• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Post your Cinebench R23 Score

Here's my cinebench for my stock x5650 as promised, and thank you wifi for failing over the past week. I even done a cpu z there too.

I need to overclock at some point, anyone know any ex58a ud3r guides hit me up, and boy was installing the cpu fun, took me hours on end to figure out I needed to bios update, time to sell the i7 930 I had.
 

Attachments

  • Cb x5650.JPG
    Cb x5650.JPG
    207.6 KB · Views: 593
  • Cb x5650 proof.JPG
    Cb x5650 proof.JPG
    343.4 KB · Views: 569
Xx Tek Tip xX said:
Here's my cinebench for my stock x5650 as promised, and thank you wifi for failing over the past week. I even done a cpu z there too.

I need to overclock at some point, anyone know any ex58a ud3r guides hit me up, and boy was installing the cpu fun, took me hours on end to figure out I needed to bios update, time to sell the i7 930 I had.
Click to expand...
done
 
Here are a few older ones I did.
All on chilled water @ -20C.

image_id_1859890.png


image_id_1871002.png


image_id_1930962.png
 
Bones said:
This is the run I did for the Country Cup late last year that won me the 7700K I'm using now.
The speed reported by the bench is different that what CPU-Z shows and that's because I used the board's OC dial to run up the clocks before I hit the run button, was ran at the speed CPU-Z shows. :D

View attachment 100489
Click to expand...
LN2?
 
dyVHSBO.png
N4DBzfVl.png
OnxGEt9l.png
WD3nHAYl.png
bnlCsM6l.png
 
Last edited:
Not gonna let a 2600K sit higher than me on the list. I'm seriously considering throwing the rad in a bucket of ice water and trying to knock that chilled loop 5GHz 3770K down a notch(or 2) too. But I'm not 100% sure that'd even be enough to do it. It's looking like I've got enough cooling as is(tops out at 83°C @ 4.9GHz full load). It's probably my VRM(or lack thereof) that's holding me back. Pretty sure I could easily get this sucker fully bench stable @ 5.0GHz+ on non-chilled water with the right mobo.

3770K @ 4.888GHz w/H2O
cb49.PNG
 
MrGenius said:
Not gonna let a 2600K sit higher than me on the list. I'm seriously considering throwing the rad in a bucket of ice water and trying to knock that chilled loop 5GHz 3770K down a notch(or 2) too. But I'm not 100% sure that'd even be enough to do it. It's looking like I've got enough cooling as is(tops out at 83°C @ 4.9GHz full load). It's probably my VRM(or lack thereof) that's holding me back. Pretty sure I could easily get this sucker fully bench stable @ 5.0GHz+ on non-chilled water with the right mobo.

3770K @ 4.888GHz w/H2O
Click to expand...
Get it colder, the majority of cpu's will clock higher when at lower temps.
 
Default i7 8700/212 evo - 1416cb
 

Attachments

  • 34341788_1792955027464260_8122610191343550464_n.png
    34341788_1792955027464260_8122610191343550464_n.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 437
added all
 
Core i3 8350K Tri-Core 5.0Ghz 1.36v (No AVX: windows bcdedit command - Linux noxsave) + CoolerMaster Hyper T4

ASUS Z370-P

8GB DDR4 2400mhz (4x2) Mushkin

Gigabyte Nvidia Geforce GTX 1050 OC (GP107 14nm: 640 Shaders / 40 TMUS / 32 ROPS) Windforce 2GB DDR5 7000Mhz 128Bit (110Gb/s)


RApuKKR.png
 
Last edited:
That i3 is a quad core? Why'd you disable the 4th core? Nice clocks btw.
 
Yep, but in his post he wrote "tri core" hence why i'm wondering why he'd disable the 4th core in bios.
 
T4C Fantasy said:
Yea new i3s are 4c 4t, i5s 6c 6t, i7s 6c 12t
Click to expand...

Hi and yeah i3 8350K is 4c/4t

Main reason for tri core is i want k cpu but dont need many cores

But with this cpu is needed disable one core for give better temps with coolermaster hyper t4 and make 5.0ghz possible

And upgrade from pentium G3258 @ 4.1ghz with artic cooling alpine 11 plus and is big boost

Pentium G3258 @ 4.1ghz give 152 points in single thread compared with 215 on i3 8350K @ 5.0ghz

Resuming in single thread performance up around 50% and around 100% up in multithread

:)
 
Neat increase! I'd highly recommended a better aircooler regardless, that 1 core will make a huge difference in frametimes and 1% lows etc. You could even delid the i3 to lower temps and get 5ghz on all cores without bad temps.

Gonna oc my x5650 today, expect some pics soon T4C

3.8ghz and 1.3v ran cinebench about 10 times - seems stable. Had to run the ram at 1200mhz instead of 1333 as bclk overclocking would push it to 2000 lol.
 

Attachments

  • 3.8ghz 1.3v x5650.JPG
    3.8ghz 1.3v x5650.JPG
    230.9 KB · Views: 463
catulitechup said:
Main reason for tri core is i want k cpu but dont need many cores

But with this cpu is needed disable one core for give better temps with coolermaster hyper t4 and make 5.0ghz possible
Click to expand...

That's a trade-off which is likely not worth it at all.
 
Vya Domus said:
That's a trade-off which is likely not worth it at all.
Click to expand...
Its not because 4 cores at 4.8 easily beats 3 at 5.1, but do what you want
 
Vya Domus said:
That's a trade-off which is likely not worth it at all.
Click to expand...
Benefits here:
- lower cpu usage
- higher performance
Your call, but i'd highly recommend against having 3 cores on a cpu, 4 is hardly enough even for me when i game a 2160p 60hz ultra
 
X3440 CIN15.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top