• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Core i7-14700K has an 8P+12E Core Configuration

Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
18,585 (2.70/day)
System Name AlderLake
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
2,063 (0.74/day)
Location
Tanagra
System Name Budget Box
Processor Xeon E5-2667v2
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Pro
Cooling Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno
Memory 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC
Video Card(s) XFX RX 5600XT
Storage WD NVME 1GB
Display(s) ASUS Pro Art 27"
Case Antec P7 Neo
Why they are stuck at 8 cores? Something with 10 cores could give them the edge over AMD in gaming.
Likely because they don’t want to make a die that big. Isn’t that why Arrow Lake might only be 6 P cores? Intel did one generation of 10c (before e-cores anyway), and it didn’t last before they dropped back to 8C. I really wonder if AMD knew what Intel’s max die size target was, and they made Ryzen what it was to put even more pressure on Intel at the high end. We pretty much jumped from 4C/8T at the high end to 8/16, just like that. Intel had to go to e-cores just to keep desktop die sizes economical. They are making it work to some degree.
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
1,515 (0.72/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name ❶ Oooh (2024) ❷ Aaaah (2021) ❸ Ahemm (2017)
Processor ❶ 5800X3D ❷ i7-9700K ❸ i7-7700K
Motherboard ❶ X570-F ❷ Z390-E ❸ Z270-E
Cooling ❶ ALFIII 360 ❷ X62 + X72 (GPU mod) ❸ X62
Memory ❶ 32-3600/16 ❷ 32-3200/16 ❸ 16-3200/16
Video Card(s) ❶ 3080 X Trio ❷ 2080TI (AIOmod) ❸ 1080TI
Storage ❶ NVME/SSD/HDD ❷ <SAME ❸ SSD/HDD
Display(s) ❶ 1440/165/IPS ❷ 1440/144/IPS ❸ 1080/144/IPS
Case ❶ BQ Silent 601 ❷ Cors 465X ❸ Frac Mesh C
Audio Device(s) ❶ HyperX C2 ❷ HyperX C2 ❸ Logi G432
Power Supply ❶ HX1200 Plat ❷ RM750X ❸ EVGA 650W G2
Mouse ❶ Logi G Pro ❷ Razer Bas V3 ❸ Logi G502
Keyboard ❶ Logi G915 TKL ❷ Anne P2 ❸ Logi G610
Software ❶ Win 11 ❷ 10 ❸ 10
Benchmark Scores I have wrestled bandwidths, Tussled with voltages, Handcuffed Overclocks, Thrown Gigahertz in Jail
12 e-cores?

A genuine query.... W T F is intel doing? These now look more like server/workstation/encoding chips.... why not cut cost, cut thermals, cut power consumption and just drop another 8C 16T i7 variant without the E?

Or is Intel just lost in competing for the higher MT score card?

Reduced cache? Where X3D has excelled Intel is reducing memory.

I don't get it... unless 14th Gen earns great points with efficiency, power consumption and significantly superior ST performance uplift - doesn't excite me.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
410 (0.22/day)
Location
NYC, NY
This time next year, that 14900K will be $899 with a motherboard and 2 sticks of DDR5.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2023
Messages
848 (1.43/day)
System Name Never trust a socket with less than 2000 pins
Yes, and your CPU is taking 55W more, which is like 1/3 more of 5800X3D so it should have about 1/3 better performance and clearly it does not have that.

Curious why i have not seen any Xeon with E-Cores :)

They don't like to mix P and E cores. There is no software to schedule efficiently for server workloads, or even most "technical" workstation stuff. I have a feeling that the desktop scheduling in Windows is also very primitive and has lots of hardcoded software package recognition (for games, mainly).

So you have Xeons with P-cores only and you will have Xeons with E-cores only.

Although, technically there are slow and fast cores in SP Xeons for quite a while. Not all cores are capable of reaching max turbo. I don't know whether Windows or Linux schedulers know about this.
 
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
2,881 (1.21/day)
Yep, E-Core are good for Cinebench scores :roll:
Plenty of productivity and scientific apps etc show the 13700K as fast or faster than 7900X in MT loads, not just cinebench. One app I use is COMSOL and 13700K kicks the shit out of the 7900X. Those 8 E cores are often a lot stronger than the additional 4 P cores of the 7900X.

AMD should have offered hybrid design from the get go with AM4 IMO. 7920X 12 Zen 4 + 4 Zen 4c for example and 4c cores have SMT unlike Gracemont E cores.
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
1,515 (0.72/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name ❶ Oooh (2024) ❷ Aaaah (2021) ❸ Ahemm (2017)
Processor ❶ 5800X3D ❷ i7-9700K ❸ i7-7700K
Motherboard ❶ X570-F ❷ Z390-E ❸ Z270-E
Cooling ❶ ALFIII 360 ❷ X62 + X72 (GPU mod) ❸ X62
Memory ❶ 32-3600/16 ❷ 32-3200/16 ❸ 16-3200/16
Video Card(s) ❶ 3080 X Trio ❷ 2080TI (AIOmod) ❸ 1080TI
Storage ❶ NVME/SSD/HDD ❷ <SAME ❸ SSD/HDD
Display(s) ❶ 1440/165/IPS ❷ 1440/144/IPS ❸ 1080/144/IPS
Case ❶ BQ Silent 601 ❷ Cors 465X ❸ Frac Mesh C
Audio Device(s) ❶ HyperX C2 ❷ HyperX C2 ❸ Logi G432
Power Supply ❶ HX1200 Plat ❷ RM750X ❸ EVGA 650W G2
Mouse ❶ Logi G Pro ❷ Razer Bas V3 ❸ Logi G502
Keyboard ❶ Logi G915 TKL ❷ Anne P2 ❸ Logi G610
Software ❶ Win 11 ❷ 10 ❸ 10
Benchmark Scores I have wrestled bandwidths, Tussled with voltages, Handcuffed Overclocks, Thrown Gigahertz in Jail
Plenty of productivity and scientific apps etc show the 13700K as fast or faster than 7900X in MT loads, not just cinebench. One app I use is COMSOL and 13700K kicks the shit out of the 7900X. Those 8 E cores are often a lot stronger than the additional 4 P cores of the 7900X.

AMD should have offered hybrid design from the get go with AM4 IMO. 7920X 12 Zen 4 + 4 Zen 4c for example and 4c cores have SMT unlike Gracemont E cores.

AMD may very well jump on this bandwagon but.... most of us don't want to pay the extra premium for BS e-cores and we're more than happy to stick with P and P alone! Either drop variants 1) P-only, 2) P.e or scrap it all-together for the i9 space (or i8e)

I'm a i7-7700K and 9700K carrier for gaming mostly single threaded workloads. The first is a quad MT and the latter ST 8 cores - all Ps by design. Now we're compelled to buy into the e-core surplus and most of us don't even need it. I don't believe for a second this is a well-intentioned endeavour to serve the productivity/server space.... it seems like a distressed endeavour to remain relevant on the score sheet (obviously some will benefit significantly but others have to pay the added premium to keep the wheels greased for the minority).
 
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
2,881 (1.21/day)
AMD may very well jump on this bandwagon but.... most of us don't want to pay the extra premium for BS e-cores and we're more than happy to stick with P and P alone! Either drop variants 1) P-only, 2) P.e or scrap it all-together for the i9 space (or i8e)

I'm a i7-7700K and 9700K carrier for gaming mostly single threaded workloads. The first is a quad MT and the latter ST 8 cores - all Ps by design. Now we're compelled to buy into the e-core surplus and most of us don't even need it. I don't believe for a second this is a well-intentioned endeavour to serve the productivity/server space.... it seems like a distressed endeavour to remain relevant on the score sheet (obviously some will benefit significantly but others have to pay the added premium to keep the wheels greased for the minority).
Last I checked the world doesn't revolve around gamers. It's a fact for productivity the e-cres are working well and it's not like somehow the Intel cpu's are poor at gaming. Look at the 1% lows across the benchmarks and see how much better Intel is on average. AMD need's v-cache to be as good.The price of the Intel cpu's is not higher than the older designs lacking E-cores, so how are you worse off. Disable them if you hate them so much.

And in case your wondering I don't any Intel cpus, both my PC run AMD.
 
Joined
Jul 30, 2019
Messages
3,196 (1.66/day)
System Name Still not a thread ripper but pretty good.
Processor Ryzen 9 7950x, Thermal Grizzly AM5 Offset Mounting Kit, Thermal Grizzly Extreme Paste
Motherboard ASRock B650 LiveMixer (BIOS/UEFI version P3.08, AGESA 1.2.0.2)
Cooling EK-Quantum Velocity, EK-Quantum Reflection PC-O11, D5 PWM, EK-CoolStream PE 360, XSPC TX360
Memory Micron DDR4-5600 ECC Unbuffered Memory (2 sticks, 64GB, MTC20C2085S1EC56BD1) + JONSBO NF-1
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 5700 & EK-Quantum Vector Radeon RX 5700 +XT & Backplate
Storage Samsung 4TB 980 PRO, 2 x Optane 905p 1.5TB (striped), AMD Radeon RAMDisk
Display(s) 2 x 4K LG 27UL600-W (and HUANUO Dual Monitor Mount)
Case Lian Li PC-O11 Dynamic Black (original model)
Audio Device(s) Corsair Commander Pro for Fans, RGB, & Temp Sensors (x4)
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
Mouse Logitech M575
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB MK.2
Software Windows 10 Professional (64bit)
Benchmark Scores RIP Ryzen 9 5950x, ASRock X570 Taichi (v1.06), 128GB Micron DDR4-3200 ECC UDIMM (18ASF4G72AZ-3G2F1)
I don't think the e-core approach is necessarily bad when you just a need a few more threads to do some gutter work while the p-cores chew their way through tougher tasks. I might eat my words later but for the moment this is my thought process. More people probably have umteen browser tabs open than ever before and Microsoft Office continues to get worse so more ecores can be useful outside a gaming context.

It seems to me 6 p-cores respond well to more juice (which Intels design can take) but 8 p-cores is on the verge of meltdown so going the 6 p-core++++++++ e-cores route makes sense until they can engineer their way into performance competitiveness more effectively without needing to push more power into their chips which AMD can't really do. Perhaps 14th gen is where 8-pcores are more feasible finally?

13th gen seems to be competitive I don't recall why e-cores are so controversial. I understand obviously it was to compete with AMD in core count and getting the upper hand in Cenebench scores. Early renditions were lackluster and Intel needed moar power to flex enough not to be completely outshined by Ryzen.

I'm willing to try an e-core cpu perhaps next year but a bit nervous what board to pick and how to tamp the power levels down to normal if the board is over juiced if nothing better so I can objectively compare the Intel vs. AMD experience for myself. Even the 12600/12700/12900 seems pretty respectable in terms of price/performance ratio at the moment although I'm more interested in trying a 13th gen chip.

So much complaints about e-cores I don't get why there aren't more complaints about duel chiplet Ryzens having the 2nd gimped chiplet instead of a separate sku that features two perfect chiplets.

You know what else gives a massive boost in performance, more P-cores. I guess I don’t get it. You can have 16 AMD P-cores with the same total performance as 8 Intel P-cores plus 16 Intel E-cores for less energy usage. Why go with the higher power, heterogeneous version other than brand loyalty?
I think to be fair 16 AMD p-cores are not the same. The 2nd chiplet of 8 cores tends to be weaker but you can kind of mitigate that with curve optimizer based on something I read recently.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 14, 2023
Messages
819 (1.24/day)
System Name Asus G16
Processor i9 13980HX
Motherboard Asus motherboard
Cooling 2 fans
Memory 32gb 4800mhz
Video Card(s) 4080 laptop
Storage 16tb, x2 8tb SSD
Display(s) QHD+ 16in 16:10 (2560x1600, WQXGA) 240hz
Power Supply 330w psu
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,437 (1.44/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
Pcore vs ecores?
more like quality vs quantity.
If ecores are so great for gaming they should have used only ecores for their CPUs. Well Intel didnt. So I guess these ecores are good for some tasks not all.
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,275 (2.05/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
Pcore vs ecores?
more like quality vs quantity.
If ecores are so great for gaming they should have used only ecores for their CPUs. Well Intel didnt. So I guess these ecores are good for some tasks not all.
Huh? Why would they use only ecores ever? Pcores have higher st, so even if ecores were absolutely great for games, theyd still use pcores on top for the st workloads.
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,437 (1.44/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
Huh? Why would they use only ecores ever? Pcores have higher st, so even if ecores were absolutely great for games, theyd still use pcores on top for the st workloads.
You have just mentioned that the zen4 cores are slower than Intel's ecores. Yet Intel still needs Pcores to keep up even though everyone says 1pcore is not equal to 4ecores taking same space.
 
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
3,275 (2.05/day)
System Name Mean machine
Processor 12900k
Motherboard MSI Unify X
Cooling Noctua U12A
Memory 7600c34
Video Card(s) 4090 Gamerock oc
Storage 980 pro 2tb
Display(s) Samsung crg90
Case Fractal Torent
Audio Device(s) Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack
Power Supply Be quiet dark power pro 1200
Mouse Viper ultimate
Keyboard Blackwidow 65%
You have just mentioned that the zen4 cores are slower than Intel's ecores. Yet Intel still needs Pcores to keep up even though everyone says 1pcore is not equal to 4ecores taking same space.
No, I didn't say they are slower. I said they are both inefficient.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
3,306 (0.81/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 desktop systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Ryzen 5 5500 / Ryzen 5 4600G / FX 6300 (12 years latter got to see how bad Bulldozer is)
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (1) / MSI X470 Gaming Plus Max (2) / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3
Cooling Νoctua U12S / Segotep T4 / Snowman M-T6
Memory 32GB - 16GB G.Skill RIPJAWS 3600+16GB G.Skill Aegis 3200 / 16GB JUHOR / 16GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 6600 + GT 710 (PhysX)/ Vega 7 integrated / Radeon RX 580
Storage NVMes, ONLY NVMes/ NVMes, SATA Storage / NVMe boot(Clover), SATA storage
Display(s) Philips 43PUS8857/12 UHD TV (120Hz, HDR, FreeSync Premium) ---- 19'' HP monitor + BlitzWolf BW-V5
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / CoolerMaster Elite 361 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Silver Power 400W / Sharkoon 650W
Mouse CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster Devastator III Plus / CoolerMaster Devastator / Logitech
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10&Windows 11 / Windows 10
Why they are stuck at 8 cores? Something with 10 cores could give them the edge over AMD in gaming.
They can't fit too many cores with a 10nm manufacturing easily, keep the power consumption low and at the same time fight against AMD's up to 16 cores Ryzen CPUs. They can't achieve all those goals at the same time if they increase P cores.

By using a hybrid design they can advertise much higher number of cores, not just eliminating AMD's marketing advantage but turning it around and making it their advantage and in some occasions where P cores are sleeping, while E cores doing the light work, advertise high efficiency, even when in fact their CPUs are much more power hungry.

So, why add more P cores? Most if not all apps are more than happy with 8 P cores and multithreading apps will show a high score thanks to having a much higher number of cores when utilizing all of those E cores.

Intel will start integrating more P cores when it's CPUs start losing in benchmarks because of it. If games start getting optimized for 10 or 12 cores, Intel will have to offer something with more P cores. Until then they have no reason to add one P core in place of 4 E cores. The average consumer will buy a 24 Cores CPU( 8+16 ) over an 18 Cores CPU ( 10 + 8 ) at the same price.
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,437 (1.44/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
No, I didn't say they are slower. I said they are both inefficient.
Well then, if you are after efficiency you are not after performance.

That is absolutely true. Zen 4 cores are similar to ecores in performance / wattage, and they both stink. You can even watch the review from this very site, when they compare 1p vs 1 zen 4 core, the zen 4 core is both slower and draw more power, rofl :roll:
just a reminder.
 
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
1,188 (0.20/day)
Huh? Why would they use only ecores ever? Pcores have higher st, so even if ecores were absolutely great for games, theyd still use pcores on top for the st workloads.

They do have E-core-only parts. Alder Lake-N (Like the N95, N100, N300...etc.) for cheap, low-powered computers. :laugh:
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2023
Messages
45 (0.07/day)
Processor 13600k (5.6ghz/4.5ghz)
Motherboard MSI Z690 PRO-A
Cooling Deepcool LS520 (240mm AIO)
Memory 32GB DDR5 6666MHZ Hynix M Die
Video Card(s) EVGA 3060TI XC (+225mhz Core/+1000mhz Mem)
Storage 118GB Optane P1600X (Boot), Wd SN850x 2TB (Game)
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G7 (1440p, 240hz)
Case CM TD500 Mesh
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser PC38X
Power Supply CM V850 V2
Mouse G Pro X Superlight
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex Pro TKL (2023)
They're 2 nodes behind so the fact they're even remotely competitive is a small miracle. It's forcing their design teams to get creative which I kind of like.

I used to be a huge AMD fan in the early zen days but since Zen 3 i feel like they're changing roles.
No they're a single node behind, intels 10nm is literally more dense than tsmc's 7nm.... Guess it really does show why node's naming hasn't represented a single dimension of the transistor's in ages, people like you punish intel for lying by less lmfao.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
6,681 (1.39/day)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-13700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
Storage 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Logitech Hero G502 SE
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
Is this for Socket 1700 LGA also?
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
18,585 (2.70/day)
System Name AlderLake
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,678 (1.72/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name Planet Espresso
Processor 13700KF @ 5.5GHZ 1.285v - 235W cap
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
No they're a single node behind, intels 10nm is literally more dense than tsmc's 7nm.... Guess it really does show why node's naming hasn't represented a single dimension of the transistor's in ages, people like you punish intel for lying by less lmfao.

Right intel gives a range of transistor density AT 10NM SIZE they list the max density to show that they're not as far behind - they CAN pack them really close together though, you're right -- therefore they're not as far behind -- you must have also seen their very accurate marketing slides talking about their node density.

Obviously the lithography still matters - TSMC is already making Apple chips on 3nm and we have nothing from intel on their 7nm process, that they're calling 5, because marketing slides.

Hopefully they gain some steam through 2024-2026 with stacked nanosheet.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,181 (5.75/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Windows 10 Pro
I find it funny when people argue about nanometers during an age when even low-end desktop CPUs offer acceptable gaming performance.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,513 (4.63/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
The EXACT same thing could be accomplished if Intel just lowered 13th gen prices and made the 13900KS more widely available. But nope they want yearly model number changes to push/trick people into upgrading.

They likely can't, the binning required for a CPU of the 13900KS's quality is severe and exceptionally few chips make the cut. It's actually quite difficult to run a 13900K at 13900KS settings with anywhere even close to reasonable voltages.

The 14900K may very well be the most underwhelming of all in this refresh, at best equal to the 13900KS but I'd argue it's probably still going to be a small step down
 

ixi

Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Messages
1,451 (0.39/day)
Higher cache, more efficienty cores. Sadly efficiency cores for me are meeeeh. Real men game and they need Pī Pī cores. Intel, when will you learn.
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
18,585 (2.70/day)
System Name AlderLake
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
Technically, the number of E cores are staying the same. Just the number of locked ones at a certain price and the model numbers are changing.

So how many "locked E-Cores" has an i5 12600?..
And how many "locked E-cores" has an i5 12600K?.....
Better yet, how many "locked or unlocked" E-Cores does intel stick on one CPU these days?..

:laugh:
 
Last edited:
Top