Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

[gazzyk1ns]

It would be genuinely brilliant (and I mean that seriously) if someone still has a 386SX or something similar that they could run CPU-Z on! I suppose the latest version (i.e. with the benchmark feature) probably wouldn't run on literally a 386, though.

Separately: Quad-channel RAM obviously creates multi-threaded heaven. Although like I said, I have HT switched off 99% of the time. I don't game and I do BOINC "compute" tasks.

 

[Toothless]

No way.
View attachment 68547 View attachment 68548

You don't win either.

 

[BiggieShady]

My Ivy Bridge i5 3570K at 4GHz compared to Devils Canyon i7 at the same clock

 

[cadaveca]

@cadaveca
Isn't your score a bit low for the given CPU? Is it stock or overclocked? I mean I basically get that much on 5820K which is the lowest model. If it's on stock though, then it's pretty good.

Our CPUs are no different except stock speeds. So at the same clock, there should be no difference between our scores.

 

[Capitan Harlock]

My Xeon w3520 XD 4ghz
EDIT: Here i was with steam open and other stuff
version 1.73 64bit

Redone the bench 2 times with all things closed and i got this 2 results Multi thread with different results version 1.74 64bit

 

[Devon68]

After seeing other peoples scores now I have to check mine. Be right back

Here it is my stock FX-6100 :

Here is the new result in ver 1.74. While opening cpu-z I get a strange error message:

and here is my old Pc still rocking 11 years later with some minor upgrades :

 

[cdawall]

No way.
View attachment 68547 View attachment 68548

Interesting that, that looses, admittedly mine is overclocked.

My Athlon X3 435 doesn't do very hot either lol it has however been running this speed for going on 6 years now however.

 

[RejZoR]

Ok, how about 5820K at 4.8 GHz

 

[Outback Bronze]

4Ghz, 5960x.

 

[AhokZYashA]

i have to try this with my dual Xeon E5-2650v3

 

[Jetster]

I didn't know CPUZ did benchmarks

 

[RejZoR]

I found it few weeks ago. It has a benchmark button and stress button, so you can also use it for OC stability testing.

 

[Ferrum Master]

The funny thing in this thread... there are either ultra performance master race machines or abysmal low end peasant machines

seconds, I dunno why the x86 and x64 versions output different bench results.

 

[tabascosauz]

I'm flying the H81 SFF banner here, so I don't blame my 4790K for falling short of toothless' scores. Respectable.

 

[Aquinus]

The funny thing in this thread... there are either ultra performance master race machines or abysmal low end peasant machines

seconds, I dunno why the x86 and x64 versions output different bench results.

Certain workloads can actually be run faster using x64 due to the extra instructions it provides in addition to supporting more addressable memory space. It's also entirely possible that the compiler used different optimization flags for 32-bit versus 64 as there may be some optimizations that work only 64-bit processes. For example, you can assume that all CPUs running 64-bit have SSE3 extensions, 32-bit on the other hand might not so you can't compile it to use it unless you have checks to see if its available and what not, which is sometimes more work than it's worth (to the developer and/or company.)

I think I'll just leave this here.

 

[RejZoR]

The funny thing in this thread... there are either ultra performance master race machines or abysmal low end peasant machines

seconds, I dunno why the x86 and x64 versions output different bench results.

I have two peasants under my roof as well One AMD E-450 (Dual Core) and one Intel Atom Z3740 (Quad Core). I'll give them a go in the evening.

 

[Toothless]

I'm flying the H81 SFF banner here, so I don't blame my 4790K for falling short of toothless' scores. Respectable.

View attachment 68565 View attachment 68566 View attachment 68567

Mmm dat stock which in all honesty is still speedy.

 

[uuuaaaaaa]

My oldschool socket 478 P4 3.4 Gallatin Extreme Edition

 

[R-T-B]

Skylake fun @ 4.5Ghz with DDR4-2750 (they are g.skill 2800Mhz modules but 2800Mhz doesn't like my gigabyte mobo for some reason at 125Mhz BCLK.)

Lulz, I beat @RejZoR in single threading anyways... at least on his daily driver overclock.

 

[KainXS]

my ol 3770k 4.5Ghz

and I really thought bay trail would score higher

 

[kniaugaudiskis]

Here's my X5670 comfortably coasting at 4.2GHz

Judging by the single thread score of 591 points of the OP's X6 1090 @ 4.0GHz, it looks like this benchmark favors Intel CPUs as my Xeon from the same era scores twice as much (1200 points) at pretty much similar speed and from what I remember, back in 2010 Bloomfield/Gulftown/Westmere CPUs had an average of 35% IPC advantage over Deneb/Thuban-based AMD processors.

 

[cdawall]

Well that's interesting. If anyone is curious how AMD's low power stacks up...I am honestly surprised it beats my Athlon X3 in both single and multithreaded.

EDIT: just noticed I didn't record ram speeds

 

[agent00skid]

 

[buildzoid]

My broadwell powered laptop. I miss my 3960X I had to leave it behind.

 

[xvi]

HP Pavilion, Memphis-B motherboard.