• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Immortals of Aveum Gets Updated PC Requirements, Confirms DLSS 3 and FSR 2.2 Support at Launch

GFreeman

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Mar 6, 2023
Messages
1,583 (2.41/day)
The day is almost here. The release of Immortals of Aveum is just around the corner, and we here at Ascendant Studios are so incredibly excited for players to get to experience what we've been building all this time. As we inch closer to August 22nd, we wanted to take a moment to talk a bit more about the technology that's powering our game, and what that means for PC players in particular.

Earlier this year, we talked about some of the amazing tools we've had at our disposal as one of the first studios to release a AAA game using Unreal Engine 5.1. There's Nanite, for example, which automatically adjusts the details the player sees based on distance, letting us build huge, detailed 3D objects that look every bit as good up close as they do from virtual miles away. The additional surface detail of our objects provide significantly more places for lighting to bounce off of.



We also make extensive use of Lumen, which lets us add incredibly realistic-looking dynamic lighting to those more detailed Nanite objects, which interacts with lighting far better than before, resulting in prettier environments. And it lets us do so dramatically more quickly than before: In Unreal 4, we'd have to balance dynamic lights with "baked in" lighting for any area, a process that would take literal hours to complete. Lumen lets us light things pretty much instantly—with lighting effects that look fantastic.

There's also Niagara, which lets us easily implement and modify graphical effects like fire, smoke and magic. Thanks to Niagara, we don't have to build each and every effect separately; we can take an existing effect that's used widely across the game world and modify it for different scenarios so it looks different each time - something that wasn't possible before.

And these are just some of the more visually noticeable features; Unreal 5.1 also features tools that make things work more smoothly behind the scenes. Streaming Virtual Texturing, for example, essentially reduces the memory required to show large, detailed textures to the player. The One File Per Actor system lets our team all work in a single environment simultaneously, rather than requiring us to "check out" a whole level to make the smallest of tweaks. And World Partition intelligently loads and unloads bits of the world as needed, allowing us to create enormous environments that don't slow the game to a crawl, make load screens necessary, and/or incinerate anyone's video cards.

The thing about all these different tools, though, is that no single one of them is responsible for making Immortals of Aveum look as good as it does while running as well as it does. The magic isn't just in any single part of Unreal Engine 5.1, but in how these tools all work together, and how the whole engine provides a degree of flexibility and modularity that hasn't been possible before now. It's given us the ability to create a huge game in a vast world with a relatively small team, and make it all look great and run well—on a wide variety of platforms.

And the really neat thing is, it lets us pass that flexibility on to players.

TUNE AT WILL
But ultimately, how you want to put that power to use is up to you. Because another thing Unreal Engine 5.1 lets us do is give PC players granular control over how exactly their machines' power is used. To do that, we've developed a Performance Budget Tool, which integrates with the game's graphics settings menu to give players detailed information about how graphical choices impact the performance of Immortals of Aveum on their specific machines.

Here's how it works: When you first launch the game, it scans your whole running setup to determine how specific features of Unreal Engine 5.1 are likely to perform on your hardware. It then provides a total "budget" that you have to play with for both your GPU and CPU, representing the power of your unique machine. You'll see a budget total for your GPU and another for your CPU; next to those, you'll see your current budget allocation. If the allocation is lower than the total budget, you can expect to see high frame rates and smooth performance—and the more room between those numbers, the faster the game will run. Conversely, of course, if the allocation exceeds the total budget, you can expect to see your framerate and performance begin to decrease as your visual fidelity increases. And keeping your allocation as close as possible to your budget total (without going over!) will give you the best balance of performance and visual fidelity.

In conjunction with this, each graphical setting is accompanied by numbers indicating how much of your total GPU and CPU budget it will require, which update as you cycle between different levels of each setting. As a result, you're able to see very quickly how different settings impact your budget, and thus the game's performance on your PC. This lets you fine-tune your graphics settings to focus on the things you care about, and get an idea of precisely how your choices will impact performance in real time, without having to resort to trial and error.

Here's what the Performance Budget Tool looks like in action—but note that these numbers are unique to this machine's hardware since every PC is different!
Note, too, that the tool accounts for the entire workload on your GPU and CPU at the time of the scan, including any other applications that are currently running. So if you find yourself a few points short of your ideal configuration, you might be able to quit out of some non-essential applications, rescan by clicking the "Reset" button, and discover you actually do have the budget after all. Or maybe you find you have enough overhead to run something in the background you didn't think you could! It's all up to you; the goal here is simply to give you the most information we can in order to help you make educated decisions about your graphical choices.

But this is just the beginning; we intend to keep improving the Performance Budget Tool post-launch to make it even more useful. In future versions, we plan to account for more hardware variables that can impact PC performance, such as other resolutions and aspect ratios, so players can continue making more informed decisions and dial-in their settings to create the experience that's right for them.



WHAT'S UNDER THE HOOD
Speaking of hardware variables, our team at Ascendant has been rigorously testing the game's performance for PC players and feels great about 60 FPS performance on the following combinations of resolution and hardware:



Additionally, the studio is continuing to optimize the game to play well on lower hardware to make the game accessible to even more players. While we aren't ready to confirm anything just yet, we intend to announce new low end specs soon targeting a 1080p/30 FPS experience. To give you an example, the team currently has the game running well in the 40 FPS range on an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 and Intel Core i7-8700K configuration. With Unreal Engine 5.1 being so new, we want to see just how far down we can optimize and thoroughly test as many lower-end set-ups as possible.

On the opposite end of the spectrum, we've added specs for the current cutting edge of GPUs and CPUs. So if you have the machine that is the envy of all around you, you can run our game in 4K at 120 frames per second.
Note: Immortals supports both AMD FSR 2.2 and NVIDIA's DLSS 3 upscaling technology.

PLAYING TO YOUR STRENGTHS
And console players, don't feel left out here! You may not be able to tweak your settings as much, seeing how consoles have much more specific and uniform specs, but that means that we were able to use all this flexibility and modularity to tune the game very carefully to each console's particular strengths. As a result, every console version will run at 60 FPS at your TV's maximum resolution thanks to the upscaling magic of FSR 2. So whatever system you're using, you'll be getting the best performance you possibly can.

That's really one of the biggest benefits of working with Unreal Engine 5.1. All these tools that make things run more smoothly behind the scenes end up being incredibly scalable, letting us meet players wherever they are—now and in the future. We won't claim that was easy; after all, you may remember that we delayed the game by about a month in order to spend more time polishing, bug-hunting, and optimizing. But Ascendant is a brand-new studio, and this is our first game, so we wanted to make every possible effort to ensure that Immortals of Aveum is an amazing experience no matter what machine it's running on. And we're so excited for you all to finally have the chance to see that for yourselves.

If you want to learn more about all the finer details of how we went about creating the PC budget tool and more, be sure to also check out the Ascendant Studios deep-dive dev blog on the subject!


View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Oct 31, 2022
Messages
199 (0.25/day)
WOW...2080Super WITH DLSS Quality for just 1080p 60FPS? That is worse then Remnant 2...
Although with a 4090 I can't reach consistent 120FPS in 4k with DLSSQ and FG in Remnant 2..., so High-End Specs seem lower in Aveum...

Still another UE Game with low FPS on current hardware.
 
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
167 (0.05/day)
WOW...2080Super WITH DLSS Quality for just 1080p 60FPS? That is worse then Remnant 2...
Although with a 4090 I can't reach consistent 120FPS in 4k with DLSSQ and FG in Remnant 2..., so High-End Specs seem lower in Aveum...

Still another UE Game with low FPS on current hardware.
Thats just the price for lumen and nanite, they are very optimized for what they offer. If you want high fps and high res without upgrading your hardware, just keep playing quake 2 or pay the price for better visuals.
 
Joined
Mar 1, 2021
Messages
115 (0.08/day)
Processor R7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI B650 Tomahawk
Memory 2x32GB 6000CL30
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Case Lian Li O11 Air Mini
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x
UE5 is extremely demanding, especially with nanite/lumen. DLSS/FSR/XeSS will be baseline requirement in these games
 
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
167 (0.05/day)
What price? There isn't something better as a 4090...
Not right now, but there will be. Its a cost you cant pay right now, does not mean they shouldn't push the visuals right now. Just like Crysis was released, one GPU gen later people were able to play 1080p 30fps. Moments like this have to happen so better GPUs and better graphics keep coming.
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
7,003 (4.81/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
These system requirements were written by someone who has absolutely zero notion about computer hardware, placing the 7900 XTX in the Ultra tier but the 4080 in the High tier, it's like they just got their phone and said "Hi Bixby, which are the fastest and second fastest graphics cards from AMD and NVIDIA currently available"? Same for the processor, having the balls to ask for a i9-13900KS or R9 7950X3D is absolutely bananas and I don't believe for a second that these are real system requirements, it shows major amateurism from the development team
 
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
167 (0.05/day)
These system requirements were written by someone who has absolutely zero notion about computer hardware, placing the 7900 XTX in the Ultra tier but the 4080 in the High tier, it's like they just got their phone and said "Hi Bixby, which are the fastest and second fastest graphics cards from AMD and NVIDIA currently available"? Same for the processor, having the balls to ask for a i9-13900KS or R9 7950X3D is absolutely bananas and I don't believe for a second that these are real system requirements, it shows major amateurism from the development team
The 7900XTX performance in Remnant 2 is a lot closer to a 4090 than a 4080. Maybe its a UE 5 thing to favor AMD hardware.

Captura de tela 2023-08-18 092414.png
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2020
Messages
1,675 (1.08/day)
Processor 5800X3D -30 CO
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling DeepCool Assassin III
Memory 32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws V @ 3800 CL14
Video Card(s) ASRock MBA 7900XTX
Storage 1TB WD SN850X + 1TB ADATA SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell S2721QS 4K60
Case Cooler Master CM690 II Advanced USB 3.0
Audio Device(s) Audiotrak Prodigy Cube Black (JRC MUSES 8820D) + CAL (recabled)
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TX-750
Mouse Logitech Cordless Desktop Wave
Keyboard Logitech Cordless Desktop Wave
Software Windows 10 Pro
Ready your 8 GB cards for that sweet 720p experience. 12 GB should be enough for 960p :oops:
UE5 pulls no punches when it comes to VRAM utilization it seems. But that Performance Budget Tool looks very useful. With the number of settings affecting performance, balancing level of detail becomes a game in itself.

EDIT: Here's something I found on the developer's blog:

dev.jpg

Consequently:
5700XT/2080S = 720p60 on low
6800XT/3080Ti = 960p60 on medium
7900XT/4080 = 1440p60 on ultra

Looks like quoting system requirements with upsampling will be the new normal. Looking forward to TPU's performance test.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
7,003 (4.81/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
The 7900XTX performance in Remnant 2 is a lot closer to a 4090 than a 4080. Maybe its a UE 5 thing to favor AMD hardware.

View attachment 309669

We've got a sample size of that one game regarding UE5 performance thus far, so there's that.

Unless there is an actual requirement of VRAM > 16 GB, there's no way that could be realistically happening, especially if raytracing is involved (the 4080 eats the 7900 XTX for lunch in this scenario). That may be the case given the drop in performance between the 7900 XTX and XT, which is much, much sharper than usual. Then again, the 3090 Ti also seems to be barely doing 60 fps, and is also faster than both the XTX and XT at RT, so who knows anymore?

Still, it's sloppy and things like this should absolutely not be happening in any shipping game. I fear we've gotten to a point where computing power is so ample that programmers are starting to become sloppy to cut corners.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,842 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
It's a new engine, of course it's demanding. UE4 was with us for 15 years before UE5 launched (I know it was enhanced in the meantime, but it was still the same engine under the hood).
And it's a challenge for early adopters, they aren't very happy with a title that severely limits their target audience because of unrealistic hardware requirements.

It really depends on what you can configure and tone down. And it will also depend on whether Immortals is a good game or not.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,965 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
We've got a sample size of that one game regarding UE5 performance thus far, so there's that.

Unless there is an actual requirement of VRAM > 16 GB, there's no way that could be realistically happening, especially if raytracing is involved (the 4080 eats the 7900 XTX for lunch in this scenario). That may be the case given the drop in performance between the 7900 XTX and XT, which is much, much sharper than usual. Then again, the 3090 Ti also seems to be barely doing 60 fps, and is also faster than both the XTX and XT at RT, so who knows anymore?

Still, it's sloppy and things like this should absolutely not be happening in any shipping game. I fear we've gotten to a point where computing power is so ample that programmers are starting to become sloppy to cut corners.

In fortnite which also uses this engine RDNA3 also performs favorably compared to ada even with RT enabled. Like call of duty this engine could just be highly optimized for AMD hardware.
 
Joined
May 8, 2023
Messages
51 (0.09/day)
None of the videos I've seen so far convinced me it's a good looking game that justifies these requirements. It's probably an UE5 thing, as others have said.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,965 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
None of the videos I've seen so far convinced me it's a good looking game that justifies these requirements. It's probably an UE5 thing, as others have said.

Yeah, I agree. No UE5 released game looks very good or at least better than older rendering tech.

I'm waiting for The Coalition to show their next game to see how far this technology can be pushed and to a lesser extent Hellblade 2 from Ninja Theory.
 
Joined
Sep 8, 2007
Messages
304 (0.05/day)
Location
Israel
System Name ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MEG X670E Ace
Cooling EK Nucleus CR360
Memory 64GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Titanium 6000Mhz CL30 1.4v
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090 ROG Strix OC
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB \ Kingston KC3000 2TB
Display(s) LG GQ950-B 4K 144hz 32"
Case Lian Li Lancool 216
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 Gen2 \ SS Arctis Nova Pro \ DT 770 Pro
Power Supply MSI A1000G 1000W ATX 3.0
Mouse HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2
Keyboard NuPhy Filed75
Software Windows 11 Pro
Another mess just like Remnant2. If this is how UE5 is like, than who needs it?! On the other hand Cry Engine had something to show for it, IOA better look real good.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,965 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
Another mess just like Remnant2. If this is how UE5 is like, than who needs it?! On the other hand Crysis had something to show for it, IOA better look real good.

Pretty much everyone is using UE5 is the problem. Over the next couple years the majority of major releases will be using it anyway.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2023
Messages
341 (0.68/day)
That's easily the highest requirements I've ever seen in a PC game, game must be truly special... or truly unoptimized. It easily rivals CP2077 4K Ultra with PT on, while needing double the CPU power - or the requirement table is a huge exaggeration. Also it seems to run better with AMD GPUs, rarely is the XTX able to rival the 4090, or the 5700 XT a 2080 Super (it normally rivals a 2070 at best).
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,965 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
That's easily the highest requirements I've ever seen in a PC game, game must be truly special... or truly unoptimized. It easily rivals CP2077 4K Ultra with PT on, while needing double the CPU power - or the requirement table is a huge exaggeration. Also it seems to run better with AMD GPUs, rarely is the XTX able to rival the 4090, or the 5700 XT a 2080 Super (it normally rivals a 2070 at best).

CP2077 with pathtracing requires frame generation to be playable and isn't playable at all on AMD hardware other than maybe at 1080p on a 7900XTX with performance FSR so this is definitely not as demanding.


My guess is becuase Nanite and Lumen seem to be automated almost a flip of a switch they are much heavier than if the developer had to do all of the lods and lighting by hand so much easier for the developer but much harder on the hardware. Probably why the majority of AAA developers are switching to this engine less work.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,965 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
Not exactly, as the CPU requirement's are over double that of those of CP2077, your statement isn't correct. CPU requirements are part of the requirements of a game.

Doesn't really matter when the game isn't playable on a 4090 with those settings what cpu you need is irrelevant if you cant break 40fps in most scenarios..... Unless someone likes console like performance.... They are currently claiming 3x the performance at 4k with a 4090.. I guess we will see when it releases.

Screenshot (205).png
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,965 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
It matters a lot as it's part of the requirements of the game. And we don't need to discuss this endlessly as when you tried to "correct" me and failed at that.

Cool story bruh
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
578 (0.11/day)
System Name Home PC
Processor Ryzen 5900X
Motherboard Asus Prime X370 Pro
Cooling Thermaltake Contac Silent 12
Memory 2x8gb F4-3200C16-8GVKB - 2x16gb F4-3200C16-16GVK
Video Card(s) XFX RX480 GTR
Storage Samsung SSD Evo 120GB -WD SN580 1TB - Toshiba 2TB HDWT720 - 1TB GIGABYTE GP-GSTFS31100TNTD
Display(s) Cooler Master GA271 and AoC 931wx (19in, 1680x1050)
Case Green Magnum Evo
Power Supply Green 650UK Plus
Mouse Green GM602-RGB ( copy of Aula F810 )
Keyboard Old 12 years FOCUS FK-8100
I wanted to buy a used card XFX 5700 XT with price $110 but after reading Hogwarts Legacy test , I gave up. I knew 5700 XT Won't be able to hold steady 60fps on 1080p.
Now according to ascendant studios, You can't get 60fps consistent on 1080p with high settings..
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2023
Messages
341 (0.68/day)
I wanted to buy a used card XFX 5700 XT with price $110 but after reading Hogwarts Legacy test , I gave up. I knew 5700 XT Won't be able to hold steady 60fps on 1080p.
Now according to ascendant studios, You can't get 60fps consistent on 1080p with high settings..

States otherwise, this news as well, are we reading the same information? Either you're reading unofficial information, or you're being overly pessimistic. I think the 5700 XT manages finely for 1080p60 (high to ultra, depending on title).
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
578 (0.11/day)
System Name Home PC
Processor Ryzen 5900X
Motherboard Asus Prime X370 Pro
Cooling Thermaltake Contac Silent 12
Memory 2x8gb F4-3200C16-8GVKB - 2x16gb F4-3200C16-16GVK
Video Card(s) XFX RX480 GTR
Storage Samsung SSD Evo 120GB -WD SN580 1TB - Toshiba 2TB HDWT720 - 1TB GIGABYTE GP-GSTFS31100TNTD
Display(s) Cooler Master GA271 and AoC 931wx (19in, 1680x1050)
Case Green Magnum Evo
Power Supply Green 650UK Plus
Mouse Green GM602-RGB ( copy of Aula F810 )
Keyboard Old 12 years FOCUS FK-8100
Top