Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

[KEVOCROOK]

file:///C:/Users/home/Desktop/Unigine_Heaven_Benchmark_4.0_20141225_1036.html
fx4170
gtx 980

 

[Hammerchucker]

I just recently took my second ASUS Direct CU II 2 GTX 780 out of SLI to get my son up an running his own PC (til he can get a 970 or 980) and so I've been a bit more into OC'ing and paying attention to stats.

This is my sweet spot for my setup. I got a bit higher scores (1634) with slightly higher GPU clock speeds (1136Ghz core) but had artifacts (but not crashing). I'm running a Corsair 750w power supply so not quite sure if I'm hitting the power supply's limit or the cards. In any case, I'm quite happy with these results on stock bios and air cooling.

 

[Hammerchucker]

says my file is too big. any help. tried zip files

I right clicked on the pic and clicked edit which opened Paint. I chose save as and .jpg. This drastically reduced the file size.

 

[SotoDojo]

I7 4770K @ 4.29


1651/3505 stock cooling

 

[Jidonsu]

i7 4790K @4.7ghz

980ti @ 1550mhz and 4005 mhz

Score 2703

 

[Ömer Irik]

i7 4820k @4.4
ARES II 1283/1800

 

[Tomgang]

Alright here is my old junk.

spec and clocks

Score

 

[jaggerwild]

Asus maximus V gene 3770K @4500 memory 1600 2X GTX 580'S. I'll post latter with 6700K on gigabyte Z170X SOC with 2 X GTX 780 Ti DC II OC

 

[neatfeatguy]

I've been playing with the OC capabilities on my 980 Ti and I've set the memory much higher while dropping the core a little bit - things run stable and I'm not sure I've reached the ceiling yet on the memory. Here's my new screen shots that shows results from Heaven (you'll notice in the upper left corner you can see the GPU clock and memory speeds from Afterburner on screen display).

CPU: i5-4670k stock
GPU (according to GPUZ): core @ 1303 w/ 1404 boost. Memory @ 2068
Heaven pic shows (kind of hard to see in upper left corner) GPU is boosting to 1479
Here's a GPUZ validation link

 

[jboydgolfer]

hope i did it right. reference GTX 970 (nvidia 970) +150 on the core, Only

 

[Flukelsx]

Updated Score: So many inconsistencies with benchmarks between similar and better systems it seems.

 

[Vellinious]

I7 4770K @ 4.29


1651/3505 stock cooling


View attachment 72490

1651 core clock on a 980ti with stock cooling, eh? Where'd you read that core clock from? Unigine? You should open up GPUz, cause.....I'm gonna go out on a limb and say your core wasn't running at 1600+.

 

[GreiverBlade]

1651 core clock on a 980ti with stock cooling, eh? Where'd you read that core clock from? Unigine? You should open up GPUz, cause.....I'm gonna go out on a limb and say your core wasn't running at 1600+.

probably max boost clock, my 980 runs 1540 max boost regularly with 1278 clock setting

for benchmark settings: 1393/1978
i got
i5-4690K 4.5GHz GTX 980 1643/1978 1978 GreiverBlade, while offcial boost was reported to be 1499 under GPU-Z main tab

that was funny the score was same as memory clock

 

[jboydgolfer]

unigine has Terrible clock reading....atleast if it IS accurate, my 970 runs @ 3000+ memory, and 1800+ Core

 

[GreiverBlade]

unigine has Terrible clock reading....atleast if it IS accurate, my 970 runs @ 3000+ memory, and 1800+ Core

never trust in bench reading (except temp, that one is quite accurate ) sadly the main post will not be updated as the edit option is not there anymore, but still nice to see some good scores
i will maybe do one, one day, when i will have enough time, although i don't know how to do a spreadsheet in a post ... but for now not enough time to do it on a regular basis.

 

[jboydgolfer]

i just run these during. like this...except not in windowed mode , and for full runs obviously.

 

[GreiverBlade]

i just run these during. like this...except not in windowed mode , and for full runs obviously.

yep i do exactly the same, and sometime HwInfo 64

 

[chuck216]

OK I'll play... both CPU and GPU at stock speeds and memory clock:

 

[Vellinious]

probably max boost clock, my 980 runs 1540 max boost regularly with 1278 clock setting

for benchmark settings: 1393/1978
i got
i5-4690K 4.5GHz GTX 980 1643/1978 1978 GreiverBlade, while offcial boost was reported to be 1499 under GPU-Z main tab

that was funny the score was same as memory clock

No....first, the 980 is a GM204, not a GM200. The clocks they're able to reach are completely different. I know guys that can't push their 980ti past 1600 with a chilled loop, custom bios, and a TON of work....and he got it done with stock cooling, and a score that screams, "I barely overclocked this"? lol, just no.

 

[GreiverBlade]

No....first, the 980 is a GM204, not a GM200. The clocks they're able to reach are completely different. I know guys that can't push their 980ti past 1600 with a chilled loop, custom bios, and a TON of work....and he got it done with stock cooling, and a score that screams, "I barely overclocked this"? lol, just no.

ok
misunderstanding ... i do know the difference about the 980 and 980Ti ... i was talking about GPU-Z READING.

for benchmark settings: 1393/1978
i got
i5-4690K 4.5GHz GTX 980 1643/1978 1978 GreiverBlade, while offcial boost was reported to be 1499 under GPU-Z main tab

the max boost reading is from Afterburner and yet my clock was still 1393 (yep Maxwell are shitty OC'er ... i perfectly know that) yet the max reading was 1643 ... which is kinda close to what SotoDojo got (1651) ok i run a Hybrid cooler (Poseidon ...)
ofc it's a GM200 vs GM204 i know that no worries (and GM200 has a stock base clock 127mhz lower than GM204 i know )

if i wanted to be correct i should have wrote 1378/1978 and not 1643/1978 (well 3956 if talking about DDR rate ram clock ) my 980 can't even pass 1378 without crashing ... on a loop

bottom line, i was just stating that he could have listed the max boost clock in GPU-Z "sensor" tab, as i do, instead of the spec listed in the "graphics cards" tab

after all he didn't mention what reading he took for the core clock, me on the other hand i told FX-GMC that my max sustained boost was 1643

 

[Vellinious]

ok
misunderstanding ... i do know the difference about the 980 and 980Ti ... i was talking about GPU-Z READING.

the max boost reading is from Afterburner and yet my clock was still 1393 (yep Maxwell are shitty OC'er ... i perfectly know that) yet the max reading was 1643 ... which is kinda close to what SotoDojo got (1651) ok i run a Hybrid cooler (Poseidon ...)
ofc it's a GM200 vs GM204 i know that no worries (and GM200 has a stock base clock 127mhz lower than GM204 i know )

if i wanted to be correct i should have wrote 1378/1978 and not 1643/1978 (well 3956 if talking about DDR rate ram clock ) my 980 can't even pass 1378 without crashing ... on a loop

bottom line, i was just stating that he could have listed the max boost clock in GPU-Z "sensor" tab, as i do, instead of the spec listed in the "graphics cards" tab

after all he didn't mention what reading he took for the core clock, me on the other hand i told FX-GMC that my max sustained boost was 1643

I'm going to state this as simply as possible. I don't care WHAT he's looking at. His 980ti was NOT running at 1600+ on the core during that run, and certainly not on stock cooling and a stock bios. Clear enough for you? lol

And yes...you should always list the max clock as listed by the GPUz sensors tab.....

Maxwells are excellent overclockers, btw....just sayin.

 

[jboydgolfer]

Maxwells are excellent overclockers, btw....just sayin.

Ill attest to that, @Vellinious helped me with unlocking the potential of one of my reference 970's, and Im getting the following scores, with VERY little work. I havent had the time to REALLY test the card, but 1500+ Actual core clocks are Easily held in both bench's, and Actual Gameplay.
Core 1520Mhz
Memory 1890Mhz
Thanks @Vellinious
if MY Damn MoBo was an SLI board, instead of Quad Xfire, Id hook up Both of my brand new ref 970's, and run some Sweet ass OC SLI bench's...but , sadly it wasn't meant to be.

I ramped the "stress test" up JUST to show my Actual clocks, since unigine doesnt show accurately afaik.

 

[GreiverBlade]

I'm going to state this as simply as possible. I don't care WHAT he's looking at. His 980ti was NOT running at 1600+ on the core during that run, and certainly not on stock cooling and a stock bios. Clear enough for you? lol

And yes...you should always list the max clock as listed by the GPUz sensors tab.....

"simply, clear enough for you, lol" who do you think i am? Rejzor?

also you do realize you wrote "I don't care WHAT he's looking at." and "And yes... you should always list the max clock listed by the GPU-Z sensors tab..." in the same post? contradiction? much.
so what about his 1600+ is like i explain for the 2 last post : MAX BOOST READING like my result ... clear enough for you?

until the concerned person answer : no real mean to know, and then therefore no need to try to explain me the opposite and treat me like that (i rarely use sarcasm when i try to explain something even if people cross-read )

Maxwells are excellent overclockers, btw....just sayin.

Ill attest to that, @Vellinious helped me with unlocking the potential of one of my reference 970's, and Im getting the following scores, with VERY little work. I havent had the time to REALLY test the card, but 1500+ Actual core clocks are Easily held in both bench's, and Actual Gameplay.

well technically ... nope 1378 under water (hybrid) is not really a good result ... compare that to a R9-290 under water, i got the same result: +200mhz (and both are stable in game at +100mhz since +200mhz is only for bench and crash once in a blue moon, but still crash)

and 1500+ actual core clock is not ... since you read GPU-Z sensor tab : it's max boost clock, i have a reading of 1643 but my real clock is 1393 so no, my actual core clock is not 1600+, but the max sustained boost is.
unlock the potential of a 970, well that GPU really need it ... for what it is so... what's your actual settings in afterburner? +100? yep, monster OC'er

oh ... to hell with that ... ok: i am an idiot, you both are right and the other user we mention is a liar (well ... less than nVidia with the 970 ... )

 

[jboydgolfer]

is early 4 mE. ure wrdz confuze me...more cawphee rekwired. asap

i am Totally confused right now, my shadowplay setting options have completely disappeared from my Geforece experience wat is going on Nvidiuuchi?>

not sure what it is your replying to . I was just saying that my 970 is holding those clocks , and it is. im not certain about minus 100mhz, or whatever. MY maxed out clocks are what i posted, im not under water, btw , (not sure, theres a Lot of info that is kind of all together) this is a Ref 970, an nvidia one. One of these ...i was only commenting on the maxwells over clock good part of @Vellinious post, the rest . i didnt even read TBH

 

[GreiverBlade]

is early 4 mE. ure wrdz confuze me...more cawphee rekwired. asap

i am Totally confused right now, my shadowplay setting options have completely disappeared from my Geforece experience wat is going on Nvidiuuchi?>

weird ... what drivers?

oh well if it was me ... i would like Shadowplay without the crap that Geforce Experience is ...

i guess i will go back to https://obsproject.com/


edit: max sustained clock : max sustained boost clock indeed and not actual clock ... ok so then 1500+ is nothing

since 1643 for 1398 is not having a 1600+ clock

that's what i mean GPU clock is 1278mhz boost is 1379mhz max boost reading in game/bench 1450+ yet my actual clock is 1278 which is only a +100mhz OC (ok over a factory OC ... )