AMD Ryzen 9 7950X Tested in Cinebench R23

[TheLostSwede]

A Cinebench R23 picture of AMD's recently announce Ryzen 9 7950X CPU having been put through its paces have appeared online via a post on Baidu, which has been taken down since the picture was posted. However, courtesy of @harukaze5719 it lives on, on Twitter and gives us a first glimpse into the Cinebench R23 performance of the upcoming CPU. The CPU is said to have been air cooled, so it's possible that we'll see even higher benchmark numbers with better cooling, so take these numbers with a pinch of sodium chloride, just to be on the safe side. The test system was also using Windows 10, so there's the potential of some extra performance by changing to Windows 11 here as well.

In the single score test, the Ryzen 9 7950X scores 2,205 points, which is in line with Cinebench R23 leaks for Intel's upcoming Core i9-13900K CPU, if a smidgen slower. The multi-core score is obviously not going to compete with Intel's Core i9-13900K due to the overall lower core count, but at 29,649, but it's ahead of the Core i9-12900K by a decent margin. It'll be interesting to see how AMD positions the 7000-series of CPUs, as although it seems like the company has done a good job in improving the overall performance compared to the 5000-series, it's not quite enough to take the performance crown this time around, if these early benchmark leaks from both sides are anything to go by.

Update 10:27 UTC: A new picture hjas appeared where the CPU has been kitted out with better cooling at the multi-core score has jumped from 29,649 to 36,256, which makes it competitive with the Core i9-13900K scores that have leaked in the past.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source

 

[ARF]

So, this time round, AMD will offer overall slower SKUs across all tiers. I think AMD will have to release A620 board and lower the pricings, so that the entry model Ryzen 5 7600X costs no higher than $100.

 

[TheoneandonlyMrK]

So, this time round, AMD will offer overall slower SKUs across all tiers. I think AMD will have to release A620 board and lower the pricings, so that the entry model Ryzen 5 7600X costs no higher than $100.

You think what ever you want but I can't see that happening, plus they're not out reviewed and compared yet, let's chill on the hyperbolics, shit that puts a 12900k at £90, IS it, no, will it be, f no.

 

[ice_v]

The leaker also posted this:

 

[Ruru]

Judging a product by leaks is totally pointless if you ask me.

 

[ARF]

You think what ever you want but I can't see that happening, plus they're not out reviewed and compared yet, let's chill on the hyperbolics, shit that puts a 12900k at £90, IS it, no, will it be, f no.

What? The 12900K is a faster SKU than the entry level Ryzen 5 7600X.

 

[ice_v]

The leaker also posted this:

Isn't F1 bios like old as f by now? Why even use that to benchmark anything?

 

[TheLostSwede]

The leaker also posted this:

So slow RAM in other words.
Btw, you can insert uploaded images below the text, rather than just as an attachment.

Isn't F1 bios like old as f by now? Why even use that to benchmark anything?

F1 tends to be the shipping version for all new boards.

 

[ARF]

The multi-core score is obviously not going to compete with Intel's Core i9-13900K due to the overall lower core count

It'll be interesting to see how AMD positions the 7000-series of CPUs, as although it seems like the company has done a good job in improving the overall performance compared to the 5000-series, it's not quite enough to take the performance crown this time around, if these early benchmark leaks from both sides are anything to go by.

^^
I agree.

 

[stimpy88]

My 5950X gets a higher multi-core score than that. I also get 60GBs memory bandwidth. So it's either fake, or setup by a fool.

 

[Dirt Chip]

The 3D variant will close the gap and some more in gaming workloads (at least on most of them), for whoever willing to pay the premium.
But for creator the situation will reamin the same. Intel with it's quicksync and much better IGP might keep it's dominance in the non-HDET market.

 

[Arowx]

What temperatures were recorded as 90°c is being reported for some benchmarks on 7000s?

 

[Dirt Chip]

The multi-core score is obviously not going to compete with Intel's Core i9-13900K due to the overall lower core count

Fewer cors, same thread count (32).
Those E core are little monsters when it come to high threaded workloads.

 

[ARF]

The bad news is that AMD tries to intensely milk the market with slower SKUs, instead of offering 24-core, 20-core, 16-core, 12-core and 10-core SKUs.
The sales will dry out, as was the case with intel, prior and during the Core i7-8700K.

Then, AMD will learn it the hard way, and will be forced to release a new generation with more cores!

 

[AusWolf]

This multi-threaded score is essentially the same as two of my 8-core 11700s glued together. Not very impressive from a 16-core CPU that has a max. boost clock of 5.7 GHz, while my 11700 runs at 4.4 GHz all-core.

The single-threaded score is not bad, though.

 

[Urlet]

Strange, my 5950X has somewhat better MT results. Something is wrong in the test of 7950X

 

[TheoneandonlyMrK]

The bad news is that AMD tries to intensely milk the market with slower SKUs, instead of offering 24-core, 20-core, 16-core, 12-core and 10-core SKUs.
The sales will dry out, as was the case with intel, prior and during the Core i7-8700K.

Then, AMD will learn it the hard way, and will be forced to release a new generation with more cores!



View attachment 260376

So , double down on hyperbolics, noice, go you.

I'll wait for proper benches.

 

[Denver]

So, this time round, AMD will offer overall slower SKUs across all tiers. I think AMD will have to release A620 board and lower the pricings, so that the entry model Ryzen 5 7600X costs no higher than $100.

That doesn't sound like something a sane person would say. By your logic, intel should pay us to use their problematic GPUs.

AMD should do the same and sell at cost, then go bankrupt. lol

 

[ice_v]

So slow RAM in other words.
Btw, you can insert uploaded images below the text, rather than just as an attachment.


F1 tends to be the shipping version for all new boards.

I know. So why even use that when for the motherboard he's using ( Gigabyte AORUS X670E Xtreme) the latest BIOS is F4 (2022/08/24)?
My point being this benchmark is pretty much useless.

 

[Richards]

Fewer cors, same thread count (32).
Those E core are little monsters when it come to high threaded workloads.

The baby cores are beats lol

Raptor lake will eat up zen 4 for breakfast.. 13900k can hit 6ghz on 10nm while zen 5 can't with tsmc 5nm

 

[Deleted member 185088]

Fewer cors, same thread count (32).
Those E core are little monsters when it come to high threaded workloads.

Two cores are after than one core with 2 threads.
Plus E cores are not all that powerless, I believe 12th gen E cores were similar to Kaby Lake, now with better node and other enhancemens I think they will be even more potent.
Unfortunately they don't deserve their E prefix, as Intel gets trashed by AMD for battery life.

 

[ZoneDymo]

The baby cores are beats lol

Raptor lake will eat up zen 4 for breakfast.. 13900k can hit 6ghz on 10nm while zen 5 can't with tsmc 5nm

the local fanboy rears his ugly head again.

Tell me (not that you will actually answer because it is a pure troll account), what constitutes "eat up zen 4 for breakfast"?
What performance delta would there have to be? and do we leave power consumption out entirely for that statement? how about product price?

Dont worry, its a rhetorical question to paint once again what muppets fanboys are.

 

[NutZInTheHead]

I too get a higher score with my 5950X. And that's not even with any manual overclock either.

I honestly dont think that 7950X score can be real.

 

[napata]

Two cores are after than one core with 2 threads.
Plus E cores are not all that powerless, I believe 12th gen E cores were similar to Kaby Lake, now with better node and other enhancemens I think they will be even more potent.
Unfortunately they don't deserve their E prefix, as Intel gets trashed by AMD for battery life.

Did Intel ever say what the E(efficiency) refers too? I think it refers to efficency in area as they are unmatched in that while P-cores are seemingly more energy efficient.

 

[rainzor]

The score is crap because the CPU throttled under air cooler. With 360 AIO it scored just over 36K.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1565625033073905665