• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i9-12900K Alder Lake Tested at Power Limits between 50 W and 241 W

Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
301 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7-12700K
Motherboard MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x16 GB (64GB) DDR4-3600 C18
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Case Fractal Define C
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G203
Software openSUSE Tumbleweed
Just setting PL2 in the BIOS doesn’t help much since the CPU and motherboard will still use high voltages for no reason. Best method is setting PL2 at 241w and reducing the voltage via V/F and you’ll get same performance at around 170w CPU package in Cinebench. 27k multi points at 170w is efficient as hell.

Motherboards sometimes actually already use lower CPU voltages than they should, to the point of instability during certain loads at high power levels. My Gigabyte Aorus B560M was one such cases. At normal or even moderately intense loads it was stable, but it quickly failed with intense benchmarks like Prime95 or Linpack, giving calculation errors, all at stock/default settings. The motherboard is fine; default settings were bad.

So, while you may find your voltage too high for typical loads, care must be taken to make sure that by lowering it stability is still maintained at all loads and also temperatures, at least if you value that.
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2018
Messages
36 (0.02/day)
Location
Durban, South Africa
Processor i5-14600KF
Motherboard GA-H610M-H-DDR4
Cooling NH-D15S
Memory F4-3200C16D-16GIS
Video Card(s) Palit 4060Ti 16GB
Display(s) VG249Q
Amazing. W1zzard is becoming the new Bill Nye.

Yeah, dropping those watts like that; it probably makes sense to disable cores, especially for max thread performance. I would keep an eye on the frequencies, and would want them all to be reaching max mhz. Although that's a thread perf optimization effort, not so much a for-science effort.
 
Joined
Apr 17, 2021
Messages
553 (0.43/day)
System Name Jedi Survivor Gaming PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus TUF B650M Plus Wifi
Cooling ThermalRight CPU Cooler
Memory G.Skill 32GB DDR5-5600 CL28
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3080 10GB
Storage 2TB Samsung 990 Pro SSD
Display(s) MSI 32" 4K OLED 240hz Monitor
Case Asus Prime AP201
Power Supply FSP 1000W Platinum PSU
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Asus Mechanical Keyboard
I should point out that not all motherboards perform properly with custom PL settings. I've had some boards cause the CPU to wildy swing up and down between frequencies instead of settling on lower frequencies. After building several computers for clients where I just set the PL limit to the cooler limit and told them similar things to this article, I ran in to a problem where the PL limit setting didn't work right with a motherboard and it put egg on my face, as a system builder. I still find it best to just manually tune a lower voltage and frequency for all cores instead of relying on the PL setting. 120W at 4.5ghz with an i7-12700k for example was possible with a custom voltage setting. Solved the client's problem.

If you are building an i9 or an i7 system, it is best to just buy a very expensive cooler instead. Noctua U12A for example. AMD has the advantage here in that you can use a Noctua U12 non A (such as Redux) with every CPU and it is just so much easier to build systems with AMD that my clients prefer it.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,192 (5.75/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE
Reviewers tend to test the product as is, i.e. recommended/ out of the box settings for the product. If Intel have changed the way the PL1 and 2 works, then it makes sense that it is tested as is, i.e. running at PL2 indefinitely as long as the cooler can maintain the temps below the threshold. And out of the box, the i9 12900K is factually a very power hungry product. So I don't think there is anything wrong with the testing. Only power users will go in and tweak the settings to make it more power efficient, and how many % of people buying an Intel Alder Lake CPU will be going into the BIOS to tweak it? In OEM machines, that option to tweak power limit may not even be available. So I don't think the general consensus from review sites paints an unrealistic picture.
Intel made it clear several times that this is the way the product is intended to be used.
Fixed that for you.
Intended: maybe, stock: no. At least not for pre-12th gen.

I've dealt with a few 400 and 500 series motherboards, and they all default to Intel indicated TDP for PL limits, unless core enhancement / optimization is turned on. MSi has an option to toggle power limits to fit your cooling (air = Intel stock, high end and water = raised PL). My Asus TUF B560M-Plus treats my 11700 as a proper 65 W CPU locked to 65/228 W PL1/2 with a 28 s Tau. With "Asus optimizer" enabled, my PLs are 200/250 W. That is not stock. It's Asus's spec for this particular motherboard and CPU. Testing with such features enabled and calling it "default" is misleading.

Maybe it's changed for 12th gen, I don't know.

Anyway, great review. :)
 
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
56 (0.04/day)
Intended: maybe, stock: no. At least not for pre-12th gen.

I've dealt with a few 400 and 500 series motherboards, and they all default to Intel indicated TDP for PL limits, unless core enhancement / optimization is turned on. MSi has an option to toggle power limits to fit your cooling (air = Intel stock, high end and water = raised PL). My Asus TUF B560M-Plus treats my 11700 as a proper 65 W CPU locked to 65/228 W PL1/2 with a 28 s Tau. With "Asus optimizer" enabled, my PLs are 200/250 W. That is not stock. It's Asus's spec for this particular motherboard and CPU. Testing with such features enabled and calling it "default" is misleading.

Maybe it's changed for 12th gen, I don't know.

Anyway, great review. :)
Many boards for the last few generations have MCE on by default, which throw power limits out of the window. I believe GN and HUB both already did videos on MCE being on by default.

You basically described the 5800 non-X for OEMs. That chip is one of the most efficient Desktop CPUs out there.
I believe activating the Eco mode achieves about the same result, unfortunately it was ignored by most reviews. Even if it wasn't the center of the review, letting people know that you have the option would have been nice.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.22/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Intended: maybe, stock: no. At least not for pre-12th gen.

I've dealt with a few 400 and 500 series motherboards, and they all default to Intel indicated TDP for PL limits, unless core enhancement / optimization is turned on. MSi has an option to toggle power limits to fit your cooling (air = Intel stock, high end and water = raised PL). My Asus TUF B560M-Plus treats my 11700 as a proper 65 W CPU locked to 65/228 W PL1/2 with a 28 s Tau. With "Asus optimizer" enabled, my PLs are 200/250 W. That is not stock. It's Asus's spec for this particular motherboard and CPU. Testing with such features enabled and calling it "default" is misleading.

Maybe it's changed for 12th gen, I don't know.

Anyway, great review. :)
We're not on about pre 12th gen, your deluded and rambling pal.
( Takes a look at thread Title) sigh I'll leave it but damn I'm tempted because , well just stop.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,699 (3.70/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Intended: maybe, stock: no. At least not for pre-12th gen.
Before 12th gen the power limits were something like 125 W/250 W 56 seconds .. this has changed with Alder Lake to be PL1=PL2. This is the new default for Alder Lake, everything else is not spec, but Intel keeps adding "if you want to configure it differently you may do so"
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
107 (0.02/day)
Unfortunately something is completely broken in this test, the 100W, 65W etc. scores are way too low. Much lower than any other scaling test.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,192 (5.75/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE
We're not on about pre 12th gen, your deluded and rambling pal.
( Takes a look at thread Title) sigh I'll leave it but damn I'm tempted because , well just stop.
Instead of calling me delusional for not having any experience with a 12th gen Intel system, how about letting me know where I'm wrong? Something like this:

Before 12th gen the power limits were something like 125 W/250 W 56 seconds .. this has changed with Alder Lake to be PL1=PL2. This is the new default for Alder Lake, everything else is not spec, but Intel keeps adding "if you want to configure it differently you may do so"
Thanks for clarifying this instead of attacking me for coming from a 10/11th gen point of view. This is the attitude we need more of on the forum. :)
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (7.97/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
@W1zzard, any plans to do head-to-head comparisons with Zen3? P-cores only at 88W/141W to match 5800X?
That'd be interesting to do a "watt to watt" comparison 12900k vs 5950x

Poor w1zz, the time it takes to do these things is immense but ooooh brain candy
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
301 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7-12700K
Motherboard MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x16 GB (64GB) DDR4-3600 C18
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Case Fractal Define C
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G203
Software openSUSE Tumbleweed
Unfortunately something is completely broken in this test, the 100W, 65W etc. scores are way too low. Much lower than any other scaling test.

Scaling with power does seem strange in some cases, for example Cinebench R23 Multi. Possibly it might have to do with the E-cores, or perhaps there's an issue similar to what I observed on my i9-11900 when setting PL1=PL2 at lower power levels.

This might be clearer by graphing the results like this:



EDIT: I made a short test with my 11900 and it scales similarly (it maxed out at 146W during the test), so it could just be that the score scaling feels unusual compared to the time scaling with fixed workloads (e.g. Blender, etc).

 
Last edited:

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (7.97/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
You basically described the 5800 non-X for OEMs. That chip is one of the most efficient Desktop CPUs out there.

AMD pretty much did just that.
Yeah, that's my point. If you look at the early zen 3 leaks, we had a 5700x mentioned that never appeared - i think both companies are fighting to win irrelevant benchmarks at this point
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,717 (3.97/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I'd be curious to know whether there's a setting for tau as well in the UEFI.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Messages
540 (0.08/day)
System Name Ed-PC
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus TUF Z690 PLUS Wifi D4
Cooling Noctua NH-14S
Memory Crucial Ballistix DDR4 C16@3600 16GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia MSI 970
Storage Samsung 980, 860evo
Case Lian Li Lancool II mesh Perf
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
Software Win10 Pro 64bit
I'd be curious to know whether there's a setting for tau as well in the UEFI.
In the bios there 3 settings you can change, short time max power (PL2), long time base power (PL1) and TAU. so you have two wattages and one time value.
Stock PL1=PL2 so Tau doesn't come into play.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2012
Messages
107 (0.02/day)
Scaling with power does seem strange in some cases, for example Cinebench R23 Multi. Possibly it might have to do with the E-cores, or perhaps there's an issue similar to what I observed on my i9-11900 when setting PL1=PL2 at lower power levels.

This might be clearer by graphing the results like this:



EDIT: I made a short test with my 11900 and it scales similarly (it maxed out at 146W during the test), so it could just be that the score scaling feels unusual compared to the time scaling with fixed workloads (e.g. Blender, etc).



It needs to be checked what is wrong, I mean all other get 22500-23000 points in Cinebench R23 at 125W and he barely gets 19000 points. The 190W+241W scores seems to be fine.
 
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
468 (0.10/day)
Location
Lithuania
Processor Intel Core i5 4670K @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z87 Extreme 4
Cooling Lepa NeoIllusion RGB CPU cooler
Memory 2*4GB Patriot G2 Series RAM
Video Card(s) MSI Radeon R9 380 4GB
Storage Transcend SSD 740 256GB + WD Caviar Blue 1TB
Display(s) Samsung SA 300 24" Full HD
Case NZXT Phantom 530 + Bitfenix Recon fan controller
Audio Device(s) Creative SB0770 X-Fi Xtreme Gamer
Power Supply PC Power and Cooling Silencer MkIII 750W 80+ Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Steelseries Apex RAW
Benchmark Scores IT WORKS

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,717 (3.97/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (7.97/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
2,508 (0.80/day)
600W balls to the wall the ways it's meant to be played by Uncle Huang leather jacket not included. That is a pretty good assessment they slap down the efficiency and cruise control when competition is far in the rear view mirror, but closer than it appears.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,192 (5.75/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE
When theres no competition, they tune them for efficiency and give us OC'ing headroom

When the competition runs hot, both teams run the chips balls to the wall and leave efficiency behind
"Hey boss, this new chip we're working on is still 0.1% behind AMD."
"Hmm... let's see what happens if we run the power output of 5 atomic plants through it."
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
301 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7-12700K
Motherboard MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x16 GB (64GB) DDR4-3600 C18
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Case Fractal Define C
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G203
Software openSUSE Tumbleweed
When theres no competition, they tune them for efficiency and give us OC'ing headroom

When the competition runs hot, both teams run the chips balls to the wall and leave efficiency behind

This seems correct. On one hand, I find positive that users can now easily decide whether to use CPUs in factory-overclocked mode, or use them more like they were used to be produced in the past just by changing a few options (often just the power limits). On the other hand, I think a reasonably "efficient mode" should have been the default, perhaps through some sort of officially-defined simple PL preset system.
 

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,147 (1.27/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,726 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
Scaling with power does seem strange in some cases, for example Cinebench R23 Multi. Possibly it might have to do with the E-cores, or perhaps there's an issue similar to what I observed on my i9-11900 when setting PL1=PL2 at lower power levels.

This might be clearer by graphing the results like this:



EDIT: I made a short test with my 11900 and it scales similarly (it maxed out at 146W during the test), so it could just be that the score scaling feels unusual compared to the time scaling with fixed workloads (e.g. Blender, etc).

I bet if you put frequency on the same graph it turns out to be just because the frequencies it reaches require more and more power.
At 241W P-cores run at 4.9GHz, at 190W it is probably 4.7GHz :)
 
Joined
Jun 22, 2012
Messages
301 (0.07/day)
Processor Intel i7-12700K
Motherboard MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory Corsair Vengeance 4x16 GB (64GB) DDR4-3600 C18
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING X TRIO 24G
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB, SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB
Case Fractal Define C
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G203
Software openSUSE Tumbleweed
I bet if you put frequency on the same graph it turns out to be just because the frequencies it reaches require more and more power.
At 241W P-cores run at 4.9GHz, at 190W it is probably 4.7GHz :)

Performance in multithread benchmarks like Cinebench should increase almost perfectly linearly with frequency, but the presence of slower E-cores on Alder Lake makes this relationship less clear.

I tried repeating a test at fixed all-core frequencies from 4.6 GHz down to the base clock of 2.5 GHz with my i9-11900. Plotting the results against CPU frequency makes them easier to understand. I just varied all-core boost frequency, not the PL, so perhaps this has an effect as well, but it is clear that power requirements increase more or less exponentially with frequency, so squeezing a few hundreds more MHz would have a very large effect on them. This should a general principle valid for all CPUs.



EDIT: by the way, the effect of temperature on power consumption can alter the results as pointed out earlier by Xebec, so this would have to be taken into account when doing CPU power testing. Hotter CPUs will throttle at lower frequencies for the same power limit when hot, or conversely consume more power if the frequency is fixed.
 
Last edited:
Top