Fortnite Gets Kicked Out From Google and Apple App Stores, Epic Games Files a Lawsuit

[EarthDog]

Please don't be upset by my short reply...

I downloaded a free game, many of them, that emplor this model. I didn't buy any skins or any back bling or dances or......... whatever else. Fortnite, Apex, COD, etc. Call me Mr. Default.

That said, in my head (lol), I would spend up to $60 on in-game items because that is how much the game costs. Why not? Support the devs? Same reason I don't steal games and haven't for over 15 years (adulting, lol).

What I don't like is the P2W model which Fortnite (sticking with the thread title) is not.

Perhaps this is preying on the weak minded? I don't know. It seems no different to me than the bitching about DLC and new maps (think BF4 as one example), and we accepted that model as well. But yeah, this I have zero issues with (people, be strong, lol), P2W sucks though.

 

[Vayra86]

Please don't be upset by my short reply...

I downloaded a free game, many of them, that emplor this model. I didn't buy any skins or any back bling or dances or......... whatever else. Fortnite, Apex, COD, etc. Call me Mr. Default.

That said, in my head (lol), I would spend up to $60 on in-game items because that is how much the game costs.

What I don't like is the P2W model which Fortnite (sticking with the thread title) is not.

Ah I see we're reasoning straight past each other then. I'm not talking about the model inside a game, because really isn't that entirely up to the discretion of the publisher/developer? My comment was about the layer on top of that, distribution/middle men who take a far too large piece of the pie and gain way too much power. The fact they can enforce this to begin with is fifteen bridges too far.

 

[EarthDog]

The fact they can enforce this to begin with is sixteen bridges too far.

FTFY.

Agreed. Apparently it's time for my morning caffeine.

 

[ZeppMan217]

In words of Ken Watanabe

 

[Nater]

I've done this vs Nintendo. IRCC, buying V-bucks on the Epic Games Store on PC didn't charge sales tax. If we purchased thru Fortnite on the Switch, it did. Saving $2-$3 is a BIG deal to a 9 year old w/ a Visa Gift Card from Grandma.

 

[R0H1T]

Ah I see we're reasoning straight past each other then. I'm not talking about the model inside a game, because really isn't that entirely up to the discretion of the publisher/developer? My comment was about the layer on top of that, distribution/middle men who take a far too large piece of the pie and gain way too much power. The fact they can enforce this to begin with is fifteen bridges too far.

You do realize you can't straight up open a bank, a hospital, a bridge, heck your own form of govt ~ how is this any different? Yes it's greed, so is pretty much every other restriction forcing you into a "walled garden" or in fact modern day "democracy"

Basically this is EPIC being greedy themselves & for themselves, they're acting no differently than the "app stores" they're accusing of <whatever> in their lawsuits!

 

[bug]

You do realize you can't straight up open a bank, a hospital, a bridge, heck your own form of govt ~ how is this any different? Yes it's greed, so is pretty much every other restriction forcing you into a "walled garden" or in fact modern day "democracy"

Basically this is EPIC being greedy themselves & for themselves, they're acting no differently than the "app stores" they're accusing of <whatever> in their lawsuits!

How do you figure? The prices directly from Epic are lower than going through said stores. So clearly they are passing the savings on to the customer.

 

[skizzo]

The simple fact is that OS platforms are marketplaces, not stores. The store is the app store, and Apple is illegally restricting the market place to one store. Allow an Epic game store on iOS is the start. Time to fix this nonsense that only got started with the iPhone and is completely different from every other OS for the last 50 years.

this is an insightful way of looking at it that I never considered and I fully agree with you. What Apple is doing then, It's sort of creating a digital monoply on iOS/macOS basically. I'm not familiar with the google store at all but seems to be they are in the same boat of creating restrictions

 

[R0H1T]

How do you figure? The prices directly from Epic are lower than going through said stores. So clearly they are passing the savings on to the customer.

Apple and Google get a 30% cut right, where's the 30% saving you see in the images above? Clearly they're taking a cut themselves, now if you're saying they're being less greedy then that is your interpretation.

 

[Selaya]

Oh, look. The problems are fighting themselves now.

 

[bug]

Apple and Google get a 30% cut right, where's the 30% saving you see in the images above? Clearly they're taking a cut themselves, now if you're saying they're being less greedy then that is your interpretation.

There's a 20% difference. The rest id probably the cost of Epic running the servers themselves.

 

[ThrashZone]

Hi,
Piece of the pie well I don't play games on cell but that is a big piece.
Add paypal slice of the pie for purchases too for other items.

 

[R0H1T]

The same argument applies to Google and Apple. You're basically choosing between lesser of the two evils, again depending on your preference.

 

[bug]

The same argument applies to Google and Apple. You're basically choosing between lesser of the two evils, again depending on your preference.

Meaning what? Stores should not charge for convenience?
At least on Android you can opt for alternate stores if you don't like Google's. No such luck on iOS.

 

[R0H1T]

Meaning what? Stores should not charge for convenience?
At least on Android you can opt for alternate stores if you don't like Google's. No such luck on iOS.

Do you get that option on Epic Store?

 

[watzupken]

I actually don't think Apple or Google is wrong to kick Epic out in this case from my opinion. EPIC runs a store selling games, which they happily charge game developers anything sold on it. Now in this case, they get charged for putting their game on the App Store and kicking a fuss out of it don't sound right to me. The App Store be it on iOS or Android works just like a super market where the game developer will buy shelf space to display their products. Except the case of app stores, the game developer don't pay a fix amount for shelf space, but rather a cut of the sales. 30% is very steep, that I don't disagree. But to try to operate in an App Store where they agree to abide by the rules and regulations, then subsequently try to game the system is not right. In a nut shell, with App Stores charging 30% on the apps sold, EPIC just have less opportunity to earn. Passing the savings to the consumer is just a smoke screen to try and justify their actions to freeload.

 

[bug]

Do you get that option on Epic Store?

Which option?

 

[zlobby]

Meanwhile in EPIC Store - haven't logged in for weeks. Try to claim Total War:



The game can be claimed for 24 hours. Yeah, good luck with that.

Put that to the long list of shenanigans from Epic.

I'd rather pay a few bucks more and know the storefront is legitimate and has my back, than to sell my soul to the devil for a pair of shoes.

 

[Vayra86]

Do you get that option on Epic Store?

Yes, you pick steam. You seem to have an issue separating A from B.

 

[zlobby]

In words of Ken Watanabe

They should Ro-Sham-Bo for it. Or as Cartman would say - I'll kick you square in the nuts!

 

[ExcuseMeWtf]

Doesn't sound like Epic has much of a case at all.

And I'm sure their lawyers know it.

 

[Assimilator]

Apple and Google are likely to find themselves in trouble here. Epic is not a small fish with little cash that can easily be bullied, and this suit being filed at the same time both stores are being scrutinised for potential antitrust violations is definitely no coincidence.

As for all those people saying "lol Epic has no case" - I suggest you understand the suit before you comment again.

If they don't, then everyone will be putting their apps "Free" and everything are in-app purchases.

Mentioning steam is quite an example.
Imagine if every game is Freemium and steam does not benefit from in-game purchases.

Are they doing a charity or something ?
Just let you profit from their platform and use the server bandwidth for $0 ?

Counterpoint: if the app stores didn't take such a high percentage of in-game payments, there wouldn't be nearly as much of an incentive for game devs to bypass those stores' built-in payment mechanisms. In short, if the stores were less greedy, this wouldn't be a problem.

 

[bug]

Counterpoint: if the app stores didn't take such a high percentage of in-game payments, there wouldn't be nearly as much of an incentive for game devs to bypass those stores' built-in payment mechanisms. In short, if the stores were less greedy, this wouldn't be a problem.

High percentage? 30% just because is more like protection money.

 

[Vayra86]

That POS should be pulled off from the entire internet. Thanks Google and Apple

You are so lost I think you cant even begin to realize it.

Thanks Google and Apple for destroying a marketplace we all have little options to escape - that is literally your line. How do you even think YOU benefit from this? By paying a 30% premium on in app purchases soon?!

I know its hard to see through the red EGS haze.. but man... do you even realize what you are saying. Independent publishers of the widest variety are finding their safe haven to preserve creative freedom in EGS. If you like your gaming as more than the hamster wheels that populate the big publishers like EA.... better start supporting Sweeney instead of fighting him. Steam or GoG wont save this.

 

[ExcuseMeWtf]

As for all those people saying "lol Epic has no case" - I suggest you understand the suit before you comment again.

It really isn't that hard.

When you sign an agreement, you state that you have read, understood and agreed to its terms. If you don't like the terms, you can try to negotiate, however there is no guarantee satisfying terms will be reached. In which case no agreement is made. You don't get to sign agreement, which terms you don't agree with, then cry about it later.

What would make Epic exempt from this?

There is theoretically a possibility that terms of agreement violate existing laws, making it automatically null and void. Let me ask you however, what are the odds that two separate multi billion dollar corporations at the same time failed to notice this and formulate terms accordingly and this has not been noticed or brought to light by anyone for multiple years, when there were multiple parties signing such agreement over that timespan?