating perf is limited by GPU utilization.

(Dunno if you want/need help overclocking but I'd be happy to do so, just send me a message )

 

[neo1738]

No reference card, was only one's available atm (in stock) and I wanted to get the build going. May decide to liquid cool them in the future but I honestly don't think I'll need that power anytime soon.

 

[MrGenius]

Ok, this is weird...

Isn't the score a bit low? I mean, the card is clocked at 1200/6800 ! Verified artifact free and with each iteration of VRAM clock increase, I've verified scores in Sisoft Sandra and 3DMark and scores were always increasing, meaning I haven't really hit the ECC wall of my RAM (which is when you don't have artifacts, but the score stays the same or even goes down. Seems a bit low to me for some reason looking at how much some score with R9-280's...

I don't know about how weird that is. With only one other 7850 to compare it to, with much lower clocks.

EDIT: WTF? Where did I get 7850 from? That's strange. Couldn't possibly be a 7850 with 3GB VRAM. DOH! My bad. Scratch that then.

But I'll tell you one thing FOR SURE, it's NOWHERE NEAR as weird as a 7950 @ 1206/1668 scoring 1397!!! Which I've just now discovered while trying to reference your score(how the hell I missed that until now I have no clue). And boy does that PISS ME OFF!!! As a matter of fact, I formally protest, and I'm going to throw a MAJOR fit if that's not removed from the list.

That is so fucking far from possible it's not even funny...AT ALL!!!

[There used to be some pretty foul stuff I said here. If you really want to see it, check the next page. Where it's been quoted by the OP]

 

[RejZoR]

There is NO way I could pull off 350 more points. The most I managed to get was pushing it over the magic 1000 points barrier. I think 1040 was the highest I've ever got with my HD7950. Only way would be with lower AA level or by forcing tesselation multiplier. 3DMark ignores all those settings or warns about it on the score page, but for Unigine tests, you can basically bend the rules as you please. Which is not exactly cool.