Ignoring the fact that you can't buy one anyway, this is the most pointless card in the world. It's the card that the 6800XT should have been, and thanks to poor optimisation or drivers doesn't even match the 3080 that the 6800XT is supposed to rival.
IMO, the 6900XT should have been a larger chip - it doesn't have enough shaders to compete with the 3090 at sensible power or cooling limits. At $999 MSRP it's a joke, because it's only even a match for the $699 3080FE in traditional raster-based loads anyway. The minute you turn on DXR it's fighting for survival between the $399 and $499 cards from Nvidia.
Once all the dust settles from the scalping and stock problems, I'd expect to see the 6900XT sell at $699 since it's still down on DXR, DLSS, and NVENC compared to the 3080 to name just a few shortcomings. The 6800XT belongs at the $579 price point the 6800 launched at - it's quite clearly fighting the 3070 in many of the tests and falls short of it with any mention of DXR or DLSS, something that's definitely gaining traction in 2020 with both new consoles including it.
As for the vanilla 6800, it's a runt using massively-defective silicon. 25% of the card disabled? Jesus! Hopefully that model will vanish altogether when yields improve and when the 6800XT comes down to it's $579 price point. If you were after raytracing performance, just get a 2018 $349 RTX2060 6GB. That's honestly how bad it is. In fact, the $299 2060KO is about equal :\