Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores Part 2

[mrpaco]

seems like it's time for an upgrade of the 5820k

http://imgur.com/nWqw2lf

http://imgur.com/SUvXAXW

 

[mdbrotha03]

 

[hmcg020]

I'm not sure if I should be doing it at 1080, etc. Also I don't even know if a higher score or a lower score is better :S Just another idiot who spent too much money I guess

Here's the 1080p taken immediately after

 

[Tomgang]

New GPU´s = new scores.

5600X/RTX A2000 bofh with overclock/PBO

5950X with PBO and 1 core CCD deactivated/RTX 4090 with overclock. CPU is holding me back a bit to get the last points.

 

[pokerapar88]

Guys.... you are all doing it wrong... you need to use the benchmark preset. If you change the settings like 1440p or 1080p fullscreen you are skewing the results and making it impossible to compare. Just use the premade extreme preset !!!

And this is a fullscreen 1440p

 

[Jetster]

Guys.... you are all doing it wrong... you need to use the benchmark preset. If you change the settings like 1440p or 108p you are skewing the results and making it impossible to compare. Just use the premade extreme preset !!!

View attachment 272717

9.) Must Be a Full Screenshot from within Heaven with the sound tab and upper right corner info shown to be valid

But honestly I don't think anyone is updating the scores anymore. So, it's a moot point. Maybe ask if you can take over the thread? It would be nice to have some newer scores added

 

[mdbrotha03]

Guys.... you are all doing it wrong... you need to use the benchmark preset. If you change the settings like 1440p or 108p you are skewing the results and making it impossible to compare. Just use the premade extreme preset !!!

View attachment 272717

The example the OP did is the standard. Anything different from that standard is wrong.

 

[pokerapar88]

The example the OP did is the standard. Anything different from that standard is wrong.

It isn't a standard if you can use different settings, like different resolutions. That would create different standards and make it a whole bunch harder to compare. Wouldn't it?

9.) Must Be a Full Screenshot from within Heaven with the sound tab and upper right corner info shown to be valid

But honestly I don't think anyone is updating the scores anymore. So, it's a moot point. Maybe ask if you can take over the thread? It would be nice to have some newer scores added

You are right. My bad. I'll update my post wile meeting those requirements.
I know that the thread is almost dead. I really don't have the time to take over the thread but I'm happy to add any new hardware I test here.
In any case, there are much newer benchmarks that take advantage of newer tech, so I think it's ok to leave this thread rest in peace.

 

[Vayra86]

It isn't a standard if you can use different settings, like different resolutions. That would create different standards and make it a whole bunch harder to compare. Wouldn't it?


You are right. My bad. I'll update my post wile meeting those requirements.
I know that the thread is almost dead. I really don't have the time to take over the thread but I'm happy to add any new hardware I test here.
In any case, there are much newer benchmarks that take advantage of newer tech, so I think it's ok to leave this thread rest in peace.

Some context; the reason different resolutions are in there is because this benchmark withstood the test of time, for some time, and also, you can simply compare within the same resolution. The rest of the settings are fixed as in the OP.

1080p was at some point mainstream for example, and when 1440p invaded and GPUs got faster, that got added as a valid way to test, quite simply because some games would become CPU bound.

 

[pokerapar88]

Some context; the reason different resolutions are in there is because this benchmark withstood the test of time, for some time, and also, you can simply compare within the same resolution. The rest of the settings are fixed as in the OP.

1080p was at some point mainstream for example, and when 1440p invaded and GPUs got faster, that got added as a valid way to test, quite simply because some games would become CPU bound.

I know that you can compare. Unfortunately, it makes it much harder.

 

[Jetster]

That's why the spreadsheet in the first post from the OP is important. Even with different resolutions. Nothing makes the spreadsheet unless it meets the requirements.
So you can just go down the respective list. However its not getting updated, I don't know when Mr Genius has been around so maybe someone take it over the duty's

Vayra86 when was the last timeMrGenius was here? ​

 

[pokerapar88]

That's why the spreadsheet in the first post from the OP is important. Even with different resolutions. Nothing makes the spreadsheet unless it meets the requirements.
So you can just go down the respective list. However its not getting updated, I don't know when Mr Genius has been around so maybe someone take it over the duty's

Vayra86 when was the last timeMrGenius was here? ​

This!
If it was being updated I wouldn't have this complaint. It's easier to scroll and compare right now.

 

[mdbrotha03]

It isn't a standard if you can use different settings, like different resolutions. That would create different standards and make it a whole bunch harder to compare. Wouldn't it?

The chart made room for different resolutions. Different settings were rejected. I have my PC listed from years ago in the same thread. The same settings I used then are the ones I used this year. I even have my GTX780 on the original post from 2014.

Again there was one standard that was set years ago. Since there are no changes to the OP you can live with what it is or start a new one so we can post to it.

 

[HammerON]

That's why the spreadsheet in the first post from the OP is important. Even with different resolutions. Nothing makes the spreadsheet unless it meets the requirements.
So you can just go down the respective list. However its not getting updated, I don't know when Mr Genius has been around so maybe someone take it over the duty's

Vayra86 when was the last timeMrGenius was here? ​

MrGenius was banned from TPU quite a while ago.

 

[AVATARAT]

This!
If it was being updated I wouldn't have this complaint. It's easier to scroll and compare right now.

There is no problem to put a few different resolutions if you want, but to be comparable you need to use the one from the first post.
All we knowing that the newest cards are faster than the old ones but the main idea of the list is how much new cards are better.

 

[pokerapar88]

I love how there was no posts since October and I, singlehandedly, revived this thread with a polemic comment. LoL

 

[mdbrotha03]

I love how there was no posts since October and I, singlehandedly, revived this thread with a polemic comment. LoL

Nah, I expect more posts in here when GPUs worthy of benching appear in 10 days.

 

[Darmok N Jalad]

Here's a result from a 2010 Mac Pro running Windows 10. The RX 480 is running 1400/2100. Oddly enough, it's an 8GB model that every other program properly ID's as 8GB. Sorry I didn't do a screenshot. I should have plugged in my bigger keyboard that has a print screen button. This was the HTML save. Not like anyone is dying to see how a a 12 year old PC with a 6 year old GPU scores.

 

[Petar666]

13900KF@P6000MHz, 2x16GB DDR5@7200MHz, RTX 3080TI@2145/1329MHz
Score-7178
FPS-285

 

[cyx2111]

GPU: Gigabyte 3070 Ti - Gaming OC
CPU: 5800X Stock Bios Settings - PBO OFF
GPU OC +100 Memory Clock +135MHZ Core Clock
Finnaly im not happy with my results

 

[ksk]

Just for fun stock bench & 1080p power limited 4090

CPU: 5800x3d (full stock bios excepted RAM xmp 3600mhz)
GPU: 4090 PL60% @270w (avg 2650mhz)

 

[cyx2111]

Just for fun stock bench & 1080p power limited 4090

CPU: 5800x3d (full stock bios excepted RAM xmp 3600mhz)
GPU: 4090 PL60% @270w (avg 2650mhz)

POWER!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[GGG]

Asus RTX4080 TUF (no overclock)

 

[ChipuCutus]

I am loving it!!

 

[Blaeza]

Not bad for a stock 5700X with no PBO and GPU with a undervolt and fan curve alteration.