• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Eyes Mid-November CDNA Debut with Instinct MI100, "World's Fastest FP64 Accelerator"

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,233 (7.55/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD is eyeing a mid-November debut for its CDNA compute architecture with the Instinct MI100 compute accelerator card. CDNA is a fork of RDNA for headless GPU compute accelerators with large SIMD resources. An Aroged report pins the launch of the MI100 at November 16, 2020, according to leaked AMD documents it dug up. The Instinct MI100 will eye a slice of the same machine intelligence pie NVIDIA is seeking to dominate with its A100 Tensor Core compute accelerator.

It appears like the first MI100 cards will be built in the add-in-board form-factor with PCI-Express 4.0 x16 interfaces, although older reports do predict AMD creating a socketed variant of its Infinity Fabric interconnect for machines with larger numbers of these compute processors. In the leaked document, AMD claims that the Instinct MI100 is the "world's highest double-precision accelerator for machine learning, HPC, cloud compute, and rendering systems." This is an especially big claim given that the A100 Tensor Core features FP64 CUDA cores based on the "Ampere" architecture. Then again, given that AMD claims that the RDNA2 graphics architecture is clawing back at NVIDIA with performance at the high-end, the competitiveness of the Instinct MI100 against the A100 Tensor Core cannot be discounted.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.94/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
Here is hoping they bring better software support for their open computing initiative this round. Hardware is only 50% of the solution, maybe even less. A robust and consistent bug-free software developer environment is key to success for such compute orientated chips.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
2,709 (1.62/day)
AMD has been winning HPC stuff recently: Frontier, El Capitain, LUMI, etc. etc. All of these are likely using MI100 (or maybe the GPU planned after that).

These supercomputers must have had a simulation system, or some other solid assurance, of CDNA's performance. Otherwise, they all wouldn't have chosen AMD here. As such, I'm willing to bet that this MI100 has to be pretty good.
 
Joined
Oct 25, 2019
Messages
203 (0.11/day)
Nvidia dominates here and dictates industry standards. I can't see AMD upsetting that.
 
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
144 (0.02/day)
System Name HTPC
Processor Ryzen 3600
Motherboard ASRock X570M Pro4
Cooling Aquacomputer Cuplex Kryros Delrin + Aquaduct 720XT
Memory Mushkin Ridgeback DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Waterforce WB RTX 2080Ti
Storage Crucial M1 500GB
Display(s) Philips 55POS9002/12 OLED TV
Case Silverstone Sugo SG11
Audio Device(s) FiiO D03k -> Pioneer A676 -> KEF iQ7
Power Supply Seasonic G550 PCGH Edition
Mouse MX Master
Keyboard Corsair K63 wireless Lapboard
As far as I know Vega based cards already had the upper hand on theoretical throughput. Unfortunately even in computing this is not always equal to faster results.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
533 (0.12/day)
AMD has been winning HPC stuff recently: Frontier, El Capitain, LUMI, etc. etc. All of these are likely using MI100 (or maybe the GPU planned after that).

These supercomputers must have had a simulation system, or some other solid assurance, of CDNA's performance. Otherwise, they all wouldn't have chosen AMD here. As such, I'm willing to bet that this MI100 has to be pretty good.

we still need to see how good they are in real world application. titan super computer end up choosing AMD bulldozer because they believe the CPU design should be good for their purpose back then. but after titan pretty much any super computer using x86 processor end up choosing intel xeon. another example is tahiti. after SANAM that show lower than 50% utilization majority of HPC client end up picking nvidia GK210 over AMD superior hawaii back in 2013 to 2015 period.

personally i think some of the HPC client probably are not too comfortable with nvidia dominance in accelerator market. hence they are giving more AMD chance this time. plus AMD have their own CPU so they can offer better integration between CPU and GPU. it is one of the reason why nvidia going after mellanox which is very popular among HPC client for it's interconnect tech.
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,437 (1.43/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
Here is hoping they bring better software support for their open computing initiative this round. Hardware is only 50% of the solution, maybe even less. A robust and consistent bug-free software developer environment is key to success for such compute orientated chips.
First you need to have the hardware to focus on support and software for it.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
853 (0.33/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GiB(2x4GiB) DDR3-1600 [800MHz]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560D 4GiB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Cooler Master MasterBox E501L
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
Joined
Oct 27, 2009
Messages
1,182 (0.21/day)
Location
Republic of Texas
System Name [H]arbringer
Processor 4x 61XX ES @3.5Ghz (48cores)
Motherboard SM GL
Cooling 3x xspc rx360, rx240, 4x DT G34 snipers, D5 pump.
Memory 16x gskill DDR3 1600 cas6 2gb
Video Card(s) blah bigadv folder no gfx needed
Storage 32GB Sammy SSD
Display(s) headless
Case Xigmatek Elysium (whats left of it)
Audio Device(s) yawn
Power Supply Antec 1200w HCP
Software Ubuntu 10.10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1780855 http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2158678 http://ww
OpenACC is Nvidia technology though.

OpenACC is a programming standard for parallel computing developed by Cray, CAPS, Nvidia and PGI. The standard is designed to simplify parallel programming of heterogeneous CPU/GPU systems.


Na, its an open standard agreed to by a consortium same as OpenCapi, nvidia just happens to be part of it... no ownership over it.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
853 (0.33/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GiB(2x4GiB) DDR3-1600 [800MHz]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560D 4GiB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Cooler Master MasterBox E501L
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
Na, its an open standard agreed to by a consortium same as OpenCapi, nvidia just happens to be part of it... no ownership over it.
Open Standard or not, Nvidia part of it makes less suitable for other vendor.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2020
Messages
2,709 (1.62/day)
Open Standard or not, Nvidia part of it makes less suitable for other vendor.

OpenACC is basically being merged into OpenMP. All the features people want are in OpenMP 4.5, and are already supported by AMD ROCm: https://github.com/ROCm-Developer-Tools/aomp

There's nothing "unsuitable" about OpenACC, aside from the fact that OpenMP's version of it (4.5+) is more up to date. Not much reason to support OpenACC technically anymore, since OpenMP 4.5 or 5.0 support will get you the same stuff.
 
Top