• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Post your Cinebench R23 Score

This is OC! 5 Ghz.
Although unnecessary.

Quicker than flies on a dung pile

OC.jpg
 
Last edited:
This is OC! 5 Ghz.
Although unnecessary.

Quicker than flies on a dung pile
This Ryzen 7 3800X only needs 4,275MHz to match that score.
Clipboard Image (13 November 2020).jpg

Imagine what the score would be at 5 GHz. :eek:
 
Ryzen 3 3300X stock (No PBO, no Auto OC, no Manual OC), 16GB x 2 DDR4 3600Mhz (2 rank per stick) CL18 XMP untweaked. Corsair H60 (2018) AIO

8ySwyHw.jpg

s9a7WFl.png

VY82Trg.png
 
Ooh, might run my 2700U at 15W just to rattle off a test....
Yep, it definitely isn't a number crunching champ! Quiet BIOS (13W STAPM limit) because I don't want worse battery life cooked testicles.

Cooling - The mighty 60mm laptop fan; All one of them.
Core - 2.2GHz stock setup with boost.

This Lenovo BIOS has a whopping zero tuning options. The only thing I've done to make it better is replace the lame 8GB single OEM SODIMM with two 2400 CL14 sticks and since that's a JEDEC speed this dumb BIOS reads those nice tight timings off the SPD and enables them, even without any memory-tuning or XMP options.

1605302679678.png


Don't get me wrong, this laptop is a fantastic all-alloy ultraportable with non-useless GPU performance and I'm struggling to find a worthy successor on the market - but those TDP-limited, first-gen Ryzen CPU cores aren't anything to get excited about.
 
Last edited:
Yep, it definitely isn't a number crunching champ! I'm on the quiet bios too - because who wants their ultraportable to have worse battery life and cook your testicles?
Cooling - The mighty 60mm laptop fan; All one of them.
Core - 2.2-3.6Ghz stock setup. This Lenovo BIOS has a whopping zero tuning options. It's not completely stock - I replaced the default 8GB single-channel RAM with two 2400 CL14 sticks and CPU-Z claims that the BIOS is even running them at that speed (not that there are any options for it)

View attachment 175559

Don't get me wrong, this laptop is fantastic and I'm struggling to find a worth successor - but it's not exactly powerful.
Interesting that my 3500u powered lappy that I posted a couple of days ago gets a higher multithreaded score but lower single thread
 
It always seems that im just narrowly beating out a 7700K in this bench.

8600 R23.png
 
Woot, broke the 9500 MT barrier by updating the BIOS and tuning the RAM latency down to 70.3ns.

Cinebench R23-5.PNG
 
Air cooling


cinemark1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Interesting that my 3500u powered lappy that I posted a couple of days ago gets a higher multithreaded score but lower single thread
Higher multithreaded I would expect - The 3500U is the same base clock and core/thread count but gets the advantage of the refined 12nm process to let it squeeze more performance out of the same TDP.
Lower single-threaded from your 3500U is a little surprising, it should be boosting higher than mine and have no TDP issues on one core. CL14 RAM maybe the reason....
 
Last edited:
Xeon 2650 V2 8c/16t (OC 3,4Ghz All cores/turbo 3,85Ghz) X79 Sabertooth motherboard
34Gb ddr3 1510Mhz
Air cooled/Max temp 64c

r23cinebench.jpg
 
Another data point for the table:

1605359820258.png


Cooling: AMD Wraith Max, Fan speed switch on Low
Clock: 3.8GHz stock, PBO disabled, Boost enabled
Other info: DDR4-3200 CL16, 1600MHz FCLK, Eco mode ON (forcing this to the 88W/60A/90A defaults of a 65W model) so think of this as a vanilla 3600 that's allowed to boost higher.
 
Has anyone been having issues with running R23 at all?

I'm trying on a Windows 7 64 build and it's just giving a termination error as soon as it starts./ Tried various installs of downloads for it but it's just not working whatever I do... I've got the service pack 1 installed, I fixed a missing DLL file it didn't have but after that it just crashes out and nothing. Any thoughts/advice or even a fix would be gratefully received!! :)
 
Here you go...
Multi Core.jpg
Single Core.jpg
CPU Specs.jpg
Memory Specs.jpg
Motherboard.jpg


All core overclock to 4.6. RTX 2080TI Video card. Cooled by EVGA CLC 280 AIO
 
Last edited:
Has anyone been having issues with running R23 at all?

I'm trying on a Windows 7 64 build and it's just giving a termination error as soon as it starts./ Tried various installs of downloads for it but it's just not working whatever I do... I've got the service pack 1 installed, I fixed a missing DLL file it didn't have but after that it just crashes out and nothing. Any thoughts/advice or even a fix would be gratefully received!! :)
I doubt it runs on 7 at all. The DLL is just one symptom and unlike R20, Windows 10 is a minimum system requirement of Cinema 4D R23.

I'm not going to tell you to upgrade from 7 as I'm sure you have your reasons but more and more you'll find stuff that's compiled specifically for the Windows 10 Kernel that either partially works on 7 or doesn't work at all.
 
Windows 10 is a minimum system requirement of Cinema 4D R23.
@phill
The webpage for Cinebench R23 on Maxon shows as system requirements worded as supported.
Supported Systems.jpg
 
9900K @ 5.2GHz AIO
ST=1401 MT=14334

Cinebench R23 9900K EVGA Z390 Dark 5.2GHz HT.png
 
PBO+103 fsb.
Dont have AMD chipset driver,only win original.

That's a low score, especially for something with PBO enabled.

Get the drivers installed, for sure, and use my score as the absolute minimum baseline you should be getting for a completely stock system. Mine is early silicon, probably - The multiplier was hovering around 39.25x for the all-core test so it's certainly no golden sample and newer 3900X silicon will do at least 40x on stock settings IME.
 
Last edited:
Cinebench R23
ST: 1181
MT: 8749

Ryzen 5 3600 (non-X), stock config. Boosted by itself to 3792 MHz all-core.
Standard AMD Wraith Stealth air-cooler.
20201114-140107.png
 
That's a low score, especially for something with PBO enabled.

Get the drivers installed, for sure, and use my score as the absolute minimum baseline you should be getting for a completely stock system. Mine is early silicon, probably - The multiplier was hovering around 39.25x for the all-core test so it's certainly no golden sample and newer 3900X silicon will do at least 40x on stock settings IME.
Good enough for every day use.
This one better multiscore but why?
Képernyőkép 2020-11-13 211230.png
 
Back
Top