• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Why doesn't every house have solar installed?

Outback Bronze

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
2,030 (0.42/day)
Location
Walkabout Creek
System Name Raptor Baked
Processor 14900k w.c.
Motherboard Z790 Hero
Cooling w.c.
Memory 48GB G.Skill 7200
Video Card(s) Zotac 4080 w.c.
Storage 2TB Kingston kc3k
Display(s) Samsung 34" G8
Case Corsair 460X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PCIe5 850w
Mouse Asus
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win 11
Benchmark Scores Cool n Quiet.
I have them on my house, 6.6kw of panels, 5kw inverter. I spent over an hour a few months ago running the numbers extensively and it has paid for itself in less than 3 years since installation in 2019.

My only regret is not doing it sooner.

Yeah, same here matey.
6.6kw in panels and 5kw Fronius inverter.
Cost just over 5k Aud back in 2017.
I went with 6.6kw worth of panels as I was told you lose power through efficiency so the 5kw inverter is always topped up, plus over a 5kw inverter you dont get the rebate per kw back to the grid. Im getting $0.07 per kw back to grid.
More panels also helps out on cloudy days.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
2,508 (0.79/day)
It's going to make more sense or less sense depending on how close you live to the equator is the simplest way to answer the question of why. Do you want to wipe off your solar panels every snow storm!? What if it's more of a ice sleet storm? Then you need to as well consider how effectiveness based on how much sunlight you get in your region in the first place. A heats pump is something more homes could install at pretty low cost and better than not doing anything. Beyond that just being smarter in the summer months with opening and closing windows. Close them during the day and open them at night work pretty well in the NE. It hasn't really even warmed up consistently enough to bother with that much at this point here, but we're getting closer and closer to a point where it's unavoidable if you want to cool things down a bit at night and lock down the fort during the day to keep the heat out.

It'll eventually with more innovation and better pricing make more sense to adopt regardless of where you live though. I don't think we're quite there yet though depending on where you live and you're probably just as well doing other things to not waste as much power in the first place or like better insulate your home. It's mostly August and July where AC feels hard to avoid from a comfort level here. It's pretty manageable until it gets unsettling sweltering hot and humid. As far as solar goes though it's not just the cost of the panels and installation, but batteries are another factor both in terms of how much energy it can store and cost to do so. Battery life also is worse in colder weather so there is that to contend with to. The answer is similar as to why people aren't building windmills in places with little or no wind. AI if we're lucky might figure out ingenious solutions to tackle these pressing issues in due time. I mean it would be less of a cost issue if we didn't have billionaires and more money to go around so that's my answer. Who really needs a billion dollars? I do for solar panels that's who.
 
Joined
Jan 29, 2012
Messages
6,881 (1.47/day)
Location
Florida
System Name natr0n-PC
Processor Ryzen 5950x-5600x | 9600k
Motherboard B450 AORUS M | Z390 UD
Cooling EK AIO 360 - 6 fan action | AIO
Memory Patriot - Viper Steel DDR4 (B-Die)(4x8GB) | Samsung DDR4 (4x8GB)
Video Card(s) EVGA 3070ti FTW
Storage Various
Display(s) Pixio PX279 Prime
Case Thermaltake Level 20 VT | Black bench
Audio Device(s) LOXJIE D10 + Kinter Amp + 6 Bookshelf Speakers Sony+JVC+Sony
Power Supply Super Flower Leadex III ARGB 80+ Gold 650W | EVGA 700 Gold
Software XP/7/8.1/10
Benchmark Scores http://valid.x86.fr/79kuh6
Some of us can barely pay bills to afford solar even. And the greedy MF's who run the electric company keep increasing the bills so you can never catch up.
 

Space Lynx

Astronaut
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
17,249 (4.67/day)
Location
Kepler-186f
Processor 7800X3D -25 all core ($196)
Motherboard B650 Steel Legend ($179)
Cooling Frost Commander 140 ($42)
Memory 32gb ddr5 (2x16) cl 30 6000 ($80)
Video Card(s) Merc 310 7900 XT @3100 core $(705)
Display(s) Agon 27" QD-OLED Glossy 240hz 1440p ($399)
Case NZXT H710 (Red/Black) ($60)
Nem 3 really screwed us out in California if I had purchased mine out of pocket it would take 8-10 years to break even. If you dont factor in tax credits which not everyone makes enough to take full advantage of.


that's still 20-30 years of profit assuming no hailstorm damages it. that's not horrible imo. maybe even 30 years.

California is a good example of the top down, tax incentives to move that way is pretty smart imo.

Price talk in the US seems absolutely crazy to me, my system was on the cheaper side, but was $2,795 AUD in 2019, with higher end going for $4-6k at the time, up to the skies the limit of you want to go crazy big, but 6.6/5kw (panels/inverter as you're allowed to oversize panels relative to inverter by 33%) is the max size you can put on residential properties and still get a tariff for feeding in power to the grid. $20k++ USD seems absolutely bonkers to me.

in redneck land where I live in USA, you can do it for about 8 grand out of pocket if you do the labor yourself, depends how big your roof is of course. I have watched several videos on how to do it, there is one guy down the road from me who did it himself, has 3 panels on his garage, pretty cool.

@Dr. Dro I understand all of that regarding the pollution, none the less they are going to keep making them, just as they keep making motherboards, monitors, and cell phones, all of which use horrible minerals too that have terrible ethical implications. there is no easy answer on these things. its out of my control is really the only answer. I'm still not convinced it's as bad as people say, lot of the videos I have seen are of these giant sized mega trucks where the tire is bigger than my house, and the dude driving it makes 6 figures a year as he takes the rare minerals to be processed. i know there are bad parts too, I have seen some of that, I just don't know how widespread that part is vs the legit parts.

Some of us can barely pay bills to afford solar even. And the greedy MF's who run the electric company keep increasing the bills so you can never catch up.

I mean you live in Florida, solar panels are probably a bad idea there considering the weather / lack of house insurance options. also, that is kind of the point of this thread, I can't afford solar panels either, that's why the original title of this thread was "The worst mistake we made as a species was not getting solar panels on every homes roof" but the mods changed it without asking me, so I don't know what to tell you. (also same reason I mentioned the Covid money in my original post... 7 trillion bucks spent like it was nothing... and we gained basically nothing from that as Covid had already wiped out the nursing homes and that was where 90% of the deaths came from...) we are hemorrhaging every chance we get to save this planet, its pretty damn sad imo.

edit: for clarification, in Keynesian Economics (which USA is run by usually) you don't just hemorrhage money without getting long term economic benefits, this is called public works - in this example the great public works project would have been building solar panel factories (I mentioned in my original post Nevada, because of the ability to build solar panels off of solar panel energy, as many factories there already run off solar fields, so it would be a win win)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,769 (4.72/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Yeah, same here matey.
6.6kw in panels and 5kw Fronius inverter.
Cost just over 5k Aud back in 2017.
I went with 6.6kw worth of panels as I was told you lose power through efficiency so the 5kw inverter is always topped up, plus over a 5kw inverter you dont get the rebate per kw back to the grid. Im getting $0.07 per kw back to grid.
More panels also helps out on cloudy days.

Now that I think of it, it really strikes me as rather insane how small is the power generation capacity of these solar devices. If I had your system installed here, it would at best cushion our power consumption from the grid. Everything in my household is electric, except for the LPG gas-powered cooktop. My previous estimate of 44 months to pay off the system at $800/mo would only be valid if the solar panels could fulfill the household's entire power load and then some.

My shower alone is a 240 V/7800 W appliance, and sometimes there are two of those on at the same time in here. Still have a good laugh with ElectroBoom's classic video on these things :laugh:


@Dr. Dro I understand all of that regarding the pollution, none the less they are going to keep making them, just as they keep making motherboards, monitors, and cell phones, all of which use horrible minerals too that have terrible ethical implications. there is no easy answer on these things. its out of my control is really the only answer. I'm still not convinced it's as bad as people say, lot of the videos I have seen are of these giant sized mega trucks where the tire is bigger than my house, and the dude driving it makes 6 figures a year as he takes the rare minerals to be processed. i know there are bad parts too, I have seen some of that, I just don't know how widespread that part is vs the legit parts.

I mean, true, it's not going to disappear and the tech will improve over time. But as it stands, it's still far too rudimentary and low-capacity to be a must-have, IMO. We will need far more efficient panels to bring most households off-grid and/or have them contribute to the pool of available energy.
 
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
1,196 (0.20/day)
Upfront costs and long time to break even are the main deterrents where I'm at. I do see more and more every year (heck, my neighbour directly across the street just got solar installed earlier this year), but adoption in general seems to be pretty slow.
 

Outback Bronze

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
2,030 (0.42/day)
Location
Walkabout Creek
System Name Raptor Baked
Processor 14900k w.c.
Motherboard Z790 Hero
Cooling w.c.
Memory 48GB G.Skill 7200
Video Card(s) Zotac 4080 w.c.
Storage 2TB Kingston kc3k
Display(s) Samsung 34" G8
Case Corsair 460X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PCIe5 850w
Mouse Asus
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win 11
Benchmark Scores Cool n Quiet.
it's still far too rudimentary and low-capacity to be a must-have

Here in Perth, Western Australia it's a must. Prob one of the sunniest states in the world. Every man and his dog has it. Hell, one of the builders I work for supply solar with the house and land packages. They are selling them before a 'For Sale' sign even has a chance of going up. In saying that we are in a bad market here where any house for sale atm is pretty much sold instantaneously.

Edit: This is my inverters production back in 2018. Now times it by 6 to get to 2024 ;)

2018.png
 
Last edited:

Space Lynx

Astronaut
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
17,249 (4.67/day)
Location
Kepler-186f
Processor 7800X3D -25 all core ($196)
Motherboard B650 Steel Legend ($179)
Cooling Frost Commander 140 ($42)
Memory 32gb ddr5 (2x16) cl 30 6000 ($80)
Video Card(s) Merc 310 7900 XT @3100 core $(705)
Display(s) Agon 27" QD-OLED Glossy 240hz 1440p ($399)
Case NZXT H710 (Red/Black) ($60)
Now that I think of it, it really strikes me as rather insane how small is the power generation capacity of these solar devices. If I had your system installed here, it would at best cushion our power consumption from the grid. Everything in my household is electric, except for the LPG gas-powered cooktop. My previous estimate of 44 months to pay off the system at $800/mo would only be valid if the solar panels could fulfill the household's entire power load and then some.

My shower alone is a 240 V/7800 W appliance, and sometimes there are two of those on at the same time in here. Still have a good laugh with ElectroBoom's classic video on these things :laugh:




I mean, true, it's not going to disappear and the tech will improve over time. But as it stands, it's still far too rudimentary and low-capacity to be a must-have, IMO. We will need far more efficient panels to bring most households off-grid and/or have them contribute to the pool of available energy.

your shower takes 7000+ watts to run?!?!?! wtf.... we have a heated water tank, but its natural gas to heat that. also natural gas to heat our home. efficient air conditioner in summer - and 9 watt LED bulbs light the house. only luxury electric items are the air fryer, fridge, and gaming PC (oven is also natural gas)

Here is Perth, Western Australia it's a must. Prob one of the sunniest states in the world. Every man and his dog has it. Hell, one of the builders I work for supply solar with the house and land packages. They are selling them before a 'For Sale' sign even has a chance of going up. In saying that we are in a bad market here where any house for sale atm is pretty much sold instantaneously.

makes sense for that area, its good to hear people have common sense based on geo-location
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2020
Messages
6,769 (4.72/day)
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
System Name "Icy Resurrection"
Processor 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition
Motherboard ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX ENCORE
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S upgraded with 2x NF-F12 iPPC-3000 fans and Honeywell PTM7950 TIM
Memory 32 GB G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 7600 MT/s 36-44-44-52-96 1.4V
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition
Storage 500 GB WD Black SN750 SE NVMe SSD + 4 TB WD Red Plus WD40EFPX HDD
Display(s) 55-inch LG G3 OLED
Case Pichau Mancer CV500 White Edition
Power Supply EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold
Mouse Microsoft Classic Intellimouse
Keyboard Generic PS/2
Software Windows 11 IoT Enterprise LTSC 24H2
Benchmark Scores I pulled a Qiqi~
Here is Perth, Western Australia it's a must. Prob one of the sunniest states in the world. Every man and his dog has it. Hell, one of the builders I work for supply solar with the house and land packages. They are selling them before a 'For Sale' sign even has a chance of going up. In saying that we are in a bad market here where any house for sale atm is pretty much sold instantaneously.

Edit: This is my inverters production back in 2018. Now times it by 6 to get to 2024 ;)

View attachment 351655

Pretty sunny here too, but still wouldn't come even close to breaking even for us :(

your shower takes 7000+ watts to run?!?!?! wtf.... we have a heated water tank, but its natural gas to heat that. also natural gas to heat our home. efficient air conditioner in summer - and 9 watt LED bulbs light the house. only luxury electric items are the air fryer, fridge, and gaming PC (oven is also natural gas)

Yep. There are even stronger shower heads with up to 8800 W of power afaik, but they are not very common. Mine's on the stronger end, they are usually around 6500 W most of the time. This is assuming they are 240 V models, the ones that run on 127 V have amperage requirements blown through the roof and usually do not go above 5400 W. The current is extremely high.

There is a dedicated breaker just for the shower itself, separate from the rest of the installation.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,922 (3.05/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
Pretty sunny here too, but still wouldn't come even close to breaking even for us :(



Yep. There are even stronger shower heads with up to 8800 W of power afaik, but they are not very common. Mine's on the stronger end, they are usually around 6500 W most of the time. This is assuming they are 240 V models, the ones that run on 127 V have amperage requirements blown through the roof and usually do not go above 5400 W. The current is extremely high.

There is a dedicated breaker just for the shower itself, separate from the rest of the installation.

That's a lot of kilowatts to clean your balls....
 

Space Lynx

Astronaut
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
17,249 (4.67/day)
Location
Kepler-186f
Processor 7800X3D -25 all core ($196)
Motherboard B650 Steel Legend ($179)
Cooling Frost Commander 140 ($42)
Memory 32gb ddr5 (2x16) cl 30 6000 ($80)
Video Card(s) Merc 310 7900 XT @3100 core $(705)
Display(s) Agon 27" QD-OLED Glossy 240hz 1440p ($399)
Case NZXT H710 (Red/Black) ($60)
Pretty sunny here too, but still wouldn't come even close to breaking even for us :(



Yep. There are even stronger shower heads with up to 8800 W of power afaik, but they are not very common. Mine's on the stronger end, they are usually around 6500 W most of the time. This is assuming they are 240 V models, the ones that run on 127 V have amperage requirements blown through the roof and usually do not go above 5400 W. The current is extremely high.

There is a dedicated breaker just for the shower itself, separate from the rest of the installation.

I'm actually really curious now, how much does it cost in USD (if you don't mind doing the math and currency conversion) to take say a 7 minute long hot shower there?

In summer time I actually have no issue taking cold showers, its invigorating after being outside in the heat. In winter I need a hot shower though.

chatgpt says it only costs 15 cents total... so that's not right... thanks for nothing AI..

here is the prompt I gave chatgpt:

Assuming you have a shower head that uses 8000 watts of power, how much would it cost to take a hot shower for 7 minutes in rio de janero brazil, then convert the currency to USD.

and here is the answer:

To calculate the cost of taking a hot shower for 7 minutes in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, we need to follow these steps:

1. **Determine the energy consumption in kilowatt-hours (kWh)**:
- Power consumption of the shower head: 8000 watts (8 kW).
- Duration of the shower: 7 minutes.
- Convert minutes to hours: 7 minutes = 7/60 hours.

2. **Calculate the energy consumption**:
\[
\text{Energy Consumption} = \text{Power (kW)} \times \text{Time (hours)}
\]
\[
\text{Energy Consumption} = 8 \text{ kW} \times \frac{7}{60} \text{ hours} = \frac{56}{60} \text{ kWh} \approx 0.9333 \text{ kWh}
\]

3. **Find the cost of electricity in Rio de Janeiro**:
- The cost of electricity in Rio de Janeiro is approximately BRL 0.80 per kWh.

4. **Calculate the cost in BRL**:
\[
\text{Cost in BRL} = \text{Energy Consumption} \times \text{Cost per kWh}
\]
\[
\text{Cost in BRL} = 0.9333 \text{ kWh} \times 0.80 \text{ BRL/kWh} = 0.74664 \text{ BRL}
\]

5. **Convert the cost from BRL to USD**:
- The exchange rate is approximately 1 BRL = 0.20 USD (this rate can fluctuate, so it might be different at the time of calculation).

6. **Calculate the cost in USD**:
\[
\text{Cost in USD} = \text{Cost in BRL} \times \text{Exchange Rate}
\]
\[
\text{Cost in USD} = 0.74664 \text{ BRL} \times 0.20 \text{ USD/BRL} = 0.14933 \text{ USD}
\]

Therefore, taking a 7-minute hot shower in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil would cost approximately USD 0.15.
 

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,176 (1.27/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 9800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X650I AX
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
Yeah, same here matey.
6.6kw in panels and 5kw Fronius inverter.
Cost just over 5k Aud back in 2017.
I went with 6.6kw worth of panels as I was told you lose power through efficiency so the 5kw inverter is always topped up, plus over a 5kw inverter you dont get the rebate per kw back to the grid. Im getting $0.07 per kw back to grid.
More panels also helps out on cloudy days.
Sounds like a great system, mines on the cheaper end as I said, but I did it quick to get in while 0.07125 rebate was still going in WA, new installed now are forced to go on a 3c peak /10c off peak plan which seems worse for the way we use our power.

My understanding is that because we're on that plan, I could even replace the inverter / panels etc with far better gear if I wanted to, as long as it doesn't exceed 6.6/5kw I can retain the feed in tariff as it's classed as a repair.

The over sizing panel arrays is a great way to do it too, get more power into the inverter on either side of the peak when 5kw Max clips a little away.
 
Joined
May 22, 2024
Messages
411 (2.16/day)
System Name Kuro
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D@65W
Motherboard MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO
Memory Corsair DDR5 6000C30 2x48GB (Hynix M)@6000 30-36-36-76 1.36V
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16G@200W
Storage Crucial T500 2TB + WD Blue 8TB
Case Lian Li LANCOOL 216
Power Supply MSI MPG A850G
Software Ubuntu 24.04 LTS + Windows 10 Home Build 19045
Benchmark Scores 17761 C23 Multi@65W
I wonder why many appeared to be concerned about storage in these small-scale setups, when it does not necessarily need that. Storage is for now much more efficient at grid-scale or in the form of an EV, than anything one would have to add to a home, unless we are talking about going off grid on solar alone.

Weather concerns are more understandable, if the array could be expected to be destroyed by severe hail/tornado/hurricane et cetera, or be buried and useless under thick snow for months when the need is greatest as someone mentioned. What's less desirable is policies or insurance actively discouraging them without those circumstances.

My shower alone is a 240 V/7800 W appliance, and sometimes there are two of those on at the same time in here.
Gosh. That boggles the mind when the (old) apartment I live in is wired up for maybe 4500W. :oops:

I do have a tank water heater that has a 1/4HP compressor unit that sips power at maybe 200W connected to a timer, and a 3000W backup heating element for when I need hot water quickly. It also dehumidifies the bathroom while it is on.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2020
Messages
917 (0.62/day)
System Name 1. Glasshouse 2. Odin OneEye
Processor 1. Ryzen 9 5900X (manual PBO) 2. Ryzen 9 7900X
Motherboard 1. MSI x570 Tomahawk wifi 2. Gigabyte Aorus Extreme 670E
Cooling 1. Noctua NH D15 Chromax Black 2. Custom Loop 3x360mm (60mm) rads & T30 fans/Aquacomputer NEXT w/b
Memory 1. G Skill Neo 16GBx4 (3600MHz 16/16/16/36) 2. Kingston Fury 16GBx2 DDR5 CL36
Video Card(s) 1. Asus Strix Vega 64 2. Powercolor Liquid Devil 7900XTX
Storage 1. Corsair Force MP600 (1TB) & Sabrent Rocket 4 (2TB) 2. Kingston 3000 (1TB) and Hynix p41 (2TB)
Display(s) 1. Samsung U28E590 10bit 4K@60Hz 2. LG C2 42 inch 10bit 4K@120Hz
Case 1. Corsair Crystal 570X White 2. Cooler Master HAF 700 EVO
Audio Device(s) 1. Creative Speakers 2. Built in LG monitor speakers
Power Supply 1. Corsair RM850x 2. Superflower Titanium 1600W
Mouse 1. Microsoft IntelliMouse Pro (grey) 2. Microsoft IntelliMouse Pro (black)
Keyboard Leopold High End Mechanical
Software Windows 11
The reality is in some locations home solar is not economic. Where I am I am able to generate a substantial amount of energy but it is hard to receive an economic rebate for the solar power I feed into the grid because others are doing the same and there are no good plans available. Going off grid entirely is only going to work when battery technology develops to a point of making economic and practical sense.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Because our "democratic" governments aren't subsidising it sufficiently, just like they aren't subsiding EVs and heat pumps and everything else we need to avoid a climate catastrophe, because those governments are bought and paid for by the fossil fuel energy sector. This is how the PRC, despite being an evil commie hellhole, is the nation that is doing the most to fight climate change - because it's not beholden to those same corrupt interests.

Solar and EVs share the same problem: they may be zero emissions, but they both have an extreme pollutant problem at the manufacturing level. Neither solve any actual problem, it just shifts them elsewhere.
As with most people who repeat this tired old trope, you don't understand the actual problem, which is the amount of carbon in the atmosphere contributing to warming the planet. All other problems are irrelevant and renewable energy is the only thing that can solve this particular one in a timeframe that won't destroy our species.

The claim that solar and EVs have an "extreme pollutant" manufacturing problem is also completely false. This is a Science and Technology forum, do some research before parroting discredited soundbites that the fossil fuel industry wants you to.

miniaturized nuclear
is a marketing scam. Nuclear requires a ridiculous amount of safety built in, safety that is simply uneconomical at any scale smaller than a full-size generating plant. Small/modular nuclear reactors are, just like liquid hydrogen, nothing more than a cynical and unworkable distraction, again pushed by the fossil fuel industry in an attempt to obfuscate, confuse and divert attention away from the solutions that have been proven for decades: solar and wind.

1) The Midwest has this thing called hail. It has feet of snow. The reason that wood and shingles are common materials is that they are very durable and can take massive temperature changes without issues...while also taking impact energy over almost that entire range. Copper and glass plates usually not so much.
This is why you put the solar generation capacity in areas of the country that don't suffer from this problem. The energy grid is a thing.

2) The 1kilowatt is the maximum that array can output....but the math there sucks. You're looking at 1000 watts for a part of each sunny day....or on average probably about 1/3 to 1/4 that. 1/2 day lost due to night. The rest lost due to non-optimal angles and coverage. Yay....your average 333 watt platform only lost 21% of its capacity...or 60 watts rounded way down. Holy crap...that sucks. No lightbulb in the bathroom for you anymore.
Nobody suggested that an entire house can be powered only by its own rooftop solar. Again, the energy grid is a thing.

3) The fact that you generate it, then need storage to meter it out, is not accounted for in costing. Let's say it's only every 3 years to replace batteries, and only uses 4 car batteries. 2024-1992 = 32 years. (32/3)*4 = 44 batteries replaced. At the average cost of about $80 that'd be $3520. That is pure cost...so be prepared for that to go up over time. Remember, lead acid is cheap but is using both sulfuric acid and lead.
The energy grid is still a thing.

4) "Modern stuff is more efficient" is a stupid non-starter. Let me be clear here...I work in manufacturing. Calculated failure dates, and planned obsolescence, is a thing. Nothing quite like a solar array bolted onto a house that requires tooling and hardware to be replaced after a decade to make you appreciate the 90's for them still building things to last...and that's almost a punchline to a joke there.
No, your claim made without any evidence is the stupid non-starter.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,341 (5.76/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE
You must be aware that we currently live in the middle of an economic recession. Most people don't have spare thousands to "offset carbon emissions". Most people don't even know what that means.

Let me propose something else. Instead of asking why people don't invest in solar, let's ask why energy companies don't invest in it. If it's really the saviour of mankind, then it must be good for them, too, right?

Edit: I watched a video a while ago that said that the entire Earth's energy needs could be served by covering the Sahara desert with solar panels - but all that black surface would lower the Earth's albedo, and raise the temperature considerably, leading to basically everyone living in a desert in the near future. Therefore, solar panels alone are not a feasible alternative to the grid, just like EVs aren't to IC.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2023
Messages
217 (0.33/day)
It's expensive where I live (so-called central Europe). Whenever the government announces any kind of incentive, manufacturers/installers immediately increase prices accordingly. You can do it yourself, but you can't tie it into the grid without paying exorbitant fees and getting nothing in return. Even if you do it only for your own off-grid needs, you have to pay taxes for generating power - when I lived in a house, we had a small 3kW installation for our AC only, but still had to pay just for being able to generate power.
So, in short - it's expensive and politicians paid by corporate lobbyists are just trash.

And for people waiting for increased efficiency - maximum theoretical efficiency of a p-n panel is 33.7%. It's called a Shockley–Queisser limit, but the theoretical efficiency of crystalline silicon solar cells was calculated to be 29.4%. There is work being done on intermediate band panels which can go up to 72% and some other technologies like thermophotovoltaic downconversion (54%) but those are many years, maybe decades away.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
If it's really the saviour of mankind, then it must be good for them, too, right?
If you think that's how megacorporations work, I have a bridge to sell you.

Edit: I watched a video a while ago that said that the entire Earth's energy needs could be served by covering the Sahara desert with solar panels - but all that black surface would lower the Earth's albedo, and raise the temperature considerably, leading to basically everyone living in a desert in the near future.
The problem is that people like you take these "what if" videos as gospel fact. Nobody has seriously suggested covering the entirety of the Sahara with solar, and nobody ever will.

Therefore, solar panels alone are not a feasible alternative to the grid, just like EVs aren't to IC.
This is a completely moronic conclusion to draw.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
2,508 (0.79/day)
Saw a pretty cool video on algae earlier in the day and lighting seems to be one of the biggest barrier in terms of getting more out of the algae doing what it do does. My thoughts are just apply the concepts of batteries and cells and like heat-sinks with surface area to lighting and algae growth and spice it up with bio-luminescence and you can probably make it significantly more effective in terms of carbon removal per square foot of space occupied or whatever. I'd imagine a lot of that is already being applied and done though somewhere by someone.

Another thing is agitating it seems to help it sounded like. So basically get it swirling around or rotating around. Sun light will only penetrate down so far though so if trying to rely on just natural sunlight keeping it moving seems like the way to go. Not that I'm some algae expert.

Just ask the AI it'll tell you what to do to make the algae the king of carbon removal.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
2,109 (1.07/day)
Location
Hungary
System Name I don't name my systems.
Processor i5-12600KF 'stock power limits/-115mV undervolt+contact frame'
Motherboard Asus Prime B660-PLUS D4
Cooling ID-Cooling SE 224 XT ARGB V3 'CPU', 4x Be Quiet! Light Wings + 2x Arctic P12 black case fans.
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200MHz
Video Card(s) Asus TuF V2 RTX 3060 Ti @1920 MHz Core/@950mV Undervolt
Storage 4 TB WD Red, 1 TB Silicon Power A55 Sata, 1 TB Kingston A2000 NVMe, 256 GB Adata Spectrix s40g NVMe
Display(s) 29" 2560x1080 75Hz / LG 29WK600-W
Case Be Quiet! Pure Base 500 FX Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard + Hama uRage SoundZ 900+USB DAC
Power Supply Seasonic CORE GM 500W 80+ Gold
Mouse Canyon Puncher GM-20
Keyboard SPC Gear GK630K Tournament 'Kailh Brown'
Software Windows 10 Pro
It's expensive where I live (so-called central Europe). Whenever the government announces any kind of incentive, manufacturers/installers immediately increase prices accordingly. You can do it yourself, but you can't tie it into the grid without paying exorbitant fees and getting nothing in return. Even if you do it only for your own off-grid needs, you have to pay taxes for generating power - when I lived in a house, we had a small 3kW installation for our AC only, but still had to pay just for being able to generate power.
So, in short - it's expensive and politicians paid by corporate lobbyists are just trash.

And for people waiting for increased efficiency - maximum theoretical efficiency of a p-n panel is 33.7%. It's called a Shockley–Queisser limit, but the theoretical efficiency of crystalline silicon solar cells was calculated to be 29.4%. There is work being done on intermediate band panels which can go up to 72% and some other technologies like thermophotovoltaic downconversion (54%) but those are many years, maybe decades away.

Same here where I live in the EU.
My country/government is a complete ass about it so its simply not worth it for the average joe or well anyone who doesn't have extra money to burn.
My father did plan on investing into solar panels a few years ago before the new regulations change but after that he backed out of it.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
18,584 (2.69/day)
System Name AlderLake
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
I have.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,811 (0.56/day)
Because our "democratic" governments aren't subsidising it sufficiently, just like they aren't subsiding EVs and heat pumps and everything else we need to avoid a climate catastrophe, because those governments are bought and paid for by the fossil fuel energy sector. This is how the PRC, despite being an evil commie hellhole, is the nation that is doing the most to fight climate change - because it's not beholden to those same corrupt interests.


As with most people who repeat this tired old trope, you don't understand the actual problem, which is the amount of carbon in the atmosphere contributing to warming the planet. All other problems are irrelevant and renewable energy is the only thing that can solve this particular one in a timeframe that won't destroy our species.

The claim that solar and EVs have an "extreme pollutant" manufacturing problem is also completely false. This is a Science and Technology forum, do some research before parroting discredited soundbites that the fossil fuel industry wants you to.


is a marketing scam. Nuclear requires a ridiculous amount of safety built in, safety that is simply uneconomical at any scale smaller than a full-size generating plant. Small/modular nuclear reactors are, just like liquid hydrogen, nothing more than a cynical and unworkable distraction, again pushed by the fossil fuel industry in an attempt to obfuscate, confuse and divert attention away from the solutions that have been proven for decades: solar and wind.


This is why you put the solar generation capacity in areas of the country that don't suffer from this problem. The energy grid is a thing.


Nobody suggested that an entire house can be powered only by its own rooftop solar. Again, the energy grid is a thing.


The energy grid is still a thing.


No, your claim made without any evidence is the stupid non-starter.

You have an obvious hate boner...maybe try to hide it.

1) The title is why doesn't every house have solar....if you read it, you'd see that half of your points are answered above by the simple logic of it would be stupid...because of the cited midwest example. If you want to change the discussion to why solar doesn't suck, that's a very different discussion.
2) The energy grid is a stupid answer. You aren't fixing a problem there, you're forcing the energy producers to either burn off excess or to dynamically balance their systems because you are providing them inconsistent power. I'd suggest that you don't understand how the grid actually works...but at this point discussing with you is not really an option. You want to be right, so you are. Myopia be damned.
3) A short retort to a simple question is a question and answer. You want to then pretend that I didn't provide extra. Maybe a little less tin foil in that hat next time.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
You aren't fixing a problem there, you're forcing the energy producers to either burn off excess or to dynamically balance their systems because you are providing them inconsistent power.
Dynamically balancing supply and demand is something that power grids have had to do from day one, that's why pumped storage is a thing. Renewables change the frequency of those peaks and troughs and the grid operators are coping with that difference by installing more classic batteries. And guess who's building those batteries... yup, it's the PRC.
 
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
12,341 (5.76/day)
Location
Midlands, UK
System Name Nebulon B
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSi PRO B650M-A WiFi
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-4800
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB
Storage 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 2 TB Corsair MP600 R2
Display(s) Dell S3422DWG, 7" Waveshare touchscreen
Case Kolink Citadel Mesh black
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones
Power Supply Seasonic Prime GX-750
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S
Keyboard Logitech G413 SE
Software Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE
If you think that's how megacorporations work, I have a bridge to sell you.
Megacorporations seem to be working on the premise of "don't think, just buy what we sell you because we said so" instead of giving you a valid reason to buy. "Carbon emissions" are not a valid reason for people whose main problems are paying bills and putting food on the table.

The problem is that people like you take these "what if" videos as gospel fact. Nobody has seriously suggested covering the entirety of the Sahara with solar, and nobody ever will.
The video said that the idea was suggested by some energy companies, but was rejected for the above reasons. I never said I took it as gospel fact, but it was interesting. You have to admit that albedo is a real thing, though.

This is a completely moronic conclusion to draw.
Claiming that without backing it up with a counter-argument serves no purpose.
 

64K

Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
6,773 (1.73/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) Temporary MSI RTX 4070 Super
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) Temporary Viewsonic 4K 60 Hz
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
Here in Perth, Western Australia it's a must. Prob one of the sunniest states in the world. Every man and his dog has it. Hell, one of the builders I work for supply solar with the house and land packages. They are selling them before a 'For Sale' sign even has a chance of going up. In saying that we are in a bad market here where any house for sale atm is pretty much sold instantaneously.

Edit: This is my inverters production back in 2018. Now times it by 6 to get to 2024 ;)

View attachment 351655

When you said, "and his dog" I chuckled but then Googled and found out there really are solar panels for Fido's house. Climate control too.

1718624283728.jpeg



Makes me wonder if there are even dog sweaters with solar cells to keep dog comfy and warm when it's cold out.
 
Top