• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel i3 9100F X4 Based "Tomahawk" build (4.2GHz boost clocks)

Joined
May 6, 2018
Messages
1,150 (0.44/day)
Location
Upstate NY
System Name Dual Socket HP z820 Workstation
Processor Twin Intel Xeon E5 2673 v2 OEM processors (thats a total of 16C/32T)
Motherboard HP Dual Socket Motherboard
Cooling Stock HP liquid cooling
Memory 64GB Registered ECC memory kit (octal channel memory on this rig)
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700 XT Gaming X 8GB
Storage 2 x 512GB SSD in raid 0
Display(s) Acer 23" 75Hz Gaming monitors 1080P x2
Case Brushed Aluminium
Audio Device(s) Integrated (5.1)
Power Supply HP 1125W Stock PSU
Mouse gaming mouse
Keyboard Dell
Software Windows 10 Pro
So, I just happened to have a new in box MSI Tomahawk Z390 board laying around here and my parents are in need of a new desktop, so I am going to put something together for them, at no charge of course, they brought me into this world after all.

In any event. This will NOT be an extreme overclock adventure, unfortunately. The Intel 9100F is a quad core 14nm Coffee Lake CPU with a base speed of 3.6GHz and a boost speed of 4.2GHz and it has a locked multiplier. I will look into overclocking the bus speed if that's a possibility, I don't know yet. I know I will be able to run my 16GB 4000MHz G.Skill kit with it so that will give me an excuse to get some faster memory for my I5 9600K rig... :)

That being said when the CPU shows up I will start detailing my plans for the build... stay tuned.

Here is a little more background on the CPU...

Intel’s Core i3-9100F is a quad-core 9th generation Coffee Lake desktop processor. It features base / boost clocks of 3.6 / 4.2 GHz, 6 MB of cache, a 65W TDP and it ships with a cooler. Gamers should pair the 9100F with a Z390 motherboard and unlock higher XMP RAM speeds. This will deliver up to a 15% fps boost which is well worth it considering that many Z390 boards are available for around $100 USD (here is one of the builds from our EFps test lab). The 9100F has great single core performance coupled with a strong memory sub system. This enables it to deliver excellent all round performance, easily holding its own against far pricier CPUs for the majority of use cases. The heavily hyped 12 threaded 6 core Ryzen 3600 barely pulls ahead in any of the top five games. [O
 
Do you already have a suitable spare GPU? Because if not and if your parents aren't gonna game on this PC, then the regular 9100 (with the igpu) would be a better choice (or even a 8100 which seems to go for quite a bit less). Otherwise I definitely agree with what is written in the box in your post - for general (office-browsing-multimedia-light gaming) use, it is a substantially better choice than any Ryzen in its price range and even far above. From personal experience I can say that it's just noticeably snappier at everything than a 2600x.
 
Do you already have a suitable spare GPU? Because if not and if your parents aren't gonna game on this PC, then the regular 9100 (with the igpu) would be a better choice (or even a 8100 which seems to go for quite a bit less). Otherwise I definitely agree with what is written in the box in your post - for general (office-browsing-multimedia-light gaming) use, it is a substantially better choice than any Ryzen in its price range and even far above. From personal experience I can say that it's just noticeably snappier at everything than a 2600x.
I opted for the CPU with no gpu, I simply prefer to keep my graphics separate from my CPU. I know, that's a little OCD but it's just the way I like to build em. And yes, I have a capable Radeon graphics card for it. Besides the 9100 is actually substantially more expensive, at least from what I gather they go for a good bit more that the 9100F.
 
If I was you, I wouldn't overclock anything for my parents system. There is almost no point in overclocking the bus speed or getting 4K memory for such a system. Literally zero benefits for the users, but many potential drawbacks in doing so. Build it, set XMP with 3200 MHz CL14 RAM, stress test it for a couple hours, and hand it over. Whatever you quoted (link?) says FOR GAMERS... and I have no idea where they are getting a 15% increase. Legit testing shows merely a couple % increase at most (we've linked this in your closed thread...). 15% increase sounds like a single game or application or something. Broad testing shows low single digit increases in an overwhelming majority of cases.
 
Last edited:
Right, I will just experiment with it a little bit before I send it to them. I'm sure I'll be limited by the stock cooler that comes with the CPU, if I can even overclock at all...
 
If I was you, I wouldn't overclock anything for my parents system. There is almost no point in overclocking the bus speed or getting 4K memory for such a system. Literally zero benefits for the users, but many potential drawbacks in doing so. Build it, set XMP with 3200 MHz CL14 RAM, stress test it for a couple hours, and hand it over. Whatever you quoted (link?) says FOR GAMERS... and I have no idea where they are getting a 15% increase. Legit testing shows merely a couple % increase at most (we've linked this in your closed thread...). 15% increase sounds like a single game or application or something. Broad testing shows low single digit increases in an overwhelming majority of cases.
I'm with @EarthDog on this....

Built a PC for my sister and her family... No overclock no nothing. I will possibly end up swapping it out at some point for a Ryzen system since at the moment a dual core Celeron is probably not the best thing in the world for them (granted no high end gaming etc and just browsing the internet) but still.. Overclocking can just lead to problems, give them a hassle free PC experience :)

Again as EarthDog mentions, no point overclocking for the average user, they aren't going to be saying "Thanks, that extra 1.76% of performance by overclocking the RAM is really noticeable....."

(1.76% was just random numbers and not actual figures or fact :laugh:)
 
I'm with @EarthDog on this....

Built a PC for my sister and her family... No overclock no nothing. I will possibly end up swapping it out at some point for a Ryzen system since at the moment a dual core Celeron is probably not the best thing in the world for them (granted no high end gaming etc and just browsing the internet) but still.. Overclocking can just lead to problems, give them a hassle free PC experience :)

Again as EarthDog mentions, no point overclocking for the average user, they aren't going to be saying "Thanks, that extra 1.76% of performance by overclocking the RAM is really noticeable....."

(1.76% was just random numbers and not actual figures or fact :laugh:)
I agree with ed as well. I won't be sending them an overclocked system. However, before I send it off to them I will see what I can do by increasing the base clocks.
 
I agree with ed as well. I won't be sending them an overclocked system. However, before I send it off to them I will see what I can do by increasing the base clocks.
It's worth a test for us as we are tweakers but for the average user or parents, I'd never take the risk :) Please feel free to post up your findings tho ;)
 
Do you already have a suitable spare GPU? Because if not and if your parents aren't gonna game on this PC, then the regular 9100 (with the igpu) would be a better choice (or even a 8100 which seems to go for quite a bit less). Otherwise I definitely agree with what is written in the box in your post - for general (office-browsing-multimedia-light gaming) use, it is a substantially better choice than any Ryzen in its price range and even far above. From personal experience I can say that it's just noticeably snappier at everything than a 2600x.
Sorry in what world is 9100F better than a 2600x in any scenario? and if you want to talk price range 1600AF will also beg to differ with your biased comment 4c/4t 4ghz vs 6c/12t 4ghz+ it gets beaten every single time regardless of the application, regardless, the OP has the motherboard there and the 9100F is a solid choice for his requirements for this build and he should definitely go down that road, but comparing it to a superior processor in nearly every way is ridiculous and to use the term "substantially" is just pure nonsense.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry in what world is 9100F better than a 2600x in any scenario? and if you want to talk price range 1600AF will also beg to differ with your biased comment 4c/4t 4ghz vs 6c/12t 4ghz+ it gets beaten every single time regardless of the application, regardless, the OP has the motherboard there and the 9100F is a solid choice for his requirements for this build and he should definitely go down that road, but comparing it to a superior processor in nearly every way is ridiculous and to use the term "substantially" is just pure nonsense.

EDIT: And surprise surprise, most of your posts are on Intel CPU threads or NVIDIA GPU threads down talking anything AMD, I just looked for myself, you can too if you don't believe me, I'll take a large bucket of salt with your propaganda advice if you don't mind, please. Oh, and I went back 8 pages, the forum default I think? every single post about AMD, can you say agenda?
You really brought in the AMD vs Intel/NVIDIA debate? Nah dude don't be trying to pull that in a thread like this. TPU has had enough threads ruined with that.


Back on track, why not snag a Hyper 212 for cheap? I know none of my family members clean their computers so if the stock cooler gets dust clogged they'll just think the whole thing is broke. At least with the 212 it can be stuck in a blanket and mostly work.
 
You really brought in the AMD vs Intel/NVIDIA debate? Nah dude don't be trying to pull that in a thread like this. TPU has had enough threads ruined with that.


Back on track, why not snag a Hyper 212 for cheap? I know none of my family members clean their computers so if the stock cooler gets dust clogged they'll just think the whole thing is broke. At least with the 212 it can be stuck in a blanket and mostly work.

And keep in mind, I am still doing thermal testing on my 9600K rig with the MSI Core Frozr XL. This cooler holds my rig at 5.0GHz but if I need more I can always swap the Frozr XL to the 9100F rig and get something better.
 
Low quality post by MaDhAtt3R
You really brought in the AMD vs Intel/NVIDIA debate? Nah dude don't be trying to pull that in a thread like this. TPU has had enough threads ruined with that.


Back on track, why not snag a Hyper 212 for cheap? I know none of my family members clean their computers so if the stock cooler gets dust clogged they'll just think the whole thing is broke. At least with the 212 it can be stuck in a blanket and mostly work.
Sorry, did you even read the post I quoted or just want to be a warrior?

I said he has the MB and should go down the 9100f for this build as it's ideal, but please keep on with your BS
 
And keep in mind, I am still doing thermal testing on my 9600K rig with the MSI Core Frozr XL. This cooler holds my rig at 5.0GHz but if I need more I can always swap the Frozr XL to the 9100F rig and get something better.
I mean going for this rig. If I was talking about going for what overclockers, say you and I go for, I'd be fanboying out my NH-D15 after getting one to replace my Kraken X60. The 212 does fantastic for cooling my gf's 4690k at 4.2 and my two 2680v2s. It's a great little cooler for majority of things.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Low quality post by MaDhAtt3R
I mean going for this rig. If I was talking about going for what overclockers, say you and I go for, I'd be fanboying out my NH-D15 after getting one to replace my Kraken X60. The 212 does fantastic for cooling my gf's 4690k at 4.2 and my two 2680v2s. It's a great little cooler for majority of things.




Just gonna report you. Your attitude is not warranted from anything in this thread, nor is your border-line insulting.
Report away, also please do tell what rules I have violated, I've reported you too, it's great being an always offended snowflake
 
Let's keep it civil, respectful, and review our forum guidelines before derailing a topic with arguments, bickering and namecalling please. Thread cleaned up, let's keep it clean moving forward please and thanks!

:toast:
 
CPU arrived yesterday. Here are some pictures of the MB, CPU and heatsink. I'm thinking a 5.0GHz overclock should be no problem on the included CPU cooler, right? :)

DSCN0593.JPG
DSCN0595.JPG


DSCN0596.JPG
DSCN0597.JPG


DSCN0598.JPG
DSCN0601.JPG


DSCN0617.JPG
DSCN0618.JPG


DSCN0619.JPG


DSCN0621.JPG
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0595.JPG
    DSCN0595.JPG
    865.8 KB · Views: 165
CPU arrived yesterday. Here are some pictures of the MB, CPU and heatsink. I'm thinking a 5.0GHz overclock should be no problem on the included CPU cooler, right? :)

View attachment 146296View attachment 146297

View attachment 146299View attachment 146300

View attachment 146301View attachment 146302

View attachment 146303View attachment 146304

View attachment 146305

View attachment 146306


Maybe if you lived in Antarctica....:roll:


That's going to be a really nice build for your parents.
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking a 5.0GHz overclock should be no problem on the included CPU cooler, right? :)
Not likely given the size of the stock cooler unless it had a copper core to soak up, and disperse the heat more evenly.
 
Last edited:
Not likely given the size of the stock cooler unless it had a copper core to soak up, and disperse the heat more evenly.

He'd be running it at max fan speed, the intel box coolers are always lacking.

@storm-chaser I'd look at CPU cooler reviews here and see which ones do not throttle under stress testing.

Deepcool released one recently, pretty good it appears.
 
He'd be running it at max fan speed, the intel box coolers are always lacking.

@storm-chaser I'd look at CPU cooler reviews here and see which ones do not throttle under stress testing.

Deepcool released one recently, pretty good it appears.
The stock cooler should be enough for stock clockspeeds. @storm-chaser was going to try overclocking via base clock as a test since the CPU multiplier is locked. He's likely not going to get past 105 MHz.

I doubt his parents will have the CPU loaded under a heavy sustained load.
 
The stock cooler should be enough for stock clockspeeds. @storm-chaser was going to try overclocking via base clock as a test since the CPU multiplier is locked. He's likely not going to get past 105 MHz.

I doubt his parents will have the CPU loaded under a heavy sustained load.

He is in his 30s, idk if he is or isn't.

About the hsf, ive known stock is stock since P2 days. Only good enough, not great...

I know during P4 days CM had a stock cooler alternative to intel.
 
Stock heatsinks from my experience from Intel would be similar to AMDs really, just about up to the task but the damn noise they make when the CPU is getting warm, jesus... Jet engine comes to mind and it's not like a delta fan when it's on full speed/power but it's a just slightly higher than needed noise so you know it's that working.. Drives me nuts..

The retail HSF's seem to be good enough to get it up and running, anything past that, I'm not so sure personally...
 
Stock heatsinks from my experience from Intel would be similar to AMDs really, just about up to the task but the damn noise they make when the CPU is getting warm, jesus... Jet engine comes to mind and it's not like a delta fan when it's on full speed/power but it's a just slightly higher than needed noise so you know it's that working.. Drives me nuts..

The retail HSF's seem to be good enough to get it up and running, anything past that, I'm not so sure personally...

Idk surface area for intel on 9100 seems lacking, heck its been that way since lga 775.
 
Idk surface area for intel on 9100 seems lacking, heck its been that way since lga 775.
They are saving money, can't afford to do better heatsinks :D :D

In serious tho, I beleive even TR has the issue with the AIO's for them.. Still, even for a budget air cooler, I'd not stick with an Intel stock cooler... Freezer Pro or even the 34 Duo I have would be much better I'm sure.... I'd actually be surprised if there was an air cooler out there that would actually be worse than the Intel stock cooler..... (I'm sure there might be but that slippery territory I think, best left alone :))
 
They are saving money, can't afford to do better heatsinks :D :D

In serious tho, I beleive even TR has the issue with the AIO's for them.. Still, even for a budget air cooler, I'd not stick with an Intel stock cooler... Freezer Pro or even the 34 Duo I have would be much better I'm sure.... I'd actually be surprised if there was an air cooler out there that would actually be worse than the Intel stock cooler..... (I'm sure there might be but that slippery territory I think, best left alone :))

Really cheap chinese ones.

This guy can afford a Great CPU cooler. And AIOs to me fail, best to custom Loop. Btw this is a msdt we are talking about iirc, not hedt.
 
Back
Top