Post Your TIMESPY, PCMARK10 & FIRESTRIKE SCORES! (2019)

[Jetster]

 

[AusWolf]

Full system specs are in my profile. CPU at Auto everything, PBO enabled, RAM at its XMP profile of 3200 MHz CL 16, GPU at all default. With a little tinkering, I could easily get 10k points, but I'm not bothered.

 

[jboydgolfer]

 

[jjnissanpatfan]

I scored 12 159 in Time Spy

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}

www.3dmark.com

 

[Fizban]

I scored 13 020 in Time Spy

Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (notebook) x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}

www.3dmark.com

 

[P4-630]

I scored 9 569 in Time Spy

Intel Core i7-6700K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}

www.3dmark.com

 

[WHDS]

Messing around with port royal, managed to get 2nd for a r5 3600 and 1060 6gb woo, 4fps never looked so good. Pretty annoying that 1st has lower clocks than me though.

 

[Lindatje]

CPU: Ryzen 3600 4,3GHz.
GPU: Sapphire RX 5700 XT Nitro+

 

[mouacyk]

Using voltage locking overclock in afterburner. Better effective GPU clock lead to better score, from 18,800.

 

[werdmonkey4321]

I saw someone beat my score on the leaderboard in Time Spy recently so I decided to take back the top spot for the RTX 2070 Super Max-Q. Mine is a shunt modded RTX 2070 Super Max-Q(130-140W) on my GS66. And it is still running the stock 32gb of Samsung 2666Mhz ram that it came with.

Here are the results.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-10750H,Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-16V1 (3dmark.com)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max-Q video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-10750H,Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-16V1 (3dmark.com)

https://www.reddit.com/r/MSILaptops/comments/lvq8m2
https://www.reddit.com/r/MSILaptops/comments/lvq5r7

 

[werdmonkey4321]

Just to give some context of the stock performance of the GS66 with an 80W 2070 Super Max-Q

Time Spy graphics: ~7080
Fire Strike graphics: ~18900


After the shunt mod(130-140W) and overclock these are the scores I get.

Time Spy graphics: 9895 (+39.8%) DX12
Fire Strike graphics: 25456(+34.7%) DX11

 

[Arctucas]

I scored 5 699 in Time Spy Extreme

Intel Core i9-9900K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}

www.3dmark.com

I scored 7 354 in Fire Strike Ultra

Intel Core i9-9900K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}

www.3dmark.com

 

[phanbuey]

Using voltage locking overclock in afterburner. Better effective GPU clock lead to better score, from 18,800.
View attachment 189438
View attachment 189435
View attachment 189439

Can you elaborate a bit more on the voltage locking? Currently running an undervolt but would love to get some more FPS out of the 3080:

 

[mouacyk]

@phanbuey In MSI Afterburner, shift the whole line up or down and then CTRL+L to lock to a certain point.

 

[Space Lynx]

new AMD drivers gave me over 1000 point boost in 3dmark timespy, same OC as before. freakin unbelievable. AMD has knocked it out of the park. @Gmr_Chick $579 msrp and it goes toe to toe with a 3080 across the board now. AMD is like fine wine

 

[Gmr_Chick]

new AMD drivers gave me over 1000 point boost in 3dmark timespy, same OC as before. freakin unbelievable. AMD has knocked it out of the park. @Gmr_Chick $579 msrp and it goes toe to toe with a 3080 across the board now. AMD is like fine wine

Glad to hear it, bud! Unfortunately I'm going to have to wait and see what the 6600 and 6500 bring to the table, should they both ever be announced. $580 is just too damn expensive for me. I'm keen to draw the line at $250-$300, which given the current market trends are prices we very well may never see again....

 

[nguyen]

Some RTX 3090 + 9900K loving

I scored 19 028 in Time Spy

Intel Core i9-9900K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 x 1, 32768 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}

www.3dmark.com

 

[Deleted member 202104]

 

[LFaWolf]

Did a +150 OC on the GPU core and nothing else.

 

[Splinterdog]

This is the kind of comparison that makes sense to me. The first is last year with Ryzen 2600X/RX 580 and the second Ryzen 5600X/RX 5700 XT and I certainly feel the difference.

 

[Rithsom]

I recently swapped cases to a Define Nano S from Fractal Design. It has way better airflow than my old modded sleeper PC case. Today I finally got around to actually taking advantage of the higher airflow and lower thermals by dialing in maximum overclocks.

And yes! I broke the 10,000-point barrier with an R7 2700X and an RTX 2060 Super! Bonus points for also getting a Legendary score and creating a new record with this hardware. I guess not a lot of people put water blocks on their 2060 Supers and overclock them to the performance of a 2070 Super.

I scored 10 008 in Time Spy

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}

www.3dmark.com

 

[Gmr_Chick]

I recently swapped cases to a Define Nano S from Fractal Design. It has way better airflow than my old modded sleeper PC case. Today I finally got around to actually taking advantage of the higher airflow and lower thermals by dialing in maximum overclocks.

And yes! I broke the 10,000-point barrier with an R7 2700X and an RTX 2060 Super! Bonus points for also getting a Legendary score and creating a new record with this hardware. I guess not a lot of people put water blocks on their 2060 Supers and overclock them to the performance of a 2070 Super.

I scored 10 008 in Time Spy

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER x 1, 16384 MB, 64-bit Windows 10}

www.3dmark.com

View attachment 195065

This is the kinda stuff I like to see! Bravo my dude. And don't worry about said hardware -- you own that shit like a boss!

 

[Rithsom]

This is the kinda stuff I like to see! Bravo my dude. And don't worry about said hardware -- you own that shit like a boss!

Thanks! I don't really care about having the latest and greatest, but this was fun to try. Knowing myself I'll probably just revert back to stock clocks after a week. I was already satisfied with the performance at stock.

 

[phanbuey]

That's actually nuts. Great work.

 

[FreedomEclipse]

Fire Strike DDR3 1866Mhz (Single Rank in Dual Channel)

1600Mhz (Dual Rank in Dual Channel)

Time Spy DDR3 1866Mhz (Single Rank in Dual Channel)

1600Mhz (Dual Rank in Dual Channel)

=====

What i am noticing that with Single Rank DDR3 1866 Ram that CPU scores are ever so slightly higher but GPu performance is lower. I mean the performance wont exactly be noticeable either way in day to day tasks with this machine but the results point to the faster ram having more performance in productivity as im guessing the extra mhz helps keep the CPU fed with data.


Anyway. More fun with this old system and my other friends 660Ti which has seemingly with stood the test of time. (Its now on its 3rd owner *ME* and this thing is still alive...)

-- Everything is bone stock. This board is a budget gigabyte GA-Z87-HD3 so no overclocking for this boy. Just regular Time Spy and Fire Strike because if i try the 'extreme' benchmarks 3DMark just CTDs so im guessing its something to do with the 660Ti not having full DX12 compatibility (if i have read correctly)

I thought i would kill some time by running some benchmarks and see how much this system gets demolished. The previous owner of this setup ran a lot of guildwars 2 on it and it served him just fine but one day it stopped working and even though i could fix it. He opted for a complete new system anyway.