• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Tested in Cinebench R23

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,653 (2.41/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
A Cinebench R23 picture of AMD's recently announce Ryzen 9 7950X CPU having been put through its paces have appeared online via a post on Baidu, which has been taken down since the picture was posted. However, courtesy of @harukaze5719 it lives on, on Twitter and gives us a first glimpse into the Cinebench R23 performance of the upcoming CPU. The CPU is said to have been air cooled, so it's possible that we'll see even higher benchmark numbers with better cooling, so take these numbers with a pinch of sodium chloride, just to be on the safe side. The test system was also using Windows 10, so there's the potential of some extra performance by changing to Windows 11 here as well.

In the single score test, the Ryzen 9 7950X scores 2,205 points, which is in line with Cinebench R23 leaks for Intel's upcoming Core i9-13900K CPU, if a smidgen slower. The multi-core score is obviously not going to compete with Intel's Core i9-13900K due to the overall lower core count, but at 29,649, but it's ahead of the Core i9-12900K by a decent margin. It'll be interesting to see how AMD positions the 7000-series of CPUs, as although it seems like the company has done a good job in improving the overall performance compared to the 5000-series, it's not quite enough to take the performance crown this time around, if these early benchmark leaks from both sides are anything to go by.

Update 10:27 UTC: A new picture hjas appeared where the CPU has been kitted out with better cooling at the multi-core score has jumped from 29,649 to 36,256, which makes it competitive with the Core i9-13900K scores that have leaked in the past.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,670 (2.64/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
So, this time round, AMD will offer overall slower SKUs across all tiers. I think AMD will have to release A620 board and lower the pricings, so that the entry model Ryzen 5 7600X costs no higher than $100.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.21/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
So, this time round, AMD will offer overall slower SKUs across all tiers. I think AMD will have to release A620 board and lower the pricings, so that the entry model Ryzen 5 7600X costs no higher than $100.
You think what ever you want but I can't see that happening, plus they're not out reviewed and compared yet, let's chill on the hyperbolics, shit that puts a 12900k at £90, IS it, no, will it be, f no.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
120 (0.02/day)
Location
Italy
System Name ICE
Processor AMD 1090t
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth 990FX
Cooling Thermaltake MaxORB EX
Memory G.Skill RipjawsX 2x4Gb DDR3@1866
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE GTX670 OC
Storage SSD 128Gb Samsung 840 pro + 2x500Gb sata HDD
Display(s) Samsung 2233RZ@120Hz
Case CM Storm Enforcer
Power Supply Corsair AX760 80Platinum
Software Win 7 - 64 bit
The leaker also posted this:
 

Attachments

  • c9a0cb1349540923cbf255a0d758d109b2de4961.jpg
    c9a0cb1349540923cbf255a0d758d109b2de4961.jpg
    80.1 KB · Views: 203

Ruru

S.T.A.R.S.
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
12,783 (2.93/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name 4K-gaming / media-PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X / Intel Core i7-6700K
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VII Hero / Asus Z170-A
Cooling Arctic Freezer 50 / Thermaltake Contac 21
Memory 32GB DDR4-3466 / 16GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) RTX 3080 10GB / RX 6700 XT
Storage 3.3TB of SSDs / several small SSDs
Display(s) 27" 4K120 IPS + 32" 4K60 IPS + 24" 1080p60
Case Corsair 4000D AF White / DeepCool CC560 WH
Audio Device(s) Creative Omni BT speaker
Power Supply EVGA G2 750W / Fractal ION Gold 550W
Mouse Logitech MX518 / Logitech G400s
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121 AIMO / NOS C450 Mini Pro
VR HMD Oculus Rift CV1
Software Windows 11 Pro / Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores They run Crysis
Judging a product by leaks is totally pointless if you ask me.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
120 (0.02/day)
Location
Italy
System Name ICE
Processor AMD 1090t
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth 990FX
Cooling Thermaltake MaxORB EX
Memory G.Skill RipjawsX 2x4Gb DDR3@1866
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE GTX670 OC
Storage SSD 128Gb Samsung 840 pro + 2x500Gb sata HDD
Display(s) Samsung 2233RZ@120Hz
Case CM Storm Enforcer
Power Supply Corsair AX760 80Platinum
Software Win 7 - 64 bit

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,653 (2.41/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
The leaker also posted this:
So slow RAM in other words.
Btw, you can insert uploaded images below the text, rather than just as an attachment.

Isn't F1 bios like old as f by now? Why even use that to benchmark anything?
F1 tends to be the shipping version for all new boards.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,670 (2.64/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
The multi-core score is obviously not going to compete with Intel's Core i9-13900K due to the overall lower core count

It'll be interesting to see how AMD positions the 7000-series of CPUs, as although it seems like the company has done a good job in improving the overall performance compared to the 5000-series, it's not quite enough to take the performance crown this time around, if these early benchmark leaks from both sides are anything to go by.


^^
I agree.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,227 (0.51/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
My 5950X gets a higher multi-core score than that. I also get 60GBs memory bandwidth. So it's either fake, or setup by a fool.
Screenshot 2022-09-02 111540.png
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,021 (0.64/day)
System Name Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep
Processor i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset)
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29e Intel baseline
Cooling Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black
Memory G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 970GTX Mini | NV 1080TI FE (cap at 50%, 800mV)
Storage 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, WD green 2TB HDD, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1
Display(s) LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27
Case Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid, stock 3*14 fans+ 2*12 front&buttom+ out 1*8 (on expansion slot)
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy)
Power Supply Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021)
Mouse Logitech Master 3
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
VR HMD Nop.
Software WIN 10 | WIN 11
Benchmark Scores CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2325-2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=37240-35500
The 3D variant will close the gap and some more in gaming workloads (at least on most of them), for whoever willing to pay the premium.
But for creator the situation will reamin the same. Intel with it's quicksync and much better IGP might keep it's dominance in the non-HDET market.
 

Arowx

New Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2022
Messages
3 (0.00/day)
What temperatures were recorded as 90°c is being reported for some benchmarks on 7000s?
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2020
Messages
1,021 (0.64/day)
System Name Dirt Sheep | Silent Sheep
Processor i5-2400 | 13900K (-0.02mV offset)
Motherboard Asus P8H67-M LE | Gigabyte AERO Z690-G, bios F29e Intel baseline
Cooling Scythe Katana Type 1 | Noctua NH-U12A chromax.black
Memory G-skill 2*8GB DDR3 | Corsair Vengeance 4*32GB DDR5 5200Mhz C40 @4000MHz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 970GTX Mini | NV 1080TI FE (cap at 50%, 800mV)
Storage 2*SN850 1TB, 230S 4TB, 840EVO 128GB, WD green 2TB HDD, IronWolf 6TB, 2*HC550 18TB in RAID1
Display(s) LG 21` FHD W2261VP | Lenovo 27` 4K Qreator 27
Case Thermaltake V3 Black|Define 7 Solid, stock 3*14 fans+ 2*12 front&buttom+ out 1*8 (on expansion slot)
Audio Device(s) Beyerdynamic DT 990 (or the screen speakers when I'm too lazy)
Power Supply Enermax Pro82+ 525W | Corsair RM650x (2021)
Mouse Logitech Master 3
Keyboard Roccat Isku FX
VR HMD Nop.
Software WIN 10 | WIN 11
Benchmark Scores CB23 SC: i5-2400=641 | i9-13900k=2325-2281 MC: i5-2400=i9 13900k SC | i9-13900k=37240-35500
The multi-core score is obviously not going to compete with Intel's Core i9-13900K due to the overall lower core count
Fewer cors, same thread count (32).
Those E core are little monsters when it come to high threaded workloads.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,670 (2.64/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
The bad news is that AMD tries to intensely milk the market with slower SKUs, instead of offering 24-core, 20-core, 16-core, 12-core and 10-core SKUs.
The sales will dry out, as was the case with intel, prior and during the Core i7-8700K.

Then, AMD will learn it the hard way, and will be forced to release a new generation with more cores!



1662108822368.png
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,341 (5.75/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE
This multi-threaded score is essentially the same as two of my 8-core 11700s glued together. Not very impressive from a 16-core CPU that has a max. boost clock of 5.7 GHz, while my 11700 runs at 4.4 GHz all-core.

The single-threaded score is not bad, though.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.21/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
The bad news is that AMD tries to intensely milk the market with slower SKUs, instead of offering 24-core, 20-core, 16-core, 12-core and 10-core SKUs.
The sales will dry out, as was the case with intel, prior and during the Core i7-8700K.

Then, AMD will learn it the hard way, and will be forced to release a new generation with more cores!



View attachment 260376
So , double down on hyperbolics, noice, go you.

I'll wait for proper benches.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2021
Messages
1,605 (1.40/day)
So, this time round, AMD will offer overall slower SKUs across all tiers. I think AMD will have to release A620 board and lower the pricings, so that the entry model Ryzen 5 7600X costs no higher than $100.
That doesn't sound like something a sane person would say. By your logic, intel should pay us to use their problematic GPUs.

AMD should do the same and sell at cost, then go bankrupt. lol
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
120 (0.02/day)
Location
Italy
System Name ICE
Processor AMD 1090t
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth 990FX
Cooling Thermaltake MaxORB EX
Memory G.Skill RipjawsX 2x4Gb DDR3@1866
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE GTX670 OC
Storage SSD 128Gb Samsung 840 pro + 2x500Gb sata HDD
Display(s) Samsung 2233RZ@120Hz
Case CM Storm Enforcer
Power Supply Corsair AX760 80Platinum
Software Win 7 - 64 bit
So slow RAM in other words.
Btw, you can insert uploaded images below the text, rather than just as an attachment.


F1 tends to be the shipping version for all new boards.
I know. So why even use that when for the motherboard he's using ( Gigabyte AORUS X670E Xtreme) the latest BIOS is F4 (2022/08/24)?
My point being this benchmark is pretty much useless.
 
D

Deleted member 185088

Guest
Fewer cors, same thread count (32).
Those E core are little monsters when it come to high threaded workloads.
Two cores are after than one core with 2 threads.
Plus E cores are not all that powerless, I believe 12th gen E cores were similar to Kaby Lake, now with better node and other enhancemens I think they will be even more potent.
Unfortunately they don't deserve their E prefix, as Intel gets trashed by AMD for battery life.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,555 (0.96/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> RX7800XT
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
The baby cores are beats lol

Raptor lake will eat up zen 4 for breakfast.. 13900k can hit 6ghz on 10nm while zen 5 can't with tsmc 5nm

the local fanboy rears his ugly head again.

Tell me (not that you will actually answer because it is a pure troll account), what constitutes "eat up zen 4 for breakfast"?
What performance delta would there have to be? and do we leave power consumption out entirely for that statement? how about product price?

Dont worry, its a rhetorical question to paint once again what muppets fanboys are.
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2012
Messages
47 (0.01/day)
System Name Yes
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG B650M Mortar Wi-Fi
Cooling NZXT Kraken X63 + 4x Arctic 140 + 3x Arctic 120
Memory G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo DDR5 32GB 6000MT/s CL30
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Aero
Storage Crucial P1 500GB | Team MP34 4TB
Display(s) Dell Alienware AW3423DWF
Case Lian Li O11 Air Mini
Audio Device(s) SMSL M500 DAC | THX AAA 789 Amp | Sennheiser HD 800 S
Power Supply be quiet! Straight Power 11 1000W
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless | Logitech G502 Wireless
Keyboard Keychron Q3
Software Windows 11 Pro
I too get a higher score with my 5950X. And that's not even with any manual overclock either.
1662112710350.png


I honestly dont think that 7950X score can be real.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
203 (0.14/day)
Two cores are after than one core with 2 threads.
Plus E cores are not all that powerless, I believe 12th gen E cores were similar to Kaby Lake, now with better node and other enhancemens I think they will be even more potent.
Unfortunately they don't deserve their E prefix, as Intel gets trashed by AMD for battery life.
Did Intel ever say what the E(efficiency) refers too? I think it refers to efficency in area as they are unmatched in that while P-cores are seemingly more energy efficient.
 
Top