• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

What are you playing?

So now you got to pay $120 for Ubisoft games to get everything the gold version used to be all they care about is money now. I want to play the new assassin's Creed game this fall but for $120 I don't think so. I stick to playing elder scrolls online.
wait for a nice deal. I got AC ORIGINS collectors edition fir $75 i think it was at ubisoft store + dlcs included. Be patient and wait. I dont regret at all. The statue of bayek is amazing


REMEMBER Ubisoft store has deals that are not shown at uplay store
 
Last edited:
I jumped into hyperspace with Homeworld: Cataclysm, I loved the remaster of the original so much, the visual upgrade made the game unspeakably beautiful. I miss the mothership, and I could stare into those backgrounds all day. I wish there was a remaster of Emergence so it could be included in the collection.

The pilot views are awesome to watch when a dogfight ensues. Sometimes I wish I could control the craft freespace style. And I always like that I can keep the ships that make it to the next level. Too bad it's hard to keep promoted ships alive long enough to keep them at some times during the campaign.

It was more enjoyable for me capturing enemy Carrier-class ships and just going to town. But with this enemy type its a lot more difficult then the original.
i still have the original CD and manual for Cataclysm and the "hit collection" edition for HW2 :D i need to check on those remaster (and maybe get HW Desert of Kharak)
 
Bought the Conclave and Monks and Mystics DLC for Crusader Kings 2 (on sale) and I really like them, Conclave especially. Council action, new portraits (which seems minor but actually provides a breath of fresh air), revised educational system, changed law systems... Definitely improved the game. I still haven't ventured away from the Deheubarth (southern Wales) starting point in any of my games, but the Kingdom of Brythoniaid is formed, the filthy Anglo-Saxons in the east fight amongst themselves (as are their wont) and I've started to conquer the small irish tribes... Then the glory of Brythoniaid shall encompass every living soul from Deasmhumhain (or Desmond) to Ipswich.


And holy crap when did Francia get a female Empress and when did they take Iberia and even the lands beyond the Gibraltar strait, and ... they stretch all the way to what now is Poland.:eek:

That's what i love about this game. You get totally engrossed in the affairs of your pathetic little kingdom while the game churns on no matter what you do, and then you zoom out a bit and the world has changed. And there are so many interesting characters around... Which brings me to this woman I don't even recall the name for.

My son had just turned sixteen and thus was eligeble for marriege. I looked for women preferebly from powerful families so his prestige would get a boon, or someone with good qualities. And then I came upon the Woman. When you look for partners you get a huge list of eligeble characters, and you can sort them by rank (essentially as powerful they are), and on the very very bottom of the list there was this Woman. She was from Greece somewhere, aged 38, childless, she had plenty of good qualities, but she was nothing special at all ... apart from the fact that she was excommunicated, meaning she had no real status in the catholic world. And she was branded as an apostate. And she had been blinded, presumably because someone had accused her of being an apostate. And her greatest longing in life ("Ambition" in game terms) was to get married. For some reason I really felt for that Woman. I still do, and it's almost bizarre how I react to it.

Anyway, I invite a nobleman to my court and promptly arrange a wedding between the two. She arrives at my court in my cold castle of Cardiff (or Caerdydd as the welsh say), far away from the intrueges of the Byzanthine Empire and the hubbub of the world. She's grateful. About six months later a bishop in my realm accuses her of being an apostate, again, and demands I do something. Obviously I don't. I don't even know if she is an apostate, but having her brought from across the world just to have the accusations thrown in her face again (together with demands of her excecution) is not something I will accept.

Two years later she dies in childbirth, giving birth to a healthy baby boy. Considering in how many interesting ways she could have died otherwise it probably was not a bad death, as such. At least her last few years was spent in relative peace, in the cold embrace of Wales. At least I hope her husband was a good man.

And the game is just full of stuff like that.

BTW, Norway is for some reason ruled by turks.
 
BTW, Norway is for some reason ruled by turks.
:laugh: Just one of those crazy things that happen no matter what the strategy game when you just let stuff alone in the rest of the world!
 
I just have CK2.. way too many add ons for me to keep track of.
 
I just have CK2.. way too many add ons for me to keep track of.

I'd try it anyway. Along with the DLCs are patches providing heavy improvements and changes. Or you start with just a few DLC, like Way of Life (much roleplay stuff) and Legacy of Rome (retinues, or standing armies). Old Gods for some pagan and Norse action combined with an earlier starting date (867 as opposed to 1066), Charlemange for more flavour and an even earlier starting date (769). Many of the DLCs are culture specific and only add minor stuff for the western world, and the myriads of music/graphical DLCs can be ignored entirely. But yes it's a downside of the Paradox approach to content: it keeps the game fresh for a long time (sex years, 14 major expansion), but if you're late to the game or haven't played for a while it'll cost to get the "full" experience. Mind you the "full" experience requires many, many playthroughs with many entirely different cultures. To see the entire game you literally has so spend probably thousands of hours in it. I have about 200 hours and I have never really played anything other than a welsh lord, and no game is the same.

You can snag up dlcs as they go on sale.

Here's a small list of the dlc's and a fairly good summation of the interesting ones.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CrusaderKings/wiki/expansions
 
I'd try it anyway. Along with the DLCs are patches providing heavy improvements and changes. Or you start with just a few DLC, like Way of Life (much roleplay stuff) and Legacy of Rome (retinues, or standing armies). Old Gods for some pagan and Norse action combined with an earlier starting date (867 as opposed to 1066), Charlemange for more flavour and an even earlier starting date (769). Many of the DLCs are culture specific and only add minor stuff for the western world, and the myriads of music/graphical DLCs can be ignored entirely. But yes it's a downside of the Paradox approach to content: it keeps the game fresh for a long time (sex years, 14 major expansion), but if you're late to the game or haven't played for a while it'll cost to get the "full" experience. Mind you the "full" experience requires many, many playthroughs with many entirely different cultures. To see the entire game you literally has so spend probably thousands of hours in it. I have about 200 hours and I have never really played anything other than a welsh lord, and no game is the same.

You can snag up dlcs as they go on sale.

Here's a small list of the dlc's and a fairly good summation of the interesting ones.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CrusaderKings/wiki/expansions

No DLC at all. Got a good deal on the main game, but left it at that so far. :)
 
still on ME Andromeda...
 
bought ROTR 20th anniversary edition (boxed), it was on sale. anyone played it ? good or not ?
 
bought ROTR 20th anniversary edition (boxed), it was on sale. anyone played it ? good or not ?
Not the 20th anniversary edition, but have played base game plus dlc’s.

I enjoyed it quite a bit. There were plenty of tombs to explore unlike the first reboot. Puzzles were challenging, map areas were large. Exploration encouraged, and the game looked great.
 
bought ROTR 20th anniversary edition (boxed), it was on sale. anyone played it ? good or not ?
Like you i bought the 20th and liked the whole game. Even though i really hate that you had to pay for such short dlcs lucky that the 20th cones with all dlcs included... in general i really liked it
 

Yep. And it's glorious.


In other news, my vassals wants a random pictish dude as king instead of me. I'm 16, my kingly father who had a stewardship skill of 23 and was generally awesome died of consumption when i was 12. I'm Dull (-2 to everything), slothful (-1 to everything) and a Misguided Warrior meaning I was educated as a warrior but sucks at it. Also I inherited my mothers anglo-saxon looks. No wonder they hate me. :(

The good thing is my father (me) built a lot of military buildings so I can raise more than 3000 men, plus I have a personal retinue (standing army) of 400 light infantrymen and 150 archers. Also he (me) consolidated his power a lot (by forging a claim on Dyfed and then kick out the old lady who was running the place. Now my demesne (counties/provinces I rule personally) is beautifully symmetrical and consists of almost 50% of the realm so they will have a hard time fighting me. I hate myself. Useless Maelgwn.

And now I'm a Drunkard, Gluttonous, Possesed, and Lunatic, and I just heard the Devil speak to me, and my wife was murdered, and my new wife - a beautiful princess from Greece (giving me 250 prestige yeeeaahhh) - really hates me. It's the saxon blood, it had to be. No true welshman would ever be an alcoholic.

And now I'm a Drunkard, Gluttonous, Possesed, and Lunatic, and I just heard the Devil speak to me, and my wife was murdered, and my new wife - a beautiful princess from Greece (giving me 250 prestige yeeeaahhh) - really hates me. It's the saxon blood, it had to be. No true welshman would ever be an alcoholic. (@CAPSLOCKSTUCK right?)

EDIT: Wooo the Glitterhoof event fired! I've never seen that before in real life (?). I wonder if they have patched out the ability to create a horse kingdom...

glitterhoof.png
 
Last edited:
Gave For Honor a quick go since it was a freebie, not too bad at all, really impressed with how good everything looks and how well it runs even on dated hardware. Multiplayer seems reasonably balanced and microtransactions haven't interfered at all so far.

Surprisingly I have enjoyed the single player campaign even more, interesting combat mechanics and a variety of ways to play. Doesn't try to be clever, does what it says on the tin. Would highly recommend to anyone that enjoys hack and slash or just as a time waster.

Tried to get back into The Witcher series with The Witcher 2. Still great games but I've got the issue with textures rendering like a PlayStation 2, still trying to resolve by editing the .ini, there's a lot to be said for a games look and immersion these days.
 
Gave For Honor a quick go since it was a freebie, not too bad at all, really impressed with how good everything looks and how well it runs even on dated hardware. Multiplayer seems reasonably balanced and microtransactions haven't interfered at all so far.

Surprisingly I have enjoyed the single player campaign even more, interesting combat mechanics and a variety of ways to play. Doesn't try to be clever, does what it says on the tin. Would highly recommend to anyone that enjoys hack and slash or just as a time waster.

Tried to get back into The Witcher series with The Witcher 2. Still great games but I've got the issue with textures rendering like a PlayStation 2, still trying to resolve by editing the .ini, there's a lot to be said for a games look and immersion these days.

Mechanically, For Honor looks pretty cool. I just hate multiplayer. But it'd be nice to get a more involved melee combat system (like fighting games) in a regular single player adventure title.

I always had an idea for a game where you were escaping an island or some area like that, and every fight (which were few and far between) was usually 1 vs 1 and took awhile. Why hasn't anyone made this? Something like, for example, the fight scenes in Die Hard.. where he nearly exhausts himself on each terrorist (like the crazy long haired blonde dude). Even though I love them, games have a bad habit of relying on waves of dumb enemies.
 
I will admit, that's one thing that PoE has solidly over GD: tactics and new content. They're always coming up with new ways to make you work for your loot at PoE. With GD, it looks like the most challenging thing is the Crucible content, which is just a gauntlet. The previous incarnation of PoE had you wandering across an NPC, who opened a portal in time to random rooms in a temple, and depending on which boss you chose to kill in your short time there, and which door you chose to try to open, you would face a final Temple arena and boss which varied wildly.
I enjoy GD because it is so much what a D3 should have been: an excellent, dark, RPG with tons of loot. But I do wish they'd take a page or two from PoE and make the challenges not a simple case of "More Mobs, More Mob Health, More Mob Damage"....
 
Grim Dawn is too brainless for me. At this point, I just want it to be over so I can play Rise of the Tomb Raider. It's not a bad game, just not for me.
 
Ive been trying to put some time in MHW but for real this Dota 2 TI got me. Imo this have been one of the most exciting ive watched. Awesomes games, amazing fights and full of counters. I will like to see EG in the finals but still they need to beat LGD.

Back to MHW , this DOTA 2 INTERNATIONAL WAS SPECTACULAR!!!!!!!! OG winner!!!! being a DBZ fan can say that their coach said the magic words for game 5.....
ITS over 9000!!!!!!!
 
playing Heroes of the Storm since there's a few new heroes to try out.
 
I will admit, that's one thing that PoE has solidly over GD: tactics and new content. They're always coming up with new ways to make you work for your loot at PoE. With GD, it looks like the most challenging thing is the Crucible content, which is just a gauntlet. The previous incarnation of PoE had you wandering across an NPC, who opened a portal in time to random rooms in a temple, and depending on which boss you chose to kill in your short time there, and which door you chose to try to open, you would face a final Temple arena and boss which varied wildly.
I enjoy GD because it is so much what a D3 should have been: an excellent, dark, RPG with tons of loot. But I do wish they'd take a page or two from PoE and make the challenges not a simple case of "More Mobs, More Mob Health, More Mob Damage"....

I sometimes read the PoE thread here and it all looks so serious. I did play it a bit some years ago, but I didn't quite enjoy it. And one crucial difference and a dealbreaker for me is that Grim Dawn can be played offline.
 
Done with Grim Dawn but Grim Dawn made me seriously consider replaying Skyrim (first time in Steam Special Edition though). Now I have to choose between Rise of the Tomb Raider and Skyrim...
 
Back
Top